CUBA6942: Terrible experience
#51
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Anchorage, AK
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would like to input that I recently purchased a PFC from CUBA6942, and recieved it quickly in great condition. I had a great experience buying from him and I would do it again.
#52
All out Freak!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: in a little box on a stick
Posts: 2,300
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
9 Posts
Does anyone else here see the irony in this?
A guy from Alaska just bought the same exact kind of part that was sent back by the OP in this thread? Cuba gets the PFC back, says "hey, it doesnt work, I am keeping your money". And THEN, he sells the same exact kind of part to this other guy?
A little homework shows that earlier in October, potassemon was posting in other people's FS threads, looking for one of these.So, it is clear that "recently" was at the very earliest in October. I wonder if this is the same unit that "doesnt work anymore"......it sure does seem like it. Cuba has never had a problem posting FS threads, he's posted a lot of them whenever he had something for sale....and yet, strangely enough, there is no FS thread showing him selling a PFC and potassemon buying it.
More to follow...
A guy from Alaska just bought the same exact kind of part that was sent back by the OP in this thread? Cuba gets the PFC back, says "hey, it doesnt work, I am keeping your money". And THEN, he sells the same exact kind of part to this other guy?
A little homework shows that earlier in October, potassemon was posting in other people's FS threads, looking for one of these.So, it is clear that "recently" was at the very earliest in October. I wonder if this is the same unit that "doesnt work anymore"......it sure does seem like it. Cuba has never had a problem posting FS threads, he's posted a lot of them whenever he had something for sale....and yet, strangely enough, there is no FS thread showing him selling a PFC and potassemon buying it.
More to follow...
#53
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (12)
It was purchased about 4 months ago.. It was a completly different unit. I shipped it out 4 months ago. I did not resell the item, as it has been thrown in the garbage.
See now your just jumping to conclusions. I had a PFC on my second gen when i had a 13b REW in it. These are two different items. If you dont believe me ask the Postessem. I sure he wont mind posting you guys pictures of the unit that i sold him 4 months agos. youll see that the etching is not there ( there is no way to remove the etching of my name). Stop jumping to conclusions . Please. I havent done anything wrong!
Please take pictures of the unit and post them on this thread . People are mistaking it as if i just recently ( Past week ) that i shipped out the PFC in question on this thread. Please take pictures and post them!!
You are trying to make look bad. this was a previous purchase. @ 4 months ago. I have him to post pictures so that you can see that it is not the same unit. In this sale It was only the PFC unit that was sold . No commander! as i used to use my Dads on my car to tune it!!!
Does anyone else here see the irony in this?
A guy from Alaska just bought the same exact kind of part that was sent back by the OP in this thread? Cuba gets the PFC back, says "hey, it doesnt work, I am keeping your money". And THEN, he sells the same exact kind of part to this other guy?
A little homework shows that earlier in October, potassemon was posting in other people's FS threads, looking for one of these.So, it is clear that "recently" was at the very earliest in October. I wonder if this is the same unit that "doesnt work anymore"......it sure does seem like it. Cuba has never had a problem posting FS threads, he's posted a lot of them whenever he had something for sale....and yet, strangely enough, there is no FS thread showing him selling a PFC and potassemon buying it.
More to follow...
A guy from Alaska just bought the same exact kind of part that was sent back by the OP in this thread? Cuba gets the PFC back, says "hey, it doesnt work, I am keeping your money". And THEN, he sells the same exact kind of part to this other guy?
A little homework shows that earlier in October, potassemon was posting in other people's FS threads, looking for one of these.So, it is clear that "recently" was at the very earliest in October. I wonder if this is the same unit that "doesnt work anymore"......it sure does seem like it. Cuba has never had a problem posting FS threads, he's posted a lot of them whenever he had something for sale....and yet, strangely enough, there is no FS thread showing him selling a PFC and potassemon buying it.
More to follow...
Does anyone else here see the irony in this?
A guy from Alaska just bought the same exact kind of part that was sent back by the OP in this thread? Cuba gets the PFC back, says "hey, it doesnt work, I am keeping your money". And THEN, he sells the same exact kind of part to this other guy?
A little homework shows that earlier in October, potassemon was posting in other people's FS threads, looking for one of these.So, it is clear that "recently" was at the very earliest in October. I wonder if this is the same unit that "doesnt work anymore"......it sure does seem like it. Cuba has never had a problem posting FS threads, he's posted a lot of them whenever he had something for sale....and yet, strangely enough, there is no FS thread showing him selling a PFC and potassemon buying it.
More to follow...
A guy from Alaska just bought the same exact kind of part that was sent back by the OP in this thread? Cuba gets the PFC back, says "hey, it doesnt work, I am keeping your money". And THEN, he sells the same exact kind of part to this other guy?
A little homework shows that earlier in October, potassemon was posting in other people's FS threads, looking for one of these.So, it is clear that "recently" was at the very earliest in October. I wonder if this is the same unit that "doesnt work anymore"......it sure does seem like it. Cuba has never had a problem posting FS threads, he's posted a lot of them whenever he had something for sale....and yet, strangely enough, there is no FS thread showing him selling a PFC and potassemon buying it.
More to follow...
Last edited by mar3; 11-10-10 at 03:07 PM. Reason: Merged back-to-back posts...time stamps were 12:06 to 12:12 PM...
#54
Full Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: California
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
See now your just jumping to conclusions. I had a PFC on my second gen when i had a 13b REW in it. These are two different items. If you dont believe me ask the Postessem. I sure he wont mind posting you guys pictures of the unit that i sold him 4 months agos. youll see that the etching is not there ( there is no way to remove the etching of my name). Stop jumping to conclusions . Please. I havent done anything wrong!
If you indeed did sell 2 PFC units (or more), what's to stop you from posting the serial of one and selling another? Who can say that you didn't have multiple units, and that you didn't sell them to people without checking them for function? Many different conclusions could be drawn from this other sale. They may or may not warrant further investigation, but they do not help either of us here.
(To clarify, I'm not accusing you of this. I'm only demonstrating why a previous good transaction for the same unit doesn't give credible evidence for, or against, the current dispute at hand.)
As rx7roller02 plainly put (as is also stated in the sticky for this section):
You're still pointing fingers in random directions trying to avert blame, and potassemon is helping you (whether or not you asked him to is irrelevant), without any evidence for this specific case.
#55
All out Freak!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: in a little box on a stick
Posts: 2,300
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
9 Posts
I posted to you here, and you apparently decided that you didnt need to pay attention to this issue any longer. So I posted to you in a thread that I know you view. You couldnt even be bothered to answer. I then sent you a PM that I know you read. You couldnt even bother replying then.
NOW IS YOUR FINAL CHANCE TO HANDLE YOUR BUSINESS LIKE A MAN.
You dont like it when someone "jumps to conclusions"?? How do you think you made your buyer feel when you didnt have a hint of proof and yet you tried to trash his name in this thread just to save your own ***???
THINK BEFORE YOU SPEAK....youre doing the SAME THING to him and you think youre justified! YOU ARE NOT.
Then again, I do seem to recall you telling us that you were sending the PFC to cali to be checked out....then, all of a sudden, you claim to have thrown an $800 piece of gear in the trash....for all you know, it could have been a problem with the map or with your buddy's setup......but we are expected to believe that you threw it in the trash without knowing what went wrong? Sorry, thats a load of crap. Youre so worried about losing money in this deal, that there's no way I could believe you simply threw it out because you were disgusted with drunkengimp......
But hey, what do I know, right? You sure are acting strangely, however, for someone so "innocent". Case in point--you had pics with two different serial numbers. How odd is it that we can still access every single pic you posted....EXCEPT for the one with the other serial number...if it didnt show anything wrong, why did you take it down from photobucket and leave the others up? I also like how at the start of this, you said "i'll post a video taken a couple days before I shipped the PFC to him to show it was working"....and then when you finally did post a video, it was from a couple MONTHS before....
Look, enough of this crap. FIX THIS or you will be removed from the forum. You actually listed the item as NEW. Clearly it wasnt. Now look, it is obvious that you know enough about PFC's to know that the map from one car will not always work in another. But when we bring this up to you, you have nothing to say! And that shows something to me, because this thread has proven how much you DO have to say about every other aspect of this deal! DECISION TIME....and this time, at least be man enough to not pretend this will all go away. Believe me, it will not.
