Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Pt6266

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 09:16 PM
  #51  
fendamonky's Avatar
F'n Newbie...
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,942
Likes: 323
From: Nokesville, Va
It's possible with the 6266, but there are more variable at play than JUST the turbo.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 09:53 PM
  #52  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally Posted by Epic Rotary
Sorry to bring an old thread back but im looking to make 400 on 15psi and maybe 500 on around 22-25psi. Im really looking at the 6266. Good choice? or should i go with something different.
On a healthy engine, with a good tune, enough fuel and ignition it will definitely make those figures;

Precision PT6266 CEA
__________________
Rotary Performance Parts


Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 10:48 AM
  #53  
rx7 SE's Avatar
Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
Bump, I saw a LOT of precision turbos at the DGRR this year. Anybody that's installed them (6266, 6766) recently want to rate their performance vs expectations?
Reply
Old May 2, 2013 | 09:15 AM
  #54  
dabigesii's Avatar
Back to basics
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 855
Likes: 12
From: Crescent City
I love mine (6766 dual ball bearing). It spools quick enough for my taste, very responsive, and doesn't run out of breath on the top end (8500rpm) like my gt35r did. The only regret I have is not going with this turbo from the beginning and saving myself a lot of money and time.
Reply
Old May 2, 2013 | 10:21 AM
  #55  
unwritten-dinasty's Avatar
Pistons are for pussy's
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 237
Likes: 1
From: Dominican Republic
Same here, 67/66 1.0 AR non BB. 440whp @ 16 psi on 91 pump with W/I and conservative tune.
Reply
Old May 2, 2013 | 11:26 AM
  #56  
rx7 SE's Avatar
Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by unwritten-dinasty
Same here, 67/66 1.0 AR non BB. 440whp @ 16 psi on 91 pump with W/I and conservative tune.
Wow, I hope to get results close to that with my 62
Reply
Old May 12, 2013 | 12:07 AM
  #57  
TougeSpirit's Avatar
Nice Wankel
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 424
Likes: 1
From: North America
Originally Posted by unwritten-dinasty
Same here, 67/66 1.0 AR non BB. 440whp @ 16 psi on 91 pump with W/I and conservative tune.
What manifold are you using and when are you seeing "full" boost?
Reply
Old May 23, 2013 | 07:21 AM
  #58  
rx7 SE's Avatar
Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
Has anybody gone 'all in' with a 6266 or 6766 yet? I'm talking like 25+ psi going borderline out of efficiency range...
Reply
Old May 23, 2013 | 08:28 AM
  #59  
unwritten-dinasty's Avatar
Pistons are for pussy's
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 237
Likes: 1
From: Dominican Republic
TougeSpirit, full boost 16psi by 4,000rpm.

Once i upgrade my primaries injectors to 850 i plan on tunning for 22-23psi, the 6766 can be pushed to 30+ psi.
Reply
Old May 23, 2013 | 11:12 AM
  #60  
TheAsset's Avatar
Mr.Epic
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 683
Likes: 2
From: Missouri
I plan on being up in the 26-27psi area when everything is said and done. I'd like to do it on water alone. But its a little down the road at the moment
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2014 | 09:50 PM
  #61  
SP_Rocket's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: United States
Hey guys sorry to just jump in on the thread but I was just curious what was the difference performance wise on the pt6266 and the GEN2 pt6266? Is it like comparing the gt and gtx series meaning you don't notice the difference on the gtx unless you're running higher boost 20+ psi? Reason I ask is because I want to also run the pt6266 just not sure to go with the reg or gen 2?
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2014 | 01:44 AM
  #62  
Grinch's Avatar
Pistion to rotary
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 305
Likes: 1
From: sioux falls
Gen 2 will make more lower at same boost levels they claim. Say make as much as there 6466 but in a 6266 package.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2014 | 04:41 AM
  #63  
rx7 SE's Avatar
Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
Wth? When did the gen 2 come out?
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2014 | 09:01 AM
  #64  
SP_Rocket's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: United States
So if I were planning on running 20 psi on both Turbos I'd see better results with the gen 2? Quicker spool and more power?
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2014 | 10:33 PM
  #65  
Grinch's Avatar
Pistion to rotary
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 305
Likes: 1
From: sioux falls
Gen 2 rated for 800ish vs the 720ish on the older ones. Goggle 6266 gen 2 and people have detailed pictures of the wheel changes and other stuff. Gen2 only comes bb though. Pick it up and let's see what 30psi gets
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2014 | 07:44 AM
  #66  
Howard Coleman's Avatar
Racing Rotary Since 1983
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,279
Likes: 728
From: Florence, Alabama
translated to rotary rwhp...

