Rotary Car Performance General Rotary Car and Engine modification discussions.

lets talk compression...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-02, 08:22 PM
  #1  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
setzep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MN
Posts: 2,524
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lets talk compression...

On a 13b-re what is "good" compression? (think it has 9.0:1 rotors??) I just ran a test on mine and came up with 120 front and rear. I've been told thats pretty good but I'd like to see what others think. What would you consider low? What is new?

thanks
Old 02-28-02, 05:44 PM
  #2  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
setzep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MN
Posts: 2,524
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not a person knows? Thats strange...
Old 03-01-02, 01:41 AM
  #3  
W. TX chirpin Monkey

 
fastrotaries's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Mesquite, TX
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i think that anything under 75 psi isn't too good. it'll operate but rough. Try a search
Old 03-02-02, 06:24 PM
  #4  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Nathan Kwok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Huntington Beach, CA, USA
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Don't get compression ratio mixed up with compression "pressure", they are two different things although they are related. Stock factory spec compression is 120psi or 8.5kg/cm^2. , so your numbers are perfect, just like a brand new engine. Original factory manuals specified 7.0kg/cm^2 (100psi) as a minimum, and this was later changed to 6.0kg/cm^2 (85psi). Both versions specify 1.5kg/cm^2 (21psi) maximum difference between the 6 chambers. I think the newer number is more accurate because I've heard of engines in the 6's that ran just fine and made excellent power, but higher is still better. I'm more concerned with even numbers across the chamgers than absolute values, fwiw.

*edit* whoops, I thought you were referring to a 13BREW, not 13BRE, these numbers are for the 13BREW.
Old 03-02-02, 08:15 PM
  #5  
HWO
inteligent extratarestril

 
HWO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Sunny B.O.P, New Zealand
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the larger the ports the less compression your guage will read
Old 03-03-02, 08:42 PM
  #6  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
setzep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MN
Posts: 2,524
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any one know what rotors I have in my 13b-re? I would guess they are the same as the 13b-rew's 9:1??

cool, so 120 is pretty damn good then. I don't know if it is 120 on all rotor faces but I did hold the check valve open open once on the compressoin gauge and it did bounce evenly so I'm guessing the compression is about the same on all rotor faces.
Old 03-04-02, 11:47 AM
  #7  
Full Member

 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NB, Canada
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
88 T2 compression results

rotor #1: 6.5-6.6-6.6 kg/cm^2

rotor #2: 6.5-6.5-6.6 kg/cm^2

this is supposedly a rebuilt with about 30,000kms on it.

from what I've read, I'm middle of the range, good even compression for a series 4 T2
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Coochas
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
44
11-05-19 11:08 PM
Smokeyfb33
Old School and Other Rotary
10
10-01-15 12:10 PM
Devon Murray
Introduce yourself
2
09-25-15 09:41 AM



Quick Reply: lets talk compression...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 AM.