Link Vi-PEC Versatile intelligent Performance Engine Control

Link Ci-PEC Link G4 RX Opinions?

Old 04-04-18, 06:22 PM
  #26  
JZG
Full Member

 
JZG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: 3116
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Saavedro88
Sorry to bump an ancient thread, I was just wondering if anyone could chime in on how their Link ECUs are doing these days? I'm looking at an Atom II for my FC, but there's no info in the second gen section. How are the Link ECUs to tune? How well do they hold up?
Link are very good value for $. Hardware wise they are very robust and reliable. It probably helps that the boards are actually assembled in New Zealand and Link make a point of using Japanese and European components in the boards. Easy to tune and the software is user friendly. Very popular here in NZ in both street and competition applications. Have noticed they are very resistant to RFI and trig errors too - switching from Microtech to Link years ago was the best thing I ever did.

You might consider the Monsoon over the Atom with it's on board 4 bar map sensor and extra inputs/outputs. If you want lambda the Link CAN Lambda is a good option without using up an AN volt channel. I've found the LSU 4.9 sensors last many times longer with this unit compared to AEM and Innovate units. I've found the accuracy is identical to Motec PLM with NTK sensor (direct comparison dyno testing).

Worth noting is the FD plug in ecus are essentially an Xtreme board, so with the expansion loom they are actually a very powerful ecu for the money. All drivers are intact so with a little modification they can be used in a direct fire ignition application, not just wasted spark.
The following users liked this post:
Saavedro88 (04-05-18)
Old 04-10-18, 08:08 PM
  #27  
Full Member

 
h_turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 163
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I am sold on the Link ECU
Old 04-10-19, 08:18 AM
  #28  
RE Suikoayanajim

 
RE.Amemiya.FD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Muscat, OMAN
Posts: 171
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy PFC vs Link

Hey guys!
need some help please.
My 7 is kinda stock but has RE Amemiya Intake and HKS Hi-Power, and running stock twins, sequential of course, but Link says it does not support sequential applications. Should I go for PFC?
I don't need to tune for race or anything, I am just looking into a light tune, my current chipped REDOM ECU isn't properly tuned and for sure don't wanna send it to RE Amemiya for retuning.

Your suggestions please.

Thanks,

Last edited by RE.Amemiya.FD3S; 04-10-19 at 08:19 AM. Reason: spelling
Old 10-29-20, 04:53 AM
  #29  
Junior Member

 
Bydlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Alberta
Posts: 12
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by RE.Amemiya.FD3S
Hey guys!
need some help please.
My 7 is kinda stock but has RE Amemiya Intake and HKS Hi-Power, and running stock twins, sequential of course, but Link says it does not support sequential applications. Should I go for PFC?
I don't need to tune for race or anything, I am just looking into a light tune, my current chipped REDOM ECU isn't properly tuned and for sure don't wanna send it to RE Amemiya for retuning.

Your suggestions please.

Thanks,
For your car, you'd be fine with Power FC, or even the stock ECU. Power FC is plug and play and works reasonably well on just the base map out of the box.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
joel(PA)
Group Buy & Product Dev. FD RX-7
8
10-04-15 06:07 PM
jdmbrendan
Introduce yourself
4
10-01-15 01:29 AM
pfsantos
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
1
09-30-15 01:29 PM
izzolaw
1st Gen General Discussion
2
09-27-15 08:33 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Link Ci-PEC Link G4 RX Opinions?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 PM.