Racing Kills Lounge The RX-7 Club and IB in no way supports or endorses illegal street racing in any way, shape or form, and highly recommends against any illegal activities.

N/A vs Mustang

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2010 | 02:08 PM
  #1  
mxrider914's Avatar
Thread Starter
.
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 624
Likes: 4
From: GA
FL N/A vs Mustang

First off I drive an 87 N/A. Not to many mods, a previous owner made there own exaust, basically a straight pipe with one muffler in it. The whole interior is stripped of all but necessities, and thats pretty much all thats done to the car. I also have bad struts and tires.

Anyway, my friend has a stock 95 5.0 V8 Mustang and we have been wanting to race for a while so last night we finally did.

We went out to this road that goes for like a mile then dead ends to construction that they quit working on, so theirs never any cars on it, and if their happend to be for some reason theirs a 4ft wide median with a curb so no crossing yellow lines, so it's a pretty safe place. Its about a 1/4 mile straight then three fast(60-65mph) turns.

We raced from a stop. First race he honked 3 times and he got a little jump on me, I spun really bad but still held pretty close the whole time. We both slowed down when we got to the turns.

Second race we had someone to tell us to go. I got a much better launch and got about three car lengthes on him in first then in second he slowly started passing me and continued to slowley pull. This time though we kept going in the turns and I killed him. I think it was a combination of my car handling way better and him being a bit of a *****, but by the end of the road I probably had about 15-20 car lengthes on him.

I was very suprised how good the N/A did against a V8, I thought he would kill me in the straight line, but he really barley had anything on me.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 01:39 PM
  #2  
zack4173's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
From: Bonney lake Washington
yeah my cousin has a 95 5.0 and i was shocked at how slow it was they can be built to be fast but stock they are garbage. Good runs.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 08:18 PM
  #3  
funkjaw's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 4
From: San Jose, CA (NorCal/S.F. Bay Area)
If he were in a fox body he would have won. Good kill
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 10:43 PM
  #4  
mxrider914's Avatar
Thread Starter
.
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 624
Likes: 4
From: GA
Originally Posted by funkjaw
If he were in a fox body he would have won. Good kill
Haha agreed. I figured it would be as fast as a fox body since it was newer, thats why I was surprised how good my 7 did.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2010 | 08:12 PM
  #5  
ineedfc's Avatar
disturbing the peace
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: sussex, wi
so you were going about 95 mph into 65 mph turns with bad tires and suspension?
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2010 | 10:34 PM
  #6  
mxrider914's Avatar
Thread Starter
.
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 624
Likes: 4
From: GA
Originally Posted by ineedfc
so you were going about 95 mph into 65 mph turns with bad tires and suspension?
I don't think I said anything about 95mph. It's not like they were tight turns, maybe it was 55 mph I don't know I wasn't looking at the speedometer.

My tires have bad tread but it's not like there about to blow out or anything. I've been to the road before and worked my up to going that fast, not like I just railed the turns my first time seeing them.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2010 | 11:57 PM
  #7  
mojave's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 203
Likes: 1
From: Gotham City
Originally Posted by mxrider914
Haha agreed. I figured it would be as fast as a fox body since it was newer, thats why I was surprised how good my 7 did.
Na, the SN97 stangs' are pretty smogged up... it's a shame, capable motor, just crippled from the factory.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2010 | 12:41 AM
  #8  
FearNoPiston's Avatar
FREAK ALL OUT!!!
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA
Originally Posted by mojave
Na, the SN97 stangs' are pretty smogged up... it's a shame, capable motor, just crippled from the factory.
yeah and the added weight to make it worse, oh well better then the 4.6 version they released in 96.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2010 | 01:30 PM
  #9  
funkjaw's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 4
From: San Jose, CA (NorCal/S.F. Bay Area)
Honestly the SN95 mustangs with the 5.0 were slower than the 4.6 believe it or not. The 96-04 also handled better. My boy's 04 with mild suspension and awesome rims is a beast on the touge.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2010 | 01:52 PM
  #10  
FearNoPiston's Avatar
FREAK ALL OUT!!!
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA
yeah I was referring to the 4.6 gt model in 96-98
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2010 | 11:14 PM
  #11  
rolfs_7's Avatar
i play with my wankel
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
From: North Manchester, Indiana
My NA FB smoked stangs all day long. 1.3L vs 5.0L its so sad.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rxlevi7
New Member RX-7 Technical
4
Sep 26, 2015 07:28 AM
mulcryant
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
10
Sep 9, 2015 05:24 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:30 AM.