I got beat.... :(
raced a twin turbo g35 and a audi s4 last night. They were both putting down over 400whp. im only around 320. we all raced at the same time. went from like a 40 roll up to 130. they were pretty much even with eachother. They pulled me by 2 2.5 cars.
|
that's funny, your power to weight ratio should be a lot better than theres.
|
yeah but at the same time they also have 110+ hp than i do
|
but you weigh like 1k lbs less, how does that happen?
|
Originally Posted by AWD-RWD racer
yeah but at the same time they also have 110+ hp than i do
I remember the thread, where someone asked how much power it would take to be a c6z, and going to Google (your guy's drag strip) it said, with the power to weight, you would need 360hp i believe....i know it wasnt more than that,. so i am giving you the benefit of the doubt. Now, if a 320 fd got beat by a turd of a g35, just think what a c6z would do! OH NOES1!1111oneoneoenone1!!! GOOGLE HAS FAILED US!!!1!!1!111 NOOOOOOOOOOO :Kill1: :Kill1: :Kill1: :Kill1: |
the kid with the g35 said his shit weighed 3500 lbs. my fd, with the sub and amp in the hatch with the spare tire, weighs about 3000.
|
Originally Posted by spoolin spec v
i have only seen ONE fast twin turbo 350z/g35 and ive seen alot of them. They are turds.
I remember the thread, where someone asked how much power it would take to be a c6z, and going to Google (your guy's drag strip) it said, with the power to weight, you would need 360hp i believe....i know it wasnt more than that,. so i am giving you the benefit of the doubt. Now, if a 320 fd got beat by a turd of a g35, just think what a c6z would do! OH NOES1!1111oneoneoenone1!!! GOOGLE HAS FAILED US!!!1!!1!111 NOOOOOOOOOOO :Kill1: :Kill1: :Kill1: :Kill1: Instead of using physics and the way the real world works, we should just consult with you because you have seen, built, and tuned everything. |
damn, with that much power you should be able to beat a saleen s7 stage 3
|
Originally Posted by ellisjuan
damn, with that much power you should be able to beat a saleen s7 stage 3
|
As says google -
Infiniti G35 Coupe RWD V6 3485.5 lbs that's with no one inside, and no TT kit, which is fucking heavy. |
Originally Posted by BackyardSog
Just like your a professional tuner and builder (taught from the best in the country)? :rlaugh:
Instead of using physics and the way the real world works, we should just consult with you because you have seen, built, and tuned everything. |
well maybe there is something wrong with the way my turbo's are working. my primary has seemed a little sluggish. and with the boost turned up, there is not a very smooth transition.
|
Originally Posted by spoolin spec v
lol you just dont get it do you.
????????????? |
Originally Posted by BackyardSog
?
????????????? |
This is from the other thread
Originally Posted by bricke
A stock 2006 Z06 has 442 rwhp w/3130lb curb weight. A lightened and modified FD at 2600lbs would need 367 rwhp to make the same power/weight ratio. Keep in mind the Z06 is stock at that point.
|
doesnt torque have anything to do with racing? most piston engine cars have more than our rotary cars.
|
Originally Posted by AWD-RWD racer
doesnt torque have anything to do with racing? most piston engine cars have more than our rotary cars.
ls7's dont have that. |
power to weight really dosint mean that much. look at drag bikes to drag cars.. the cars with the worse powet to weight kill the bikes...
on a side note every 100lbs is 10th of a sec... so if you have the same cars and take 1000lbs out of one of them it will be a sec faster in the 1/4 mile |
that's funny.. now the power to weight ratio does not matter as much.......
|
dum poeple
:pow: I love how many internet mechanics there are out there, sometime I wish the literacy rate in the us was lower than it all ready is. :101384_l:
|
at least you get the props for honesty
|
Originally Posted by ellisjuan
that's funny.. now the power to weight ratio does not matter as much.......
06 r1 150hp (rear wheel) / 381lbs (dry) = 2.54 pounds per HP..... 1/4 mile 10.50 on a good day big daddy dwayne gutridges...on DOT drag tire 93 trunk mustang 900hp (rear wheel) / 3000lbs (weight of his class cant be lighter) = 3.333333333 pounds per hp.....1/4 mile time 7.90 where is your power to weight department now :) like i said power to weight dosent matter that much.. power to weight is not everything.... yes a lighter car with less HP can beat a heavy car with more power... but its not always the case that is all i was sayin when i said it didint matter that much... |
vehicle weight
engine power, and the details of the torque or horsepower curve coefficient of friction of the tires on the track aerodynamic drag moment of inertia and frictional loss of moving parts drivetrain gearing shifting mechanisms location of the vehicle's vertical and horizontal center of gravity driver skill ^ All matter http://www.stealth316.com/2-calc-hp-et-mph.htm |
Originally Posted by 93ttwankel
vehicle weight
engine power, and the details of the torque or horsepower curve coefficient of friction of the tires on the track aerodynamic drag moment of inertia and frictional loss of moving parts drivetrain gearing shifting mechanisms location of the vehicle's vertical and horizontal center of gravity driver skill ^ All matter http://www.stealth316.com/2-calc-hp-et-mph.htm +1 its not just 1 thing out of the list he said |
Originally Posted by 81gsl12a
+1 its not just 1 thing out of the list he said
|
i just saw a recent uploaded vid on youtube of a s4, g35, and a fd..that didnt happen to be you did it AWD racer?
edit: heres the link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGeEmP8_eFw |
looks like it, good run.
Those modded s4's roll out. |
Originally Posted by BackyardSog
Just like your a professional tuner and builder (taught from the best in the country)? :rlaugh:
Instead of using physics and the way the real world works, we should just consult with you because you have seen, built, and tuned everything. lol! I was thinking the same thing :rofl: Edit: it's hillarious how there are few people on here that are all butt hurt from previous threads. lol |
lol the typical clowns that know jack shit are here. once again there will be no need for us to humilate any of you as u fools will do it on your own.
|
Originally Posted by AWD-RWD racer
doesnt torque have anything to do with racing? most piston engine cars have more than our rotary cars.
in most cases its really quite simple 100 rwhp = 1k lbs. if u make 320 then the audi needs 420. whats done to your car to make 320 rwhp? have u taken ur car to the track to get a trap speed? is your engine pulling good vacuum? does your engine have 100k miles on it? is the rest of the car in good mechanical shape?.....basically i am asking does ur car run right? it already sounds like it doesnt. People these cars are 14 yrs old. not many run right these days and are owned by complete fast and furious jack asses that dont have a clue. get your car running right then race the thing if thats what u like to do. |
Originally Posted by 81gsl12a
power to weight really dosint mean that much. look at drag bikes to drag cars.. the cars with the worse powet to weight kill the bikes...
now we are gonna use a comparison of a bike vs a car to form educated conclusions. come on man lets keep it apples to apples here. or is your post a joke? power to weight is 99% of the comparison when talking about sports cars. hey i got an idea lets compare an astro van to a lotus elise. that will be very helpful in this discussion. i have smoked dozens of cars on the street or track that make more rwhp then me. sometimes even 100rwhp more....yeah but weight is meaningless. |
Originally Posted by 93ttwankel
vehicle weight
engine power, and the details of the torque or horsepower curve coefficient of friction of the tires on the track aerodynamic drag moment of inertia and frictional loss of moving parts drivetrain gearing shifting mechanisms location of the vehicle's vertical and horizontal center of gravity driver skill ^ All matter http://www.stealth316.com/2-calc-hp-et-mph.htm every car that me or my friends own from domestic to imports all run very close to what the physics dictate. this is real world with many many yrs of drag racing and having fun on the street experience. |
Originally Posted by ellisjuan
no crap it all matters... it's not THAT important according to other people posting on this board. e.g.: https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=629803
|
Originally Posted by montego
lol! I was thinking the same thing :rofl:
Edit: it's hillarious how there are few people on here that are all butt hurt from previous threads. lol |
me? man car boats planes astro vans or lotus its the same math. is it not? it is not 99% if you think that you are a moron... its EVERYTHING its not just 1 thing.. i never said it didint matter i just said. "it didint matter that much". caz everything plays a roll in it.. other wise if it was only about or99% about power to weight bikes would always win... and is this true? no its not and if it is plz explane to me caz i guess im slow.....
|
Originally Posted by 81gsl12a
me? man car boats planes astro vans or lotus its the same math. is it not? it is not 99% if you think that you are a moron... its EVERYTHING its not just 1 thing.. i never said it didint matter i just said. "it didint matter that much". caz everything plays a roll in it.. other wise if it was only about or99% about power to weight bikes would always win... and is this true? no its not and if it is plz explane to me caz i guess im slow.....
|
I love this board. It's the main reason I wake up in the morning. <3<3
|
What was the topic for this thread again?
|
Originally Posted by ITS N STI
Nah dude, P:W is all you need to know when looking at who's going to win a race. You're an IDIOT for thinking otherwise. God made power to weight for a reason, and that's so FD's could win races.
yeah you are pretty much dumb in that statment.. last time i checked traction has alot to do with it also... lets say your car weighs 1800 lbs and makes 400hp but you have no traction witch means you are spinning. your power to weight didint help very much seen as you cant get the power to the ground. there are lots of cases like this.. also come down to driver (not every1 is a race car driver like you) power to weight didint help much when you missed 3rd and went to 5th... there is much much more to a car and racing then power to weight... power to weight dose play a roll in it.. like i said b4 im not saying it dosent matter. but its not as big of a roll as you think it is. its not even half of it but sence you think it is such a big roll even the most importanet thing tell me why a bike with better power to weight will lose against a car with worse power to weight????? or why a turbo CRX making 600+ hp is a 10 sec car and a mustang making 500+ hp is a 9 sec car can you plz tell me why? the power to weight is better for the CRX.... |
Originally Posted by 81gsl12a
yeah you are pretty much dumb in that statment.. last time i checked traction has alot to do with it also... lets say your car weighs 1800 lbs and makes 400hp but you have no traction witch means you are spinning. your power to weight didint help very much seen as you cant get the power to the ground. there are lots of cases like this.. also come down to driver (not every1 is a race car driver like you) power to weight didint help much when you missed 3rd and went to 5th... there is much much more to a car and racing then power to weight... power to weight dose play a roll in it.. like i said b4 im not saying it dosent matter. but its not as big of a roll as you think it is. its not even half of it
but sence you think it is such a big roll even the most importanet thing tell me why a bike with better power to weight will lose against a car with worse power to weight????? or why a turbo CRX making 600+ hp is a 10 sec car and a mustang making 500+ hp is a 9 sec car can you plz tell me why? the power to weight is better for the CRX.... http://auto.howstuffworks.com/horsepower2.htm Do these 600+/ 500+ hp cars really exist? Because from a 40-130 mph the CRX is going to win. |
mods that i have:
99 twin turbos split second additional injector controller 2 additional 750cc injectors (mounted on greddy elbow) Greddy profec 2 spec b boost controller greddy elbow greddy 2 row front mount intercooler HKS racing suction intakes koyo rad b&m short shifter w/momo shift knob all new vac lines and rad hoses aluminum ast m2 down pipe megan racing midpipe racing beat single tip cat back aem uego wideband autometer boost gauge center 2pod gauge holder (goes where center speaker goes) dimpled/slotted rotors eibach lowering springs koni yellow struts RE rear toe links the car ran a 12.6 @ 117 mph |
Originally Posted by 81gsl12a
me? man car boats planes astro vans or lotus its the same math. is it not? it is not 99% if you think that you are a moron... its EVERYTHING its not just 1 thing.. i never said it didint matter i just said. "it didint matter that much". caz everything plays a roll in it.. other wise if it was only about or99% about power to weight bikes would always win... and is this true? no its not and if it is plz explane to me caz i guess im slow.....
|
Originally Posted by ellisjuan
I love this board. It's the main reason I wake up in the morning. <3<3
|
Originally Posted by BackyardSog
Do you really think two cars with the proper sized tires starting from 40mph like the original poster are going to have a problem with static friction? I may agree with you and the bike but like sombody said before, compare apples to apples.
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/horsepower2.htm Do these 600+/ 500+ hp cars really exist? Because from a 40-130 mph the CRX is going to win. it seems to me you are adding more factors into this then power to weight... like i said power to weight matter.. just not as much as you think it dose..other wise you apples to apples we have a astro van and the lotus we talked about b4..just this time the astro van has work done to it and they both have the same power to weight..from what you said. they should both have the same out come witch is going to have the higher top speed? the lotus you know why aerodynamics the astro van is a flying brick... power to weight didint help at all in this situation did it? how come? caz power to weight is not everything!!! |
Originally Posted by 81gsl12a
it seems to me you are adding more factors into this then power to weight... like i said power to weight matter.. just not as much as you think it dose..other wise you
apples to apples we have a astro van and the lotus we talked about b4..just this time the astro van has work done to it and they both have the same power to weight..from what you said. they should both have the same out come witch is going to have the higher top speed? the lotus you know why aerodynamics the astro van is a flying brick... power to weight didint help at all in this situation did it? how come? caz power to weight is not everything!!! |
Originally Posted by 81gsl12a
it seems to me you are adding more factors into this then power to weight... like i said power to weight matter.. just not as much as you think it dose..other wise you
apples to apples we have a astro van and the lotus we talked about b4..just this time the astro van has work done to it and they both have the same power to weight..from what you said. they should both have the same out come witch is going to have the higher top speed? the lotus you know why aerodynamics the astro van is a flying brick... power to weight didint help at all in this situation did it? how come? caz power to weight is not everything!!! Nice comparison |
Originally Posted by AWD-RWD racer
mods that i have:
99 twin turbos split second additional injector controller 2 additional 750cc injectors (mounted on greddy elbow) Greddy profec 2 spec b boost controller greddy elbow greddy 2 row front mount intercooler HKS racing suction intakes koyo rad b&m short shifter w/momo shift knob all new vac lines and rad hoses aluminum ast m2 down pipe megan racing midpipe racing beat single tip cat back aem uego wideband autometer boost gauge center 2pod gauge holder (goes where center speaker goes) dimpled/slotted rotors eibach lowering springs koni yellow struts RE rear toe links the car ran a 12.6 @ 117 mph |
Originally Posted by fcfanatic
Was that your car in the vid that was posted?
|
117 moph is a nice trap
|
Originally Posted by matty
117 moph is a nice trap
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands