Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Dyno: 490 RWHP and 395 TQ, T-61 single

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 09:39 AM
  #26  
Old Slow Coach's Avatar
Front Range Express
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs
Originally Posted by dubulup
about the 5th island...do I win?

dupulup FTW!!! I'm getting a new race gas tune on my T-61 in about a week and planning to run 26 lbs, but I've been under the impression one could run up to 28lbs on the T-61. Planning to post it up on the forum if motor survives. It'll be on a really low reading dyno, so that should be fun trying to make comparisons! (LoL)
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 12:30 PM
  #27  
hondahater's Avatar
spending too much money..
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,117
Likes: 1
From: louisiana
I've always heard 22 is the sweat spot with not much more gain the higher you go.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 01:02 PM
  #28  
Old Slow Coach's Avatar
Front Range Express
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs
J-Rat- What type of port work are you flossin'?
T-61 BB Q-trim

+ Racing Beat Race Port

=

Last edited by Old Slow Coach; Nov 8, 2006 at 01:07 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 01:30 PM
  #29  
hondahater's Avatar
spending too much money..
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,117
Likes: 1
From: louisiana
thats the same port I've got. How does that t61 feel with it?
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 02:05 PM
  #30  
Old Slow Coach's Avatar
Front Range Express
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs
See last picture in series above
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 05:27 PM
  #31  
J-Rat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Alcohol Fueled!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,093
Likes: 2
From: Hood River oregon
The port I have is a proprietary one that Glen @ AZrotaryrockets built.

For comparison, I made 407 wheel at 14 PSI, so the motor FLOWS.

At 490 Hp, the car is FRIGHTENING... I turned the boost back down because I like traction..
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 11:05 PM
  #32  
ROT8TN's Avatar
HOK Blurple GT35R Goodnes
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, Va
I love your car...good luck on the sale
Its a great price
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2006 | 01:17 AM
  #33  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,999
Likes: 349
From: FL
very impressive numbers. sure sounds like fun ... any video clips?
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2006 | 05:40 AM
  #34  
hondahater's Avatar
spending too much money..
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,117
Likes: 1
From: louisiana
Originally Posted by III Gen X
See last picture in series above

lol, nice!

Originally Posted by ROT8TN
I love your car...good luck on the sale
Its a great price
he's not selling his car is he?
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2006 | 07:48 AM
  #35  
Old Slow Coach's Avatar
Front Range Express
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs
Originally Posted by J-Rat
The port I have is a proprietary one that Glen @ AZrotaryrockets built.

For comparison, I made 407 wheel at 14 PSI, so the motor FLOWS.

At 490 Hp, the car is FRIGHTENING... I turned the boost back down because I like traction..
I know of a stock motor T-61 that put down 420 at 17lbs, and ran 11.1 @ 122. Is your proprietary port an average sized street port? Not sure how the comparison at lower PSI is evidence that the exhaust port is LARGE.

Your dyno graph shows precipitous torque losses relatively early. What does it take to keep torque production up a bit longer thru the range? I don't think that's because the T-61 is running out of breath up there. What is your turbine housing's a/r? Nevertheless, I do not doubt that the car is absolutely FRIGHTENING on the street.

I'm just a huge fan of the T-61 and it's my opinion that it's the best all around t-series hair dryer for street use. If or when I have to replace it, however, I'm going with a GT series and probably the A-Spec 500-R.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2006 | 08:42 AM
  #36  
J-Rat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Alcohol Fueled!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,093
Likes: 2
From: Hood River oregon
Originally Posted by hondahater
lol, nice!



he's not selling his car is he?

No, I am not selling.. Not sure where that came from.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2006 | 08:43 AM
  #37  
J-Rat's Avatar
Thread Starter
Alcohol Fueled!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,093
Likes: 2
From: Hood River oregon
Originally Posted by III Gen X
I know of a stock motor T-61 that put down 420 at 17lbs, and ran 11.1 @ 122. Is your proprietary port an average sized street port? Not sure how the comparison at lower PSI is evidence that the exhaust port is LARGE.

