Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

Coilovers vs. "Coilovers"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-07-05, 07:52 AM
  #26  
Are'nt we all registered?

 
RX7goZoomZoomBoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Indianapolis IN
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tokico HPs especialy have a hard time handling anything over 350 lbs in the front of an FC.
I think its because they are weak over all. I tried to use HPs (the Blue ones) and they just did not cut it when it came to dampning ability it seemed like they were unable to control the spring intentions. When I switched over to AGXs from Kyb I noticed a dramatic improvment from any tokicos I have ever owned the adjusment worked great and they were able to perform well with a spring wound with a 450 lbs front rate.

My friend has a Cusco kit he got offline that is so adjustable it will make your eyes spin. you can change the position of the strut mounting relative to the damper insert (up or down) this so great because you can adjust the dampers min stroke before it hits bump stop with out raising the car. None of the after market just coilover kits offer this type of adjustment.
Old 02-13-05, 08:43 PM
  #27  
I R SAD PANDA W/O BAW

 
ilike2eatricers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: bay area
Posts: 6,061
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not to thread jack but in regards to a true coilover (tein, JIC, etc.) vs a coilover set up such as KR2d (uses sleeved threaded perches)

I understand that the k2rd setup I have does not allow full suspension travel. Does this suspension travel include the twisting of the swaybars? Also would the camber adjustment at the subframe for an FC be affected differently since right height could be adjusted from a true coilover setup instead of at the perch only?
Old 02-13-05, 09:35 PM
  #28  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!

 
SRA-FD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: rotary world!!!!!!!!
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
go with the tein flex the fd needs more stroke in the rear!!!!!!!!!
Old 02-15-05, 06:14 PM
  #29  
I R SAD PANDA W/O BAW

 
ilike2eatricers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: bay area
Posts: 6,061
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
bump for my question above.
Old 02-17-05, 04:02 PM
  #30  
I R SAD PANDA W/O BAW

 
ilike2eatricers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: bay area
Posts: 6,061
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Anybody?
Old 02-22-05, 06:03 PM
  #31  
I R SAD PANDA W/O BAW

 
ilike2eatricers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: bay area
Posts: 6,061
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Somebody has to know? Do I need to reword my question or something?
Old 02-22-05, 11:23 PM
  #32  
www.silverbulletrx7.com

 
dis1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Gaithersburg, Md
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ilike2eatricers
Not to thread jack but in regards to a true coilover (tein, JIC, etc.) vs a coilover set up such as KR2d (uses sleeved threaded perches)

I understand that the k2rd setup I have does not allow full suspension travel. Does this suspension travel include the twisting of the swaybars? Also would the camber adjustment at the subframe for an FC be affected differently since right height could be adjusted from a true coilover setup instead of at the perch only?
The problem with your question is that the topics are unrelated. Sway bars do not impact suspension travel and camber adjustments do not have anything to do with ride height. Nobody is answering your question because it is like asking how much louder will my exhaust be when I inflate my tires to 34 psi?

dis1
Old 02-23-05, 04:20 AM
  #33  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
I can't give you an answer cause I'm not too sure what you're asking.

I dunno what the deal with limitations with the coilovers - i.e. K2RD system.
K2RD tests their stuff ON THE TRACK.
Their coilovers have been running on their NASA PS2 (similar to SCCA IT-S) FC NA for several seasons with very good results.
I dunno what exactly you mean by limitations in travel, but it sure doesn't show up on the track.


-Ted
Old 02-23-05, 04:39 PM
  #34  
I'll blow it up real good

iTrader: (1)
 
RX-Heven's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My .02 cents....

I have a ground control kit with custom (by tri-point engineering) dual adj. konis w/ 500lb. front and 375 rear. This is on my TII.
I also have Tein Flex's on my turbo vert.
I typically had the same tires and alignment setup on both cars.

The Teins do not hold a candle to the GC/Koni setup except for having the independant height adjustment. Granted, the springs are much stiffer with my GC setup which is better for the track vs. the softer sprung Teins, but the dampers ability to control the spring is also better with the doulble adjustable Konis.
I have to point out though that my Koni setup was much more expensive than the Teins.

Both setups have endured street and track use for several years and both have held up very well.
No complaints about either really.

I also drove a friends fc with the K2RD setup. I preferred them to my Teins also.
If only Paul would have answered his phone I would have gotten a set of those instead of the Teins (turns out he lives right around the corner from me).

Features are nice, performance is better.
Old 02-28-05, 02:29 PM
  #35  
Senior Member

iTrader: (3)
 
Gen2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: bay area
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All tein models under RA are pretty comparable to "k2rd" setup (GC w/ AGX) for they are all twin tube shocks with height adjustability.

