Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Dyno numbers on E85

Old Mar 26, 2009 | 04:29 PM
  #201  
classicauto's Avatar
Crash Auto?Fix Auto.
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,831
Likes: 2
From: Hagersville Ontario
I swear, if this hasn't gone down by the time I get to florida in april - *I'll run the evo*. I made 380whp last yearon 91! I'll get my *** handed to me but at least I'm not afriad to have that happen!!!

MAN UP LADIES! YOU GOING TO FIDDLE WITH YOUR TAMPONS ALL NITE OR ARE WE GONNA RACE?
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 07:50 AM
  #202  
burnoutking999's Avatar
Mentos and Magnums
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,373
Likes: 0
From: FLROIDUH
Originally Posted by turboR1
thats where all the 699hp cars face reality when they see there trap speed..

Link works fine for me.
so, you are saying they typically suffer from lower traps?
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 07:50 AM
  #203  
burnoutking999's Avatar
Mentos and Magnums
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,373
Likes: 0
From: FLROIDUH
Thanks, that interesting.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 12:01 PM
  #204  
BluRR's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 483
Likes: 4
From: Jamaica
53 thousand posts...are you for real dude?
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 12:13 PM
  #205  
ITSWILL's Avatar
Wiring Nightmare
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 2
From: Ortonville, MI
Originally Posted by classicauto
I swear, if this hasn't gone down by the time I get to florida in april - *I'll run the evo*. I made 380whp last yearon 91! I'll get my *** handed to me but at least I'm not afriad to have that happen!!!

MAN UP LADIES! YOU GOING TO FIDDLE WITH YOUR TAMPONS ALL NITE OR ARE WE GONNA RACE?
my sentiments exactly
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 12:56 PM
  #206  
Gorilla RE's Avatar
GorillaRaceEngineering.co
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
Originally Posted by BluRR
53 thousand posts...are you for real dude?
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 07:50 PM
  #207  
Trots*88TII-AE*'s Avatar
4th string e-armchair QB
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
From: North Bay, Ontario
In 4 years. Wow. You deserve to be a super-moderator for that kind of accomplishment!

When the hell is this race going to go down? This is soooo weak.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2009 | 02:05 AM
  #208  
Gorilla RE's Avatar
GorillaRaceEngineering.co
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
Originally Posted by Trots*88TII-AE*
In 4 years. Wow. You deserve to be a super-moderator for that kind of accomplishment!

When the hell is this race going to go down? This is soooo weak.
Soooo posts=knowledge huh.....

-J
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 09:53 AM
  #209  
Trots*88TII-AE*'s Avatar
4th string e-armchair QB
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
From: North Bay, Ontario
who said being a moderator = being knowledgeable?
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2009 | 12:34 AM
  #210  
Gorilla RE's Avatar
GorillaRaceEngineering.co
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
Not I...
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2009 | 09:39 PM
  #211  
Sesshoumaru's Avatar
Tenseiga
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,252
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Originally Posted by howard coleman
i don't think so... not disputing your hp necessarily but definitely don't buy 4 1600 injectors w E85.

here's how i see it.

it takes 1.92 CFM to make one rotary rear wheel hp.

699 times 1.92 is 1342 CFM.

1342 CFM/14.471 is 92.72 lbs per minute of air.

let's say you did it at an AFR of 11.

92.72 pounds of air/ 11 is 8.43 pounds of gasoline.

but you didn't do it on gas... you did it on ethanol (i know E85 is 85/15... just hang with me.)

the equivalent Lamda to 11 gas is 4.8! if you were running 100% ethanol you would burn 19.32 pounds of ethanol per minute to make the same 11 AFR.

(alcohol has 9500 BTUs V gasoline at 18,400 BTUs per pound. the two quantities generate approx 184,000 BTUs)

converting from pounds per minute to CC/Minute:

to make 699 rw rotary hp on gasoline requires 5188 CC/Min

to make 699 rw rotary hp on (100%) ethanol requires 11,097 CC/Min

to do it on E85 takes 10,210 CC/Min

you have 4 1650 CC Min injectors.... that's 6600 CC/Min

that works out to 500 hp max at 100% duty cycle.

the car has either a whole lot of additional injectors or there's a typo on the hp.

FWIW i have a friend that makes 1000 rw rotary hp on 100% methanol and he has 14 1650 CC injectors.

'nothing personal here but it doesn't add up and will be interesting to hear the rest of the story.

one afterthought... injector flow rates are at a given pressure.. raise the pressure and you will get more flow. however, the increase in flow is the square root of the % change. in other words, if you moved pressure from 40 to 50, that would be a 25% increase in pressure but only a 5% increase in flow.



howard coleman

You can run over 100 percent duty cycle also.

The fuel injectors open when the intake port is closed.

Not best practice but will still work.

LOL I've calculated 130 percent on my primaries once and 175 on secondaries running 11's afr once. Whoops.

