3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Test of stock air-inlet flow restriction.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 12, 2004 | 03:06 PM
  #1  
FDjunkie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 394
Likes: 1
From: Bartlesville, OK.
Test of stock air-inlet flow restriction.

Well, guess what, the stock system sucks. I know big surprise.

I’ve read the posts about reverse-flow problems, the many filter and airbox mods/replacements, etc. So a few weeks ago I decided to try and measure how much restriction to airflow was created by the stock air inlet passages on my ’95 PEP. Other flow-affecting mods are SS downpipe and catback.

My test setup was to run a 3/16” clear vinyl tube from inside the airbox back in to the passenger compartment where the other end of the tubing was attached to 4-inch diameter mechanic’s vacuum/pressure test gauge. Then I went for a test drive while monitoring the test gauge’s responses.

Worst case I found 7-8 inches of vacuum IN FRONT OF THE FILTER ELEMENT! So regardless of the type of filter, the OE air passage between the air box and the front of the car cause a significant amount of flow restriction.

During this test I was running a Purolator brand filter element with ~9K miles of daily use. Had this been a higher flowing K&N, or even just a new element, I’m sure I would have seen higher vacuum readings.

Since I wanted to keep a stock appearance and also maintain as much air to the intercooler, I decided to perform the Robinette Cold Air mod http://www.rx7.org/Robinette/coldair.htm using two each 1-3/4” diameter aluminum flex hoses. Following this I retested and measured zero vacuum under all conditions. Butt-o-meter said there was noticeable improvement in power, particularly at higher RPM’s. Secondary boost recovered faster and held higher at redline. Transition spiking also increased by 2-3 PSI forcing me to add a manual controller for the wastegate; already had one for pre-spool.
Attached Thumbnails Test of stock air-inlet flow restriction.-measuring-vacuum-inside-filter-box-2.jpg   Test of stock air-inlet flow restriction.-cold-air-inlet-tubes.jpg  
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2004 | 03:27 PM
  #2  
Zyon13B's Avatar
"I see triangles"
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
From: PA
Good work.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2004 | 05:35 PM
  #3  
afterburn27's Avatar
Lets Go Hokies!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,727
Likes: 4
From: Greenville, SC
Good information, I always wanted to do this test but I was too lazy. Now I don't have to!
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2004 | 06:40 PM
  #4  
fd3s_rx7's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
From: Sac., CA
damn, good write up...
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2004 | 07:09 PM
  #5  
adam c's Avatar
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Good info.

I would be curious to hear if you get vacuum with a K&N. Any plans to test with a K&N?
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 08:40 PM
  #6  
FDjunkie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 394
Likes: 1
From: Bartlesville, OK.
adam c, my future plans do include switching to a K&N, but right now I've already installed another OEM style paper element; WIX this time.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 12:24 AM
  #7  
RotorMotor's Avatar
DRIVE THE ROTARY SPORTS
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,150
Likes: 0
From: CA (Bay Area)
Originally Posted by adam c
Good info.

I would be curious to hear if you get vacuum with a K&N. Any plans to test with a K&N?
i can test with a k&n... i have a stock box at the moment and freshly oiled K&n and my boost gauge is just lying around on my desk waiting for a project
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 02:36 AM
  #8  
Narfle's Avatar
Rx7 Wagon
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,021
Likes: 888
From: California
Originally Posted by RotorMotor
i can test with a k&n... i have a stock box at the moment and freshly oiled K&n and my boost gauge is just lying around on my desk waiting for a project
wouldnt it show even more vaccum since the filter element is less of a restirction all the restriction plus the increased air induction due to the performance filter would occuer at the duct???
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 03:57 AM
  #9  
scotty305's Avatar
~17 MPG
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 326
From: Bend, OR
RotorMotor, it would be very helpful if you performed these tests with a stock filter for baseline. It wouldn't make much sense to compare your results to FDjunkie's, since you'll each be using slightly different test setups, and testing slightly different motors in terms of mods & health.

-s-
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 04:23 AM
  #10  
RotorMotor's Avatar
DRIVE THE ROTARY SPORTS
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,150
Likes: 0
From: CA (Bay Area)
Originally Posted by scotty305
RotorMotor, it would be very helpful if you performed these tests with a stock filter for baseline. It wouldn't make much sense to compare your results to FDjunkie's, since you'll each be using slightly different test setups, and testing slightly different motors in terms of mods & health.

-s-
true... also the other thing im currently lacking is the top cover duct thing that goes over the IC and air box... (i installed a koyo, and everyhting seems to sit to high despite every effort to lower it).

also wouldnt you need two tests for every setup?? youd need a pre filter vacuum test, and a post filter vacuum test to compare anything. id think one would also want a test with NO filter at all to see what the upper bounds would be... in other words, the value that we are striving towards (no restriction).

another thing that would need to be considered is RPM, and what the turbos are doing. depending on those 2 factors, the vacuum value you would obtain would be altered. im down to experement with various filters (i should have the apexi filters for my project car hopefully soon) but we need to isolate the variables so we can see what exactly is affecting our readings... sorry that sounded really dorky, but anything we find will be useless unless the tests are controlled... so lets talk -heath
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 04:26 AM
  #11  
RotorMotor's Avatar
DRIVE THE ROTARY SPORTS
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,150
Likes: 0
From: CA (Bay Area)
i wish i had a gauge setup where i could plot pressure/vacuum vs RPM.... then i could just go WOT and we could get some nice plots of how particular filter setups compared.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 04:45 AM
  #12  
maxcooper's Avatar
WWFSMD
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,035
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
FDjunkie, great test! I've always wondered about that. I'm glad the hoses-in-the-bottom provided such a measurable improvement.

-Max
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 04:57 AM
  #13  
SpoolinRX's Avatar
OFENSIV
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 714
Likes: 1
From: N/A
Your to smart for you own good, you make my head hurt max
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
immanuel__7
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
89
Sep 5, 2015 10:23 AM
efini7
Test Area 51
1
Sep 4, 2015 02:59 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:10 AM.