Megasquirt AFR table for autotune use. 87 TII
AFR table for autotune use. 87 TII
I was wondering if someone could take a look at my AFR table that I'm going to be using with the autotune feature of megatune. It is my best guess from experience and what I've gathered off various forums.
My car is a 87 TII with a streetport, 89 rotors, 3" turbo back exhaust, no cats, stock turbo, front mount intercooler, 1000cc secondary injectors, an adjustable FPR, K&N air filter, and the air flow meter has been removed. I'm only running about 10-12 psi in boost, so the values in the table above that are for boost spikes.
I've been using a megasquirt version 2 board with the 29t extra code and megatune 2.25. I've been using fuel only and have gotten tuned sorta close using the datalogs.
Any input is welcomed.
JC
My car is a 87 TII with a streetport, 89 rotors, 3" turbo back exhaust, no cats, stock turbo, front mount intercooler, 1000cc secondary injectors, an adjustable FPR, K&N air filter, and the air flow meter has been removed. I'm only running about 10-12 psi in boost, so the values in the table above that are for boost spikes.
I've been using a megasquirt version 2 board with the 29t extra code and megatune 2.25. I've been using fuel only and have gotten tuned sorta close using the datalogs.
Any input is welcomed.
JC
I am no expert but your #'s seem alittle high, I try to keep mine from 0-10 psi I have it set to 11.5 then 11.0 at 15+. This has worked well for me so far.
Last edited by West-se; Oct 19, 2006 at 03:39 PM.
DO NOT use autotune, or run closed loop on boost.
The MS closed-loop algorithm causes slight oscillations (and doesn't react very quickly) in the AFR when it's active. This means if you're tuning close to the edge, it might go a little lean, and cross that edge. Personally I wouldn't trust ANY standalone EMS to do closed-loop on boost.
Instead I recommend starting out really rich on those parts of the table, and hand-leaning them out as you need to. Run open-loop above 100 kPa as well.
Ken
The MS closed-loop algorithm causes slight oscillations (and doesn't react very quickly) in the AFR when it's active. This means if you're tuning close to the edge, it might go a little lean, and cross that edge. Personally I wouldn't trust ANY standalone EMS to do closed-loop on boost.
Instead I recommend starting out really rich on those parts of the table, and hand-leaning them out as you need to. Run open-loop above 100 kPa as well.
Ken
Originally Posted by muythaibxr
DO NOT use autotune, or run closed loop on boost.
The MS closed-loop algorithm causes slight oscillations (and doesn't react very quickly) in the AFR when it's active. This means if you're tuning close to the edge, it might go a little lean, and cross that edge. Personally I wouldn't trust ANY standalone EMS to do closed-loop on boost.
Instead I recommend starting out really rich on those parts of the table, and hand-leaning them out as you need to. Run open-loop above 100 kPa as well.
Ken
The MS closed-loop algorithm causes slight oscillations (and doesn't react very quickly) in the AFR when it's active. This means if you're tuning close to the edge, it might go a little lean, and cross that edge. Personally I wouldn't trust ANY standalone EMS to do closed-loop on boost.
Instead I recommend starting out really rich on those parts of the table, and hand-leaning them out as you need to. Run open-loop above 100 kPa as well.
Ken
Ok, how about using the VE analyze function in Mega log viewer 2.52?
Originally Posted by jkrueger
Ok, how about using the VE analyze function in Mega log viewer 2.52?
Alright, it seems the safest and best way to tune the upper reaches of the VE table is the way I have been doing it (scanning datalogs and making tweaks). Does my AFR table at least look like good targets to aim for???
I know that the O2 readinds lag the actual conditions that the engine was at to produce the O2 reading. Does anybody have an idea of what that lag is? I'm using a techedge wide band sensor.
Thanks,
JC
I know that the O2 readinds lag the actual conditions that the engine was at to produce the O2 reading. Does anybody have an idea of what that lag is? I'm using a techedge wide band sensor.
