Power FC 13b Peripheral injectors
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
13b Peripheral injectors
I have searched but maybe i havent searched the correct terms so not 2 manny flames please.
I have a 13b peripheral port and have decided im goning to be running it on e85 so to start with i need lots of injector.
I have decided to have my primarys as 1680's as well as my secondarys so 4 x 1680.
Im wonrderin if anyone has run 1680's as primarys before and is so give me a few starting blocks.
Ideally im looking for a 13b pp map running 1680's all round but even a bridge map running the same would be good.
No telling me not to run 1680's as primarys as the work has already been dun and the injectors are in place.
So all input is welcome.
Steve
I have a 13b peripheral port and have decided im goning to be running it on e85 so to start with i need lots of injector.
I have decided to have my primarys as 1680's as well as my secondarys so 4 x 1680.
Im wonrderin if anyone has run 1680's as primarys before and is so give me a few starting blocks.
Ideally im looking for a 13b pp map running 1680's all round but even a bridge map running the same would be good.
No telling me not to run 1680's as primarys as the work has already been dun and the injectors are in place.
So all input is welcome.
Steve
#3
Eye In The Sky
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In A Disfunctional World
Posts: 7,894
Likes: 0
Received 114 Likes
on
66 Posts
The only problem with the very large injectors, will be to lean them out for idle.
Use the lag adjustment to do it even if it requires negative lag. This will only mess up the calculated injector duty cycle and not maximum flow through the injector.
850s require about -.04 lag.
(1680 / 850) = 1.98, 98% more flow
(125000/90490) = 1.38, 38% more flow needed for E85 over gasoline
Thus you will need a large negative lag to lean out idle.
Use the lag adjustment to do it even if it requires negative lag. This will only mess up the calculated injector duty cycle and not maximum flow through the injector.
850s require about -.04 lag.
(1680 / 850) = 1.98, 98% more flow
(125000/90490) = 1.38, 38% more flow needed for E85 over gasoline
Thus you will need a large negative lag to lean out idle.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Thanx Chuck, managed to get it started tonight, had to pull a lot of fuel as i under estimated just how much fuel it would use during cranking, also pulled lots out of the cranking map as well.
ticks over about 2k atm but may manage to get that down to 1600 with a little effort
gonna be getting afr's about 12.5 at tickover then start working with the cold start map from cold
ticks over about 2k atm but may manage to get that down to 1600 with a little effort
gonna be getting afr's about 12.5 at tickover then start working with the cold start map from cold
#5
Eye In The Sky
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: In A Disfunctional World
Posts: 7,894
Likes: 0
Received 114 Likes
on
66 Posts
Sorry but I did not explain this one and it may not be obvious to some.
An easy way to figure comparative fuel requirements between different fuels is
by BTUs. The same BTUs are required to make the same power regardless of the AFR differences.
125,000 btus for 1 gallon of gasoline (no ethanol added).
90,490 btus for 1 gallon of E85.
An easy way to figure comparative fuel requirements between different fuels is
by BTUs. The same BTUs are required to make the same power regardless of the AFR differences.
125,000 btus for 1 gallon of gasoline (no ethanol added).
90,490 btus for 1 gallon of E85.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mulcryant
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
10
09-09-15 05:24 PM