800/ 1.3 = 615

looks like it should make 80 pounds per minute if the estimate is correct.

given the Garrett GTX3582r which also sports a 21st century compressor wheel that is the same size plus or minus a hair makes 77 pounds tops or 580... i will be greatly impressed if 80 pounds are delivered.

this is not a knock on the turbo, just some clarification primarily as to Rotary HP versus Piston HP.

howard
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2014 | 05:18 AM
  #67  
RiceFx306's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 631
Likes: 2
From: Flower Mound, TX
Originally Posted by Grinch
Gen 2 will make more lower at same boost levels they claim. Say make as much as there 6466 but in a 6266 package.
6466 is actually the Gen2 tech (before the unveiling of Gen2 options) which is probably why it showed so strongly vs the old 6266 and 6766. I really want a 6466.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2014 | 10:01 PM
  #68  
SP_Rocket's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: United States
I wonder is it possible to run a single turbo kit upgrading IC, rad, fuel, and ecu? Even if it's at very low boost. Possible?
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2014 | 10:03 PM
  #69  
SP_Rocket's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: United States
*without running An upgraded IC, Rad, ecu, fuel.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2014 | 04:57 AM
  #70  
rx7 SE's Avatar
Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by SP_Rocket
*without running An upgraded IC, Rad, ecu, fuel.
Sure its possible. But it is HIGHLY likely that you will damage the motor.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2014 | 09:56 AM
  #71  
SP_Rocket's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: United States
I'm just antsy to get a kit already and drive the car lol
But I know to be safe I need the upgraded fuel, ecu, rad, IC, ignition, and tune.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2014 | 04:06 AM
  #72  
RiceFx306's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 631
Likes: 2
From: Flower Mound, TX
Does anyone know if Precision (or anyone else) sells exhaust housing. A friend put a 6466 on his gf's car and with Runway Rivalry coming up and Precision not releasing the 6768 he went ahead and ordered another 6466 (v-band) just for the event and he would be willing to sell it to me. I'm going to assume whatever exhaust size he ordered (EVO) will be too small for an RX7. I was really impressed with the turbo and he gets better prices than I do so I may pick it up for a win win, but I have to know if I can order an exhaust housing for it. Also any advice on what size to get? Need something for ~25lbs or more. I saw SMG was running 1.15 on his 6766, but wasn't sure how it would compare. Thanks!

Figure a month at 35+lbs on his car will be a good workout to see if it's any good before I slap it on the 7.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdLKyzIcMu0#t=29
Reply
Old May 12, 2014 | 09:19 PM
  #73  
Rotor Nut.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,163
Likes: 2
From: RI
I have tuned a 6266 made 402whp at 14psi on pump gas and conservative tune. That turbo all out will most likely be in the 550whp range in the high 20s . My personal FD made 644whp at 30 psi on a 6766 , With more to go which is coming soon .
Reply
Old May 14, 2014 | 09:55 PM
  #74  
txfdr2's Avatar
Full Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: Spring, Tx
im running 6266 on stock ports with a .84 hotside. I have never dyno'd it. At 12psi it feels no different than the twins did. Most I have boosted is around 18psi and it scoots. But power feels slightly restricted at 7000+ rpm. Might be my stock ports. Or my .84 hotside. Or Racing beat exhaust and rerouted wastegate. Or all of the above!

I am considering trying a 1.0 AR hotside to see if I gain some top end and if it lowers my EGTs a little.
Reply
Old May 21, 2014 | 10:32 PM
  #75  
SP_Rocket's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: United States
Originally Posted by smg944
I have tuned a 6266 made 402whp at 14psi on pump gas and conservative tune. That turbo all out will most likely be in the 550whp range in the high 20s . My personal FD made 644whp at 30 psi on a 6766 , With more to go which is coming soon .
That's pretty much what I'm looking for 400whp. What kind of mpg did that fd get? And how was the drivability/reliable was it?
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 PM.