Your dyno graph shows precipitous torque losses relatively early. What does it take to keep torque production up a bit longer thru the range? I don't think that's because the T-61 is running out of breath up there. What is your turbine housing's a/r? Nevertheless, I do not doubt that the car is absolutely FRIGHTENING on the street.

I'm just a huge fan of the T-61 and it's my opinion that it's the best all around t-series hair dryer for street use. If or when I have to replace it, however, I'm going with a GT series and probably the A-Spec 500-R.
At 17 PSI I was pretty much in the 460 range. I am not the turbo specialist, so I am not sure what to make of all the data, but as far as the AR goes, its a .96 turbine.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 06:35 PM
  #38  
turbo-polak's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
From: van city
motor dowled yet? nice power! congrats
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 08:46 PM
  #39  
dhahlen's Avatar
FD Under Construction =P
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,022
Likes: 24
From: Avondale, AZ
dowling is a waste of money IMO. I've talk to several pro builders that agree, but everyone has their argument.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2006 | 12:38 AM
  #40  
13btnos's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 797
Likes: 4
From: VISTA
Originally Posted by dhahlen
dowling is a waste of money IMO. I've talk to several pro builders that agree, but everyone has their argument.
Dowling is not a waste of time if you don't have the best tuning skills. If you do have great tuning skills then yes it would be a waste of time. I prefer to dowel just as an extra measure if I can prevent my rear plate from cracking hell all the better. Easier for me to replace a damaged rotor than it would be for me to port and replace a rear iron and would cost me a lot less. And doweling a motor is simple. A pic of extra dowels.
Attached Thumbnails Dyno:  490 RWHP and 395 TQ, T-61 single-dsc02258.jpg  
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2006 | 06:26 AM
  #41  
moremazda's Avatar
Gone Race'n
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 4
From: Rockford, IL
Dowling is not a majic force feild from poor tuning... it is only a way for the rear plate to transfer the forces of rotational acceleration to the rest of the engine.

Dowling is neccssary for anything more than about the 500-520 whp mark, at least if you want it to last in a racing senario for any length of time....
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2006 | 06:41 AM
  #42  
hondahater's Avatar
spending too much money..
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,117
Likes: 1
From: louisiana
yeah either going to dowl my motor or get the stud kit, not sure. I think if your building an expensive setup that you want to last, every little piece of insurance is a good thing. At what, 250 bux if you get someone else to do it, it's not all that bad of a price.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2006 | 08:25 PM
  #43  
turbo-polak's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
From: van city
i wasnt putting the question whether to dowl or not up for discussion, i just asked him if he had dowled it or not
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2006 | 01:09 AM
  #44  
bobybeach's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Auckland NZ
Originally Posted by J-Rat
At 17 PSI I was pretty much in the 460 range. I am not the turbo specialist, so I am not sure what to make of all the data, but as far as the AR goes, its a .96 turbine.
I have a customer that made 513whp on dynopac hub dyno with T-61 @18psi using WI, The t-61 will reach its flow limits at about 17-18 psi on 13b at high rpm, increasing boost more than this will only give you more torque at mid rpm. I beat your boost had droped from 25psi to about 18psi at max rpm. this why your peak torque drops also as it follows the boost drop with rpm increase.
Good work on the power figures, it will be gd to see the new number with the race fuel.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2006 | 01:18 AM
  #45  
Old Slow Coach's Avatar
Front Range Express
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs
Originally Posted by bobybeach
I have a customer that made 513whp on dynopac hub dyno with T-61 @18psi using WI, The t-61 will reach its flow limits at about 17-18 psi on 13b at high rpm, increasing boost more than this will only give you more torque at mid rpm. I beat your boost had droped from 25psi to about 18psi at max rpm. this why your peak torque drops also as it follows the boost drop with rpm increase.
Good work on the power figures, it will be gd to see the new number with the race fuel.

