Twin GT28r Turbo Kit Pics
#51
Originally Posted by modrx7
Twin turbos aren't need for cars over 350ci.... Plenty of big block/sm block chevys feen one single pt88 or the like... Yes twins look cooler, but the performance benefits will be about the same... Maybe a bit quicker spool, but that might be about it. Because all they are doing is pushing air and they may push just as much as a bigger turbo or a little less depending on sizing. So why go twins? Well maybe for looks!! Thats about the only reason I see.
Edan
Edan
#52
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Gallatin, TN
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mark'sMazda
What does a ported 13brew flow cfm wise?
The KSP drag fc seemed to work very well with it’s twin GT3037's.
The KSP drag fc seemed to work very well with it’s twin GT3037's.
-Alex
#53
stop stealing my avatar
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Canton MI
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have the book, have read and re-read it.
I was just un-sure of what to plug into the forumla for a 13b. I also made the assumption, of 2.6L 4pot, then noticed that's just under what corky recomends for a twin setup on an otto cycle.
Im looking foreward to seing the car, hopefully in action, at the rotary revilution.
I was just un-sure of what to plug into the forumla for a 13b. I also made the assumption, of 2.6L 4pot, then noticed that's just under what corky recomends for a twin setup on an otto cycle.
Im looking foreward to seing the car, hopefully in action, at the rotary revilution.
#54
Ga-nome liberator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hell
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well lets think about this. You are running half the exhaust to two different turbos. Let's say the turbos are exactly 1/2 the size of some specific single turbo. Each of the twin's is recieving half the exhaust. Each of the shafts is half as heavy and the wheels are half the diameter, so it takes less energy from the exhaust to spool them, but each one has to be spooled which pretty much equals that of the single. In complete theory disregarding any type of friction, you are taking the exhaust splitting it in two, each turbo requires half of the exhaust that the single needs, but you have two, so they are about equalled out. Obviuosly this is all theory. I personally used to be a fan of twin setups but I'm not too sure about the benefits anymore, that's why I look forward to the results.
- Steiner
- Steiner
#55
"In complete theory"
That probably should have been incomplete theory : ).
A. The twins are not half the size.
B. A combined header, single turbo, will actually reduce the total amount of exhaust energy relative to two completely divided tubes and turbos.
C. I don't think you understand what I meant about rotating mass and distance from the point of rotation. It's not a linear relationship as you're thinking. It takes more effort to accelerate 1 large wheel than it does 2 small wheels.
D. Things don't equal out. With appropriately sized twins you will have faster spool, READ IMPORTANT, and the same top end flow as a large single.
The downside is you'll have a few pounds of additional weight and complication of all the coolant, oil, exhaust and intake lines/tubes and if equal quality a higher price.
If we want to nitpick there will be the additional benefits, minor as they may be, of more surface area to exchange heat in the center sections meaning likely longer turbo and system life, additional coolant and oil volumes to the system. They will likely run cooler.
I'm not holding my breath for these particular turbos to be a great example as the headers don't seem to be equal length and from what I can see of the exhaust side I'd rather have it done a bit differently, same with the wastegates. Of course price is a major reason for some of these things and on that basis it definately looks very worthwhile for the price. I'd still bet with the right exhaust housings they'll perform much better than an equally rated single.
Oh and the reason some big blocks use large singles, because they have so much torque and low RPM oomph that spool doesn't matter to them, they're looking for extra power after they're up and moving. Ask someone why they have staged nitrous systems. : ) I can't believe someone said people make twin systems based on looks. sheesh.
Kevin T. Wyum
That probably should have been incomplete theory : ).
A. The twins are not half the size.
B. A combined header, single turbo, will actually reduce the total amount of exhaust energy relative to two completely divided tubes and turbos.
C. I don't think you understand what I meant about rotating mass and distance from the point of rotation. It's not a linear relationship as you're thinking. It takes more effort to accelerate 1 large wheel than it does 2 small wheels.
D. Things don't equal out. With appropriately sized twins you will have faster spool, READ IMPORTANT, and the same top end flow as a large single.
The downside is you'll have a few pounds of additional weight and complication of all the coolant, oil, exhaust and intake lines/tubes and if equal quality a higher price.
If we want to nitpick there will be the additional benefits, minor as they may be, of more surface area to exchange heat in the center sections meaning likely longer turbo and system life, additional coolant and oil volumes to the system. They will likely run cooler.
