Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Buying a S300SX FMW...0.91 A/R vs. 1.00 A/R turbine housing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-12, 12:43 PM
  #26  
Full Member

 
Full-Race Geoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hey I dont post on here too often, but wanted to give my 2cents. I have limited rotary experience, but the few guys ive worked with they are like any other motor and hate restriction on the turbine side. One friend had a very accomplished 13b road race/drift car, so we tested a twinscroll gt3071R . it had decent response, the engine didnt miss a beat but the WG and turbine housing melted lol. we switched to s300sx and the car gained power spoolup and response everywhere in the powerband. it was a low boost setup but worked extremely well

I agree with your decision to use the .91 a/r on the cupped tip turbine wheel Ive used the 1.00 a/r on occasion and its just a little too lazy. the quicker response on the 0.91 I think is worth it unless you need to run higher boost. We have one person who will try this same turbo on a 0.83 a/r because his 2jzge will not see "Gte" boost levels so they prefer a little quicker spool. We also have had a lot of diesel customers who love this turbo and run a lot of boost on the .83 a/r. last but not least - you get the 6 pad bearing and machining associated with that. on a rotary i'd want all the thrust handling capabilities possible, and there is no journal bearing from any other mfg burlier than this

Originally Posted by 0110-M-P
So the S400SX FMW? That's a big turbo. Post a link in this thread whenever you start that project...I'd like to see one of those stuffed in the FD.
attached is my friend's photos he sent me of the car in progress, s400sx is BIG
Attached Thumbnails Buying a S300SX FMW...0.91 A/R vs. 1.00 A/R turbine housing-s400sx-fd.jpeg  
Old 12-25-12, 01:38 PM
  #27  
Pistion to rotary
iTrader: (2)
 
Grinch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: sioux falls
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any updates on this? Can't decide on this or a persison 6266
Old 12-26-12, 08:36 AM
  #28  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Gilgamesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: hsv al
Posts: 845
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Grinch
Any updates on this? Can't decide on this or a persison 6266
considering i picked up a brand new from a dealer s366 for under 700 shipped..... its a no brainer for me.
Old 12-26-12, 07:18 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
ScorpionT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Arctic Circle
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Grinch
Any updates on this? Can't decide on this or a persison 6266
BW. The quality of the turbos is superior and they stand behind their products.
Old 01-01-13, 10:06 PM
  #30  
Too Many Projects

Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
0110-M-P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Grinch
Any updates on this? Can't decide on this or a persison 6266
No updates yet. I have been out of town the past 2 weeks. I'm probably going to start fitting things up this or next weekend.
Old 02-09-13, 02:52 PM
  #31  
Junior Member

 
bdarepat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Waterlooville UK
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any update on this?

The reason I am asking is that I am pretty close to ordering an S300SX FMW myself, but facts about its performance in the real world seem hard to find.
Old 02-28-13, 12:38 PM
  #32  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (21)
 
ArmenMAxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,599
Received 47 Likes on 26 Posts
I am curious how the s300x compares to a journal bearing TD61x as far as response and power potential. I think that power should be pretty much the same, but I am super curious about the response.

These two turbos seem to be the new "celebrities" as everyone is talking about them.
Old 03-03-13, 12:43 AM
  #33  
Instrument Of G0D.


iTrader: (1)
 
WANKfactor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: omnipresent
Posts: 1,540
Received 963 Likes on 727 Posts
Im keen to see how you go too.
Old 03-14-13, 07:41 AM
  #34  
Too Many Projects

Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
0110-M-P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
So I FINALLY started my build thread. I still need some components, but I should at least have the FD pulled in the garage to start initial fitment soon.

https://www.rx7club.com/build-thread...2-1-a-1029178/
Old 08-05-13, 02:11 AM
  #35  
Junior Member

 
bdarepat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Waterlooville UK
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Due to my prolonged wait in a queue for BW to produce some decent quantities of their EFR 8374 turbos and the almost total lack of solid performance figures for them produced on 13B motors atm, I have also purchased an S300SX FMW in the above configuration instead.

Do I sound a little frustrated?

Probably.
Old 08-05-13, 02:46 AM
  #36  
Full Member
 
wangracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
^^^ Was waiting on the EFR7670 myself. Would be a year now. Was over Full Race lack of feedback and ability to honour a delivery date so have grabbed a TDX61R ball bearing unit from Elliot at Turblown with his new twin 11 blade billet comp wheel. Just waiting on completing my build to fit it.
Old 08-07-13, 02:51 PM
  #37  
Full Member

 
Full-Race Geoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
with regards to rotary 13B applications - the S300SX FMW is a great match. Everything that makes the standard S300 turbos good is improved, one of the better journal bearing turbos on the market - especially for the 75lb flow rate (gt35R, pt62, etc). The cupped tip turbine wheel and housing options are high flowing which compliments these engines. Weve had great feedback since this turbo came out last year, a lot of people requesting a larger S300SX fmw with 80lb/hr flow rate, so that is coming from BW next. fortunately they CAN ship those..


Originally Posted by bdarepat
Due to my prolonged wait in a queue for BW to produce some decent quantities of their EFR 8374 turbos and the almost total lack of solid performance figures for them produced on 13B motors atm, I have also purchased an S300SX FMW in the above configuration instead. Do I sound a little frustrated? Probably.

Originally Posted by wangracing
^^^ Was waiting on the EFR7670 myself. Would be a year now. Was over Full Race lack of feedback and ability to honour a delivery date so have grabbed a TDX61R ball bearing unit from Elliot at Turblown with his new twin 11 blade billet comp wheel. Just waiting on completing my build to fit it.
sorry youve both been frustrated with BorgWarner, you are not alone.. nobody expected it could take this long to get their act together.. we are receiving some 8374's and 9180's again but for how long I do not know.

wangracing - Still no 7670's, but if youre looking at a 61mm turbo that is 8374 size and we are seeing them with more consistency than some of the other models
Old 08-08-13, 02:55 PM
  #38  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
chohakai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Geoff,

Great to see you pitching in. Howard Coleman insisted that the EFR turbine wheels are not heat resistant enough for the rotary heat, which could be over 1700 degrees, while those wheels are rated to 1600 or so.

Can you confirm that? If that's the case then the S300SX FMW is the way to go over the EFR 8374's anyways. They are very similar, except EFR's cost more and are ball bearing, and should be more responsive due to the exotic meterial and lightweight exhaust wheel, correct?

Thanks!


Originally Posted by Full-Race Geoff
with regards to rotary 13B applications - the S300SX FMW is a great match. Everything that makes the standard S300 turbos good is improved, one of the better journal bearing turbos on the market - especially for the 75lb flow rate (gt35R, pt62, etc). The cupped tip turbine wheel and housing options are high flowing which compliments these engines. Weve had great feedback since this turbo came out last year, a lot of people requesting a larger S300SX fmw with 80lb/hr flow rate, so that is coming from BW next. fortunately they CAN ship those..



sorry youve both been frustrated with BorgWarner, you are not alone.. nobody expected it could take this long to get their act together.. we are receiving some 8374's and 9180's again but for how long I do not know.

wangracing - Still no 7670's, but if youre looking at a 61mm turbo that is 8374 size and we are seeing them with more consistency than some of the other models
Old 08-09-13, 04:37 AM
  #39  
Junior Member

 
bdarepat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Waterlooville UK
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chohakai
Geoff,

Great to see you pitching in. Howard Coleman insisted that the EFR turbine wheels are not heat resistant enough for the rotary heat, which could be over 1700 degrees, while those wheels are rated to 1600 or so.

