Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Aspec GT35/40 Drool shots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 7, 2003 | 10:22 AM
  #26  
enzo250's Avatar
IRS Champion
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 1
From: NY
Well im sorry to say but it looks like the fabricator is taking the easy way out to save time and money so that these manifolds could be mass produced cheaply
Old Jul 7, 2003 | 11:00 AM
  #27  
H2o's Avatar
H2o
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: USA!
It seems like alot of you guys fail to realize that shops that make parts for our cars (M2,A-spec, Pettit) dont have milliions of dollars to dump on equipment to make the absolute best manifold or parts for our car.. they try there best with the skills and equipment availible to them.. Our cars are a dying market, theres always gonna be some haters no mattter what... if a shop puts a alot of R&D, time or pricy material the customer wont pay it and will say "why is so expensive?" " i could get it cheaper"...blah,blah,blah

soon with all the constant bitching out there no one will make "custom" parts and shops will go out of business (M2,pettit,Rp,A-spec,SRX7.com)


Mikey D.

Originally posted by enzo250
Well im sorry to say but it looks like the fabricator is taking the easy way out to save time and money so that these manifolds could be mass produced cheaply
Old Jul 7, 2003 | 11:02 AM
  #28  
20B Junkie's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Originally posted by Badog
Yes, I have a keyboard and can say anything I want too.
What its not true?

Originally posted by AJC13B
That turbo won't make the power. It will make over 500rwhp, but won't go to 600

And I would get a Haltech before the Apexi
This is taken from the 600+RWHP thread on page two. AJC13B was saying how the GT35/40 won't make 600RWHP.

Last edited by 20B Junkie; Jul 7, 2003 at 11:10 AM.
Old Jul 7, 2003 | 12:38 PM
  #29  
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 0
From: l.a.
Originally posted by H2o
It seems like alot of you guys fail to realize that shops that make parts for our cars (M2,A-spec, Pettit) dont have milliions of dollars to dump on equipment to make the absolute best manifold or parts for our car.. they try there best with the skills and equipment availible to them.. Our cars are a dying market, theres always gonna be some haters no mattter what... if a shop puts a alot of R&D, time or pricy material the customer wont pay it and will say "why is so expensive?" " i could get it cheaper"...blah,blah,blah

soon with all the constant bitching out there no one will make "custom" parts and shops will go out of business (M2,pettit,Rp,A-spec,SRX7.com)


Mikey D.
it won't take millions of dollars to fix this particular problem. a simple redesign of the manifold can completely alleviate the problem. even a-spec themselves have acknowledged the problem and are willing to fix it. i don't even know why you bring this subject up, no one has ever asked any shops to spend millions of dollars on r&d and then sell their product at rock bottom prices. i don't see anyone "bitching" as you say, they just want the manifold to be better, which i gather it will be soon. as for rotary shops going out of business, that's unlikely, but if they do, then oh well. if there's no market for it then there's no market for it. it's not up to the consumer to artificially prop them up by paying exorbitant prices for inferior products.
Old Jul 7, 2003 | 04:37 PM
  #30  
CCarlisi's Avatar
Rebreaking things
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
From: 1 foot in Boston 1 in NJ
You can always get a shop to produce a one off mani. Getting the next cutting edge plug and play ECU might be more difficult at this stage in the car's life. However, the FD is not that old from a global standpoint. In Japan they stopped producing it just last year. So even if the us shops move on there will be plenty of off shore shops that still cater to the FD.

The craftmanship of the A-spec kit looks very nice. I'm sure v2 will be a good buy.

Last edited by CCarlisi; Jul 7, 2003 at 04:40 PM.
Old Jul 7, 2003 | 11:05 PM
  #31  
A-Spec Tuning's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
As was stated above in earlier posts all the above is going to be addressed. I one need to get caught up on previous orders, and two need to clean out the material I have already in stock for the current setup, but at the same time I don't think there are too many people out there complaining about the performance of the current setup either, and thanks for the complements on the welds, 30+ yrs exp, you should see what my welder can do when he feels a little creative.

Thanks,Sean
Old Jul 7, 2003 | 11:39 PM
  #32  
RICE RACING's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,306
Likes: 1
From: lebanon
Sorry to say it but thats a ***** "designed" manifold !

