RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum

RX7Club.com - Mazda RX7 Forum (https://www.rx7club.com/)
-   Canadian Forum (https://www.rx7club.com/canadian-forum-42/)
-   -   Mission May: Complete Twin Turbo FD V8 (https://www.rx7club.com/canadian-forum-42/mission-may-complete-twin-turbo-fd-v8-1032236/)

Aaron Cake 04-15-13 08:50 AM


Originally Posted by zeeshan (Post 11438104)
that is exactly it, spark plug clearance. the damn plugs are at an angle to head.
you can see in this pic if i angle the runners clockwise (which i have to due to turbo placement), i decrease the plug clearance a lot
log manifolds in general are poop as you know already :p i didnt want to go with tubular style manifolds either cause they takes too much damn space and i wasnt aiming for anymore than 700bhp

That makes sense. So my next question is, why not stainless? :P I don't doubt that the SCH40 steel will hold up really well considering the rather weak EGTs of a piston engine compared to a rotary, but in bulk the supplies in stainless aren't much more than mild steel. Of course it requires much more fussy welding.

And why stainless for the intercooler piping instead of the much lighter aluminum? I used to make mine with stainless before I had the equipment to weld aluminum.

Hope it doesn't sound like I'm picking you apart...I just want to understand your decisions.

What EMS are you going to run?

CS13B 04-15-13 01:46 PM

Nice work, keep the updates coming!

zeeshan 04-15-13 07:55 PM


Originally Posted by Aaron Cake (Post 11439602)
That makes sense. So my next question is, why not stainless? :P I don't doubt that the SCH40 steel will hold up really well considering the rather weak EGTs of a piston engine compared to a rotary, but in bulk the supplies in stainless aren't much more than mild steel. Of course it requires much more fussy welding.

And why stainless for the intercooler piping instead of the much lighter aluminum? I used to make mine with stainless before I had the equipment to weld aluminum.

Hope it doesn't sound like I'm picking you apart...I just want to understand your decisions.

What EMS are you going to run?

I like to use low carbon steel for turbo manifolds because when you weld it the heat affected zone (HAZ) has composition that's very similar to the base metal, therefore the weld has a very similar grain structure to the base metal grain structure. This is because there isn't enough carbon or other alloys to form brittle crystalline structures. Stainless on the other hand will rapidly form brittle crystalline structures at the HAZ. Even though stainless has better creep resistance than low carbon steel, if you consider in the composition at the HAZ, the low carbon steel welds have better creep resistance than stainless welds. You'll notice most properly welded stainless manifolds will crack in the HAZ. (If they crack in the center line of the weld, that is just a bad weld -- wrong filler, little penetration)

Other minor reasons are low carbon steel expands less than stainless steel, don't need to back purge low carbon steel, low carbon steel warps less than stainless steel (not only when welding, but during service too).

You are right, stainless steel weld elbows cost about $1 more than steel in bulk. So cost really isn't a factor.

Ideally, the ULTIMATE manifold would be thick cast stainless steel! I'm planning to make a kit out of this if this works out well in the future. When I get to that point, I will definitely be making cast stainless manifolds because the cost will be justified, the setup well be proven, and there will be no welds to crack :)


I used to make aluminum intercooler piping before. You're right its lighter. For my current setup, it'd be about 6lb lighter. Aluminum on the other hand is absolutely garbage in terms of being scratch resistant! After a couple times removing the piping in and out of the car, they'd be scratched easily. Shit even putting them on the work bench meant they'd get scratched! I can throw my stainless pipes onto the table, across the room (don't ask me why), and they don't get scratched or dented. Another reason is cost. I can get stainless mandrel bends for a lot cheaper than aluminum mandrel bends. $13 vs $22 on average. So it costs less, looks better (yes I've got ricer tendencies hehe), and weighs slightly more -- this is why i use stainless over aluminum.

Scrodes 04-18-13 12:08 AM

Man, that car was looking good tonight. Nice work Zeeshan

Subscribed.

You me and Ken need to get together for drinks at your place

Aaron Cake 04-21-13 10:32 AM


Originally Posted by zeeshan (Post 11440173)
I like to use low carbon steel for turbo manifolds because when you weld it the heat affected zone (HAZ) has composition that's very similar to the base metal, therefore the weld has a very similar grain structure to the base metal grain structure. This is because there isn't enough carbon or other alloys to form brittle crystalline structures. Stainless on the other hand will rapidly form brittle crystalline structures at the HAZ. Even though stainless has better creep resistance than low carbon steel, if you consider in the composition at the HAZ, the low carbon steel welds have better creep resistance than stainless welds. You'll notice most properly welded stainless manifolds will crack in the HAZ. (If they crack in the center line of the weld, that is just a bad weld -- wrong filler, little penetration)

I agree, welding stainless can be very easy to get wrong. Controlling heat and keeping the oxygen away will go a long way to help carbon embrittlement but of course the only fix is to anneal the whole manifold after. Not exactly a practical measure for most people. :)


Ideally, the ULTIMATE manifold would be thick cast stainless steel! I'm planning to make a kit out of this if this works out well in the future. When I get to that point, I will definitely be making cast stainless manifolds because the cost will be justified, the setup well be proven, and there will be no welds to crack :)
That will be very impressive. I don't know anyone making a cast stainless manifold in the rotary world.

zeeshan 04-24-13 09:11 PM


Originally Posted by Scrodes (Post 11442584)
Man, that car was looking good tonight. Nice work Zeeshan

Subscribed.

You me and Ken need to get together for drinks at your place

sounds good matt!

zeeshan 04-24-13 09:13 PM

3 Attachment(s)
intercooler pipes welded!
Attachment 674178

Attachment 674179

Attachment 674180


spacing between the weld puddles is in an effort to save filler and gas :P

zeeshan 04-25-13 03:07 AM

3 Attachment(s)
bead rolled the intercooler pipes

Attachment 674171

Attachment 674172

Attachment 674173

Aaron Cake 04-25-13 08:41 AM

Bead roller....*drool*

zeeshan 04-25-13 02:09 PM

aaron if you need your ic pipes beaded you can come use it :)

2Fierce 04-25-13 06:52 PM

so beautiful.

zeeshan 04-27-13 04:32 AM

downpipe coming together slowly. still gotta recirculate the wastegate dumps. thanks to my buddy brian for helping me out major under the car.
right side setup:
http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p...ps81d6b2db.jpg

left side setup:
http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p...ps54e41979.jpg

zeeshan 04-27-13 03:09 PM

2 Attachment(s)
Attachment 673929

Attachment 673930

KenSpeC 04-27-13 03:27 PM

Zee that looks awesome!! Ill definitely swing by this week :)

Scrodes 04-29-13 06:42 AM

Nice work Zee!

Ken, let me know when you're going to swing by and I'll come join you guys.

IAN 04-29-13 07:12 PM

Dual turbos :)

1.3L NoValves 04-30-13 07:16 AM

This things come a long way from when I saw it last winter. Great work man keep it up. Ill have to come check it out too


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands