My autocross FD SM2 build up
I thought I would share with the forums my conversion from running SCCA Solo ASP to SM2.
http://www.rotarycarclub.com/showthread.php?t=243 It is a work in progress that will be updated as I have time. Thanks, Dan |
Very nice engine choices. ;)
|
Originally Posted by Mahjik
(Post 7919724)
Very nice engine choices. ;)
I should also thank Erik (streldoc) and Andy (Amrx7) for all the information they have shared with me on the setup of their cars. You won’t find two nicer people in the RX7 community. Dan |
Originally Posted by Chadwick
(Post 7920581)
Thanks, it is different than what most would build and I received a lot of "what the hell are you thinking" comments when I shared my thoughts. Only two people seemed to understand what I was really after, Ari from RP and Rob from Pineapple. Both were very supportive during my research phase of the build.
I should also thank Erik (streldoc) and Andy (Amrx7) for all the information they have shared with me on the setup of their cars. You won’t find two nicer people in the RX7 community. Dan Regarding the porting, I had my engine rebuilt by Rob as well, with the exact same goals in mind - low end torque and spooling up the turbo as soon as possible. Though my car is still 'under construction' and hasn't been raced yet with the new engine, the low end torque is surprisingly good. With 6-8 lbs of boost during break in I was seeing full boost on the turbo (TO4S .82 AR hotside) by 5k RPM. I didn't go as far with the motor mods as you have though, it is still using all FD internals. I did go for some other mods though, heavy duty coolant seals, and oil passage mods. Can't wait to race it! |
Originally Posted by jkstill
(Post 7921582)
Interesting engine work.
Regarding the porting, I had my engine rebuilt by Rob as well, with the exact same goals in mind - low end torque and spooling up the turbo as soon as possible. Though my car is still 'under construction' and hasn't been raced yet with the new engine, the low end torque is surprisingly good. With 6-8 lbs of boost during break in I was seeing full boost on the turbo (TO4S .82 AR hotside) by 5k RPM. I didn't go as far with the motor mods as you have though, it is still using all FD internals. I did go for some other mods though, heavy duty coolant seals, and oil passage mods. Can't wait to race it! Rob was asking me for help finding a IDA down draft manifold and some how we got in a discussion about porting. That is when I bounced my build ideas off him and he offered his suggestions. I got a pretty good laugh when he told me to "Think like air" but I understood what he meant. I'm with you, can't wait to get my car back together and hit the races. Dan |
Dan, I think you've made some very good choices and the car should be a rocket off the corner. It will be interesting to see a full torque turve all the way to redline with the 99 specs. However, I do love the simplicity of my single setup from a strictly maintenance point of view.
One note, you mentioned alot of use of 99 parts. I'd be careful that those are allowable mods covered by SM rules since you can't update/backdate to them legally. I think everything you listed was fine, but not sure about the bumper support. -Andy |
Originally Posted by AMRX7
(Post 7921998)
Dan, I think you've made some very good choices and the car should be a rocket off the corner. It will be interesting to see a full torque turve all the way to redline with the 99 specs. However, I do love the simplicity of my single setup from a strictly maintenance point of view.
One note, you mentioned alot of use of 99 parts. I'd be careful that those are allowable mods covered by SM rules since you can't update/backdate to them legally. I think everything you listed was fine, but not sure about the bumper support. -Andy Thanks for kind words. I think I could make an argument under section P that the rebar is to facilitate an allowed change as it is the lower attachment point of the bumper and does not weigh less than the stock rebar. Functionally it servers the same purpose and is not an intrinsic performance enhancement. What do you think? One part I can't find a rule on is side skirts, are they allowed? Thanks, Dan |
Updated the original link with pictures of the porting, tire fitment, gauges and carputer. Also wrote a little bit about the porting.
Thanks, Dan |
Looks good Dan.