Mass production and a quick buck have a lot to answer for

Nice welds and good spec material don't mean much when the manifold design is crap ! As far as a 700bhp capable turbo please don't go telling/selling customers this or you will end up in court

A totally non related question can someone please post a 500rwhp or greater SAE dyno graph of this kit on a 13B, we have been waiting forever for this with not even a hint of a responce from anyone who runs this kit ? Surley this is possible given the power potential of the turbo ? maybe A-spec can source one for us ?
Old Jul 8, 2003 | 04:36 PM
  #33  
Badog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
From: Bannished
Originally posted by RICE RACING
Sorry to say it but thats a ***** "designed" manifold !

Mass production and a quick buck have a lot to answer for

Nice welds and good spec material don't mean much when the manifold design is crap ! As far as a 700bhp capable turbo please don't go telling/selling customers this or you will end up in court

A totally non related question can someone please post a 500rwhp or greater SAE dyno graph of this kit on a 13B, we have been waiting forever for this with not even a hint of a responce from anyone who runs this kit ? Surley this is possible given the power potential of the turbo ? maybe A-spec can source one for us ?
Rice,

If you want to see a dyno chart....go post a thread on it, man! Are you daft, burying the request in a thread? No wonder no one has heard you!

Glad you have a opinion on this. Opinions are like bungs, everyone has one. Thanks for sharing. But I think yours stinks!

Regards,

Tony


Last edited by Badog; Jul 8, 2003 at 04:40 PM.
Old Jul 8, 2003 | 07:49 PM
  #34  
RICE RACING's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,306
Likes: 1
From: lebanon
Originally posted by Badog
Rice,

If you want to see a dyno chart....go post a thread on it, man! Are you daft, burying the request in a thread? No wonder no one has heard you!

Glad you have a opinion on this. Opinions are like bungs, everyone has one. Thanks for sharing. But I think yours stinks!

Regards,

Tony

Tony

Same feelings here bro, just read the comments of other "experienced" people who make manifolds I guess all those bungs stink too ?

Beautifull manufacture no doubt ! design leaves allot to be desired ! Cant take it, don't post

Regarding the RWHP figures, who better to ask than the people who sell the kit ! , this question has been asked MANY MANY times and every excuse under the sun has been offered with no real reputable results to back up the advertised claims, so on behalf of all forum readers I am asking a totally valid question. This unit is advertised as a 700bhp turbo then why have we NEVER seen a SAE sheet for 500rwhp (or more?) on a 13B runing turbo only ?

Valid questions and comments bro, none without basis, its clear for all to see
Old Jul 8, 2003 | 08:02 PM
  #35  
Maxthe7man's Avatar
Freedoms worth a buck o'5
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 1
From: Calgary Alberta Canada
If the Turbine numbers are right that I have for that turbo, I would have to say that on a 13b there is not enough flow on the exhaust side for those kind of numbers, especially with T3 style inlet flange...Max
Old Jul 8, 2003 | 08:30 PM
  #36  
Carl Byck's Avatar
Mad Man
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 2
From: Big Island Hawaii
Max is a smart man in need of glasses
Old Jul 8, 2003 | 10:48 PM
  #37  
A-Spec Tuning's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally posted by RICE RACING
Tony

Same feelings here bro, just read the comments of other "experienced" people who make manifolds I guess all those bungs stink too ?

Beautifull manufacture no doubt ! design leaves allot to be desired ! Cant take it, don't post

Regarding the RWHP figures, who better to ask than the people who sell the kit ! , this question has been asked MANY MANY times and every excuse under the sun has been offered with no real reputable results to back up the advertised claims, so on behalf of all forum readers I am asking a totally valid question. This unit is advertised as a 700bhp turbo then why have we NEVER seen a SAE sheet for 500rwhp (or more?) on a 13B runing turbo only ?

Valid questions and comments bro, none without basis, its clear for all to see


I would like to know where you keep getting this from, as if I have been misleading people or something, it gets pretty tiring hearing it; nowhere have I ever told people this was a 700hp kit. I have never advertised this.This kit that everybody else seems to be advertising on there sites, isn't even advertised on mine. What I have told people that have called the shop is that garret rates the turbo at 650hp, that there numbers are usually conservative, and that those ratings would be based on a piston motor you will see less on a rotary,I have then gone on to say you should see around 410-20rwhp on stock ports, and 430-40 on a streetported motor at about 15lbs and that you should see that at around 3400 rpms. That the turbo is eff. up to 29lbs and then will start to generate heat. I have said those lines again and again and again. Please do not put words into my mouth or imply that those are my words.If you don't like what you see, cool, thats your opinion and your free to voice it but what you are not free to do is accuse me a misleading people when I never have.

-Sean

Last edited by A-Spec Tuning; Jul 8, 2003 at 10:50 PM.
Old Jul 8, 2003 | 10:58 PM
  #38  
Poweraxel's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
From: In the Sky
Rice Racing seems to be a hater on anything he doesnt like... theres been numerous dynos on the GT3540 over 400+rwhp by normal everyday people....
the ratio of people running bigger turbos to the small percentage of people running GT35/40's is huge and a decent percentage of those people running bigger turbos cant get 500rwhp or even 400rwhp.... oh well
Old Jul 8, 2003 | 11:03 PM
  #39  
RICE RACING's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,306
Likes: 1
From: lebanon
Sean

I am glad you went to the effort to clarify your companies view point. I was not putting words in your mouth, I was asking for what I asked for.
There is MANY a claim on this board that this turbo easily supports 500rwhp (or even more) on a 13B rotary and to date NO ONE has ever seen a sheet to validate this claim.

Have you ever seen one ?
Old Jul 8, 2003 | 11:08 PM
  #40  
RICE RACING's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,306
Likes: 1
From: lebanon
Originally posted by Poweraxel
Rice Racing seems to be a hater on anything he doesnt like... theres been numerous dynos on the GT3540 over 400+rwhp by normal everyday people....
the ratio of people running bigger turbos to the small percentage of people running GT35/40's is huge and a decent percentage of those people running bigger turbos cant get 500rwhp or even 400rwhp.... oh well
Not hating. Your "seems" is totally wrong !

Just want to see something to back up the claims ? To date there has never been anything approaching the claims by a LONG WAY.

Call it hate if you wish to taint it that way, I see it as wanting to know what the product actually does on our cars, there is a BIG difference there
Old Jul 8, 2003 | 11:16 PM
  #41  
Badog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
From: Bannished
Originally posted by RICE RACING
Tony

Same feelings here bro, just read the comments of other "experienced" people who make manifolds I guess all those bungs stink too ?

Beautifull manufacture no doubt ! design leaves allot to be desired ! Cant take it, don't post

Regarding the RWHP figures, who better to ask than the people who sell the kit ! , this question has been asked MANY MANY times and every excuse under the sun has been offered with no real reputable results to back up the advertised claims, so on behalf of all forum readers I am asking a totally valid question. This unit is advertised as a 700bhp turbo then why have we NEVER seen a SAE sheet for 500rwhp (or more?) on a 13B runing turbo only ?

Valid questions and comments bro, none without basis, its clear for all to see
Dude,

I respect what you and some others have been through...and doing. I just think you're all bogus for hating based on 0 experience with this setup!

As to why there have not been posts on the sheets, I don't know. For most cases most could give a sheet on what you want to see or not. I imagine most people are happy with what they have and they go from there. I know what I have tuned for and seen on GT35/40s, and you are all wet, bro! Since they are not from my car or my dyno sheets to distribute, I'll just wait until mine is ready, okay?

When I post my dyno sheet, you can continue hating on that thread too, okay?

Regards,

Tony K.
Old Jul 8, 2003 | 11:18 PM
  #42  
Poweraxel's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
From: In the Sky
if i remember corrrectly there has been dyno sheets posted with people over 450 rwhp at 15-16 psi... "Ihor" "nocab" (if i remember right) put down over 475 rwhp at 15-16psi on his car.. hes a normal everyday person who put his car together... if you put this turbo with a good tuner (peter farell,Cameron Worth,Ray lockhead, Chris ott,etc...) 500rwhp doesnt seem to be unitainible..

instead of always doubting it lets find ways for all of us to get 500rwhp from this turbo for all of us to learn

Greddy and HKS make huge claims on there T-78,T-88,T04R,T51R-Kai turbos but most of us know its not achieveable on a 13B but on a Supra, thats a different story!
Old Jul 8, 2003 | 11:22 PM
  #43  
RICE RACING's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,306
Likes: 1
From: lebanon
Tony Tony Tony, you and others continue to use the word "hate" don't portray yourself as a victim, that's weak !

