1982 IMSA Endurance Racer Build- The Shrike
#77
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,900
Received 2,643 Likes
on
1,872 Posts
for a new car you want to have fresh fluids, and torque everything on the chassis. i set the alignment to something simple basic (totally fine just to check what you have an write it down), and then set tire pressure to like 28 cold and just drive.
this last car we spent most of the first day adjusting seat/mirrors/belts.
do bring a notepad (or have a primer square on the hood and a sharpie) and write stuff down. once you get the bugs worked out you do want a little log of what changes you make to the car, and what it did, over time it'll be useful
this last car we spent most of the first day adjusting seat/mirrors/belts.
do bring a notepad (or have a primer square on the hood and a sharpie) and write stuff down. once you get the bugs worked out you do want a little log of what changes you make to the car, and what it did, over time it'll be useful
The following users liked this post:
gracer7-rx7 (05-04-21)
#79
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,900
Received 2,643 Likes
on
1,872 Posts
#80
Full Member
Thread Starter
You guys are awesome! Thanks for all the pointers. Tom set up the suspension so before I mess with anything I'm going to catalogue in great detail exactly the way he had it so I can have a good baseline. That way if i change something and it ruins the set-up I can fix it!
I have another question for y'all: how rich do you tune your engines to run? Mine is currently running so rich that at idle, it'll leave a pile of soot and stain the tarmac! I know rotary engines need slightly different set-ups than piston ones, but we don't set-up any of our carbureted V8s to run anything near that rich, so Im inclined to believe I need to adjust the mixture on my carb. Does the rotary need to run that rich? If so why? Is it because of the higher operating rev-range?
I have another question for y'all: how rich do you tune your engines to run? Mine is currently running so rich that at idle, it'll leave a pile of soot and stain the tarmac! I know rotary engines need slightly different set-ups than piston ones, but we don't set-up any of our carbureted V8s to run anything near that rich, so Im inclined to believe I need to adjust the mixture on my carb. Does the rotary need to run that rich? If so why? Is it because of the higher operating rev-range?
#81
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
Based on personal experience with Tom's carbs, I know that he liked to tune the carb very rich through the primaries. Somewhere recently I noted that cars he prepped ran like crap at part throttle, but were fine when you get to WOT. I had him rebuild a carb for me quite a while ago. That was for a stock port 12A with RB short collected header. The jetting was 140/130 primary/secondary, with all other jets stock. After several trips to the dyno, I eventually found that 110/170 resulted in the same (or slightly better) HP without the part throttle deficiency. The A/F ratio is 12.5 to 13-ish. That seems to be where the best power is. Others may have different/better experience.
BTW, I was racing with Lucky Dog this last weekend and ended up with two broken front spindles. One on Saturday and the other on Sunday. I am pretty sure that both are original to my car (Spec7 to Pro7 to ITA to STL/Endurance) with about 20 years of racing use. It doesn't seem to happen too often, but it does. I am planning on doing a dye penetrant test (chemicals are available for about $100) on a regular basis to try and minimize the possibility of future on track failures. I am also smoothing out a sharp transition from parallel to tapered on the outboard end of the spindle to reduce the possibility of stress risers occurring at that point (which is where both failures occurred). I started a separate thread that shows the failed spindles.
Have fun when you get out on track. Your car will work great with Lucky Dog type groups. Before our spindle failure a little over 2/3 of the way through the Saturday race, we were in 1st place in class C (29 cars). You and your team can easily get there too. If you want to win/podium overall, you need a much different car. Maybe turboed Miata or E36/E46 BMW. Class C is where we want to be tho
Good Luck
Carl
BTW, I was racing with Lucky Dog this last weekend and ended up with two broken front spindles. One on Saturday and the other on Sunday. I am pretty sure that both are original to my car (Spec7 to Pro7 to ITA to STL/Endurance) with about 20 years of racing use. It doesn't seem to happen too often, but it does. I am planning on doing a dye penetrant test (chemicals are available for about $100) on a regular basis to try and minimize the possibility of future on track failures. I am also smoothing out a sharp transition from parallel to tapered on the outboard end of the spindle to reduce the possibility of stress risers occurring at that point (which is where both failures occurred). I started a separate thread that shows the failed spindles.
Have fun when you get out on track. Your car will work great with Lucky Dog type groups. Before our spindle failure a little over 2/3 of the way through the Saturday race, we were in 1st place in class C (29 cars). You and your team can easily get there too. If you want to win/podium overall, you need a much different car. Maybe turboed Miata or E36/E46 BMW. Class C is where we want to be tho
Good Luck
Carl
#82
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,900
Received 2,643 Likes
on
1,872 Posts
#83
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
What I was trying to say about the standard "Tom tuning" was that at part throttle, when the secondaries are not yet opening, the A/F is very rich. Spewing black smoke rich. Once the secondaries open, everything evens out and the car runs fine. This super rich part throttle makes the engine unresponsive if you have turns requiring part throttle. The super rich primaries though may make a functioning accelerator pump less important, since there is already plenty of fuel when the secondaries start to open. That may have been his logic. If the accelerator pump is working fine though, it is not a concern.
I am interested to here what jetting is installed in your carb. Let us know after you have taken a look.
Also don't worry about changing it before getting out on track. It will work OK and there were plenty of Pro7's driving around for a long time with Tom's jetting. Rick drove the car like that for a long time. Not very quickly, but drove it.
Carl
I am interested to here what jetting is installed in your carb. Let us know after you have taken a look.
Also don't worry about changing it before getting out on track. It will work OK and there were plenty of Pro7's driving around for a long time with Tom's jetting. Rick drove the car like that for a long time. Not very quickly, but drove it.
Carl
#84
Full Member
Thread Starter
Based on personal experience with Tom's carbs, I know that he liked to tune the carb very rich through the primaries. Somewhere recently I noted that cars he prepped ran like crap at part throttle, but were fine when you get to WOT. I had him rebuild a carb for me quite a while ago. That was for a stock port 12A with RB short collected header. The jetting was 140/130 primary/secondary, with all other jets stock. After several trips to the dyno, I eventually found that 110/170 resulted in the same (or slightly better) HP without the part throttle deficiency. The A/F ratio is 12.5 to 13-ish. That seems to be where the best power is. Others may have different/better experience.
Carl
Carl
I think I may tweak the mixture screw a little and see if I can lean it just enough to stop the smoking and plug fouling I'm having and leave it at that. If I'm careful and only lean it out a little I don't believe that'll cause any problems. I also have stock carb on a motor I pulled form an 83 auto RX7 in a parts yard on the 2nd but I doubt swapping it over to the race car would be the right call.
Tell me, gentlemen do your rotary powered racers run so rich they smoke?
#85
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,900
Received 2,643 Likes
on
1,872 Posts
yeah that is a thing too
#86
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,900
Received 2,643 Likes
on
1,872 Posts
if it was mine, i would adjust the idle mixture, same as any other engine, just turn it until it runs the best. if it starts stumbling driving around, you can always run it richer.
#87
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (3)
I had an ISC carb and a Paul Yaw carb on my car when I ran in IT7/ITA. As I recall both of them idled pretty clean and the car only smoked a little on start up at the beginning of the weekend because of an excess of premix in the fuel bowl. Nothing sooty ever.
As long as I kept the floats and fuel pressure adjusted correctly the car ran like it had EFI. Typically I had to set both once a weekend.
Both of those carbs were way better than the stock ones my competitors had. So, make your race prepped carb work.
As long as I kept the floats and fuel pressure adjusted correctly the car ran like it had EFI. Typically I had to set both once a weekend.
Both of those carbs were way better than the stock ones my competitors had. So, make your race prepped carb work.
#88
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
No smoking issues here either other than sometimes a small amount on start-up. I believe that happens if I pump the throttle a little too much before starting the car. Idle is fine at ~1200 rpm after the coolant temp reaches about 120 degF. Before that I keep my foot on the throttle at >2000rpm. Starts easy cold and hot. If it is smoky while driving full throttle you probably have some problem other than running too rich. Interestingly I never have to reset the floats and fuel pressure after initially dialing them in. I am sure it must be just luck on my part, as I am no where near as skilled with carbs as Paul Yaw or ISC.
It is really easy to check the jet sizing, just so you know. With your background it should be really easy to figure out, but I will give a quick rundown. Remove the airhorn. It is held down by a 6 or 7 (or something) small screws (examples of which are circled in red below). Then remove the center bolt (also circled in red). You will also have to disconnect the throttle return spring. With the airhorn off, you can see the jets. You might even be able to read the jet sizes if you are lucky (they will be 3 digits). If you can't see the sizes, there are access plugs that need to be removed (circled in yellow). Once those are removed, you use a flat bladed screwdriver to unscrew the jets. You might have to modify a screwdriver or two, because of access interference. You should be able to do it the first time in less than 20 minutes. About 5 minutes once you know the drill and have the right screwdrivers. Of course you don't have to modify screw drivers if you just pull the carb off the engine, which is only 4 nuts which should be pretty accessible on your stripped carb.
Although you can probably find it on the internet pretty easily, I can forward you a copy of the Mazda carb manual if you PM me your email address.
Carl
It is really easy to check the jet sizing, just so you know. With your background it should be really easy to figure out, but I will give a quick rundown. Remove the airhorn. It is held down by a 6 or 7 (or something) small screws (examples of which are circled in red below). Then remove the center bolt (also circled in red). You will also have to disconnect the throttle return spring. With the airhorn off, you can see the jets. You might even be able to read the jet sizes if you are lucky (they will be 3 digits). If you can't see the sizes, there are access plugs that need to be removed (circled in yellow). Once those are removed, you use a flat bladed screwdriver to unscrew the jets. You might have to modify a screwdriver or two, because of access interference. You should be able to do it the first time in less than 20 minutes. About 5 minutes once you know the drill and have the right screwdrivers. Of course you don't have to modify screw drivers if you just pull the carb off the engine, which is only 4 nuts which should be pretty accessible on your stripped carb.
Although you can probably find it on the internet pretty easily, I can forward you a copy of the Mazda carb manual if you PM me your email address.
Carl
#89
Full Member
Thread Starter
I had an ISC carb and a Paul Yaw carb on my car when I ran in IT7/ITA. As I recall both of them idled pretty clean and the car only smoked a little on start up at the beginning of the weekend because of an excess of premix in the fuel bowl. Nothing sooty ever.
As long as I kept the floats and fuel pressure adjusted correctly the car ran like it had EFI. Typically I had to set both once a weekend.
Both of those carbs were way better than the stock ones my competitors had. So, make your race prepped carb work.
As long as I kept the floats and fuel pressure adjusted correctly the car ran like it had EFI. Typically I had to set both once a weekend.
Both of those carbs were way better than the stock ones my competitors had. So, make your race prepped carb work.
No smoking issues here either other than sometimes a small amount on start-up. I believe that happens if I pump the throttle a little too much before starting the car. Idle is fine at ~1200 rpm after the coolant temp reaches about 120 degF. Before that I keep my foot on the throttle at >2000rpm. Starts easy cold and hot. If it is smoky while driving full throttle you probably have some problem other than running too rich. Interestingly I never have to reset the floats and fuel pressure after initially dialing them in. I am sure it must be just luck on my part, as I am no where near as skilled with carbs as Paul Yaw or ISC.
It is really easy to check the jet sizing, just so you know. With your background it should be really easy to figure out, but I will give a quick rundown. Remove the airhorn...
Although you can probably find it on the internet pretty easily, I can forward you a copy of the Mazda carb manual if you PM me your email address.
It is really easy to check the jet sizing, just so you know. With your background it should be really easy to figure out, but I will give a quick rundown. Remove the airhorn...
Although you can probably find it on the internet pretty easily, I can forward you a copy of the Mazda carb manual if you PM me your email address.
I have a 1982 model year FSM and I believe that I also have a carb manual in my folder of car documents. If I don't have it I'l be sure to send you a PM, Carl and then I can go from there in regards to finding out the jetting sizes. I'll also try to post pics of the old dyno sheets as they're in the same folder so if I have to have them out I may as well! I'll let y'all know what happens when I start messing with the mix, hopefully later today.
#90
Full Member
Thread Starter
Well I finally properly looked over the dyno paperwork, and Carl was right! It appears that Mazdatrix tuned my carb with 140 primary AND secondary jets. That may explain why my car is running so very rich! I haven't touches the idle mixture screw yet, but I'm not sure it'll be able to compensate for the big honkin' jets dumping fuel into the carb! I still may try to mess with it and see what I can do, but I may have found my problem. Here's all the dyno paperwork I have:
Carl I'll send you a PM with my email in the hope you can send me over that rebuild manual you mentioned earlier
Carl I'll send you a PM with my email in the hope you can send me over that rebuild manual you mentioned earlier
#91
Full Member
Thread Starter
I also have a big binder full of printed out copies of a whole bunch of stuff including a Yawpower guide to carb tuning and this Mazspeed book as well. It's a bummer about the Mazspeed thing though as it seems the printer was low on toner and stopped printing clearly about half-way through. I'll check online and see if I can find a .pdf copy somewhere
#92
Rotary Enthusiast
Looks like it used all of the toner on the front cover
The following users liked this post:
mustanghammer (05-13-21)
#94
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
I am not a Nikki expert, especially on the non-WOT operating modes. The fuel for the idle circuit is pulled through the primary main jets though, so the main jets do come into play somewhat at least. I would think that the mixture adjustment screw (basically only effective at idle) should be able to make up for a lot of the effects of the large primary jets.
Here is a clip from the Mazda manual
Here is a clip from the Mazda manual
The following users liked this post:
mustanghammer (05-13-21)
#96
Full Member
Thread Starter
I am not a Nikki expert, especially on the non-WOT operating modes. The fuel for the idle circuit is pulled through the primary main jets though, so the main jets do come into play somewhat at least. I would think that the mixture adjustment screw (basically only effective at idle) should be able to make up for a lot of the effects of the large primary jets.
Carl are you making similar power with you 110/170 jetting? Also does anyone see any glaring issues with my mixture screw idea? Is that the right court of action of does it pose some danger on Nikki carbs I'm not aware of? I've been treating them like Hollys bit as I learn more it seems that they're substantially more different than I thought...
#97
Full Member
Thread Starter
Alright y'all here's an update: I leaned out the idle as much as I could with the MAS and there's no change to the presence of smoke coming out of the tail pipe. The MAS was basically as lean as it could go anyway. At this point I'm not sure if I'll try Carl's preferred jet sizes or try and finally get a different carb set-up for this engine like I initially wanted. I'll figure it out as I go along.
#98
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,900
Received 2,643 Likes
on
1,872 Posts
Alright y'all here's an update: I leaned out the idle as much as I could with the MAS and there's no change to the presence of smoke coming out of the tail pipe. The MAS was basically as lean as it could go anyway. At this point I'm not sure if I'll try Carl's preferred jet sizes or try and finally get a different carb set-up for this engine like I initially wanted. I'll figure it out as I go along.
#99
Full Member
Thread Starter
My Bridgeport 12A with a modified Nikki carb is currently set to idle at 1500rpm when at operating temperature. I asked Daniel at Garage Life and read all the forum posts I could about where a bridge should idle and that was the answer I kept getting.
In an email Carl sent me he explained that the stock jets on a Nikki were something like 92/160 so I may be unable to compensate with the MAS for the jet being basically 50% larger than stock. But of course, if this engine actually is bridgeported than it would be able to consume more air than a stock engine, but then again the stock carb may already be flowing all the air it can, regardless of the engine's ability to move more air. I'm stumped, gentlemen! I guess I'll look into jetting the carb more towards Carl's preference of 110/160 and see how that pans out! If i need to I can also through the stock 83 12A in the car and see what that does.
In an email Carl sent me he explained that the stock jets on a Nikki were something like 92/160 so I may be unable to compensate with the MAS for the jet being basically 50% larger than stock. But of course, if this engine actually is bridgeported than it would be able to consume more air than a stock engine, but then again the stock carb may already be flowing all the air it can, regardless of the engine's ability to move more air. I'm stumped, gentlemen! I guess I'll look into jetting the carb more towards Carl's preference of 110/160 and see how that pans out! If i need to I can also through the stock 83 12A in the car and see what that does.
#100
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,900
Received 2,643 Likes
on
1,872 Posts
so the idle hole is in a fixed place, physically. and when you raise the idle speed it moves the throttle plate away from the idle hole, and the carb will start using the next circuit (on a weber its the progression holes).
this reduces the effect of the idle mixture screw, because basically you're not using that part of the carb as much. its one of the quirks with the IDA on a rotary
if you lower the idle speed, the mixture screw will work more. the P port/Weber will idle around 900rpm, although nikki/BP is a different thing
i'm not sure how the Nikki works enough, but on the Weber the progression holes are controlled by the idle jet, so if you wanted to idle at 1500rpm, all the tuning is the idle jetting. mixture screw would do almost nothing
hopefully that makes sense
this reduces the effect of the idle mixture screw, because basically you're not using that part of the carb as much. its one of the quirks with the IDA on a rotary
if you lower the idle speed, the mixture screw will work more. the P port/Weber will idle around 900rpm, although nikki/BP is a different thing
i'm not sure how the Nikki works enough, but on the Weber the progression holes are controlled by the idle jet, so if you wanted to idle at 1500rpm, all the tuning is the idle jetting. mixture screw would do almost nothing
hopefully that makes sense
Last edited by j9fd3s; 05-14-21 at 01:22 PM.