The only other thing that I do wish about this whole mess is that people in Florida who have had things to say about you would do it to your face. More than once I got a PM from someone commenting on your shadiness, on how you have sold things before without disclosing all the details, about how youre this much of a jerk in real life like you are on the forums.....and yet they didnt want me to mention them by name. I wont--that isnt my place to do--but if the people who know you in person have such things to say about you, it concerns me. It should concern you too. And before you go off all half-cocked, what you SHOULD be doing is looking in the mirror before you look to anyone else.
#56
All out Freak!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: in a little box on a stick
Posts: 2,300
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
9 Posts
See now your just jumping to conclusions. I had a PFC on my second gen when i had a 13b REW in it. These are two different items. If you dont believe me ask the Postessem. I sure he wont mind posting you guys pictures of the unit that i sold him 4 months agos. youll see that the etching is not there ( there is no way to remove the etching of my name). Stop jumping to conclusions . Please. I havent done anything wrong!
I said I WONDER IF...I didnt say that it WAS the same unit. Why the hell do you think I said MORE TO FOLLOW?? Obviously my post was not the assumption youre claiming it was.
Please take pictures of the unit and post them on this thread . People are mistaking it as if i just recently ( Past week ) that i shipped out the PFC in question on this thread. Please take pictures and post them!!
You are trying to make look bad.
this was a previous purchase. @ 4 months ago.
I sure he wont mind posting you guys pictures of the unit that i sold him 4 months agos. youll see that the etching is not there ( there is no way to remove the etching of my name).
#57
Full Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: California
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rx7roller02 I noticed in your post you referenced phone calls that Cuba supposedly recorded (I'll assume that he told you about this in private).
I'm certain that if Cuba references a recording as evidence that the content will show I have not consented to have the call recorded. I'm also certain that I have not admitted any guilt seeing as I've done nothing wrong. I was completely unaware that this was happening (if indeed it was) and frankly it feels like an invasion of privacy, and I'd like to alert you to a legal issue.
About telephone recording:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws
This from http://www.rcfp.org/taping/ (I underlined for clarity):
You'll notice Florida (where Cuba is from) and California (my location) are both on the list.
Another resource (also underlined for clarity):
From http://www.pimall.com/nais/n.tel.tape.law.html :
Before anyone says it, some businesses record all incoming phone calls. However, they only do it with a disclaimer that the call may be recorded for training purposes.
I am not a lawyer myself so I'm not completely sure about all the technicalities, but this behavior is as outrageous as it is invasive. I have tried my best to make this situation as bearable as possible for the both of us, and I'm tired of being slammed in the dirt for doing nothing but protecting myself.
I'll admit that I have no proof myself that he recorded calls and I'm not 100% on the legality of the situation, but I think it's prudent to point out this issue. Obviously if no calls were actually recorded this isn't an problem.
I apologize if this post is not conducive to the thread. If it is out of line please delete it.
I'm certain that if Cuba references a recording as evidence that the content will show I have not consented to have the call recorded. I'm also certain that I have not admitted any guilt seeing as I've done nothing wrong. I was completely unaware that this was happening (if indeed it was) and frankly it feels like an invasion of privacy, and I'd like to alert you to a legal issue.
About telephone recording:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws
This from http://www.rcfp.org/taping/ (I underlined for clarity):
12 states require, under most circumstances, the consent of all parties to a conversation. Those jurisdictions are California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington.
Another resource (also underlined for clarity):
From http://www.pimall.com/nais/n.tel.tape.law.html :
The federal law makes it unlawful to record telephone conversations except in one party consent cases which permit one party consent recording by state law. What that means is a person can record their own telephone conversations without the knowledge or consent of the other party in those states that allow one party consent.
It's important to understand the difference between what has become known as one party consent and two party or all party consent. One party consent simply means that one party to the conversation must have knowledge and give consent to the recording. Two party or all party consent means that every party to the conversation must have knowledge and give consent to the recording.
There are twelve states that require all party consent. They are:
California
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Illinois
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Montana
New Hampshire
Pennsylvania
Washington
It's important to understand the difference between what has become known as one party consent and two party or all party consent. One party consent simply means that one party to the conversation must have knowledge and give consent to the recording. Two party or all party consent means that every party to the conversation must have knowledge and give consent to the recording.
There are twelve states that require all party consent. They are:
California
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Illinois
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Montana
New Hampshire
Pennsylvania
Washington
I am not a lawyer myself so I'm not completely sure about all the technicalities, but this behavior is as outrageous as it is invasive. I have tried my best to make this situation as bearable as possible for the both of us, and I'm tired of being slammed in the dirt for doing nothing but protecting myself.
I'll admit that I have no proof myself that he recorded calls and I'm not 100% on the legality of the situation, but I think it's prudent to point out this issue. Obviously if no calls were actually recorded this isn't an problem.
I apologize if this post is not conducive to the thread. If it is out of line please delete it.
#58
Full Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: California
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you had pics with two different serial numbers. How odd is it that we can still access every single pic you posted....EXCEPT for the one with the other serial number...if it didnt show anything wrong, why did you take it down from photobucket and leave the others up?
You can verify that it's the same picture from the thread by referencing a screen shot I took in another previous post :
I'm astounded that I need to be this thorough on what should have been a minor dispute, but I've been accused so many times in this thread that I don't feel I've had any choice.
#59
All out Freak!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: in a little box on a stick
Posts: 2,300
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
9 Posts
Rx7roller02 I noticed in your post you referenced phone calls that Cuba supposedly recorded (I'll assume that he told you about this in private).
I'm certain that if Cuba references a recording as evidence that the content will show I have not consented to have the call recorded. I'm also certain that I have not admitted any guilt seeing as I've done nothing wrong. I was completely unaware that this was happening (if indeed it was) and frankly it feels like an invasion of privacy, and I'd like to alert you to a legal issue.
About telephone recording:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws
This from http://www.rcfp.org/taping/ (I underlined for clarity):
You'll notice Florida (where Cuba is from) and California (my location) are both on the list.
Another resource (also underlined for clarity):
From http://www.pimall.com/nais/n.tel.tape.law.html :
Before anyone says it, some businesses record all incoming phone calls. However, they only do it with a disclaimer that the call may be recorded for training purposes.
I am not a lawyer myself so I'm not completely sure about all the technicalities, but this behavior is as outrageous as it is invasive. I have tried my best to make this situation as bearable as possible for the both of us, and I'm tired of being slammed in the dirt for doing nothing but protecting myself.
I'll admit that I have no proof myself that he recorded calls and I'm not 100% on the legality of the situation, but I think it's prudent to point out this issue. Obviously if no calls were actually recorded this isn't an problem.
I apologize if this post is not conducive to the thread. If it is out of line please delete it.
I'm certain that if Cuba references a recording as evidence that the content will show I have not consented to have the call recorded. I'm also certain that I have not admitted any guilt seeing as I've done nothing wrong. I was completely unaware that this was happening (if indeed it was) and frankly it feels like an invasion of privacy, and I'd like to alert you to a legal issue.
About telephone recording:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws
This from http://www.rcfp.org/taping/ (I underlined for clarity):
You'll notice Florida (where Cuba is from) and California (my location) are both on the list.
Another resource (also underlined for clarity):
From http://www.pimall.com/nais/n.tel.tape.law.html :
Before anyone says it, some businesses record all incoming phone calls. However, they only do it with a disclaimer that the call may be recorded for training purposes.
I am not a lawyer myself so I'm not completely sure about all the technicalities, but this behavior is as outrageous as it is invasive. I have tried my best to make this situation as bearable as possible for the both of us, and I'm tired of being slammed in the dirt for doing nothing but protecting myself.
I'll admit that I have no proof myself that he recorded calls and I'm not 100% on the legality of the situation, but I think it's prudent to point out this issue. Obviously if no calls were actually recorded this isn't an problem.
I apologize if this post is not conducive to the thread. If it is out of line please delete it.
Ok, I recieved the pfc and commander. However, I installed it on my buddys FD and now it doesnt work. the car cranks and cranks. I sent you a good unit. I have video of this item working a couple of days before shipping them out to you. I dont know what happended but now my unit is not functional. I knew something was up when you all of the sudden changed your mind. I will not be refunding your money and i have all my emails and conversations recorded as well to protect myself. I have already contacted paypal. You got me good! Now im out of a PFC and 800 dollars. Thanks alot. I will never do buisness with you again!!!!!
1--if he's never had a problem here, then why would he have to take such drastic measures to protect himself with this sale?
2--if he really "doesnt trust anyone", then why is it that your sale is the only place where he did all these things to protect himself?