SM2 should be fun. I am always up in the air about SM2 or ASP. I just jump back and forth at the moment since I am not even fully prepped to ASP rules. If I want to race more people and have fun=SM2 and if I want to chase pax=ASP. I am with you on wanting to change some body parts but can't under SP rule set. I have always wanted to put the hood vents from a Jaguar XKR Supercharged into an FD hood but can't unless I want 2 hoods to still race in ASP. Having the 4.77s should just dig you out of the corners (another reason to go SM2). I have been wanting to try and find some 15X10s or 10.5s with the 275/35 hoosiers that could fit over the FD suspension just to fix the gearing problem in ASP. While the engine issue is being discussed and Andy is reading this... Are the Racing Beat aluminum engine plates an SM2 legal mod? My guess is no and there is no way I would spend the money but bench racing is always fun. With the season about to start again you can tell I have crazy ideas bouncing around my head. I have and will be keeping an eye on your results. Hopefully I can race you at a GASS event or some other event between our regions. I am doing the baby thing at the moment so I have not hit as many events lately. Also +1 on thanking Erik and Andy. They help out a lot. Without Andy I would have had a hard time getting through tech at my first Nationals at Forbes. Jeff |
Helpfull thread.
|
very cool
|
Originally Posted by Chadwick
(Post 7924815)
Hey Andy,
Thanks for kind words. I think I could make an argument under section P that the rebar is to facilitate an allowed change as it is the lower attachment point of the bumper and does not weigh less than the stock rebar. Functionally it servers the same purpose and is not an intrinsic performance enhancement. What do you think? One part I can't find a rule on is side skirts, are they allowed? Thanks, Dan The next paragraph of P gives you more examples of the modification of parts for the allowable mod. It doesn't suggest replacement of parts not already covered elsewhere in the rules. From a strict interpretation, I'd think you'd be better off modifying the stock reinforcement (we're talking about the big yellow fiberglass piece,right?) to work with your front end, even if it means hacking it up. That said, if the weight is the same I don't think anyone will give you grief. We have enough issues with participation without driving people away over nit picky stuff. -Andy |
I love the fact that your using the 9.7 compression rotors for improved throttle response. Are you going to run the twins seq? I've always been curious as to how much faster the twins would spool with higher compression rotors.
|
Originally Posted by t-von
(Post 7934802)
I love the fact that your using the 9.7 compression rotors for improved throttle response. Are you going to run the twins seq? I've always been curious as to how much faster the twins would spool with higher compression rotors.
Yes, 99 twins to start with, may move to a single if I don't meet my HP expectations. Dan |
Originally Posted by AMRX7
(Post 7934259)
Dan,
The next paragraph of P gives you more examples of the modification of parts for the allowable mod. It doesn't suggest replacement of parts not already covered elsewhere in the rules. From a strict interpretation, I'd think you'd be better off modifying the stock reinforcement (we're talking about the big yellow fiberglass piece,right?) to work with your front end, even if it means hacking it up. That said, if the weight is the same I don't think anyone will give you grief. We have enough issues with participation without driving people away over nit picky stuff. -Andy Dan |
Updated write up to include links to parts used in build up.
Dan |
fwiw, i just bought another used bumper reinforcement to replaced my original one that had been cut up to fit a FMIC. My original one was black/greyish. The other one is yellowish.
|
Originally Posted by gracer7-rx7
(Post 7942772)
fwiw, i just bought another used bumper reinforcement to replaced my original one that had been cut up to fit a FMIC. My original one was black/greyish. The other one is yellowish.
Dan |
If I raced with SCCA, I'd be in XP.
Do you know if at last nationals the SM2 guys (Andy and Erik) beat the XP times? |
Originally Posted by 2MCHPWR
(Post 7944033)
If I raced with SCCA, I'd be in XP.
Do you know if at last nationals the SM2 guys (Andy and Erik) beat the XP times? Dan |
Added a couple pictures of the rear wing being installed.
Dan |
Posted some information on using RX8 internals in a 13b-rew here:
http://www.rotarycarclub.com/showthread.php?t=847 Dan |
Updated the thread with pictures of the engine being built.
http://www.rotarycarclub.com/showthread.php?t=243 Dan |
unfortunately it wont let me view your rotaryclub thread without having a membership :(
|
Updated the thread with pictures of the completed engine and a list of mods required to use the Xcessive LIM with stock or 99 twins.
Dan |
Motor is installed in the car and is almost ready to fire up. Added quite a few pictures of the build up and misc parts installed.
