Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

New idea: stock vert rims+2" adapters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 12:27 AM
  #1  
skatingsamurai's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 5
From: Co springs, co
New idea: stock vert rims+2" adapters

what do you think? stock 15" vert rims -11lbs plus 2" 5 lug adapters 6lbs each. im running bf goodrich traction t/a's -205 60 15. so all i will have to do is roll the rear fenders a bit. but this way ill only have spent 85 bucks and more traction? as apposed to spending 700-1000 on a new set which will weigh more. these should increase the width (not rims width) from 6.5 to 8.5

good bang for my buck?
Attached Thumbnails New idea: stock vert rims+2" adapters-5lug_adapter.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 01:15 AM
  #2  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
You think sticking the wheels out 2-inches is goig to increase traction? How so? You are going to need some seriously long *** lugs.... pretty pointless idea IMO unless you are trying to make the car look like a low rider.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 02:12 AM
  #3  
skatingsamurai's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 5
From: Co springs, co
no, see the adapters alow you to bolt in the adapter, Then bolt the wheel on to the adapter...pretty spiffy if you ask me. and since the rear tires are going out 2" on each side, doesnt that widen the wheel base?? thus giving it a lower center of gravity???? seems like thats what would happen.


i also found 5- 4 lug conversions, 4-5 lug conversions and anything from a 1"spacer to a 2" spacer. i suppose if no one else has used these. ill just go ahead and try them out and everyone know. ill post before and after pics too.

Last edited by skatingsamurai; Apr 26, 2007 at 02:29 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 05:57 AM
  #4  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by skatingsamurai
oesnt that widen the wheel base??
Wrong terminology...
"Wheel base" denotes front to rear distance.
You're talking about "track width".


-Ted
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 11:24 AM
  #5  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
How does widening the track lower the center of gravity?
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 08:27 PM
  #6  
skatingsamurai's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 5
From: Co springs, co
thought that it might be squated out more???
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 08:48 PM
  #7  
240sx's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: chicago
it's not good for wheel bearings. if it's 2 inches wideron one side it should be 2 inches wider on the other too
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 11:18 PM
  #8  
skatingsamurai's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 5
From: Co springs, co
what?>??? of course it would be on both rear wheels
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 11:33 PM
  #9  
aznpoopy's Avatar
strike up the paean
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,495
Likes: 2
From: fort lee, nj
Originally Posted by skatingsamurai
what?>??? of course it would be on both rear wheels
lol.

he means the inside of the wheel should be extended 2" as well. i.e. get wheels that are wider, with offset that gets the look you want. easily inferred from his comment about the wheel bearings...

most people who do run spacers do not run more than 25mm. 2" is like 50mm+. if you feel comfortable 'testing it out,' do so, but make sure you post back if something goes wrong.

we take no repsonsibility for any damage or injury incurred during this experiment.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 12:03 AM
  #10  
skatingsamurai's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 5
From: Co springs, co
well first i should correct my self. i no longer want 2 inch spacers. its 1.5 inch.

i dont understand how it would be bad for the wheel bearing. as long as the inside of the rim doesnt extend out past the bearing i dont see how it could effect it. so someone is going to have to inform if im wrong. but if i am wrong, then wouldnt running all rims with a - offset be bad for the bearing?
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 04:56 AM
  #11  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
You are wrong, the wheel bearings were designed for a certain loading, you are essentially adding a 2-inch lever to the bearing with the weight of the wheel/tire.

You are not going to accomplish anything by doing this other than making your car look dumb.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 01:32 PM
  #12  
skatingsamurai's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 5
From: Co springs, co
well then i guess its a bad idea. theres no need to criticize on looks here either. but i do have to wonder about something. if the offest is 0 or closest to 0, is it going to be better for the bearing? if not, what size and/or offset is best for the bearing?
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 11:57 PM
  #13  
240sx's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: chicago
stock
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DC5Daniel
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
60
Aug 11, 2016 10:00 PM
TheAsset
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
7
Sep 5, 2015 04:36 PM
LMBTG
New Member RX-7 Technical
4
Sep 2, 2015 07:01 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:58 AM.