SAE acceptance
03-13-04, 12:44 PM
#26
Rotary Enthusiast
Originally posted by Evil Aviator
Then why don't you measure the displacement by dividing the length of the eccentric shaft by the diameter of the flywheel, and then multiplying by the number of spark plugs squared?
Then why don't you measure the displacement by dividing the length of the eccentric shaft by the diameter of the flywheel, and then multiplying by the number of spark plugs squared?
"The "displacer", or "male" portion of the mechanical aparatus (ie piston or rotor) has absolutely no bearing on displacement other than its physical relationship to defining the displacement of the displaced portion."
That's amazing nonsense and contradiction.
The one rev pump rating method is the likely basis for boinger ratings, as I stated. No conspiracy, just like minds that know a rotor housing contains 3 active dynamic chambers, and calling it a simple cylinder is wrong.
03-13-04, 04:55 PM
#27
Senior Member
Originally posted by rxtasy3
why don't we just send this arguement to the Mazda engineers and see what they come up with? this might be interesting. have to include all these links u all posted.
why don't we just send this arguement to the Mazda engineers and see what they come up with? this might be interesting. have to include all these links u all posted.
