Water powered rotary?
Lol, the amount of misinformation and ignorance in this thread is unbeliveable. Aaron Cake is correct, some of you others are smoking crack.
While hydrogen does have significantly higher energy per unit mass than gasoline, it is practically impossible to store hydrogen at the densities required to make it even somewhat comparable. Realisitically, you must make comparisons using energy per unit volume. Once you do this, it becomes very clear that gasoline, alcohols, and other fuels have the advantage.
For many years I played with water powered cars and to say hydrogen has a low energy density is very wrong it just like those ******* that say rotaries don't have torque!! It all depends on density, water contains 2 hydrogen atoms for each O atom. If you actually get down and do some of these experiments and actually measure things you will find some very interesting facts.
First of all this is no such thing as a "water powered car". Water is not a power source. And unless you are doing a matter to energy conversion, it never will be. Water can be broken down into hydrogen and oxygen which makes a decent fuel, but it requires energy to do this. Basic fundamental science.
There are times when this is not true. I'll let you figure out when.
You can never run a car on pure hydrogen because it needs something to react with. Whether you burn it with air, or combine it with oxygen in a fuel cell using a catalyst, it needs something else to react with. Gasoline is useless on it's own. It must be combined with air (oxygen, nitrogen, and a bunch of other random stuff) to liberate energy.
Water injection is used to cool the combustion process.
Well duh. Any 3rd grade science student has performed electrolosys and burned the hydrogen produced. The problem is that electrolosys is very inefficient and without a major power input, very little gas is produced.
No one in the world is driving a water powered car, because such a thing flat out doesn't exist.
Belief is irreverent. Reality is the only belief worth having.
Bingo.
Pure hydrogen is not explosive at all. It's only explosive when it is near an oxidizer. Again, basic fundamental science.
I'm sorry, what? Cold fusion is not yet possible.
Yes...but it is not powered by water. The "reaction chamber" contains something that reacts with the water and splits into hydrogen and oxygen. Both the water and reactant are consumed during this reaction. Byproducts are produced besides hydrogen and oxygen. This is hardly new science but again, it is NOT powered by water. It is powered by hydrogen, generated in this reaction. I forget exactly what they are using to react but generally several types of metal hydrides are used.
Here's a link to a topic on my forum which explains why all this stuff is pure horse ****:
http://www.aaroncake.net/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=7606
There are times when this is not true. I'll let you figure out when.
You can never run a car on pure hydrogen because it needs something to react with. Whether you burn it with air, or combine it with oxygen in a fuel cell using a catalyst, it needs something else to react with. Gasoline is useless on it's own. It must be combined with air (oxygen, nitrogen, and a bunch of other random stuff) to liberate energy.
Water injection is used to cool the combustion process.
Well duh. Any 3rd grade science student has performed electrolosys and burned the hydrogen produced. The problem is that electrolosys is very inefficient and without a major power input, very little gas is produced.
No one in the world is driving a water powered car, because such a thing flat out doesn't exist.
Belief is irreverent. Reality is the only belief worth having.
Bingo.
Pure hydrogen is not explosive at all. It's only explosive when it is near an oxidizer. Again, basic fundamental science.
I'm sorry, what? Cold fusion is not yet possible.
Yes...but it is not powered by water. The "reaction chamber" contains something that reacts with the water and splits into hydrogen and oxygen. Both the water and reactant are consumed during this reaction. Byproducts are produced besides hydrogen and oxygen. This is hardly new science but again, it is NOT powered by water. It is powered by hydrogen, generated in this reaction. I forget exactly what they are using to react but generally several types of metal hydrides are used.
Here's a link to a topic on my forum which explains why all this stuff is pure horse ****:
http://www.aaroncake.net/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=7606
Japanese companies currently have 2 advertised prototypes from 2 different companies that use lead based cold fusion. Add water and you get electricity you need nothing else.
2 I am well aware that you need a oxidizer but most hydrogen cars store H2 under pressure or in metal hydrides maybe I assumed too much of you. H2 burned in air does pollute. Adding water injection does lower the temp reducing this tendency..
As opposed to fuel cell H2 cars that use oxygen from the air to make electricity.
3 I never mentioned electrolysis.... Also with regard to electrolysis ... if you have the voltage just right the process is endothermic absorbing heat from the environment...not that I would ever do it that way as you said it is very inefficient.
Your words
Pure hydrogen is not explosive at all. It's only explosive when it is near an oxidizer. Again, basic fundamental science
My words
I don't drive in a vacuum I have 21-23 percent oxidizer around me all the time.
Your words.
No one in the world is driving a water powered car, because such a thing flat out doesn't exist.
My words
Tell the 2 companies in Japan it can't be done! I don't think they would believe you!!
After all they have 4 prototypes driving on Japanese roads as we speak!
I also drove a 6 cylinder 3 liter engine that run on hydrogen and oxygen split via solar. It didn't drive far and you couldn't use it realistically but I guess you are wrong their too.
Anyway have a great day.
Cheers
Michael Smith
Although I agree that if this were a viable resource, that many details would need to be worked out - I have to say that this statement is relative to the process being used for electrolosys. There are those which are quite efficient - enough for the job of powering your vehicle.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
I forgot about this topic.
Waiting still for that link to the "run on water" cars from Japan.
Compared to just charging batteries, electrolosys is very inefficient. The power is better used to charge an EV.
Waiting still for that link to the "run on water" cars from Japan.
Compared to just charging batteries, electrolosys is very inefficient. The power is better used to charge an EV.
just did some searching on this ***** "water powered car" and he seems not to be a complete retart the vehical works off some type of electroloisis. a simple search in google brought me to this. a liter of andy water and even tea will alow the thing to move at 80kmph for about an hour
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrxfMz2eDME
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrxfMz2eDME
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Yeah, I've seen that one before. All the "water powered cars" are either HHO scams, just a fuel cell, or use something to react with the water and make hydrogen. Not water powered at all. Big surprise there.
Lol, the amount of misinformation and ignorance in this thread is unbeliveable. Aaron Cake is correct, some of you others are smoking crack.
While hydrogen does have significantly higher energy per unit mass than gasoline, it is practically impossible to store hydrogen at the densities required to make it even somewhat comparable. Realisitically, you must make comparisons using energy per unit volume. Once you do this, it becomes very clear that gasoline, alcohols, and other fuels have the advantage.
While hydrogen does have significantly higher energy per unit mass than gasoline, it is practically impossible to store hydrogen at the densities required to make it even somewhat comparable. Realisitically, you must make comparisons using energy per unit volume. Once you do this, it becomes very clear that gasoline, alcohols, and other fuels have the advantage.
I don't know about the charcoal canister concept but I don't really believe that it would be the solution to using hydrogen as a fuel for a car because of the volume consumed in order to power an IC engine. A charcoal canister isn't going to modify this volume - it may make it safer to store, but most likely not. Wherein lies your biggest problem with hydrogen as an automotive fuel - storage of such a large quantity. A charcoal canister isn't going to reduce that volume. Myers had it right by basically mass producing it at the point of use and using that which was produced.
On a higher note, I saw that Cali's looking to legalize and tax bud due to their deficit.
On a higher note, I saw that Cali's looking to legalize and tax bud due to their deficit.
Doesnt work. Simple as that.
Some of my co-workers thought it would, they all chipped in to buy the book.
Thier "brown" gas experiment never worked. They made thier little containers out of canning jars, only had one explode.
Either way, it doenst work.
BTW i did not fall for it and never chipped in. I also got a good laugh when it failed..lol
Some of my co-workers thought it would, they all chipped in to buy the book.
Thier "brown" gas experiment never worked. They made thier little containers out of canning jars, only had one explode.
Either way, it doenst work.
BTW i did not fall for it and never chipped in. I also got a good laugh when it failed..lol
Look it up for yourself
First the water4gas is a scam but the technology of it is legit. I have made my own cell and i had a increase of about 30% fuel savings. There are a lot of scams out there but if you research just the information(public information not kits) you can build one cheap and easy.There are many sites devoted to getting this information out FREE.Second Stan Meyer did not use brute force he use resonance meaning he was not putting electricity into the water but different frequency so over unity is possible( I'm not say he did or did not but it is possible) Third I don't know but was told that you can't use this for a rotary because of the apex seals. If anybody know please pm me . I want to put it on my s4 for the power and economy but I'm scared it will blow the motor.
Mazda already does. They have dual fuel RX-8's on corporate leases in Japan.
The engine makes significantly less power when running on hydrogen though.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
First the water4gas is a scam but the technology of it is legit. I have made my own cell and i had a increase of about 30% fuel savings. There are a lot of scams out there but if you research just the information(public information not kits) you can build one cheap and easy.There are many sites devoted to getting this information out FREE.Second Stan Meyer did not use brute force he use resonance meaning he was not putting electricity into the water but different frequency so over unity is possible( I'm not say he did or did not but it is possible) Third I don't know but was told that you can't use this for a rotary because of the apex seals. If anybody know please pm me . I want to put it on my s4 for the power and economy but I'm scared it will blow the motor.
http://www.aardvark.co.nz/stanley_meyer.shtml
HHO is a scam. It will never work. Basic, 8th grade science tells you this.
I demand proof that you obtained a mileage increase. This proof is to be scientific, conducted in controlled conditions and must include a double blind test.
The idea of an HHO engine is not to replace a gas-powered rotary, but to enhance it. Water4Gas is a nice starting point. I did a conversion on my dad's Dodge Neon and now it gets about 50 miles to the gallon on the highway. I want to test it on my rx7, but my car is tempermental enough. I'd like to try hooking up the water vat to more than 12 volts and see if I can't get a better output.