I'm not holding my breath for these particular turbos to be a great example as the headers don't seem to be equal length and from what I can see of the exhaust side I'd rather have it done a bit differently, same with the wastegates. Of course price is a major reason for some of these things and on that basis it definately looks very worthwhile for the price. I'd still bet with the right exhaust housings they'll perform much better than an equally rated single.
Oh and the reason some big blocks use large singles, because they have so much torque and low RPM oomph that spool doesn't matter to them, they're looking for extra power after they're up and moving. Ask someone why they have staged nitrous systems. : ) I can't believe someone said people make twin systems based on looks. sheesh.
Kevin T. Wyum
#56
Ga-nome liberator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hell
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kevin T. Wyum
"In complete theory"
That probably should have been incomplete theory : ).
A. The twins are not half the size.
B. A combined header, single turbo, will actually reduce the total amount of exhaust energy relative to two completely divided tubes and turbos.
C. I don't think you understand what I meant about rotating mass and distance from the point of rotation. It's not a linear relationship as you're thinking. It takes more effort to accelerate 1 large wheel than it does 2 small wheels.
D. Things don't equal out. With appropriately sized twins you will have faster spool, READ IMPORTANT, and the same top end flow as a large single.
The downside is you'll have a few pounds of additional weight and complication of all the coolant, oil, exhaust and intake lines/tubes and if equal quality a higher price.
If we want to nitpick there will be the additional benefits, minor as they may be, of more surface area to exchange heat in the center sections meaning likely longer turbo and system life, additional coolant and oil volumes to the system. They will likely run cooler.
I'm not holding my breath for these particular turbos to be a great example as the headers don't seem to be equal length and from what I can see of the exhaust side I'd rather have it done a bit differently, same with the wastegates. Of course price is a major reason for some of these things and on that basis it definately looks very worthwhile for the price. I'd still bet with the right exhaust housings they'll perform much better than an equally rated single.
Oh and the reason some big blocks use large singles, because they have so much torque and low RPM oomph that spool doesn't matter to them, they're looking for extra power after they're up and moving. Ask someone why they have staged nitrous systems. : ) I can't believe someone said people make twin systems based on looks. sheesh.
Kevin T. Wyum
That probably should have been incomplete theory : ).
A. The twins are not half the size.
B. A combined header, single turbo, will actually reduce the total amount of exhaust energy relative to two completely divided tubes and turbos.
C. I don't think you understand what I meant about rotating mass and distance from the point of rotation. It's not a linear relationship as you're thinking. It takes more effort to accelerate 1 large wheel than it does 2 small wheels.
D. Things don't equal out. With appropriately sized twins you will have faster spool, READ IMPORTANT, and the same top end flow as a large single.
The downside is you'll have a few pounds of additional weight and complication of all the coolant, oil, exhaust and intake lines/tubes and if equal quality a higher price.
If we want to nitpick there will be the additional benefits, minor as they may be, of more surface area to exchange heat in the center sections meaning likely longer turbo and system life, additional coolant and oil volumes to the system. They will likely run cooler.
I'm not holding my breath for these particular turbos to be a great example as the headers don't seem to be equal length and from what I can see of the exhaust side I'd rather have it done a bit differently, same with the wastegates. Of course price is a major reason for some of these things and on that basis it definately looks very worthwhile for the price. I'd still bet with the right exhaust housings they'll perform much better than an equally rated single.
Oh and the reason some big blocks use large singles, because they have so much torque and low RPM oomph that spool doesn't matter to them, they're looking for extra power after they're up and moving. Ask someone why they have staged nitrous systems. : ) I can't believe someone said people make twin systems based on looks. sheesh.
Kevin T. Wyum
First off, thanks for immediately making snide comments. Next what I ment by in complete theory, was to take everything into theory, ie. no friction all gases and other elements act ideal. I did not mean that it was the complete end all of theories, misunderstanding but thanks for the insult.
A. I realize that these turbos are not half the size of any turbo, that's why I said "Let's say the turbos are exactly 1/2 the size of some specific single turbo." which means that we are simplifying things by taking an easy ratio. Again misunderstanding whatever.
B. I don't understand this, you'll have to elaborate further, I can't just assume it's right.
C. I don't think we are thinking the same things on this either. They way I am looking at it, is in a torque perspective. Ie. force x distance. Regardless you're final statement is correct, it does take more force to spin one larger wheel vs two.