Post the sheet

That's all I ask, back the claim or dont make the claim ............ simple
Old Jul 8, 2003 | 11:29 PM
  #44  
Badog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
From: Bannished
Let me re-cap, for the sake of this thread, that I had the pleasure of being involved in the tuning for the following singles:
T78, GT35/40, T78 (upgraded compressor wheel), XS To4s, XS To4r, Rx-6

Of that list, I would choose a Aspec GT35/40 for my kit. I was pulled towards the upgraded T78, but I don't like the non-bb lag for my goals: 500RWHP under 20psi boost.

Will it be my last turbo? Probably not. But it will be on one of my daily drivers that will see all kinds of track and cruise time.

Regards
Old Jul 8, 2003 | 11:34 PM
  #45  
Badog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
From: Bannished
Originally posted by RICE RACING
Tony Tony Tony, you and others continue to use the word "hate" don't portray yourself as a victim, that's weak !

Post the sheet

That's all I ask, back the claim or dont make the claim ............ simple
I think that group was called Tony, Toni, Tone, actually!

Wake up! Smell the thread again! What claim did I make? It's all there. I promise I didn't delete it.

I'm not a victim. But you're coming in with some serious baggage, bro. Take a step back a take a look.

My goal is still 500RWHP at under 20psi. I exceed my goals in most cases.

Now that I said that you can kick back in your upside-down rocking chair (you are down under after-all) and wait. You're not adding anything on this thread. So shhh!

Regards,

Toeknee
Old Jul 8, 2003 | 11:43 PM
  #46  
RICE RACING's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,306
Likes: 1
From: lebanon
Originally posted by Badog

My goal is still 500RWHP at under 20psi. I exceed my goals in most cases.

Good luck, I hope you make it, till then its a pipe dream and I will treat it as such

Offended, badluck Post a sheet and prove me wrong if that makes you happy

In relation to the thread, that manifold is POOR in design, my opinion or not it sucks *** ! It is made from nice material and well fabricated but thats it !

My 2 cents worth
Old Jul 8, 2003 | 11:44 PM
  #47  
Badog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
From: Bannished
Will do. Next time I am down your way, I'll make a point of making you buy me an ale over it.

Last edited by Badog; Jul 8, 2003 at 11:47 PM.
Old Jul 8, 2003 | 11:47 PM
  #48  
Marshall's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
From: Edwards, CA
Originally posted by Poweraxel
if i remember corrrectly there has been dyno sheets posted with people over 450 rwhp at 15-16 psi... "Ihor" "nocab" (if i remember right) put down over 475 rwhp at 15-16psi on his car.. hes a normal everyday person who put his car together...
Any links to that dyno? This was the only 15-16 psi pull from Ihor I could find: https://www.rx7club.com/forum/attach...&postid=990150 Note the numbers are STD corrected, an SAE correction would knock them down to 415-ish. Does anybody have an SAE corrected dyno of over 450 rwhp at 15 psi on a street/race port (non bridge or peripheral) engine?
Old Jul 8, 2003 | 11:52 PM
  #49  
RICE RACING's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,306
Likes: 1
From: lebanon
Originally posted by Badog
Will do. Next time I am down your way, I'll make a point of making you buy me an ale over it.
Mate, I will buy you a "slab of ****" if you do it (your goal) and post it to you
Old Jul 8, 2003 | 11:53 PM
  #50  
Marshall's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
From: Edwards, CA
Peter,
Can you explain why that mani "sucks ***"? Is it because the runners turn too soon after the exhaust port? Is it because of the fairly sharp angle betwen the runners and the turbo flange? What about the wastegate pipe -would it help if it were angled into the exhaust flow direction? Any idea what type of gains one might see with a corrected version?
thanks!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 AM.