Great info! How much do you think the whp would be at 18 lbs without the W/I tune? THanks!

edit- I still don't get how there is such a huge drop in pressure at high rpm. Don't the specs say it can flow up to 650 cfm? The power production is not demanding that much air, so why doesn't the turbo hold boost by simply increasing rpm with the motor? (it's late in the morning and I hope this question makes sense when I get up tomorrow (lol))

Last edited by Old Slow Coach; Nov 12, 2006 at 01:26 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2006 | 02:47 AM
  #46  
bobybeach's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Auckland NZ
Originally Posted by III Gen X
Great info! How much do you think the whp would be at 18 lbs without the W/I tune? THanks!

edit- I still don't get how there is such a huge drop in pressure at high rpm. Don't the specs say it can flow up to 650 cfm? The power production is not demanding that much air, so why doesn't the turbo hold boost by simply increasing rpm with the motor? (it's late in the morning and I hope this question makes sense when I get up tomorrow (lol))
A lot less, Id imagine you will easily loss 50-100hp as you pull the ignition back and add more fuel to cool things down.
The t-61 is supposed to flow aprox 60-65lbs/min which equates to an aprox 660-700hp. The problem is max hp is made with aggressive ignition tune, but once boost is added to the equation the ignition needs to be pulled back to far to keep thing under control.

In most applications because of conservative tunes If you could measure the turbo flow of lbs/min you will find that the turbo reaches its peck at a hp figure that seem shy of the turbos true limits. Adding the WI will allow a more aggressive ignition and fuel tune that will more efficiently convert the lbs/min into raw hp.


BTW good nite haha

Last edited by bobybeach; Nov 12, 2006 at 02:55 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2006 | 11:19 AM
  #47  
hondahater's Avatar
spending too much money..
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,117
Likes: 1
From: louisiana
so your saying to keep the psi down to 17 or 18. I was planning on running 22psi but if that is out of it's efficiancy range than I will back it down to your suggested limmits.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2006 | 03:43 PM
  #48  
bobybeach's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Auckland NZ
Originally Posted by hondahater
so your saying to keep the psi down to 17 or 18. I was planning on running 22psi but if that is out of it's efficiancy range than I will back it down to your suggested limmits.
No, run the 22psi that your thinking, This will give you a heap more mid torque. The t-61 performs well at high boost application, Its just that at high rpm the engine consumes a lot more than at low rpm. Since the turbo will reach its assumed flow limit of aprox 22psi at 6 rpm on 13b then after that point boost has to drop because the engine will demand more cfm at 7000 and 8000rpm .
A larger turbo like t-64 or t-70 will hold the 22psi higher in the revs, A t-70 could probably hold 22-25psi all the way to 8500rpm.

Efficiency and flow are two different things. Rule of thumb is....
small trim gives high boost efficiency.
Large inducers or large trim gives high flow.

High flow is what’s required to hold boost at high rpm.
High boost Efficiency is what’s required to give good compressor performance at hi boost.

Think of ot this way... Run twin T-61 on a 13b. The compressor maps of the t-61 show it favoring high boost applications. Running twins will allow huge cfm flow that will enable you to hold aprox 35psi at high rpm on your 13b. And the compressors will love it. 35psi is a walk in the park for a T-series type compressors.

Last edited by bobybeach; Nov 12, 2006 at 03:46 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2006 | 07:11 PM
  #49  
hondahater's Avatar
spending too much money..
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,117
Likes: 1
From: louisiana
cool, sounds great, thanks. Can't wait to see what it can do but building the hole setup to support one of your t70's or even mp gt45's maybe later on But not really sure if I even want to do that due to the slower spool etc... I think once I get this t61 where I want it I may start asking you about the t64, sounds like a pretty cool turbo as well. Thanks again.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2006 | 07:36 PM
  #50  
bobybeach's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Auckland NZ
Originally Posted by hondahater
cool, sounds great, thanks. Can't wait to see what it can do but building the hole setup to support one of your t70's or even mp gt45's maybe later on But not really sure if I even want to do that due to the slower spool etc... I think once I get this t61 where I want it I may start asking you about the t64, sounds like a pretty cool turbo as well. Thanks again.

haha i think you will be more than happy with the t-61, I know i was. Im fitting the t-64 now.... i hope i dont regret it.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:39 AM.