D. The fact that the two turbos will spool individually faster is understood. But I have been told varying things on this subject, ie. some have said that the actually boost pressure that is made is the combination of both turbos, ie. if they are each producing 7lbs, then total they will produce 14lbs. But I've heard the opposite as well, that if they are both making 7lbs, then together they are still only making 7lbs unless you run an individual ic and runner all the way to the port.
additional turbo life, possibly, you also have to take into account that they are going to give off more heat than a single, by the same pricinple more surface area. More oil doesn't neccessarily mean that they will run cooler, oil can only absorb so much, and as I'm sure you know, there is a maximum point to where too much oil just isn't adding any benefits. Again it will take more oil to cool the system so the increase in amount of oil in the system should ballance this out, because you don't want to overflow what the stock system can take.
In my opinion if you want faster spool there are many devices on the market that can offer it at price that is much less than this. But as stated before some people want to do something different, which is why I think this kit has been developed.
- Steiner
#60
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Originally Posted by LT1-7
And just maybe a twin GT3071R kit for people that are sick in the head All kits are dual ball bearing turbos with internal wastegates.
I'll take one of those, if the price is right
#62
Ga-nome liberator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hell
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by milkman2k52
lol @ steiner
Well I think we both misread what we posted. Just trying to clear things up. Besides it's better to have different perspectives when judging or looking at a system like this. I'm merely offering what I can, and what I can understand, not anything definitive, just my perspective. It's all constructive which is what matters.
- Steiner
#64
FOR SALE
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RacerX_IU
i want to see how you guys are planning on plumbing from the turbos to the intercooler
#67
Originally Posted by krautrocket
disco potato to the rescue ... x2
#70
Originally Posted by Xcessive
Hey John, I have a pair of GT30rs, shall we try them on the 7? Also I have HP tuners ecu
program firgured out and it rips!!! Ralph
program firgured out and it rips!!! Ralph
I think we're gonna try HP Tuner on the turbo Trans Am. Probably be a couple months before we can dyno it though. When do you think you can start dynoing again?
Last edited by LT1-7; 01-26-05 at 02:10 AM.
#71
The king of the highway!
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Home of the 305 Boyz(miami)
Posts: 2,988
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I will say that twins are safer than single turbos. but twins have too much heat than single.
i bet you could produce 500hp on twins eaiser than you can on a single
i bet you could produce 500hp on twins eaiser than you can on a single
#72
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looking for some confirmation here but that is what I think.'
Stock port, flows max of 40 lbs/min at 15 PSI, 46 at 20 PSI, 58 at 30
Street ports (big range but best I've seen) 47, 54, 68
Bridge port (big range again) 51, 57,71
PP 58, 66, 82
Looks to me that most twins are overkill for stock or not so great street ports. I would think the 28r is probably the best choice for most.
Stock port, flows max of 40 lbs/min at 15 PSI, 46 at 20 PSI, 58 at 30
Street ports (big range but best I've seen) 47, 54, 68
Bridge port (big range again) 51, 57,71
PP 58, 66, 82
Looks to me that most twins are overkill for stock or not so great street ports. I would think the 28r is probably the best choice for most.
#73
Rotor Head Extreme
iTrader: (8)
Originally Posted by KNONFS
I've been thinking about this for quite some time...
If we were able to run each turbo exhaust seperately from one to the other (they never merge toghter); wouldn't that lower the emissions considerably?
If it works, even a half BP might be possible, and still pass emissions, am I dreaming?
If we were able to run each turbo exhaust seperately from one to the other (they never merge toghter); wouldn't that lower the emissions considerably?
If it works, even a half BP might be possible, and still pass emissions, am I dreaming?
A bridge may never pass emissions (regardless of turbo) because of the larger overlap it creates. With the exaust and intake partially open at the same time, the exhaust will draw in some of the un-burned air intake mixture. This will cause more gas to be burned in the exhaust itself.
Last edited by t-von; 01-31-05 at 02:35 AM.
#74
Rotor Head Extreme
iTrader: (8)
Originally Posted by LT1-7
This is just one of the twin turbo kits we have to offer. We are also coming out with a twin GT28RS (disco potato) kit which we estimate will push 550hp. And also for you crazy hp freaks, we will be making a twin GT2871R kit which will likely push over 650. And just maybe a twin GT3071R kit for people that are sick in the head All kits are dual ball bearing turbos with internal wastegates.
These kit are the best of both worlds. Fast spooling with lots of top end. And to add on top of that, it looks bad ***!! How many FD owners do you know with aftermarket twin turbos??? And priced around what most single turbo kits sell for.
These kit are the best of both worlds. Fast spooling with lots of top end. And to add on top of that, it looks bad ***!! How many FD owners do you know with aftermarket twin turbos??? And priced around what most single turbo kits sell for.
Does the kit mount the front turbo low enough so that the stock smog pump can be used? If so, this would be a really nice benefit compared to a single.