General Rotary Tech Support Use this forum for tech questions not specific to a certain model year

Porting , or boost ? 350 goal better powerband ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-29-13, 02:29 PM
  #1  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Tem120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Porting , or boost ? 350 goal better powerband ?

yeah I guess the tittle is a bit misleading


I'm just curious about the idea . and Would like to ask what your opinions were on the subject .


there are a few ways to make power out of a rotary we all know that .

But what about maintaining a wide powerband .



now my question is this. which will yield a better power band result .

Say Option 1 stock ports to maintain low end power , and a bigger turbo that will achieve your desired goals , say 350 or 400


Options 2 , use a smaller turbo then in option 1 for quicker spool , BUT port the engine for more power top end .

Which would yield better results what would be the differences in the characteristics of the motor using these 2 options ?
Old 11-29-13, 03:58 PM
  #2  
F'n Newbie...

iTrader: (6)
 
fendamonky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Nokesville, Va
Posts: 3,928
Received 313 Likes on 228 Posts
As I understand it, enlarging the ports shifts the powerband to the right in exchange for a higher peak horsepower at the highest rpms. The larger the port, the more dramatic the change.

Personally, I would stick with stock sized ports and a gt35 sized turbo. If 350whp is your goal than you'll EASILY get there with a small/medium sized turbo.

Also, you left out the option with stock/smoothed ports, a small/medium BILLET turbo, and higher boost levels
Old 11-29-13, 04:04 PM
  #3  
F'n Newbie...

iTrader: (6)
 
fendamonky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Nokesville, Va
Posts: 3,928
Received 313 Likes on 228 Posts
Porting is a good way for N/A rotaries to flow more air, thus making more power.. FDs have the "easy" button, being the turbo, where you just gotta increase the boost to bump up the air flow.

Stock FD ports will flow 600whp+ for sure..
Old 11-29-13, 06:52 PM
  #4  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
diabolical1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 10,809
Received 305 Likes on 266 Posts
at the end of the day, whether ported or not, the key is sizing the appropriate turbo for your application. for 350, i wouldn't (in good conscience) tell you anything more that get an appropriate turbo for the car and whatever supporting parts you'd need to make it work safely. porting really isn't necessary at all for that power when turbocharging is involved.
Old 11-29-13, 06:58 PM
  #5  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
diabolical1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 10,809
Received 305 Likes on 266 Posts
Originally Posted by fendamonky
Stock FD ports will flow 600whp+ for sure..
quite true, but i just want to add though, that from what i've seen it's not really a common occurrence - even for the people making 600+.
Old 11-29-13, 07:20 PM
  #6  
F'n Newbie...

iTrader: (6)
 
fendamonky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Nokesville, Va
Posts: 3,928
Received 313 Likes on 228 Posts
Originally Posted by diabolical1
quite true, but i just want to add though, that from what i've seen it's not really a common occurrence - even for the people making 600+.
Agreed, however it also begs the question of whether "common practice" equated to "necessary practice" in this situation.

This scenario is, I believe, well beyond the scope of the original question. However I think that if the tuning is right, and the supporting mods are right, than "big" power on stock ports should totally be doable!!
Old 12-02-13, 03:14 PM
  #7  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Tem120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
ok now lets throw a bit of a twist ,

My motor is currently ported medium street port . I drove it around a bit and I did feel a lack of low end power .

Now if I had Gone the single turbo route

gotten a larger GT35 single with stock ports

VS using the 99 twins sequentially at 330 WHP

which would have a wider power band I'm not looking for much power just reliable power with a wider torque band .
Old 12-03-13, 01:27 PM
  #8  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
diabolical1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 10,809
Received 305 Likes on 266 Posts
without actually searching for graphs on either (that's on you ), if i had to guess, i would probably say the twins are probably going give you a better torque curve in that things will probably happen sooner and stay live for the usable stock RPM range. higher RPM use would likely bring more intake heat though.

depending on which turbine housing you go with on the GT35(R), you could probably come close, if not match, the initial spool of the twins, but i doubt you'd match their overall linearity. that said, i don't think it would be anything a good, sensible downshift couldn't fix if you needed it. also, i would expect the GT35 to ramp up softer, but plateau higher than the twins ... and still be on the boil in the higher RPM.

my 2 cents.
Old 12-04-13, 08:35 AM
  #9  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Tem120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Thanks , to everyone , alot of great info we'll see how things go , My friend has a quick spooling turbo , and I have the twins we'll see how our torque curve compares in a month or so .

his motor is ported though .


Also , as far as heating up the intake air temps .. I'm ok in that aspect atleast

Last edited by Tem120; 12-04-13 at 08:40 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
03-28-17 03:30 PM
ChrisRX8PR
Single Turbo RX-7's
18
08-21-15 01:56 PM



Quick Reply: Porting , or boost ? 350 goal better powerband ?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:52 PM.