Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

8 months and counting with no blowoff valve

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-13, 09:15 PM
  #251  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
seandizzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: fwb.florida
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by strang3majik

Plus, lets not forget the back pressure in the exhaust playing a part. In the exhaust manifold before the turbine, there's usually double, sometimes more, pressure than the boost level your running at (thats why backpressure isn't a problem in turbo cars, and large exhaust is best).


There is no pressure on the turbine when you let out of the throttle...
Old 01-05-13, 11:56 PM
  #252  
Full Member

iTrader: (1)
 
strang3majik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hanover, PA
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Turbo II Rotor
Most ignorant post I've read all day.
Please elaborate. Until then. Likewise.


Originally Posted by seandizzie
There is no pressure on the turbine when you let out of the throttle...
Pressurized exhaust gases in the exhaust manifold simply vanish once the throttle plate is closed?

Exhaust manifold pressures are often in excess of 30 or more psi. Evacuating a pressurized exhaust manifold of its contents over the turbine is no different than whats happening on the compressor side.

When the throttle plate is closed the pressure is not sustained, correct, but its still following the path of least resistance. Over the exhaust wheel. While on the compressor side, compressed air is following the path of least resistance, over the compressor wheel. Due to the pitch of the compressor wheel, it is in turn putting an opposite force than the exhaust side. At the same time.

Draw.
Old 01-06-13, 03:00 PM
  #253  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
seandizzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: fwb.florida
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
hmm... the compressor is creating the pressure and the turbine is being driven by the exhaust port. No throttle= No exhaust flow= no pressure on the exhaust side. The compressor is still spinning( pumping) and flow has gone to 0 so it goes into surge ( as seen on the compressor map and the fluttery noise happens) but since the turbine is not being driven it's not the dangerous type.

So yes it is different. As the Compressor is pumping and the turbine is being pumped
Old 01-06-13, 05:31 PM
  #254  
Junior Member
 
TheROVER's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: north carolina
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking conquest with no BOV

Originally Posted by strang3majik
1983-1989 Mitsubishi Starions/Chrysler Conquests did not have BOV or BPV. Vehicles driven hard experienced turbo failures in under 50k miles. Very seldom does one get over 100k out of a stock turbo with no BOV on those cars. This was in the early age of turbos on street cars. It was an experimental stage and much was learned from mistakes.

And that being said, I installed one on my completely stock car and noticed a significant difference. Without a BOV, that car had horrible compressor surge. I'd lay back into after every gear and it would need to spool back up every time.


After installing the BOV, it hit full boost almost instantly once I layed back into it.



Turbos spin well in excess of 15k rpms...some much much higher. When there's no BOV/BPV, air finds the path with the least resistance, and thats back the way it came, or popping a hose off. When it goes back over the blades, depending on boost levels and compressor speeds, I've seen cases of compressor blades actually bending. You're taking something from spinning at 15k rpms to a halt almost instantly.

With a BOV you're giving that compressed air somewhere to go, therefore its not forcing the turbine to a stop allowing it to more or less free wheel until the next gear gets it back to its full rpm or until it gets down to its idle speed as you shut down after a run.

Yes it evacuates all the air out of the system, but the turbo remains spooled, therefore will make boost as soon as the throttle plate allows air through the engine and out the exhaust. Without a BOV your also taking all the air out of the system, but now your stopping the turbine so it has to rebuild its RPM damn near completely.

Plus, lets not forget the back pressure in the exhaust playing a part. In the exhaust manifold before the turbine, there's usually double, sometimes more, pressure than the boost level your running at (thats why backpressure isn't a problem in turbo cars, and large exhaust is best). Now thats trying to continue on its journey outward while the air on the compressor side is also trying the same. Therefore the compressor stall, or surge since they're forcing it in opposite directions...also causing severe heat.


And BOV/BPV serve no real emissions purpose. Car companies don't put them on for nothing.
They install BPV/BOV from the factory because they don't want to have to replace turbos under warranty. A penny spent now is a dollar saved later.


Running without a BOV is no different than shutting your car off everytime after a run without letting it cool down. There's no instant effect (usually), but overtime the effects are obvious. But just like this topic, many swear with modern turbos you don't have to let it cool down.


Kinda like double clutching versus shoving it in reverse and dumping the clutch between every gear.
They make setups for some cars now that cut timing so you can stay full throttle between shifts and it limits your revs to keep the turbo spooled fully.