Dan |
The build has come along nicely. How soon until she's ready for SM2 action?
|
If we don't run into any issues at startup another week or so. Our next local event is 5/11 so that gives me about 2 weeks to get everything sorted out.
Dan |
very nice car. good luck with it.
|
Yet another update with a bunch more pictures and a write up at the end about the first start.
Dan |
Added pictures of the wing fabrication and inside wiring. Also a small right up at the end of the thread.
Build thread Dan |
Added pictures and specs of the alignment and corner balancing.
Dan |
Saw the car in action this weekend, good job.
|
Originally Posted by NeoTuri
(Post 8204857)
Saw the car in action this weekend, good job.
Now I need to work on the biggest limiting factor.... driver :) Dan |
So... when will you have something to topple Erik's car? ;)
|
Originally Posted by NeoTuri
(Post 8214247)
So... when will you have something to topple Erik's car? ;)
Added a video and some action pictures from the Atlanta National tour. Dan |
Very nice and informative write-up! I autocross in SM2. My car is starting to show early signs of a bad coolant seal(s) and your build-up has got me interested. How is the low-end/boost response now with the higher compression rotors? I too have the 99 twins, however I feel as though the 93-95 twins had higher torque at lower boost pressures compared to the 99s. The 99s feel much better at 10-15psi.
I think it rude to ask people how much they pay for things, but could you perhaps PM me with how much I could *expect* to pay for a similar motor setup??? Thank-you! |
Originally Posted by DJF(NJ)
(Post 8225655)
Very nice and informative write-up! I autocross in SM2. My car is starting to show early signs of a bad coolant seal(s) and your build-up has got me interested. How is the low-end/boost response now with the higher compression rotors? I too have the 99 twins, however I feel as though the 93-95 twins had higher torque at lower boost pressures compared to the 99s. The 99s feel much better at 10-15psi.
I think it rude to ask people how much they pay for things, but could you perhaps PM me with how much I could *expect* to pay for a similar motor setup??? Thank-you! Dan |
chadwick, i still can't see your build thread without logging in. :(
hopefully we'll see you at the next nashville autox :) |
Dan,
I used to peak at about 250ft-lbs on my first turbo when it was bone stock. It would drop off to about 225 before the transition point, then spike to 300+ after the transition. This was at about 15psi. I didn't figure out I had the sticking solenoid issue where it would blow off boost when going back down to just the primary turbo (I'm pretty sure you have the fixed). When it *didn't* have that issue, the car was a rocket off the corners with the 4.77 gears. -Andy |
Originally Posted by AMRX7
(Post 8240795)
Dan,
I used to peak at about 250ft-lbs on my first turbo when it was bone stock. It would drop off to about 225 before the transition point, then spike to 300+ after the transition. This was at about 15psi. I didn't figure out I had the sticking solenoid issue where it would blow off boost when going back down to just the primary turbo (I'm pretty sure you have the fixed). When it *didn't* have that issue, the car was a rocket off the corners with the 4.77 gears. -Andy Dan |
hey very nice car man! I'm just getting into autocross, i'm in SM2 also. I'm still getting used to the car as it is but its a lot of fun. im still on stock R1 suspension but after a few more events of getting used to the stock suspension i'm looking to get konis on my car and some new springs. just need to figure out what rates i'm gonna get. keep up the good work!:) :icon_tup:
|
Dan, you put the Kaaz and 4.77 in yet?
|
Originally Posted by memphisraines82
(Post 8313909)
Dan, you put the Kaaz and 4.77 in yet?
Dan |
Been awhile since I posted an update on here. Added some action pictures after the the Kaaz and 4.77 were installed. What a great upgrade.
Build thread Dan |
|
Well I guess they are still blocking links to the Rotary Car Club . Com but if you click on the quote button you can copy and paste the link in your browser.
Dan |
^^^
Catually you can't the asterisks show up there too... but I'll search for ya over at RCC. |
Originally Posted by ptrhahn
(Post 9113813)
^^^
Catually you can't the asterisks show up there too... but I'll search for ya over at RCC. Here is one of the pictures: http://www.tweakit.com/rx7/rx7trscca1.jpg |
Here is the in car video from the sameday that picture was shot:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVNW1l4e3P8&fmt=18 Dan |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands