Naturally Aspirated Performance Forum Discussion of naturally-aspirated rotary performance. No Power Adders, only pure rotary power! From the "12A" to the "RENESIS" and beyond.

Low power, NA tuning.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 10, 2012 | 11:34 PM
  #1  
djSL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 135
From: Duluth, MN
Low power, NA tuning.

Yes, I know there are countless threads regarding similar situations. However, I have some specifics. I plan on tuning the living **** out of the suspension and chassis of this vehicle to see potential drift/ time attack days as well as street use.

This being said, I am not adverse to gutting a majority of the chassis. I am also stitch welding the entire chassis(free service :])

Currently I am an NA 6 port with a full rb system, no cat, koyo rad, e fan, stupid Blitz cone filter, all emissions deleted minus OMP, stock suspension for now, and a 17" setup on wheels with 245's/8.5 in the rear. I understand that is probably waaaay too much rubber for what the 160-170ish I may be running but it came with the car.

Basically I am looking for suggestions for a near 200whp (less is fine), yet extremely track friendly FC. I appreciate all answers minus just turbo the B****

Reply
Old Sep 10, 2012 | 11:48 PM
  #2  
flaco's Avatar
******
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
From: miami
you planning in rebuilding and porting the engine ?
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2012 | 11:56 PM
  #3  
djSL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 135
From: Duluth, MN
That is a definite possibility. The motor currently only has 6k on it. However, I am open to porting.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2012 | 08:38 AM
  #4  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
ditch the 17's and get something shorter, or get some 4.44 or 4.7 rear end gears
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2012 | 08:44 AM
  #5  
a2dadamm's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: westchester, ny
will deff need a port. and look into an engine management system
and I would for sure lose the 17's find really light 16's or even stick with a 15. I think like rpf1's in 16's are around 15 pounds each. something like that will really help.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2012 | 09:10 AM
  #6  
23Racer's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 9
From: Oakville, Ontario
Absolutely loose the 17" wheels. I run 15x7's with 225x45x15 tires. Really low rolling radius effectively acts as a higher ratio rear gear and there is more than enough traction. I run wheels that weigh 15.7 lbs and when I use a heavier set of wheels (17 lbs+), they look cooler, but I am almost a second a lap slower on average. Also, the lighter wheel and tire package reduces unsprung weight and really improves the mechanical grip and responsiveness of the car.

Regarding the 6 port, we bolted on all kinds of stuff on our S5 6 port and made some decent power with it. It had good torque and was only limited by the stock rev limiter. My suggestion would be to go to an aftermarket ecu that allows for setting your own air/fuels, aggressive timing and rev limits, a ported RB Road Race header or if you can find a good ICS header, better. A very good exhaust system, I prefer long tube primaries merging into a 3" single. An S4 UIM amd LIM (works way better at higher rpm) and then make sure all of the other vehicle systems are in as good of shape as possible. I have heard of guys with stockish S5 kegs pulling the magical 200 whp in ITS and EProd, but I have never seen it in reality. I expect they are pullin a gazzilion rpm and the lifespan of the keg is in minutes.

Just some suggestions.

Eric
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2012 | 12:06 PM
  #7  
SCCAITS's Avatar
SCCAEP
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by 23Racer
An S4 UIM amd LIM (works way better at higher rpm)
Eric
I think you meant to say S5.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2012 | 05:00 PM
  #8  
djSL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 135
From: Duluth, MN
I plan on losing the wheels I currently have for a decent set of 16's. Also, I intend to eventually swap to a Turbo II drivetrain (mine seems to be acting up anyway), get a different clutch/lightened flywheel, and perhaps an aluminum driveshaft. I figure every little bit can help. I am planning on an ECU upgrade as well, though due to the cost it may be sometime. I would like to buy an ECU that I could use for either an NA or Turbo in case way down the road I decide to go turbo.

On that note, anyone want any 17x8.5 MB Weapons with some Yoko S-drives? I will trade for a nice set of 16's hahaha.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2012 | 10:49 AM
  #9  
rx7freak13v's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
From: Summerfield,FL
SCCAITS, 23Racer did mean s4. s4 na manifold has long smooth runner that flow better on the top end. the s5 manifold has a collector for the air and then splits off again. the s5 manifold is only worth using once it's ported and only if your keeping the vdi active, otherwise the s4 manifold is better.

DjSl, remember lighter is better. get you a good 6puk sprung clutch and lightweight flywheel. meantime, weght reduce the **** out of it lol. keep defrosters.....the extra 40ish pounds if that isn't worth not being able to see at night, or in the morning. i made that mistake before. otherwise, porting will be required to make that kind of power na and quieted for street use. your going to be over revving it like crazy which is something the PO didn't plan for, so while your in there doing your porting, have the rotating assembly balanced after you invest in the new clutch/flywheel. oh and gasket port match your intake manifold or even better, grab a ms3 and get some itb's
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 04:02 PM
  #10  
djSL's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 135
From: Duluth, MN
Yes, so far the plan is to lighten it up. I am trying to find a decent TII trans as mine is getting weak. So I might wait for the clutch/flywheel combo until a trans is acquired.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Queppa
New Member RX-7 Technical
11
Nov 18, 2024 03:47 AM
stickmantijuana
Microtech
30
Apr 23, 2016 06:37 PM
stickmantijuana
Microtech
5
Aug 23, 2015 11:04 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 PM.