S5 turbo engine new rebuild
For SaleEngine - Complete
06-24-23, 01:15 PM | Replies: 12 | Views: 951
-
Price
$5,000• OBO
- Location Brigham City, UT, 84302, USA
- Condition Used
- Compatibility
| Make | Model | Year |
|---|---|---|
| Mazda | RX-7 | 1986 - 1991 |
Description:
Want a turbo engine without the hassle trying to source one with bad compression or trying to See if you can rebuild it and not work??? Here is what you're looking for. selling a s5 turbo engine with excellent compression numbers .Engine was rebuilt and was put in car. Last owner didn't have the funds to finish it.Drop in ready. Rc injectors and ports were cleaned up. Can ship through abf freight. Also have a complete aftermarket turbo setup for 1500..
5k for engine
06-25-23, 12:50 PM
#4
You do you man. Those numbers exceed new Renesis numbers at a lower compression ratio and less overlap, not to mention it's on the cusp of being punted by FSM standards by both chamber pressure differential as well as front/rear rotor differential.
This smacks of pouring oil in and netting good numbers on a cold engine that is otherwise unknown.
The following users liked this post:
Rx7K20 (06-25-23)
06-25-23, 01:02 PM
#5
You do you man. Those numbers exceed new Renesis numbers at a lower compression ratio and less overlap, not to mention it's on the cusp of being punted by FSM standards by both chamber pressure differential as well as front/rear rotor differential.
This smacks of pouring oil in and netting good numbers on a cold engine that is otherwise unknown.
This smacks of pouring oil in and netting good numbers on a cold engine that is otherwise unknown.
06-25-23, 01:22 PM
#7
I actually own Rotaries
iTrader: (40)
Lots of scammers out there, Like Joe Maddox for example.... Be careful guys
Trending Topics
06-25-23, 02:25 PM
#10
That's not how compensation for elevation works - higher elevation reads less, not more. Couple that with the fact that the screenshots are already altitude and RPM corrected according to your tester.
If they weren't corrected your already extremely dubious number of 144 with those rotors in that configuration would be closer to 175. An impossible number.
06-25-23, 02:38 PM
#11
Incorrect
That's not how compensation for elevation works - higher elevation reads less, not more. Couple that with the fact that the screenshots are already altitude and RPM corrected according to your tester.
If they weren't corrected your already extremely dubious number of 144 with those rotors in that configuration would be closer to 175. An impossible number.
If they weren't corrected your already extremely dubious number of 144 with those rotors in that configuration would be closer to 175. An impossible number.
This can help you and others how to read it correctly. Showed my live videos to reputable builders. They all said I should be around 130 to 140 after running hot.if you have any further questions I can send you to reputable builders who can answer them for you.
The following users liked this post:
matt555 (07-03-23)