Thanks,
JC
Trending Topics
generally you can tell this by looking at your datalog.
blip the throttle, then look in the datalog and see how long it takes AFR to change after you blip.
For most of the engine's I've worked with, it's about 200-300 ms.
blip the throttle, then look in the datalog and see how long it takes AFR to change after you blip.
For most of the engine's I've worked with, it's about 200-300 ms.
Those targets look safe.... although maybe a little rich up top for best power... depends on your ignition timing too though along with many other factors.
Last edited by muythaibxr; Oct 20, 2006 at 01:14 PM.
Originally Posted by renns
VE analyze uses EGO correction %, which is ....
hrmm, I'll have to ask Phil next time I talk to him (the guy that wrote it)....
Or see if he makes source-code available.
I think if you're running closed loop he definitely uses the EGO %... otherwise he wouldn't be able to calculate a proper value.
Or see if he makes source-code available.
I think if you're running closed loop he definitely uses the EGO %... otherwise he wouldn't be able to calculate a proper value.
Originally Posted by Eagle7
I don't think that's the case. It does its own analysis of actual AFR vs target, factoring in delay in AFR measurement, hit count, proximity to bin points, etc. You can even change the AFR target an reanalyze to get different results. I've had good luck getting an approximate map while running open loop.
http://www.ideasandsolutions.biz/Meg...eAnalysis.html
Originally Posted by jkrueger
Alright, it seems the safest and best way to tune the upper reaches of the VE table is the way I have been doing it (scanning datalogs and making tweaks).

I like setting it well rich, and backing it off as i brake against the accell to bring boost up or hold rpm steady. best when you have a good driver, leaving you to tune..
i wouldn't trust going into uncharted high load areas without having eased into it and be ready to crank up the fuel or back off the accell quickly.
sorry if misinterpretated... it's just soo easy for a unknown car to step out, or turbo to quickly spool or likewise...
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
From: Va Beach or IN, indianapolis
sorry to steal a thread.
but since its talking about this matter...here is the problem im having with this window.
my AFR target for VE table 1 shows up in volts im not to sure on how to change it to (AFR)
so reight now its
AFR Targets for VE table 1 (Volts) ive tried resetting it to default but nothing can make it go to the AFR settings
any help guys?
thanks
but since its talking about this matter...here is the problem im having with this window.
my AFR target for VE table 1 shows up in volts im not to sure on how to change it to (AFR)
so reight now its
AFR Targets for VE table 1 (Volts) ive tried resetting it to default but nothing can make it go to the AFR settings
any help guys?
thanks
A bit old, but for anything under about 75 kPa I try to run approx 16-16.2 AFR since this seems to give the best efficiency (except at idle, where I cant seem to get it stable at any leaner than 13:1). right around 100 kPa I aim for 13-13.5 AFR, up to 12 AFR at 140 kPa and down to 10.5-11 above there. I think this is a bit conservative in boost, but I havent gotten to a dyno to tune it more safely.
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
From: Va Beach or IN, indianapolis
no topless , i need help on setting up the window from VOLTS to AFR .
i found a link of what i have the same problem with and tried cutting and pasteing the ini file but the computer cant understand it. so im not sure how to set this up here is the link i mentioned.
http://www.msefi.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=30610
i found a link of what i have the same problem with and tried cutting and pasteing the ini file but the computer cant understand it. so im not sure how to set this up here is the link i mentioned.
http://www.msefi.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=30610
Sorry, I havent encountered that problem, im not sure how to resolve that... a suggestion would be to make sure that you're using one of the preset volts to AFR conversions in the configurator. That thread you linked to seems to be about the gauge displayed on the main page of megatune, not the AFR table anyway.
I just read the first bunch of posts and replied to what seemed to be the topic of the thread
I just read the first bunch of posts and replied to what seemed to be the topic of the thread
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MidnightOwl
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
1
Sep 25, 2015 10:24 PM