Can you confirm that? If that's the case then the S300SX FMW is the way to go over the EFR 8374's anyways. They are very similar, except EFR's cost more and are ball bearing, and should be more responsive due to the exotic meterial and lightweight exhaust wheel, correct?

Thanks!
I recently posed the EFR Ti turbine temperature range question to Turbo Dynamics Limited, the UK BW distributor. Their response was as follows:-

'Hi Mike,
This is what BW say – “950C is the rated max for the Ti wheel. That being said, we have a diesel drag race truck that is running somewhere north of that figure. I recall it being at appx 1100C for a period of about 6-7 seconds.”
Not an overly clear answer, but gives you an idea.
Kind regards,
Tom Russell
Turbo Dynamics Limited'
Old 08-09-13, 08:09 AM
  #40  
Racing Rotary Since 1983

iTrader: (6)
 
Howard Coleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hiawassee, Georgia
Posts: 6,093
Received 512 Likes on 287 Posts
"Howard Coleman insisted that the EFR turbine wheels are not heat resistant enough for the rotary heat"

that is not what i said.

i am considering an EFR 9180 for my Texas Mile event. i have a contact who is part of the developmental process at BW-USA.

i was informed that the EFR hotside is questionable at 1650 F (890 C) and above.

if this is accurate, and it comes from BW, this may or may not rule out the EFR line for many rotaries.

i found, during the 10 years i raced and built full tilt piston motors that 1322 F produced the best power. rotaries are more like 1500 to 1800 F.

during a 5 year period (04-09) when i was dynoing w 93 pump and approx 1200 cc of meth my EGTs topped out around 1750 at 8000.

after more than doubling the meth my EGTs were stable at 1550 F.

i don't have any data on E85 ATM but i expect that EGTs will be low. my car is now converted to a Flex Fuel config and should be on the dyno and generating the E85 EGT data i need. if the EGTs are below 1650 i will be lobbying BW for a 9180 as it has an awesome compressor map.

i am aware that there are some EFR turbos in rotary service currently and am only sharing info that might prove helpful. if you are running w gas as base fuel and a typical 50/50 WM AI i would be cautious w re to the EFR turbo line.

i am merely passing on info from a source which i consider to be solid.

howard

Last edited by Howard Coleman; 08-09-13 at 08:24 AM.
Old 08-09-13, 01:04 PM
  #41  
Full Member

 
Full-Race Geoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes - there is no question that if you plan to over-heat or over-speed your turbo, the EFR is not going to take abuse like an old school inconel turbine.. HOWEVER if you can properly size a turbo to your engine (not overspeed) and tune it right - there is no reason exhaust should be >950C.

to the guy asking about a EFR7670, i think that is too small for a 13B.

**Its also important to mention a twinscroll "divided" turbo manifold/turbine housing will typically have lower EGT and higher deltaP than a 'singlescroll undivided' manifold
Old 08-09-13, 02:07 PM
  #42  
Full Member

 
Full-Race Geoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
*replace >1650 with >950C

(i cant edit that post for some reason)

Last edited by Full-Race Geoff; 08-09-13 at 02:11 PM. Reason: hmm
Old 08-09-13, 02:17 PM
  #43  
Racing Rotary Since 1983

iTrader: (6)
 
Howard Coleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hiawassee, Georgia
Posts: 6,093
Received 512 Likes on 287 Posts
from "the efr god" at BW;


"950C should be communicated as the limit.

1742F

shaft speed should not exceed the top RPM line on each comp map."

this is a different (higher) number than i was previously advised and does open the EFR line to most rotary apps. i will edit the EFR thread.

howard
Old 08-22-13, 03:46 PM
  #44  
Instrument Of G0D.


iTrader: (1)
 
WANKfactor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: omnipresent
Posts: 1,540
Received 963 Likes on 727 Posts
Originally Posted by 0110-M-P
Got the turbo in a couple of weeks ago. Figured I would snap a few pics and post them here before I really got to work on the car...







