Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Considering 4in exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 1, 2011 | 06:32 PM
  #26  
thewird's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,603
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
I was considering 3.5" before as well but then when I couldn't find a good presilencer in 3.5" in oval form decided to go 4" which Borla has a nice big oval that fits just perfect (although tight). The 3.5" would have been a canister which would have stuck out under the car since it was 6.25" tall (if I remember correctly) which I did not want.

thewird
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2011 | 09:49 PM
  #27  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally Posted by t-von
I just saw this today while I was at the book store. 3.5" is the way to go and 4" is over kill! In the test, they gained 103 rwhp from 3" exhaust to 3.5". Same boost level and decreased spool time by 200 rpms. Great read with dyno results to back it up.



http://www.modified.com/tech/modp-11...ech/index.html
I've seen similar results myself, this is why our turbo kits come with 3.5" downpipes standard....
__________________
Rotary Performance Parts


Reply
Old Feb 1, 2011 | 10:11 PM
  #28  
zaridar's Avatar
35r 13b first gen
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
From: Richland Center WI
my borla is 3.5 in and oval????? fits perfectly!
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2011 | 10:14 PM
  #29  
zaridar's Avatar
35r 13b first gen
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
From: Richland Center WI
http://www.streetsideauto.com/p/borl...GoogleShopping


I got mine as a blem for about 80 bucks because there was some plastic melted onto a small spot of it.... this is it tho... then magnaflow out back.

Elliot I am very happy with 3.5 in! thanks I'm sure I will be even when i put my dump tube back into the exhaust!
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2011 | 11:45 PM
  #30  
thewird's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,603
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by zaridar
my borla is 3.5 in and oval????? fits perfectly!
Since I wanted the best sound suppression, I wanted their XR-1 multi-core and not the sportsman. Yes, there is a 3.5" oval in the sportsman variety but I chose to go 4" to get the multi-core.

part #400069 http://www.borla.com/products/produc...?cat=5&type=76

Also, if anyone is interested, Borla claims their XR-1 mufflers are built to withstand great sustained temps. "They can with stand constant temps of 2400 degrees with short burst of 2800 degrees.".

thewird
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2011 | 05:35 AM
  #31  
Bitchn7's Avatar
Zilla Killer
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
Im going 4" on my car also. T04Z 1.06 rear housing.
currently 3.5" into twin 2.5" withon eresonator each side then back into single 3.5" wiht one big rear carn
now im going to 4" dump into existing rear, but then also doing a striaght through 4" section to replace the mid twin 2.5" section for track work, will have also converted all joins to v band.
wastgates feed back into current 3.5" dump, but going to change it so when current mid section is used, WG feed back into mid section, then when runnign 4", WG will vent to at.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2011 | 01:08 PM
  #32  
PandazRx-7's Avatar
Fast + Reliable = $$$$$
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
All this talk about bigger exhaust got me a thinkin'! I'm currently 3" all the way back Magnaflow in the midpipe and RB duals in the back... wonder how much power is being left on the table.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2011 | 02:57 PM
  #33  
Double_J's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,089
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
zaridar did you have any luck with your ticket? That sounds pretty loud to me lol
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2011 | 04:34 PM
  #34  
zaridar's Avatar
35r 13b first gen
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
From: Richland Center WI
Originally Posted by Double_J
zaridar did you have any luck with your ticket? That sounds pretty loud to me lol
I didn't end up showing the judge the video... however I did get the ticket dropped since i have Hobbyist plates... The District attorney was a dick and upset when the judge said im throwing this out Haha
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2011 | 11:58 PM
  #35  
fcs13's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: so cal
that articles pretty cool, but a 3.5 would only make gains on cars with higher hp right?
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 12:34 PM
  #36  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,479
Likes: 932
From: CA
that articles pretty cool, but a 3.5 would only make gains on cars with higher hp right?

If the car has a turbo there will be gains from the larger exhaust.

An issue with a smaller turbo (I assume what you mean by lower hp car) will be that the gains are so great you will not be able to control the boost creep with the wastegate(s) you have.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 03:22 PM
  #37  
Double_J's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,089
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
While we are on the topic of larger exhaust for performance and possibility of increased decibels does wrapping the downpipe have an audible impact?