The info you posted about recording calls is spot on--what he did is against the law in both states. And its a real shame that he doesnt have the ***** to face up to his actions. There is NO WAY that someone who legitimately "doesnt trust anyone" will only take these measures on a sale that he had no reason to believe would be any different than his others. He didnt even know ahead of time that your car doesnt run.....And the only thing I can come up with is this--if he took all these steps to "protect himself" that he doesnt take in his other sales, then he must have known ahead of time that something would happen. And the only way he could have known that is if he knew the unit was bad.
Last edited by rx7roller02; 11-10-10 at 05:54 AM.
#61
Full Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: California
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cliff notes for others who browse through the thread without reading and also feel the need to insult me without evidence:
The reason for the return was not just a "scratch", it was the overall condition of the unit which was not as described, in addition to the lack of a serial number and questionable compatibility with the controller. As rx7roller02 pointed out, one of the biggest red flags was his name etched into the unit, which also contributed to my return. There is no evidence if it was working or not before it was sent or even after it was returned with the sellers consent.
The reason for the return was not just a "scratch", it was the overall condition of the unit which was not as described, in addition to the lack of a serial number and questionable compatibility with the controller. As rx7roller02 pointed out, one of the biggest red flags was his name etched into the unit, which also contributed to my return. There is no evidence if it was working or not before it was sent or even after it was returned with the sellers consent.
Last edited by mar3; 11-12-10 at 01:18 PM. Reason: Killd quote of deleted post...
#63
All out Freak!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: in a little box on a stick
Posts: 2,300
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
9 Posts
Lets start with the basics. Seller advertised the unit as NEW. Obviously it isnt new. Seller posted pics of two different serial numbers. Buyer therefore has every right to be concerned about compatibility--do you routinely spend $800 without even knowing if what you just bought is even for your specific car? Get a clue, man, and knock it off.
Buyer gets package, opens it, and sees things wrong. One of the units has the serial number physically missing. Again, this could be a red flag for a stolen item, one that doesnt even work, onr that isnt compatible, or who knows what else. So he contacts the seller on the spot and SELLER AGREES TO A REFUND....
This shall be the end of your posting in this thread. If it isnt, it will earn you a vacation. There is no need for you or anyone else to come in here, without any idea as to what actually happened, and kick-start more drama than we already have on this issue. You could have read even just the first three or four posts of the thread and you would know that the crap you posted isnt what took place.
#65
All out Freak!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: in a little box on a stick
Posts: 2,300
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
9 Posts
well seller says is new with (2 years) of use on it ........... duhhh is not new!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He said that HERE, in THIS THREAD. When he advertised it as NEW, all he said was that it came off of his dad's FD. There was no way the buyer could have known how long it had been there. It could have been there a week, or two days, or five years.....The buyer relied upon the seller's word, and in this case the seller did not tell the truth. When you advertise something as NEW, it had damn well better be new. If you actually think the buyer should have known, before the seller ever told us, that it was at least two years old, then youre a bigger idiot than previously thought.
In the meantime, enjoy your vacation, "DUHHH!!" And next time, when I tell you something like:
This shall be the end of your posting in this thread. If it isnt, it will earn you a vacation.
#66
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Anchorage, AK
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I didn't mean to stir up anything I didn't fully read the post because, well I didn't have time. I did buy it from him a few months ago, and from what I can tell it looks like a good unit. but I guess it doesn't really matter anymore.
#67
Administrator
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: So. Arlington, TX!!!
Posts: 12,974
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes
on
36 Posts
It does. Post pics of the unit and especially the serial number...if you don't want to post the serial number, then send that pic to rollr ASAP, please. Don't ignore PM's from Moderators, this is usually a death wish action.
#70
Full Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: California
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just wanted to update the thread since I finally got confirmation that the credit dispute has been resolved.
From my credit card company:
Thank god for credit card protection! Quite a long wait, but I was told up to 6 months for a final result, so I'm satisfied.
From my credit card company:
In response to your request, we filed a claim against the merchant on your behalf and provisionally credited your account for the disputed amount on 11/23/2010. The merchant's bank has accepted the claim and the credit is now permanent and will remain in your account.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 07:16 PM
Snook
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
23
09-30-15 11:36 AM
AMOC
SE RX-7 Forum
1
09-10-15 09:42 AM