dissapointed in the numbers my fd pulled. T04S guys get in here?
#1
manned by boarderators
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Fremont Ca
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dissapointed in the numbers my fd pulled. T04S guys get in here?
I'm curious as to what kind of numbers you T04S guys are getting? something's definitely wrong with the tune or the car.
280whp @ 11psi (mustang dyno)
shitty ca w/ 10% ethanol 91 octane gas
3pm heat of the day in california summer (might have something to do with it)
the car kept spiking at 11psi, maybe something is wrong with the boost controller?
front mount/3" tbe/1300cc primarys, 850cc secondarys/all the supporting mods.
blitz sbc-II
i also have a slight leak in the downpipe but that shouldnt matter that much.
it really shouldnt be this low, but my tuner said that it was pretty good for a stock motor.
i really hunger for more power, should i try running C16? or will i just have to get a ported motor?
280whp @ 11psi (mustang dyno)
shitty ca w/ 10% ethanol 91 octane gas
3pm heat of the day in california summer (might have something to do with it)
the car kept spiking at 11psi, maybe something is wrong with the boost controller?
front mount/3" tbe/1300cc primarys, 850cc secondarys/all the supporting mods.
blitz sbc-II
i also have a slight leak in the downpipe but that shouldnt matter that much.
it really shouldnt be this low, but my tuner said that it was pretty good for a stock motor.
i really hunger for more power, should i try running C16? or will i just have to get a ported motor?
#3
Where has my $ gone?
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bay Area, Cal/Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
You don't need c16. Try running 14 psi and see what your results are, on a dynojet I'm sure you'll make better numbers.
#5
Original Gangster/Rotary!
iTrader: (213)
Originally Posted by njstreetrx7
no 280 is low u should be more at 300 at 10 psi...this is whjat most people run on stock ports
#6
manned by boarderators
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Fremont Ca
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MakoRacing
Agreed, 11psi is low...also mustang dynos read lower than dynojets. Also you got your injectors messsed up, the 1300's are the secondaries Did chuck tune your car? I remember him telling me he tuned someones and got 280whp..
Trending Topics
#12
Lives on the Forum
T04S = TS04?
If so, the numbers sound about right.
280 on an MD is easily over 300 on a DynoJet.
The TS04 makes right about 400 at 15 to 18psi - pump gas max.
So slightly over 300 (DJ #'s) at 11psi is about right.
Also, the turbo's efficiency isn't in the lower psi range, so 11psi isn't in it's real efficient range.
I agree, get it running at 14psi and see what it does...
The TS04 is similar in size to a T04E "60" or 60-1, so I wouldn't call it "small".
-Ted
If so, the numbers sound about right.
280 on an MD is easily over 300 on a DynoJet.
The TS04 makes right about 400 at 15 to 18psi - pump gas max.
So slightly over 300 (DJ #'s) at 11psi is about right.
Also, the turbo's efficiency isn't in the lower psi range, so 11psi isn't in it's real efficient range.
I agree, get it running at 14psi and see what it does...
The TS04 is similar in size to a T04E "60" or 60-1, so I wouldn't call it "small".
-Ted
#13
How is your intake and exhaust system? Is it on stock ECU or aftermarket ECU? What is your AFR at 11psi?
That is kinda low, considering I made 316whp on 12psi on a KnightSport Hybrid on a DynoJet and its an s4 13BT.
Do you have pics of the dyno graph?
That is kinda low, considering I made 316whp on 12psi on a KnightSport Hybrid on a DynoJet and its an s4 13BT.
Do you have pics of the dyno graph?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post