I know its for heat management but I was curious if anyone noticed a decrease in sound.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 03:28 PM
  #38  
neit_jnf's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 262
From: Around
I used to have a ceramic coated and thermo wrapped 3" downpipe with twins, it was much quieter than the 4" naked one I have now. But only in the engine bay area.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 03:35 PM
  #39  
allrotor93's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (126)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,703
Likes: 3
From: Cary, NC
I had a 4" all the way back with 2 magnaflow mufflers on my 20b and it was loud as hell. How much power will I lose if I go 4" dp and mp and a 3" racing beat cb? I don't mind upping the boost to make up for the loss if the noise is reduced....

Any thoughts?
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 03:59 PM
  #40  
neit_jnf's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 262
From: Around
why not 4" dp with 3.5" mp and cb? it's what I have from SMB and it's moderately quiet. of course I'm still on stock twins!
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 04:02 PM
  #41  
thewird's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,603
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by neit_jnf
why not 4" dp with 3.5" mp and cb? it's what I have from SMB and it's moderately quiet. of course I'm still on stock twins!
Stock twins themselves act as a fairly good muffler especially in sequential. I remember when I installed the aspec 500r-sp the car got noticbly louder with nothing else changed

thewird
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 04:58 PM
  #42  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
Originally Posted by allrotor93
I had a 4" all the way back with 2 magnaflow mufflers on my 20b and it was loud as hell. How much power will I lose if I go 4" dp and mp and a 3" racing beat cb? I don't mind upping the boost to make up for the loss if the noise is reduced....

Any thoughts?
If you have an open WG, I would be willing to bet it would only cost you 4 % power.
__________________
Rotary Performance Parts


Reply
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 07:04 PM
  #43  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Originally Posted by fcs13
that articles pretty cool, but a 3.5 would only make gains on cars with higher hp right?

The gains where really beneficial above 500rwhp as stated in the article. Also consider this, larger exhaust will lower your spool time even with low rwhp. These are all pluses. Only negative is keeping it quiet the bigger you go.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2011 | 11:18 PM
  #44  
AaronJ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 281
Likes: 2
From: AZ
Originally Posted by t-von
The gains where really beneficial above 500rwhp as stated in the article. Also consider this, larger exhaust will lower your spool time even with low rwhp. These are all pluses. Only negative is keeping it quiet the bigger you go.
True but if you think about it i would assume that a 500whp rotary engine is moving as much air as a 650whp piston engine.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 12:46 AM
  #45  
fcs13's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: so cal
Thanks for all the tips even though this is not my thread. I noticed I have a 4 in dp going to a welded cat which is welded to a 4 in cutoff and that continues to a welded 3.5 in y pipe which leads to a 3 in split exhaust with flowmaster tips. Should I make the y pipe and piping to the tips 3.5 in? Or keep them their respective sizes
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 12:48 AM
  #46  
fcs13's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: so cal
Thanks for all the tips even though this is not my thread. I noticed I have a 4 in dp going to a welded cat which is welded to a 4 in cutoff and that continues to a welded 3.5 in y pipe which leads to a 3 in exhaust with flowmaster tips. Is that a good setup for my 13b-t with full bolt ons and top mount
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 02:25 PM
  #47  
2a+RoN's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,402
Likes: 0
From: chandler, AZ
I run a full 4" exhaust that is actually relatively quiet. The trick was splitting it into dual 3" at the mufflers, which has more cross-sectional area than a single four, while also having a much higher muffled surface area. I built the mufflers and rolled the perf tube myself to ensure as much sound reduction as possible and the end result was better than expected!
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 04:25 PM
  #48  
AaronJ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 281
Likes: 2
From: AZ
Originally Posted by 2a+RoN
I run a full 4" exhaust that is actually relatively quiet. The trick was splitting it into dual 3" at the mufflers, which has more cross-sectional area than a single four, while also having a much higher muffled surface area. I built the mufflers and rolled the perf tube myself to ensure as much sound reduction as possible and the end result was better than expected!
pictures? im very interested plus your a local
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 05:09 PM
  #49  
zaridar's Avatar
35r 13b first gen
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
From: Richland Center WI
Originally Posted by 2a+RoN
I run a full 4" exhaust that is actually relatively quiet. The trick was splitting it into dual 3" at the mufflers, which has more cross-sectional area than a single four, while also having a much higher muffled surface area. I built the mufflers and rolled the perf tube myself to ensure as much sound reduction as possible and the end result was better than expected!
Nice i would also like to see pictures!
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2011 | 01:29 AM
  #50  
thewird's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,603
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
Some more food... This is at ~300 rwhp power levels and it had gains of 15 rwhp going to a 4" from a 3". Can't wait for spring when I get to test my new 4" exhaust

http://www.turbo944.com/bbs/config.c...ames;read=3942

thewird
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:51 AM.