Reason you're paying high prices is becuase the features tein offfers, such as helper spring or separate right height adjustment.
Old 02-28-05, 08:23 PM
  #36  
®

iTrader: (4)
 
BASTARD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Talking Is it for show or go????

The damper controls the speed of the compression and rebound by displacing fluid with a piston/valve. Simply put there is a piston at the end of the shaft… (Part of this shaft is visible the other part disappears into the shock body). At the end of the shaft that is not visible is a piston; on this piston is a valve/orifice(s). This piston/valve is submerged in fluid (usually oil). It is the thickness of the oil and the size or number of orifice(s) in the valve that determines how fast the shock will cycle. An adjustable shock is one that you can change the size of the orifice(s) of the valve. A shock absorber can not hold up any weight on its own.

This is where a spring comes into play. A spring controls weight transfer and ride height by it’s length and spring rate. Ride height and travel are the determining factors in spring selection. Pick a heavy spring and your suspension will barely cycle and you may encounter “topping out” this may destroy a shock by blowing it apart. Pick a soft spring and you will encounter “bottoming” this is when the suspension cycles quickly thru the travel and bounces off the bottom stoppers. Use a spring that is too long and you will get “binding”, this is where a spring bottoms out on it’s self before the suspension cycles thru it full travel. Use a spring that is too short and the shock will bottom out and will probably destroy the shock.

In theory there is no reason for having adjustable ride height or adjustable dampening, you should be able to determine the length of the shock based on the amount of travel needed to cycle the suspension and then set ride height buy calculating the corner weight of the vehicle. Of course you will have to factor in what type of driving you intend to do. Road racing will require heavier springs and slower valving then street driving. Obviously there is way more involved in selecting the correct setup such as tire size, tire pressure, down force, top speed, corner speed, sway bars, weather etc etc....and yes if you change spring rate or preload you will probably have to adjust the dampening to

Most people are buying stuff that is overkill for what they do and end up driving around in cars that are slammed to the ground riding on the bottom stoppers with springs that are way too heavy and too much dampening so when there car hits a bump it bounces off the road … sending a sharp pain up there spinal cord that taps on the brain saying, "yeah….bitchen, super cool… I wish I could lower it some more". Now let me call a tow truck to drag it back onto the road

may the force be with you young luke
Old 03-03-05, 12:37 AM
  #37  
Burning up Time

 
The Griffin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by RX-Heven
My .02 cents....

I have a ground control kit with custom (by tri-point engineering) dual adj. konis w/ 500lb. front and 375 rear. This is on my TII.
I also have Tein Flex's on my turbo vert.
I typically had the same tires and alignment setup on both cars.

The Teins do not hold a candle to the GC/Koni setup except for having the independant height adjustment. Granted, the springs are much stiffer with my GC setup which is better for the track vs. the softer sprung Teins, but the dampers ability to control the spring is also better with the doulble adjustable Konis.
I have to point out though that my Koni setup was much more expensive than the Teins.

Both setups have endured street and track use for several years and both have held up very well.
No complaints about either really.

I also drove a friends fc with the K2RD setup. I preferred them to my Teins also.
If only Paul would have answered his phone I would have gotten a set of those instead of the Teins (turns out he lives right around the corner from me).

Features are nice, performance is better.
Which coilover or coilover kit/shock combo would you recommend for a street driven FC3S for a person leaning towards a more decent ride,looking to be able to drop the suspension a little more then the average aftermarket springs are, like in the neighbourhood of 1.25-1.5.On a side note is K2RD still in biz, and still offering the FC coilover kits? thanks
Old 03-03-05, 12:55 AM
  #38  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
snub disphenoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northern California
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by The Griffin
Which coilover or coilover kit/shock combo would you recommend for a street driven FC3S for a person leaning towards a more decent ride,looking to be able to drop the suspension a little more then the average aftermarket springs are, like in the neighbourhood of 1.25-1.5.On a side note is K2RD still in biz, and still offering the FC coilover kits? thanks
Tein Flex, JIC SF-1, or the tried and true GC/KYB setup should be fine plenty for a primarily street driven car.
Old 03-03-05, 08:42 PM
  #39  
I'll blow it up real good

iTrader: (1)
 
RX-Heven's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
IIRC, the gc kits come with 400lb front and 250 rear typically. That makes for a pretty harsh ride on the street for most. Of course you can always get different spring rates right off the bat.
Tein flexes have a pretty good ride quality for the street in an fc and transition to the track quite well. They are more expensive though....

