Got Brakes?
could that be with the help of some aerodynamics just for show. because it is a brake sponsered 996.
Ohhhhhh!!!! Look back there on the track, there is a transition from concrete to pavement. That could have been the cause of the "bump"
Ohhhhhh!!!! Look back there on the track, there is a transition from concrete to pavement. That could have been the cause of the "bump"
Trending Topics
It's from a bump or the photo is doctored. No way in hell a car could do that, the front tires would lock and skid before allowing the rear end to rise like that. Absolutely impossible for the tires to provide enough grip to allow a decel that substantial.
If the car had its cg about 15 feet in the air, then maybe it would be possible
If the car had its cg about 15 feet in the air, then maybe it would be possible
Could the car be going fairly slow, so that the friction of the tires/brakes is greater than the momentum/inertia (I dont know the proper term for MASS+SPEED) of the vehicle?
After doing some investigating, I am inclined to think an off camera elevation change as well
After doing some investigating, I am inclined to think an off camera elevation change as well
The picture is fine, it hasnt been manipulated at all and the camera is flat. I know it hasnt been doctored because the front tire is under a lot of load (it looks flat). The only reason it could be doing this is from that transition from concrete to asphault in the rear of the picture! and I will only say that one more time!!!!!
http://images.cardomain.com/installs...3_142_full.jpg
One thing we haven't considered is that the car may have been airborne, and what you're seeing is the 911 touching back down?
One thing we haven't considered is that the car may have been airborne, and what you're seeing is the 911 touching back down?
Originally posted by tookwik
The picture is fine, it hasnt been manipulated at all and the camera is flat. I know it hasnt been doctored because the front tire is under a lot of load (it looks flat). The only reason it could be doing this is from that transition from concrete to asphault in the rear of the picture! and I will only say that one more time!!!!!
The picture is fine, it hasnt been manipulated at all and the camera is flat. I know it hasnt been doctored because the front tire is under a lot of load (it looks flat). The only reason it could be doing this is from that transition from concrete to asphault in the rear of the picture! and I will only say that one more time!!!!!
but my question remains, maybe not for this car, but if you were going slow enough, and had brake bias all the way to the front - if the stopping power of the brakes is greater than the mass+speed of the vehicle , wouldnt it still have a chance of inducing something like this?
i think if this was a civic, and it had a big bi-plane style wing on it, the wing was angled up so at speed it would creat lift... it could drive down the hiway with the back wheels off the ground.
seriously tho, i agree that the brakes are not bringing those wheels off the ground. i've done some freestyle car jumping in my day (not in a porsche, mind you) and i could have taken simlar pictures. boy it'd be fun if brakes/tires could bring the back end off the ground. that'd be a hoot at red lights.
seriously tho, i agree that the brakes are not bringing those wheels off the ground. i've done some freestyle car jumping in my day (not in a porsche, mind you) and i could have taken simlar pictures. boy it'd be fun if brakes/tires could bring the back end off the ground. that'd be a hoot at red lights.
Originally posted by BicuspiD
but if you were going slow enough, and had brake bias all the way to the front - if the stopping power of the brakes is greater than the mass+speed of the vehicle , wouldnt it still have a chance of inducing something like this?
but if you were going slow enough, and had brake bias all the way to the front - if the stopping power of the brakes is greater than the mass+speed of the vehicle , wouldnt it still have a chance of inducing something like this?
Originally posted by DamonB
No, no, no. Brakes do not stop cars, tires do. The tires could never provide enough grip to make that happen.
No, no, no. Brakes do not stop cars, tires do. The tires could never provide enough grip to make that happen.
Originally posted by BicuspiD
OK just to stir the pot, dont drag slicks make enough grip to lift the front end of the car off the ground? Why wouldn't this work in reverse if the tire are was large enough?
OK just to stir the pot, dont drag slicks make enough grip to lift the front end of the car off the ground? Why wouldn't this work in reverse if the tire are was large enough?

Drag cars can generate far more than 1g of acceleration from the power they apply to the drivetrain, given enough traction, from a standing start. No car generates much more than 1g of braking power with the brakes alone. The tires will lock and slide long before you could generate enough force to lift the rear of the car. Even on slicks... check out a NASCAR track some time.

My money says that someone snapped a picture immediately at the point of touch down after the car was (deliberately or otherwise) jumped.
IT could have hydraulics. LOL!!!!!!! Let's see some 3 wheel motion. hehe. There's some definate inconsistencies here. But an obvious physical explanation due to the load on the front tires and the amount that it's suspension is compressed. I'm thinking a leap in the air or something as well. A little camera trickery. Quite interesting.
I think it's funny that is has a big *** sticker on the front valence saying, "Brake Parts". What a great advertisement. hehe.
Rishie
I think it's funny that is has a big *** sticker on the front valence saying, "Brake Parts". What a great advertisement. hehe.
Rishie




