I've about 300 hp at the fly whell, and 245 st the rear wheel on a chassy dyno.
This with a street ported 13B RC 720 Inj and a E6K Haltech ecu.
For complete detail on my engine go to www.realride.com and click on tech info.

Thx
Benny

 

Good work.

 

NEW ENGINE 13B PERIPHERAL PORT:
-New turbo housing (1988)
-High compression rotors (1989)
-Racing Beat carbon seals, hardened stationary gears, high volume and pressure oil pump
-NASCAr style double pass Aluminium radiator, electric fan
-Stock oil cooler plus 2sd remote oil cooler
-Racing Beat Header with 3' pipe, Dynomax muffler
-2 55mm throttle bodies TWM Induction 3000 serie
-4 Rc 700cc injectors
-Stock coils and crank sensor -
Haltech E6K ECU
-Paxton fuel regular
This engine will go to the dyno very soon, will post the result

 

45hp loss between the engine and the wheels? Sorry, don't buy it.

The flag has been raised...

 

245rwhp on a Dyno Jet type dyno equates to 288 HP at he flywheel

245rwhp on a Dyno Dynamics type dyno equates to 335 HP at the flywheel, what type of dyno was it done on?

 

You're running a racing beat header on a turbo peripheral port? I guess you're implying you modified the header to act as a turbo manifold? You're using a STOCK turbo on a peripheral port? Are you ?

 

My new engine is only a pepripheral for now.
The fact I'm rummimg endurance races, it's more suitable than the turbo.

The turbo engine was with a stock turbo running 10 pound of boost. We are now still running the same turbo engine on the red car number 47. So for 2002 we will see wich engine is better.

The turbo manifold was stock, but we made a remote HKS wastegate using a stock exhaust housing.

Thx
Benny

 

DAMN, why don't we just hold him down and take turns beating the hell out of him?

If he has 300 flywheel hp, then a 15% drivetrain loss would be -45 hp, which would put him around 255 rwhp. I'm not sure about all this PP stuff, but it looks like everyone's having a slam fest instead of a normal discussion.

Cut him some slack...

 

Unless you have some great new scientific method, you CAN NOT say, X% HP loss thru the drivetrain. It is simple a reading discreation between the type of rolling road dyno you have used and ther true HP reading you would get on an engine dyno.

 

Saying there is a 15% loss from the flywheel is not etched in stone. However, this percent is the most common percent used for an approximation. To the statement

I say that 15% does show a 45 HP loss. This number may not be exact, but it is a believable number. That's what I'm saying.

 

Only a 15% drivetrain loss is calculated??? JESUS!!

Explains a few things....

 

Depend on the dyno !
One of the problem with chassis dyno and turbo engine, is that chassis dyno shop ussualy don't big enough fan to produce max air for the turbo.
so to make every thing perfect,you have to take in consideration that the car may have more power on the track due to better air flow.

Last thing, there is usually between 15 to 30% difference, between chassis and engine dyno.
Do you really beleive that my 454 suburban has about 300 hp at the rear whell !!! LOL Guaranty there is more than 15 % loss.

Thx
Benny