rx7 with celica lights....
#26
Full Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Burnsville, MN (near Twin Cities)
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well...
It's not my cup of tea either, but I am sure that car is worth double or triple just about anyone else's car on the board.
It does look like an angry Pokemon or something though...
It does look like an angry Pokemon or something though...
#27
Glug Glug Glug Burp
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Scott AFB, IL
Posts: 3,819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Well...
Originally posted by xxxHondaGuyxxx
but I am sure that car is worth double or triple just about anyone else's car on the board.
but I am sure that car is worth double or triple just about anyone else's car on the board.
That I highly doubt. It's only WORTH what someone will pay, not how much has been invested.
I would buy it JUST to restore it to origional specs. Then I'd put the lights on a Supra..... Just for fun of course.
#29
Perpetual Project
iTrader: (4)
Originally posted by ptrhahn
Its not the worst thing i've ever seen... and it is a very clean install...
I think it would look alot better if it wasn't with the '99 turn signals, which don't work with them.
I can't believe in all these years nobody has ever come up with a factory-quallity light kit for these cars, so i can't really blame this guy for wanting to do SOMETHING.
Its not the worst thing i've ever seen... and it is a very clean install...
I think it would look alot better if it wasn't with the '99 turn signals, which don't work with them.
I can't believe in all these years nobody has ever come up with a factory-quallity light kit for these cars, so i can't really blame this guy for wanting to do SOMETHING.
What's sad is that the guy probably has alot better lighting then most FD owners - which qualifies it as a 'functional' upgrade. What's rice about that?
#30
Perpetual Project
iTrader: (4)
Hmmm, now that I look at it, I'm wondering how it would look with the TRD light covers in place (that make the lights look smaller).
http://www.trdracing.com/celica/celica3.htm
Too bad I've always associated 7s with pop-ups - that would have been an interesting project.
http://www.trdracing.com/celica/celica3.htm
Too bad I've always associated 7s with pop-ups - that would have been an interesting project.
#33
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Butler, PA
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by RX7FD
Does that look like the 350Z to anyone else but me?
Does that look like the 350Z to anyone else but me?
I can appreciate the quality of work done, as it looks like it's a pretty nice job, but why tinker with an FD, it's already the sexiest car on the roads IMHO. Hopefully I'll be fortunate enough to own one in the near future.
#34
Glug Glug Glug Burp
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Scott AFB, IL
Posts: 3,819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by ricola555
I like it. It's new and different. Variety is the spice of life. I'm sure the ladies would be drawn to it, and to its pilot.
I like it. It's new and different. Variety is the spice of life. I'm sure the ladies would be drawn to it, and to its pilot.
I could care less if ladies are drawn to it or not.... I don't drive the car to get laid. But if you like it, that's cool. I just think FD's chopped and merged with other cars should be put down; Like a horse with a broken back.
If you want variety, buy 3 FD's instead of ******* one up.
#35
Glug Glug Glug Burp
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Scott AFB, IL
Posts: 3,819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by dclin
Yeah, it's ok. Seems like they did a very good job at integrating in. I take more offense to the graphics then the lights.
What's sad is that the guy probably has alot better lighting then most FD owners - which qualifies it as a 'functional' upgrade. What's rice about that?
Yeah, it's ok. Seems like they did a very good job at integrating in. I take more offense to the graphics then the lights.
What's sad is that the guy probably has alot better lighting then most FD owners - which qualifies it as a 'functional' upgrade. What's rice about that?
On a side note... Is the hood functional? That could be a good thing also. I just think the lines are too sharp..
#37
Originally posted by stokedxiv
replacing parts of a great car, with parts from a lesser car = rice-a-roni
replacing parts of a great car, with parts from a lesser car = rice-a-roni
#38
Glug Glug Glug Burp
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Scott AFB, IL
Posts: 3,819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Shinobi-X
I also think the paint has a lot to do with it. Maybe if it was black, and those were S2000 headlights, it would be better.
I also think the paint has a lot to do with it. Maybe if it was black, and those were S2000 headlights, it would be better.
Maybe.... But I'm willing to bet it sits on 20's or some dumb ****... And couldn't get out of it's own way.
#39
Originally posted by jdhuegel1
Maybe.... But I'm willing to bet it sits on 20's or some dumb ****... And couldn't get out of it's own way.
Maybe.... But I'm willing to bet it sits on 20's or some dumb ****... And couldn't get out of it's own way.
#45
0-rotor-0-turbo-0-fd
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is not as hirrible as it looks, but they totaly don't fit the car looks though, and they should of had them smoked like the 99 bumper lights.
Otherwise the FD looks bad ***.
Otherwise the FD looks bad ***.
#48
Full Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: California, San Diego
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I always see supra tail lights on honda's. This is sort of similar. But, I always say, we should put Civic lights on one supra and see how they like it. But that'd be a waste of a good supra.