Unless you track the car, I always suggest to just get some better springs and shocks. Eibach and others make some decent progressive and/or linear rate springs that do quite well for most street rides. You don't have the height adjustability and bragging rights (you could cut the springs like a hack to get the car lower ), but you will have a fatter wallet at the end of the day or put into the car later.

K2RD is on 'hold' for the time being apparently.
They also used the same spring rates as GC.
Old 03-03-05, 08:55 PM
  #40  
I R SAD PANDA W/O BAW

 
ilike2eatricers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: bay area
Posts: 6,061
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The K2RD setup is stiff! Not very comfortable on the street but if you're not a total wimp your kidneys can handle it.
Old 03-19-05, 05:13 PM
  #41  
Hobby or mental illness?

 
RoadRaceJosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SW Washington
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by RX7goZoomZoomBoom
snip

My friend has a Cusco kit he got offline that is so adjustable it will make your eyes spin. you can change the position of the strut mounting relative to the damper insert (up or down) this so great because you can adjust the dampers min stroke before it hits bump stop with out raising the car. None of the after market just coilover kits offer this type of adjustment.
You are the 1st person in this thread to actually state why the better coilovers are able to keep/correct suspension travel with a lowered car! Finally!

It doesn't matter where the spring is on the strut or if it's on the strut at all! (Go find the front spring on a 911 if you don't believe me.) The car weighs X and will compress Y rate spring Z inches/mm. The only way to change how much the spring is compressed is to change the spring rate or the weight of the car. Having shorter dampers, moving the strut tube down in relation to the spindle (very common on Porches) or moving the upper mount upwards are the only ways to increase suspension travel on a lowered car. A stiff spring can keep you from bottoming out, but it does nothing for suspension travel.

Higher quality adjustable dampers and adjustable damper position are the main reasons for high dollar coilovers. If you really want to win races you will spend more money on track time and tuning than you will on the suspension itself. You'll put big money into both and one set of $2400 coilovers is only a small part of the budget. That's the way it is in big time racing. You can bolt on all the right parts, have the best engine/drivetrain money can buy, but if you don't test and tune you won't even qualify.

Now for those of us that don't have a crew and sponsors for our cars or thousands to blow on springs and dampers we end up with something like Ground Control coilovers so we can choose decent spring rates for the way the car is used, set ride height within reason. and put them on adjustable dampers so we can try and control the wheel motions.

Joshua
Old 03-19-05, 05:40 PM
  #42  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by RoadRaceJosh
You are the 1st person in this thread to actually state why the better coilovers are able to keep/correct suspension travel with a lowered car! Finally!
I mentioned it in the very first reply to this thread...
Old 03-19-05, 08:20 PM
  #43  
Hobby or mental illness?

 
RoadRaceJosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SW Washington
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

Actually you wrote:

Originally Posted by rynberg
The cheaper "JDM" coilovers suffer the same exact drawbacks as the Ground Control kit -- the spring perches are not independently adjustable. Therefore, ride height determines length of suspension stroke and spring pre-loading. This is not ideal. The better quality coilovers have independent spring perches so full suspension stroke is retained...
How does a spring perch adjust the position of the damper?

You must move the damper in relation to the strut housing/spindle to regain suspension travel on a lowered car. Just moving the spring up and down the strut housing without changing ride height doesn't do that. I know you understand the concept, but the explanation was lacking. I did not and do not mean to trash you. I was just pointing out that RX7goZoomZoomBoom had explained the concept of moving the damper rather than moving the spring first.
Old 03-22-05, 11:22 PM
  #44  
Shikkaku Dori

iTrader: (16)
 
N3philum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Japanland
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ive been following this thread and there is a ton of good info. im looking for a setup for street with some track/drifiting involved. right now ive consided purchasing some tokiko illuminas. im looking at eibach springs as of right now, but after reading everything here, im not sure. what would you all suggest for a beginner getting into drifiting but not wanting to spend a whole assload of money. thanks for your help
Old 03-23-05, 03:03 AM
  #45  
strike up the paean

 
aznpoopy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: fort lee, nj
Posts: 2,495
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
if you haven't actually gone drifting yet, register and drive at an event. ditto for autox, or hpde or whatever you want to do.

if nothing is terribly broken, get some track time before you start modifying suspension.
Old 03-23-05, 04:26 AM
  #46  
Shikkaku Dori

iTrader: (16)
 
N3philum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Japanland
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ive been in a couple events and done some spirited driving to learn the car, only problem is the suspension is getting old and kinda sloppy. thats why i want it replaced
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GKW
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
5
09-28-15 04:34 PM



Quick Reply: Coilovers vs. "Coilovers"



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 AM.