Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

fd stock turbo to fc

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 06:24 PM
  #26  
ineedfc's Avatar
Thread Starter
disturbing the peace
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: sussex, wi
Originally Posted by RacerXtreme7
Well, I suppose there is always someone willing to spend a half an hour or maybe longer typing up a response and SPOON feed lazy ***'es who could find their answers in the same amount of time doing a search.

~Mike...........
****. you. you need an attitude adjustment ********.

Originally Posted by arghx
all of these turbos have proprietary flanges etc and the twins come in an assembly. it's not like stock twins on a 3000GT or something.
most helpful info/response in the whole thread.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 06:28 PM
  #27  
ineedfc's Avatar
Thread Starter
disturbing the peace
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: sussex, wi
GT2860RS (Disco Potato).....................3.549................. ..3.105.................... 87%
FC T2 (OEM).........................................3.57 9....................4.288................... 119
GT3071R........................................... ....4.776....................4.019................ ... 84
GT3071R........................................... ....4.776....................3.683................ .... 77
GT2876............................................ .....5.224.....................3.108.............. ..... 59
TO4E 57 Trim........................................5.369. ....................5.408 (Stg 5)......... 100
GT3776............................................ .....5.374.....................5.441.............. ...... 101
TO4E 60 Trim.........................................5.476 ....................5.408...................... 98
GT3076R........................................... .....5.511...................4.019................ ....... 73
Turbonetics 60-1....................................5.647........ ...........5.89....................... 104
Turbonetics T61......................................5.79..... ............... 5.89......................101
TO4B 62-1..............................................5.8 7..................... 5.89...................... 100
FD (OEM)............................................. ....5.972.................5.25.................... ..... 88
this is what spawned this question in the first place, taken directly from the stickies in this section.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 08:24 PM
  #28  
RacerXtreme7's Avatar
NASA geek
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 2
From: Virginia
Originally Posted by ineedfc
****. you. you need an attitude adjustment ********.



most helpful info/response in the whole thread.
Awesome, your profanity and name calling further reinforces our assumptions of your intelligence level, bravo my friend! Keep in mind this is an open forum and your profanity is a bit extreme. Think of the things allowed on radio and tv, then think of what's not allowed in either and that's what should be deleted or refrained from being used here as well.




Originally Posted by ineedfc
GT2860RS (Disco Potato).....................3.549................. ..3.105.................... 87%
FC T2 (OEM).........................................3.57 9....................4.288................... 119
GT3071R........................................... ....4.776....................4.019................ ... 84
GT3071R........................................... ....4.776....................3.683................ .... 77
GT2876............................................ .....5.224.....................3.108.............. ..... 59
TO4E 57 Trim........................................5.369. ....................5.408 (Stg 5)......... 100
GT3776............................................ .....5.374.....................5.441.............. ...... 101
TO4E 60 Trim.........................................5.476 ....................5.408...................... 98
GT3076R........................................... .....5.511...................4.019................ ....... 73
Turbonetics 60-1....................................5.647........ ...........5.89....................... 104
Turbonetics T61......................................5.79..... ............... 5.89......................101
TO4B 62-1..............................................5.8 7..................... 5.89...................... 100
FD (OEM)............................................. ....5.972.................5.25.................... ..... 88
this is what spawned this question in the first place, taken directly from the stickies in this section.
OK, so looking at this chart NONE of the numbers between the FC and FD correlate, not one bit (not by half, not by double). I assume you saw these numbers and came to the conclusion that one FD turbo of the twin system is the same size as the one turbo off an FC. How the hell did you come up with THAT assumption looking at this chart??????

arghx gave u a great and detailed explanation, little did he and probably EVERYONE READING this know that you meant ONE turbo from the twins. You should thank him for his time and attempting to help, then let this useless thread die off and save yourself some face by refraining from posting any further brilliant responses. You got your answers to your questions. I apologize for coming off abrasively at first, but if you've ever been on forums you'd understand the frustration of repetitive questions being annoying when all you have to do is search. Again, your question would not have yielded your specific answer, your original post was not clear at all as to what you were getting at, and it still isn't clear (the whole chart being your basis for assumption that one FD turbo can replace the single on a fc).

~Mike...... <----- signing out this thread
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 03:52 PM
  #29  
XLR8's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,902
Likes: 10
From: NJ
OP, I see where you are coming from. You are looking for an upgrade while trying to keep things on the inexpensive side. The FD twins are not the answer my friend.

Look into a series 5 TII turbo as an upgrade (89-92), if you have a S4 (87-88). If you are looking for more power than an OEM turbo, than your going to have to start looking at the few TII kits manufactured, or piece together a kit.
Reply
Old May 25, 2010 | 01:14 AM
  #30  
w.sen's Avatar
In a Bucket
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
From: ocala, florida
So here's some light on this subject

I have an na s4... I have fd twins and stock fd ehuast manifold..

I AM going to make this work... for everyone who says it can't be done....


......I will do it.!

I have stock LIM modded removed acv flange no 5th and 6th ports... still more things in the worx..
Reply
Old May 25, 2010 | 09:38 AM
  #31  
rotaryinspired's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City
have fun w/ that. Go make it work. When it doesnt work the way you want let us know. If you have played w/ the twins on a FD and know how much a a nightmare they can be troubleshooting them and the soleniods you would not even consider them.

Good luck.
Reply
Old May 25, 2010 | 05:30 PM
  #32  
Frostycrowd's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
This thread made me giggle
Reply
Old May 25, 2010 | 07:23 PM
  #33  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
Originally Posted by w.sen
I have stock LIM modded removed acv flange no 5th and 6th ports... still more things in the worx..
Answer this question: have you confirmed that there is clearance for the FD turbo assembly with your modded LIM?

If you can fit it in there, you can make this work. I've already proposed how to run them sequentially in a longer thread in the 2nd gen section. It involves using 5 MAC 3 port solenoids ($26 each), all triggered by a single rpm switch (Rtek 2.1 can also be used to trigger it).


I will now reproduce the information here.
Reply
Old May 25, 2010 | 07:24 PM
  #34  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
In this case let's assume you are running at the spring pressure of 7-8psi. The OEM FD solenoids are known to be problematic, but you should be able to use aftermarket 3 port solenoids, same as the Haltech/AEM boost control soleniod, to control the twins (viton check valves are an upgrade as well).



available here for about $26 each: http://www.frightprops.com/FrightPro...ID=A-0013-0082

the factory solenoids look like this:



You will need 4 or preferably 5 of the MAC solenoids if you want to keep the wastegate shut just like Mazda does from the factory. Then you will need an rpm switch (or you can use an Rtek) such as this cheapo one: http://www.racerpartswholesale.com/p...ue_Shift_Light

If you have the stock ECU/Rtek you will need a custom TID that splits from the AFM to the two turbos. You can also use dual MBC's or a single external EBC. There's more than one way to do it.
Reply
Old May 25, 2010 | 07:25 PM
  #35  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
Here's a diagram of the main actuators in the system:

Reply
Old May 25, 2010 | 07:25 PM
  #36  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold


That's the factory FD control logic for very low throttle. At high throttle the transition point is 4000rpm. So at 4000rpm (you could still adjust the rpm later) you will need to switch your charge control, charge relief, the two turbo control solenoids, and you will want to begin opening the wastegate. Technically the charge relief solenoid isn't supposed to come online until at least 2000 rpm (which would require a window switch), but I don't think it matters that much. So here is one idea:



Under 4000rpm:

-- Charge control actuator receives vacuum from vac chamber
-- Charge relief receives vacuum from vac chamber (valve opened)
-- Turbo control actuator (pressure side) is vented
-- Turbo control actuator (vacuum side) is vented
-- Wastegate is vented (held shut to improve spool), 2nd port on actuator capped
-- Pre control valve is connected directly to the compressor outlet to control boost via spring pressure, 2nd port on actuator capped. An EBC or MBC could also be used.

Over 4000rpm:

-- Charge control actuator receives pressure from compressor outlet
-- Charge relief valve vented (valve closed)
-- Turbo control actuator (pressure side) receives pressure from chamber
-- Turbo control actuator (vacuum side) receives vacuum from chamber
-- Wastegate receives compressor outlet pressure in order to control boost. An MBC or EBC could be installed in-line
-- Pre control continues to receive compressor outlet pressure and is thus held in the full open position.

I've never actually tried that exact plumbing personally, but on paper it should work. If you look at the stock solenoids, they are just 3 port valves just like the MAC valve I have posted here. The main thing that's different among the solenoids is the configuration of the ports. This has to do with the vacuum and pressure control logic inherent in the system. Some actuators are meant to be vented and then supplied pressure. Some are meant to have vacuum and then boost, whatever. It's no different than wiring up a circuit with a bunch of 5 pin relays. A 3 way solenoid valve works exactly like a 5 pin relay. You have a normally open point, a normally closed point, and a common point that is always connected to the other two. Then there is a coil to switch them on and off.

Good luck. I'd love to see someone pull this off on an s4 n/a--not because it's that great of an idea, but just for all the haters out there.
Reply
Old May 25, 2010 | 10:46 PM
  #37  
SirCygnus's Avatar
whats going on?
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,930
Likes: 8
From: atlanta ga
i have been thinking about doing this for quite some time on my s4 t2 block with s4 na rotors. should be fun.
Reply
Old May 26, 2010 | 02:29 AM
  #38  
w.sen's Avatar
In a Bucket
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
From: ocala, florida
I bought "rich mans" non seqt. And not going back to seqt. I have almost finished modding my LIM its going to be a tight sqeeze. But I'm like 80% sure its gunna work..

I've been slammed at work and haven't been able to get a few hours to get to my moms house to work on my 7. From the looks of things I really do think I can make it all fit!

If the LIM doesn't fit and the HT12's can't fit with a small spacer. And it hit the frame or anything I might just get a whole T2 intakes. But we will see.!!
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2010 | 03:39 PM
  #39  
oinesra's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 287
Likes: 3
From: Orange Park, FL
This is pretty easy to do.

Is it worth wile? Maybe if you have the parts sitting around or can get them really cheap.

The biggest issue with this swap is going to be water pump clearance. The front turbo sits so close to the lower outlet that you cant get a hose on.

The quickest way to fix that is with a first gen water pump housing (even though one stud wont work. Or cut, angle and re-weld the stock housing.

But just like it has been said before, if you have to ask, you probable don't have what it takes to do it.

Also, NO WAY in hell is it going to clear a 6port lower intake manifold, even with a spacer.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cristoDathird
Introduce yourself
28
May 30, 2019 08:47 PM
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
0
Aug 18, 2015 10:01 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:47 PM.