8,000 rpm/60 sec = 133.333 rotations/sec = 1/133.333 sec/rotations ~ 7.5ms/rotation

anything over 7.5ms injector time is over 100 duty cycle.

by running over 100 percent duty cycle he can move more fuel than you would think.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 04:16 PM
  #212  
darkphantom's Avatar
Thread Starter
The king of the highway!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,988
Likes: 0
From: Home of the 305 Boyz(miami)
im calling you now mike!


called him. set everything up now im trying to get a hold of the red fd.

p.s. Dunno bout the 1k mike (raising the stakes) but ill ask him just for the hell of it!
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 04:24 PM
  #213  
mike@awdmotorsports's Avatar
Ernie T's DADDY
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Well i am now told the original Rx7 cannot run something is broken and its not getting fixed, who knows.. They now have a red Rx7 they want to use instead and once again i say " BRING IT , DONT SING IT "..

With all the BS we are not going to be bothered for 300.00.. We want 1000.00 and its 50-150 simple as that.. If the red RX7 cant do it find one that will or please dont waste mine and everyone on the boards time.. you have my #..

Mike
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 04:55 PM
  #214  
djseven's Avatar
Eh
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,552
Likes: 344
From: Nashville, TN
Has a "streetable" fd ever trapped 155+, this doesn't look good for whatever rotary steps up to the plate, still would be nice to see a video though
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2009 | 01:06 PM
  #215  
crispeed's Avatar
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
Originally Posted by djseven
Has a "streetable" fd ever trapped 155+, this doesn't look good for whatever rotary steps up to the plate, still would be nice to see a video though
The EVO that they are going to be running does not trap anything close to 156mph.
Mike might as well forget running them with any EVO and just use his 4100lb, daily driven, 4-door sedan!
If not then the Dodge 'tow vechicle' is all that's left!
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2009 | 10:21 AM
  #216  
Gorilla RE's Avatar
GorillaRaceEngineering.co
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
Originally Posted by Sesshoumaru
You can run over 100 percent duty cycle also.

The fuel injectors open when the intake port is closed.

Not best practice but will still work.

LOL I've calculated 130 percent on my primaries once and 175 on secondaries running 11's afr once. Whoops.

8,000 rpm/60 sec = 133.333 rotations/sec = 1/133.333 sec/rotations ~ 7.5ms/rotation

anything over 7.5ms injector time is over 100 duty cycle.

by running over 100 percent duty cycle he can move more fuel than you would think.
Note to self: Do not let this guy tune anyones car you like and that needs to stay in one peice.......

-J
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2009 | 03:33 PM
  #217  
lidman's Avatar
RX3
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Stockholm, Sweden
Originally Posted by internal comsucktion engi
Note to self: Do not let this guy tune anyones car you like and that needs to stay in one peice.......

-J
It´s really fascinating that you can have an injector open more than 100%!!??
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2009 | 04:00 PM
  #218  
Gorilla RE's Avatar
GorillaRaceEngineering.co
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
Originally Posted by lidman
It´s really fascinating that you can have an injector open more than 100%!!??
Isn't it though....

-J
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2009 | 08:52 PM
  #219  
Trots*88TII-AE*'s Avatar
4th string e-armchair QB
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
From: North Bay, Ontario
It's also fascinating to see the inside of our engines.... again.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2009 | 10:50 PM
  #220  
Sesshoumaru's Avatar
Tenseiga
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,252
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Originally Posted by internal comsucktion engi
Note to self: Do not let this guy tune anyones car you like and that needs to stay in one peice.......

-J
LOL well in all fairness it was @ 9k that I calculated those rediculous duty cycles.

I usually ran about stock 7k so that makes a huge huge difference on duty cycles.

I did it more to make a point........
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2009 | 10:53 PM
  #221  
Sesshoumaru's Avatar
Tenseiga
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,252
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Originally Posted by lidman
It´s really fascinating that you can have an injector open more than 100%!!??
No where did I say an injector can be open more than 100 percent.

I said you can run more than 100 percent duty cycle.

They are two different things.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009 | 09:54 PM
  #222  
RexRyder's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 6
From: Tucson
daym. pwned.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 03:16 AM
  #223  
crispeed's Avatar
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
I heard the rx-7 had a run in with another EVO!
I'm going to quote the owner of the EVO.

Originally Posted by CWiLL
Me Vs Black RX7 50roll
I come off brake boost a car or so out and keep it that way if not pull about another car. Second one rx7 misses a gear and I pull. Third my car brakes up and we leave with him half a car out and I creep back up to him.
CWill's EVO is making just over 500whp.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 09:20 AM
  #224  
djseven's Avatar
Eh
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,552
Likes: 344
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by crispeed
I heard the rx-7 had a run in with another EVO!
I'm going to quote the owner of the EVO.



CWill's EVO is making just over 500whp.
You usually speak in code, but I think I have decoded this one. Are you saying the fd didnt make 699 rwhp
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 10:10 AM
  #225  
killahrx7's Avatar
dyno queen potentials
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 445
Likes: 1
From: ga
this is really making rx7s look like ****.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 PM.