Try it before you slam it. As far as the Water4Gas guy being a known criminal, aren't we all criminals at heart?
Try it before you slam it. As far as the Water4Gas guy being a known criminal, aren't we all criminals at heart?
The idea of an HHO engine is not to replace a gas-powered rotary, but to enhance it. Water4Gas is a nice starting point. I did a conversion on my dad's Dodge Neon and now it gets about 50 miles to the gallon on the highway. I want to test it on my rx7, but my car is tempermental enough. I'd like to try hooking up the water vat to more than 12 volts and see if I can't get a better output.
Try it before you slam it. As far as the Water4Gas guy being a known criminal, aren't we all criminals at heart?
Try it before you slam it. As far as the Water4Gas guy being a known criminal, aren't we all criminals at heart?
Abraham Lincoln
16th president of US (1809 - 1865)
came across this site
http://water4gas.com/2books.htm?hop=...FReDIgodfGumYA
basicly a kit and instructions on how to make your car run on both water (HHO gas created from water) and regular gasoline. Also there are sites that claim you can do a complete conversion to run on water only. I did some seaching and found some people praising the system and others saying it's not passable and a total scam. I've been toying with the idea of buying a cheep N/A FC and trying out the system on that. I've always wanted an FC as a daily driver but didn't like the gas mileage. Has anyone tried this or seen one working first hand on any car? There are some U-tube videos but anything is possable on there. I can't seem to find any evidence either way as to weather or not this is just a scam.
http://water4gas.com/2books.htm?hop=...FReDIgodfGumYA
basicly a kit and instructions on how to make your car run on both water (HHO gas created from water) and regular gasoline. Also there are sites that claim you can do a complete conversion to run on water only. I did some seaching and found some people praising the system and others saying it's not passable and a total scam. I've been toying with the idea of buying a cheep N/A FC and trying out the system on that. I've always wanted an FC as a daily driver but didn't like the gas mileage. Has anyone tried this or seen one working first hand on any car? There are some U-tube videos but anything is possable on there. I can't seem to find any evidence either way as to weather or not this is just a scam.
This is really weird place to have to comment on something I feel like I'm stepping on your page but anyway I guess this is the way it works but you can definitely run your car off of water at least with a gas engine I know that because me and my cousin back before hydrogen was a big thing we would would take salt water put in a mason jar but we had two of them connected together and we would put bolts in there and then put washers in there and space them out and of course that created the hydrogen bubbles we need it which Rose at the top came gas and once that gas started rolling out we put it into the car that at no gas tank and we can almost get at the fire then we put the gas tank back with a little tiny bit of gas and it fired of course perfectly fine and then we ran it it was we got about 60 more horsepower than we had before and then on top of that we were getting about about 50 to 60 miles per gallon and we were smashing into it constantly so it works I would get the kid off of Amazon because we had a hard time keeping a good seal on this mason jars so kid off Amazon has seals and all that good stuff have you got the stuff laying around might as well just do it that way I mean it's just like literally a bolt down through the lid seal it then have another hole where the hose comes out put glue around that and then put the hose into two we put it straight into the intake manifold we didn't put it in then take runner we put it directly into the manifold but we did this on a del Sol because it was my cousin's idea and it was his car so a good thing also that helped out is that he had a massive ******* turbo on that damn thing that would not spool up until almost redline but that also helped out a lot cuz it started giving us boost around 2500 RPM but anyway if it doesn't give you extra power it will definitely give you extra gas mileage that's a 100% fact at least on a gas motor now on a rotary I'm assuming it would save gas but looks like rotaries are going to start being generators at least for Mazda that way they can have a battery car with regen that's actually good enough to keep the car running without having to charge it I knew they were going to find out that figure out a way to do that I didn't know if Mazda would get it I kind of figured they would because bigger the only way to do it to do it was with the small wankle so like 2026 we can see a preview it's kind of helping but still not happy myself about electric vehicles mainly because I had the idea when I was a kid I was like why don't car is just run on batteries like RC cars and seems like every idea I had somebody else with money had and ran with it if I had generational wealth I'd be like so rich right now not really a cheap own horn I just see good ideas and want to run with them but I can't. This is like this hydrogen things that me and my cousin are making those kids weren't online back and like I don't have ******* 10 15 years ago that we did that I'm not even sure like how much of a concept that even was back then and we could have made some money doing that but we were dumb and never did anything with it after that week of playing with it because his car died not because of that but because he didn't know how to put an engine back together he took it apart and never he just tightened everything he didn't torque anything so of course the head gasket went. Anyway end of story lol
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
streetlegal?
New Member RX-7 Technical
13
Mar 17, 2022 02:46 PM
befarrer
Microtech
3
Aug 22, 2015 05:52 PM