Thats the best way to go.
What your talking about wasnt a turbo issue, Its a 2.6L long stroke truck engine issue. Granted the Conquest is arguably on of the sexiest cars made but like alot of sexy things it comes with a SHT TON of diseases( jet valves, 2 injectors, 6.5 ton flywheel, a head that water wont even flow thru, just to name a few plus the fact it had the sweetest electrical/computer ever) Its like a sexy azz woman, you know shes a ***** and is laden with disease and problems but damn she looks good. Trust me no BOV was the very very very least of your problems. Jesus himself wouldnt waste the miracle required to make that 2.6 run properly furthermore run fast. Good tranny and clutch is all you need if your man enuff you can shift so fast is doesnt matter,,,,,,,,,,,,well unless its a 2.6 conquest,,,, but a cherry picker will solve alot wrong with the car.
Old 01-06-13, 05:37 PM
  #255  
Junior Member
 
TheROVER's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: north carolina
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh and double clutching,,,,,,,,,,someones been watching fast and the furious again.
Old 01-06-13, 05:39 PM
  #256  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (8)
 
thewird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 6,591
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by TheROVER
Oh and double clutching,,,,,,,,,,someones been watching fast and the furious again.


thewird
Old 01-06-13, 05:51 PM
  #257  
Junior Member
 
TheROVER's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: north carolina
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
You won't get a 'rash of ****' for being a DSM guy, but you will get laughed at mercilessly for saying absolutely retarded crap like the above.
Its ok to be laughed at on the forum, But havent had any laughing after pulling up side on of these ole dsms, lol
Old 01-08-13, 06:16 PM
  #258  
Full Member

iTrader: (1)
 
strang3majik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hanover, PA
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TheROVER
Oh and double clutching,,,,,,,,,,someones been watching fast and the furious again.
Lol...was hoping someone got that reference.



Because double clutching a trans with synchros is neccesary



And guys, I've called every autoparts store and no one can get me rod bearings for my RX7
Old 01-09-13, 07:49 PM
  #259  
'downgrading to upgrade..
iTrader: (11)
 
sclas90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I might have some...
Old 01-10-13, 10:21 AM
  #260  
Junior Member
 
TheROVER's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: north carolina
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by thewird


thewird
Thats ok, if you beat me with all those extra gears ill just pull up beside you,,,,,,,unscrew my noooohs(nitrous),,,,,,,,,,,push in my cig lighter,,,,,,,,,,,,,,and BOOM blow your car to hell since its so very flamable.... lol those movies are a hoot.
Old 01-23-13, 05:24 PM
  #261  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (52)
 
XLR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,902
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Reworking my engine bay this winter.... Plan to run 25psi with preturbo on my new BB TD61. SERIOUSLY considering ditching my Tial 50mm.

We shall see....
Old 02-23-13, 12:34 PM
  #262  
Junior Member

 
Beezy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: south UK
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
haha love this thread, just goes to show there are so many paranoid people out there.

Back in the 80s all the turbo F1 cars running 50+psi never used shitty BOV's
Old 02-23-13, 01:52 PM
  #263  
35r 13b first gen

iTrader: (3)
 
zaridar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Richland Center WI
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the main function of a BOV isnt necesaarily safety of the turbo.. (which I feel having a BOV will help prolong turbo life)...but moreso to minimize "lag" if you will, between gears and in ,on,off, and on thottle again, instances...

By releasing excess boost pressure the turbo keeps spinning at higher speeds...ie.. Ready to start building boost as soon as throttle is reapplied..... If not released pressure slows/stops the turbo when the throttle is closed..thus taking longer to get back up to boosting speeds when the throttle is reapplied... My 2 cents
Old 02-24-13, 08:23 AM
  #264  
Senior Member

 
13bdarren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zaridar
I think the main function of a BOV isnt necesaarily safety of the turbo.. (which I feel having a BOV will help prolong turbo life)...but moreso to minimize "lag" if you will, between gears and in ,on,off, and on thottle again, instances...

By releasing excess boost pressure the turbo keeps spinning at higher speeds...ie.. Ready to start building boost as soon as throttle is reapplied..... If not released pressure slows/stops the turbo when the throttle is closed..thus taking longer to get back up to boosting speeds when the throttle is reapplied... My 2 cents
If your can look at datalogs you will see the opposite happens. Cause the pressure cannot leave fast enough when you close the throttle it is still there when you get back on it. I will try to find pic of my datalogs. Only way to see the shifts is by the tps has the boost does not drop. I have not run a bov for years. I have had to many issues with them leaking and causing drivability issues. I have yet to damage any turbos or any sign of premature wear.
Old 02-24-13, 09:31 AM
  #265  
Senior Member

iTrader: (5)
 
killalot13601's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
How much money do you think that it costs to produce a bov?
Lets just say 10 dollars because I do not know.
Now lets produce one for every Dodge SRT-4 (25,000).
$250,000.


Why do manufacturers spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on parts they don't need?
Its easy, they don't.

I do agree that for a course of a few years the wear does not begin to show itself.
Old 02-24-13, 05:05 PM
  #266  
Senior Member

 
13bdarren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dodge does it for the sound lol. And for the very same reason as all the replies in these post. Some people think it need to be because that is what people tell them. So bottom line is do what you want in your own car. The title of the post was just saying his results of not running one. Not saying to throw them out. I shared my results.
Old 02-24-13, 06:23 PM
  #267  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
they produce and install them for the people who do not want to hear the compressor surge on factory cars. it's purpose is to minimize noise and not enhance it like the aftermarket blow off valves.

you may be surprised at what people will complain about when they buy a brand new car and shell out over $30k for it will be bothered by.

why do some diesels not come with anti surge turbo housings also? because they are quieter. yet you see people in modded up trucks "whistling" happily down the street. aftermarket these are attention getter devices, so that people know you have a turbo and it's doing something, at least making noise anyways. overall i find them to be efficiency reducers, why dump all that boost when you may need some of it to spool the turbo for the next stab in the next gear?

oh, and turbos spin more in the range of 100,000-120,000 RPMs. 15k? not even close.

Last edited by RotaryEvolution; 02-24-13 at 06:35 PM.
Old 02-25-13, 06:18 PM
  #268  
Senior Member

iTrader: (5)
 
killalot13601's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by RotaryEvolution
they produce and install them for the people who do not want to hear the compressor surge on factory cars. it's purpose is to minimize noise and not enhance it like the aftermarket blow off valves.
close.
Do you have any creditable source for this, or is it just the most logical reason to you?
Old 02-25-13, 06:45 PM
  #269  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
most logical that i worked as a factory tech for a decade.

most logical that i haven't used a blowoff valve for about the past 3 years with no problems. neither have most of the people posting in this thread who aren't running blowoff valves and have properly running setups.

there's so much BS in this thread that it started to stink many pages ago.

Last edited by RotaryEvolution; 02-25-13 at 06:48 PM.
Old 02-25-13, 07:26 PM
  #270  
Senior Member

iTrader: (5)
 
killalot13601's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by RotaryEvolution
most logical that i worked as a factory tech for a decade.
I just do not see 3 or even 5 years being long enough to say one way or another.
A turbocharger should last twice that length of time. It could increase wear by 10% and you would not know in your time frame.

Realize I am not saying one way or another because there is no public scientific research of it. Just opinions from people who conclude from there own logic.
Old 02-25-13, 08:49 PM
  #271  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (8)
 
thewird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 6,591
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
I blew 2 different Precision turbo's without a BOV. I really think its just Precision that sucks but I'm going to try one more time with a Garret GTX4202R on the 20b I'm building. If the Garrett blows, then I'll know why and stop wasting my time with no BOV . I track my car seriously, its not a show and shine queen or waste my time doing simple highway pulls.

thewird
Old 02-25-13, 11:10 PM
  #272  
35r 13b first gen

iTrader: (3)
 
zaridar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Richland Center WI
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
btw even though diesels have no throttle plate, when one lets off the throttle the engine slows more quickly than the turbo... thus the same effect.. but maybe not as abrupt... also diesels run much more boost than gas motors, if i could generalize, so therefore the effects are still noticed..
Old 02-25-13, 11:32 PM
  #273  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (8)
 
thewird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 6,591
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by zaridar
btw even though diesels have no throttle plate, when one lets off the throttle the engine slows more quickly than the turbo... thus the same effect.. but maybe not as abrupt... also diesels run much more boost than gas motors, if i could generalize, so therefore the effects are still noticed..
Might wanna look at this (towards the end)... Turbos change speed extremely quickly. When the guy lets off it drops from almost 100k to 50k between shifts almost instantly.


thewird
Old 02-26-13, 08:32 AM
  #274  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Gilgamesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: hsv al
Posts: 845
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by thewird
I blew 2 different Precision turbo's without a BOV. I really think its just Precision that sucks but I'm going to try one more time with a Garret GTX4202R on the 20b I'm building. If the Garrett blows, then I'll know why and stop wasting my time with no BOV . I track my car seriously, its not a show and shine queen or waste my time doing simple highway pulls.

thewird
i was thinking the other day... out of all my friends that i know personally who have ran precision turbos... has any of them NOT had to replace it blow? answer.... nope.


however they are great for the money. and all that jazz, but i like OEM manufacturers like Garrett and Borg Warner.

i ran no BOV on a tII stock turbo in a RX3 but hated the sound of the surge as i thought it was damaging my turbo. so i put a bov on it. ( this was years ago)

now i plan to run no BOV with my S366. because if it messes up EVENTUALLY they only cost $650 now
Old 02-26-13, 10:07 AM
  #275  
35r 13b first gen

iTrader: (3)
 
zaridar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Richland Center WI
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by thewird

Might wanna look at this (towards the end)... Turbos change speed extremely quickly. When the guy lets off it drops from almost 100k to 50k between shifts almost instantly.

Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B196nyntLbQ

thewird
Ok I should have said that the engine slows down faster than the pressure decreases in the intake... or maybe more appropriately engine is pumping less air than the turbo is at that moment


Quick Reply: 8 months and counting with no blowoff valve



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:52 PM.