Im sure this is a repost but you just got to love a car that can do 407 kmph (253mph)

ENJOY!!!!

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x15...n-at-top-speed

 

I said i wouldn't mind if this was a repost again, but honestly...why create another thread about this?

 

Too bad this car is a piece of crap!

 

that was the gr8est thing ever

 

Now that is an amazing machine. The way they made the w16 is perfect. 253mph in absoutly insane. I would kill to do that fast in anycar

 

Wow! Absoutely amazing

 

and they wonder why they wont let that run a track... the thing's a boat. Probably will not do very well around a track...

 

I still like the Mclaren F1 better!!!!!! The production of the Mclaren F1 Road Car Started in 1993 and ended in 1998. They car looks way nicer, BMW naturally aspirated V12 S70 engine. Horsepower around 620.... almost 400 horsepower less than the bugatti veyron and the Veyron only goes 12 miles per hour faster... plus the bugatti has newer technology, four turbos and only goes 12 mph faster. That tells you how well Mclaren did building the Mclaren F1 Road Car. Does the Veyron have three seats...no. hahahah. Just my opinion. But i will say the Bugatti Veyron is a nice machine, but imo i like the Mcalren better

 

It takes stupid amounts of power to over come wind resistance at that speed for ever lil bit faster.

 

Ya, I know... but you have to admit, its a amazing machine for the years it was produced.

 

The point of the car was not shear speed, but the ability for most any driver to drive the car fast, or just down the road to get some grocerys. The car is supposed to be well mannered at any speed. It'd be a bit much to drive the Mclaren around town vs the Bugatti which has more creature comforts.

 

Thats cool, I just like the more sporty mclaren over the luxury-sporty Veyron

 

that's friggin ridiculous..........

 

Man you are an

The McLaren was created to be the fastest road car period.

The Veyron was created to do 400km/h, make 1,000 hp and do all of it in the highest of luxury. All the people that have tested the Veyron say it is not even nerve racking at the top end where as people would complain that the nose lifted comming around corners in the McLaren. The Veyron is a much much more liveable (if that can be said about a Hyper car) than the McLaren.

A Radical SR3 is undoubtedly faster than a McLaren Mercedes SLR around a track does that make it a better car?

 

Fast, not the best looking though . .

 

also, mclaren f1 is only 2600 lbs? or 2400lbs... it's lighter than our beloved FD's!

 

Not trying to get in an argument guys... I understand all of your points. Its just my opinion. I would take a mclaren F1 over a veyron because ever since I new what a Mclaren f1 was... ive been hooked. Im jsut into the spotiness of the mclaren, looks, interior is like a racecar, it is in road car form. The veyron is too luxury for me, i like the sporty feel...thats all im saying. I'll admit though, that the veyron is faster...only 12 mph... and is more for the modern day guys/girls who have the money to buy it. I would take a Veyron though if had money, but first the Mclaren. Its been my favorite forever. Sorry if I came out wrong... i didn't try too. God bless

 

Off subject a bit- I think the Sport FC has a lower CD than the Veyron. Can anyone verify this? If I recall the '86 sport has a cd of .26? Just something else to discuss.