Is that the flat tip or the cupped tip? Im looking at getting an FMW as well, with the same goals as you described in the 1st post; 400+ rwhp and as much response and mid-range as possible.
Im tossing up between .91 and 1.00, "cupped" tip or "flat"
The Full race website states that the cupped tip is for max flow, the flat tip is for max spool - I was wondering how a .91 cupped would compare to a 1.00 flat?
Anyway, i'll be watching this thread with great interest!
Cheers and beers!
Old 10-02-13, 01:11 PM
  #45  
Junior Member

 
trinirx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: trinidad
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
whats the max whp on the s362sx fmw on a 13b?
Old 10-02-13, 04:06 PM
  #46  
Built Not Bought

iTrader: (14)
 
TwinCharged RX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 4,228
Likes: 0
Received 840 Likes on 529 Posts
5 million
Old 10-02-13, 05:20 PM
  #47  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
chohakai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by trinirx
whats the max whp on the s362sx fmw on a 13b?
It's probably the ideal turbo with great response for someone going for 450WHP to 500WHP on a 13B, at reasonable boost levels, say 20 psi or so, so it's steetable/trackable and not just for drag.
Old 10-06-13, 06:30 PM
  #48  
Junior Member

 
eliminster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: ft benning
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To everyone having questions about the efrs and rotaries ask speed junkie about his. He is running the 7670 on his car and having no problems so far and he does drive his car pretty hard to include a cross the country trip in it.
Old 10-07-13, 02:36 PM
  #49  
Full Member

 
Full-Race Geoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by eliminster
To everyone having questions about the efrs and rotaries ask speed junkie about his. He is running the 7670 on his car and having no problems so far and he does drive his car pretty hard to include a cross the country trip in it.
is there a thread on this? Would love to see

Originally Posted by nikko13b
Is that the flat tip or the cupped tip? Im looking at getting an FMW as well, with the same goals as you described in the 1st post; 400+ rwhp and as much response and mid-range as possible. Im tossing up between .91 and 1.00, "cupped" tip or "flat" The Full race website states that the cupped tip is for max flow, the flat tip is for max spool - I was wondering how a .91 cupped would compare to a 1.00 flat?
Rotary engines benefit from free flowing hotsides, combine that with the fact that these are twinscroll setups theres really no reason to use flat tip for a 13B. Based on experience, I'd recommend cupped tip and .91 for up to 23psi, 1.00 for 24-28psi and 1.10 for 29+ max boost levels.

Originally Posted by chohakai
It's probably the ideal turbo with great response for someone going for 450WHP to 500WHP on a 13B, at reasonable boost levels, say 20 psi or so, so it's steetable/trackable and not just for drag.
that is the idea behind the S300SX FMW, a 450-550whp turbo that fits a broad spectrum of cars with great durability and turbine housing selection, excellent response, good value.

for the drag racers the s400sx fmw would be the call, with a high flowing 4" downpipe
Old 10-07-13, 02:40 PM
  #50  
Junior Member

 
eliminster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: ft benning
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Full-Race Geoff
is there a thread on this? Would love to see

Rotary engines benefit from free flowing hotsides, combine that with the fact that these are twinscroll setups theres really no reason to use flat tip for a 13B. Based on experience, I'd recommend cupped tip and .91 for up to 23psi, 1.00 for 24-28psi and 1.10 for 29+ max boost levels.

that is the idea behind the S300SX FMW, a 450-550whp turbo that fits a broad spectrum of cars with great durability and turbine housing selection, excellent response, good value.

for the drag racers the s400sx fmw would be the call, with a high flowing 4" downpipe
His thread is under the single turbo section labeled EFR 7640 he also has a complete build thread on the Cmzc forum which entails his entire build. Would get an efr myself just don't have the money for it.


Quick Reply: Buying a S300SX FMW...0.91 A/R vs. 1.00 A/R turbine housing



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 AM.