On-Board Wideband vs AFR500v2
On-Board Wideband vs AFR500v2
I have a Ballenger AFR500v2 (NTK) that I have been using with FuelTech.
Now that I am moving to an R3 ECU is it better to use the on-board o2 controller? Or is the Ballenger still a better option? Is there a difference in accuracy and does it matter? I will be using an NTK sensor
Apart from the on-board being simpler to install and using 1 less input, is there any discernible difference?
Now that I am moving to an R3 ECU is it better to use the on-board o2 controller? Or is the Ballenger still a better option? Is there a difference in accuracy and does it matter? I will be using an NTK sensor
Apart from the on-board being simpler to install and using 1 less input, is there any discernible difference?
Last edited by FD Wheel Covers In Carbon; Sep 13, 2024 at 08:36 AM.
The strength of the AFR500v2 is how stable the heating circuit is, alongside usage of lab grade NTK sensors - it's accuracy and repeatability is why I've swapped my old engine dyno controllers using 'disposable' LSU 4.2s even though I still need to keep them around for my hub dyno and its onboard controller.
That said so long as the heating circuit isn't overdriving things such as Innovates old(and probably current) gear the LSU is completely adequate for standard fuels if you keep it cool/downstream. I personally would keep it simple and run the onboard controller unless I was doing heavy alcohol injection, constant e85, meth, etc.
TL;DR - on paper and in real world use the AFR500 is superior, you probably wont be able to tell the difference in actual use and it makes for a cleaner install.
That said so long as the heating circuit isn't overdriving things such as Innovates old(and probably current) gear the LSU is completely adequate for standard fuels if you keep it cool/downstream. I personally would keep it simple and run the onboard controller unless I was doing heavy alcohol injection, constant e85, meth, etc.
TL;DR - on paper and in real world use the AFR500 is superior, you probably wont be able to tell the difference in actual use and it makes for a cleaner install.
I recently killed an innovate LSU 4.9 in a few hundred miles on the FD, and have another one on the way out in my FB (via Haltech WB1).
I've been wondering about this myself - if I should upgrade to the NTK via WB1 or the standalone Ballenger unit.
My innovate would slowly trend leaner and leaner until it stopped working, while the WB1 just cuts out under boost at the top of the pull. Interested to hear if anyone has had a good experience with the Haltech WB1/NTK sensor.
dguy: I'm guessing my sensors have been getting overheated and cooked and am under the impression that the NTK is better suited to high temps. That said, I have always wondered how important the controller is. You're saying that the cheaper controllers might just keep the sensor hotter overall? Therefore more likely to toast when we throw some good heat at em?
I've been wondering about this myself - if I should upgrade to the NTK via WB1 or the standalone Ballenger unit.
My innovate would slowly trend leaner and leaner until it stopped working, while the WB1 just cuts out under boost at the top of the pull. Interested to hear if anyone has had a good experience with the Haltech WB1/NTK sensor.
dguy: I'm guessing my sensors have been getting overheated and cooked and am under the impression that the NTK is better suited to high temps. That said, I have always wondered how important the controller is. You're saying that the cheaper controllers might just keep the sensor hotter overall? Therefore more likely to toast when we throw some good heat at em?
I recently killed an innovate LSU 4.9 in a few hundred miles on the FD, and have another one on the way out in my FB (via Haltech WB1).
I've been wondering about this myself - if I should upgrade to the NTK via WB1 or the standalone Ballenger unit.
My innovate would slowly trend leaner and leaner until it stopped working, while the WB1 just cuts out under boost at the top of the pull. Interested to hear if anyone has had a good experience with the Haltech WB1/NTK sensor.
dguy: I'm guessing my sensors have been getting overheated and cooked and am under the impression that the NTK is better suited to high temps. That said, I have always wondered how important the controller is. You're saying that the cheaper controllers might just keep the sensor hotter overall? Therefore more likely to toast when we throw some good heat at em?
I've been wondering about this myself - if I should upgrade to the NTK via WB1 or the standalone Ballenger unit.
My innovate would slowly trend leaner and leaner until it stopped working, while the WB1 just cuts out under boost at the top of the pull. Interested to hear if anyone has had a good experience with the Haltech WB1/NTK sensor.
dguy: I'm guessing my sensors have been getting overheated and cooked and am under the impression that the NTK is better suited to high temps. That said, I have always wondered how important the controller is. You're saying that the cheaper controllers might just keep the sensor hotter overall? Therefore more likely to toast when we throw some good heat at em?
The strength of the AFR500v2 is how stable the heating circuit is, alongside usage of lab grade NTK sensors - it's accuracy and repeatability is why I've swapped my old engine dyno controllers using 'disposable' LSU 4.2s even though I still need to keep them around for my hub dyno and its onboard controller.
That said so long as the heating circuit isn't overdriving things such as Innovates old(and probably current) gear the LSU is completely adequate for standard fuels if you keep it cool/downstream. I personally would keep it simple and run the onboard controller unless I was doing heavy alcohol injection, constant e85, meth, etc.
TL;DR - on paper and in real world use the AFR500 is superior, you probably wont be able to tell the difference in actual use and it makes for a cleaner install.
That said so long as the heating circuit isn't overdriving things such as Innovates old(and probably current) gear the LSU is completely adequate for standard fuels if you keep it cool/downstream. I personally would keep it simple and run the onboard controller unless I was doing heavy alcohol injection, constant e85, meth, etc.
TL;DR - on paper and in real world use the AFR500 is superior, you probably wont be able to tell the difference in actual use and it makes for a cleaner install.
That said, I’ve had good luck with Haltech and their standalone and internal controllers with the Bosch sensor. They give good life and apparent accuracy on everything I've used them on. I’ve only used an NTK sensor once with their internal controller, when the R5 was first released, and it was a disaster. They had issues with the firmware and the reading were skewed heavily rich. That said, they’ve apparently corrected the issue. Haven’t felt the need to use an NTK with their stuff since.
IMO, either option will work well for the original poster. If you have an extra analog input, use the AFR500. Otherwise, use the internal controller with confidence.
Not sure why so many people have sensors failing with the Haltech Controllers?
We fit them day in day out for many cars in the shop I can't think of the last time I had to replace a sensor.
Three things come to mind that could be variables to consider if your damaging sensors
Bad Controller (AEM, innovate etc)
Too close to turbo(Rotaries produce lots of heat)
Sensor mounted below horizontal and is retaining water, oil, fuel etc
If I had an R3 I would be using the onboard controller. It's significantly faster, you will find yourself factoring less for o2 delay when tuning and get a better picture of what is happening.
My 2 cents
We fit them day in day out for many cars in the shop I can't think of the last time I had to replace a sensor.
Three things come to mind that could be variables to consider if your damaging sensors
Bad Controller (AEM, innovate etc)
Too close to turbo(Rotaries produce lots of heat)
Sensor mounted below horizontal and is retaining water, oil, fuel etc
If I had an R3 I would be using the onboard controller. It's significantly faster, you will find yourself factoring less for o2 delay when tuning and get a better picture of what is happening.
My 2 cents
Trending Topics
I recently killed an innovate LSU 4.9 in a few hundred miles on the FD, and have another one on the way out in my FB (via Haltech WB1).
I've been wondering about this myself - if I should upgrade to the NTK via WB1 or the standalone Ballenger unit.
My innovate would slowly trend leaner and leaner until it stopped working, while the WB1 just cuts out under boost at the top of the pull. Interested to hear if anyone has had a good experience with the Haltech WB1/NTK sensor.
dguy: I'm guessing my sensors have been getting overheated and cooked and am under the impression that the NTK is better suited to high temps. That said, I have always wondered how important the controller is. You're saying that the cheaper controllers might just keep the sensor hotter overall? Therefore more likely to toast when we throw some good heat at em?
I've been wondering about this myself - if I should upgrade to the NTK via WB1 or the standalone Ballenger unit.
My innovate would slowly trend leaner and leaner until it stopped working, while the WB1 just cuts out under boost at the top of the pull. Interested to hear if anyone has had a good experience with the Haltech WB1/NTK sensor.
dguy: I'm guessing my sensors have been getting overheated and cooked and am under the impression that the NTK is better suited to high temps. That said, I have always wondered how important the controller is. You're saying that the cheaper controllers might just keep the sensor hotter overall? Therefore more likely to toast when we throw some good heat at em?
Yes, cheaper controllers tend to overdrive the heating circuit causing premature sensor failure. The odd floating ground issue that Innovates had didn't help matters either.
Not sure why so many people have sensors failing with the Haltech Controllers?
We fit them day in day out for many cars in the shop I can't think of the last time I had to replace a sensor.
Three things come to mind that could be variables to consider if your damaging sensors
Bad Controller (AEM, innovate etc)
Too close to turbo(Rotaries produce lots of heat)
Sensor mounted below horizontal and is retaining water, oil, fuel etc
If I had an R3 I would be using the onboard controller. It's significantly faster, you will find yourself factoring less for o2 delay when tuning and get a better picture of what is happening.
My 2 cents
We fit them day in day out for many cars in the shop I can't think of the last time I had to replace a sensor.
Three things come to mind that could be variables to consider if your damaging sensors
Bad Controller (AEM, innovate etc)
Too close to turbo(Rotaries produce lots of heat)
Sensor mounted below horizontal and is retaining water, oil, fuel etc
If I had an R3 I would be using the onboard controller. It's significantly faster, you will find yourself factoring less for o2 delay when tuning and get a better picture of what is happening.
My 2 cents
Where is your sensor located? When I installed my new wideband, the manual says it needs to be located 18" away from the compressor housing. Most I have seen are in the DP and with the heat our motors put off, can kill the sensors quickly if they are too close.
I would reference the manual for the O2 sensor. Mine said 18" away from heat source to ensure it survives. I had bung welded in the midpipe just over the flange to DP.
I have fitted many to OEM down pipes in the OEM location, Most sensors seem to go for roughly 3-4 years before they fail. It's definitely recommended to have them further away though. 18inch as mentioned already is a good place to be
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Adaptronic Adaptronic Wideband Modules now available
Turblown
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
0
Apr 29, 2019 02:28 PM







