3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Where did all my boost go? - sequential troubleshooting

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-04-21, 02:48 PM
  #26  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
SwappedNA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NA
Posts: 690
Received 84 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by Project88Turbo
Do you still have a catalytic converter? Maybe it's clogged.

Vince
That did cross my mind, but if the cat was/is clogged, wouldn't it choke under heavy load all the time, not just with the secondary turbo?

Edit: My car is also a JDM FD, so I do not have a precat.

Last edited by SwappedNA; 07-04-21 at 05:13 PM.
Old 07-05-21, 08:17 AM
  #27  
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Testrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: South FL
Posts: 1,456
Received 252 Likes on 191 Posts
Only time I had an issue like this was crack in my crv hose. I didn't go the silicone route yet, but I will eventually get around to it. I grabbed a quick hose from parts store with the proper bend, cut, installed, and issue went away.
only other boost issues I can remember now are the couplings for the ic which I just bought new, high quality hump hoses and new clamps. Keep us posted l.
Old 07-05-21, 08:29 AM
  #28  
Stock boost FTW!

iTrader: (22)
 
Project88Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 1,134
Received 110 Likes on 71 Posts
Originally Posted by SwappedNA
That did cross my mind, but if the cat was/is clogged, wouldn't it choke under heavy load all the time, not just with the secondary turbo?

Edit: My car is also a JDM FD, so I do not have a precat.
It's possible that is is broken up maybe. You can easily confirm this by banging on the converter shell when it's cold to see if it rattles.

Other possibilities are the double solenoid that is bolted to the UIM where you can see it or there is one in the rat nest marked F If I recall correctly.

When I reassembled my long block, I followed a guide on here that walked you thru testing all the solenoids. But basically you put them on a cookie sheet in the oven at 250 to simulate underhood temperatures. Then you tested it with a mighty vacuum to check for leakage, then applied power with a 9V battery to be sure it operates.

I found one bad one in my setup and one that was just broken.

There are a few other things that could be wrong, but you'll have work your way thru all the parts. The butterfly in the y pipe could be sticking, the CRV could be leaking among others.

Keep us posted on your findings,
Vince

Last edited by Project88Turbo; 07-05-21 at 08:31 AM.
Old 07-05-21, 01:32 PM
  #29  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
SwappedNA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NA
Posts: 690
Received 84 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by Project88Turbo
It's possible that is is broken up maybe. You can easily confirm this by banging on the converter shell when it's cold to see if it rattles.

Other possibilities are the double solenoid that is bolted to the UIM where you can see it or there is one in the rat nest marked F If I recall correctly.

When I reassembled my long block, I followed a guide on here that walked you thru testing all the solenoids. But basically you put them on a cookie sheet in the oven at 250 to simulate underhood temperatures. Then you tested it with a mighty vacuum to check for leakage, then applied power with a 9V battery to be sure it operates.

I found one bad one in my setup and one that was just broken.

There are a few other things that could be wrong, but you'll have work your way thru all the parts. The butterfly in the y pipe could be sticking, the CRV could be leaking among others.

Keep us posted on your findings,
Vince
The solenoids are all brand new. While I wouldn't rule out the possibility of a DOA one, I suppose it doesn't hurt to keep that in mind. I'll be replacing the CRV, CCV, and BOV hoses with some new silicone I bought, the plan is to test those during the process.
Old 07-06-21, 11:19 PM
  #30  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
SwappedNA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NA
Posts: 690
Received 84 Likes on 63 Posts
I actually did have a moment. I'm sure I mentioned this, but if I haven't, the car has a PFC, and has had one since before it came over on the boat from Japan. All I have is the Commander. While I doubt they would deliberately tune it to act this way, I was curious as to if maybe there could be something PFC related that got changed?
Old 07-07-21, 05:22 PM
  #31  
Full Member

iTrader: (5)
 
photoresistor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: PDX
Posts: 199
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
  • It's easy to pressure test the intake piping so I'd just do it.. (I wish I did this earlier when I was troubleshooting my car as it rooted out a couple issues). Yes, if you are getting 10 psi on your primary, you likely don't have big leaks. However, by doing this you can verify your ABV and CRV and new silicone hoses are good. If you test over ~7psi, you need to apply some pressure to the reference ports of them so they hold higher pressures otherwise they start mooing like a cow and letting air through. Go to Lowes/Wilco and grab a couple of test caps.. you can use these to cap off the primary and secondary inlets to easily test things: 2" test caps
  • Another good test is to manually put pressure into your WG and precontrol actuators to test that they move at ~7psi. If not, there is an issue. Because your primary boost is good and then it bogs at the transition, it makes me think the secondary turbo is not getting spooled up or something. You might be able to even test your WG/precontrol solenoids here by putting pressure on the inlet side of them and then energizing them (I'm a little fuzzy on this as I replaced my stock solenoids with MAC valves). You can also do this to the CCA actuator.
  • To test more of the complete system, you can then manually put pressure in the pressure tank and vacuum in the vacuum tank using a Mityvac/bike air pump and then energize a solenoid and check that the corresponding actuator moves. For example, even with the car off but ignition on, I believe if you put vacuum in the vac tank, the CCA arm should suck itself in. If you then energize that valve, it should release (you can also just verify this by looking at the actuator when the car is idling, it should be sucked in). Make sure you have both pressure and vacuum in the tanks and you energize both TCA solenoids (there's one for vacuum and one for pressure) to test the TCA. You do have to study and understand the solenoid control system to know how they should be behaving and which solenoid(s) to energize.

If you try a bunch of these things and don't find anything and suspect maybe an issue with the turbos, you can always wire them to be non-sequential temporarily and verify you are getting good response and boost in non-sequential mode.

Good luck!


Last edited by photoresistor; 07-07-21 at 05:24 PM.
Old 07-07-21, 07:08 PM
  #32  
#FakeCarEnthusaist

iTrader: (10)
 
Brody8877's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,814
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by SwappedNA
In my efforts to track down my boost issues, I've performed the following:

Brand new solenoids (all of them)
Four new check valves (thanks Dale!)

My problem has remained largely unchanged, however. I figured based on search results that I should replace the solenoids and check valves anyway, just for good measure.

Primary boost is excellent down low, however, as the RPMs climb, my boost will drop suddenly and drastically, and struggle to climb back up (but never reach) where it was. The engine noise also seems to change pitch.

However, if I accel off and give it time to let the RPMs drop, I will have immediate boost again.

Cruising and going into the throttle I have no issues building boost either, it seems to be related to high rpm and the changeover process?

The shop that did the work is familiar with FDs, and you can see the picture below the check valves replaced, and the one that was left alone. I'm assuming this was done correctly as far as the check valves go, as Dale mentioned to only change the green/white and Green/Black.

Anyone have any suggestions on where to pursue this problem further in terms of troubleshooting?

Sounds like you had similar issue that I had when I had twin. I know this probably a wild crap shoot, have you tried looking into you wastegate and pre-control connection? Sounds like your pre-control signal is going into the wastegate and wastegate signal going into the pre-control.


On your WG and Pre-Control, there is a white dot, white DOT on the harness goes into white DOT solenoid.

Old 07-16-21, 07:39 PM
  #33  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
SwappedNA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NA
Posts: 690
Received 84 Likes on 63 Posts
A slight update,

All of my replacement parts have arrived, so at this point once I've replaced the Vacuum & Pressure tanks, the CCV, and the CRV, as well as the 3/4" hoses that go to them, I will have basically run out of parts to fix. I'm not typically the one to just throw money and parts at something until it sticks, but the car has 52,000~ miles on it, so I imagine it's spent a lot of time in a garage, and not a ton being driven. At this point I'm replacing everything on the sequential system with new/known good components and considering it preventative maintenance.

The last parts have arrived (thanks to the forum members, you know who you are) and I'll hopefully have this done by next week.


Old 07-17-21, 05:28 PM
  #34  
Rotary Freak

 
billyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,545
Received 263 Likes on 201 Posts
Seems autosport racetech thing has disappeared sometime in the last few years, which had a good troubleshooting guide. Hard to believe this was back in 2008! https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generati...-stuff-802060/ That's a comprehensive way to test everything. There's a non zero number of solenoids that are defective out of the box, so wouldn't necessarily trust everything to be perfect.

Was in the fortunate position to have several racks worth of them, multiple W/G and precontrol and turbo control, plus back up actuators when running sequential twins, which to my mind, is the only way to assure ongoing reliabilty without costing the earth. For the solenoids at least, I was always looking for instant release (testing above operating pressure) when voltage was removed, not a slow bleed, then a pop.

Did find about 2 in every 3 second hand charge controls had perforated diaphragms and wouldn't maintain pressure and every used charge relief didn't meet mazda spec - not necessarily a problem. unless really bad.

I don't see it, hope you don't want to maintain the rubber coupler and plastic crossover for originality either...leave that for selling the thing!
Old 07-17-21, 07:23 PM
  #35  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
SwappedNA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NA
Posts: 690
Received 84 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by billyboy
Seems autosport racetech thing has disappeared sometime in the last few years, which had a good troubleshooting guide. Hard to believe this was back in 2008! https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generati...-stuff-802060/ That's a comprehensive way to test everything. There's a non zero number of solenoids that are defective out of the box, so wouldn't necessarily trust everything to be perfect.

Was in the fortunate position to have several racks worth of them, multiple W/G and precontrol and turbo control, plus back up actuators when running sequential twins, which to my mind, is the only way to assure ongoing reliabilty without costing the earth. For the solenoids at least, I was always looking for instant release (testing above operating pressure) when voltage was removed, not a slow bleed, then a pop.

Did find about 2 in every 3 second hand charge controls had perforated diaphragms and wouldn't maintain pressure and every used charge relief didn't meet mazda spec - not necessarily a problem. unless really bad.

I don't see it, hope you don't want to maintain the rubber coupler and plastic crossover for originality either...leave that for selling the thing!
It actually has an aftermarket silicone coupler for the crossover. I've debated on switching to the Efini Y pipe just for good measure as well.
Old 08-20-21, 11:58 AM
  #36  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
SwappedNA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NA
Posts: 690
Received 84 Likes on 63 Posts
The troubleshooting continues! Sorry for the long pause between updates, I've had IRL things to tackle.

So, since my last post, I've had the Efini Y pipe installed (all new gaskets on the secondary turbo side as well), a new CCV (with the new o ring), a new CRV, as well as the 3/4" 90 degree bend hose and the regular straight hoses replaced with silicone, as well as replacing the vacuum and pressure chambers. After all that, I am still getting that issue with the secondary boost. Is it possible the car is, for some reason, running on a tune with the PFC that has the secondary turbo set to work that way? I wouldn't think its the tune because it's not the exact same behavior every time, but it is very close. I'm basically out of ideas at this point.
Old 08-20-21, 12:16 PM
  #37  
Stock boost FTW!

iTrader: (22)
 
Project88Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 1,134
Received 110 Likes on 71 Posts
Ok. You've really got unlucky with this!

One thing to check, I forgot I had to do on my own car, is the valve/ butterfly in the crossover pipe. The flap in there has gotten misaligned at some point and was hanging up. A little adjusting later and it was opening smoothly again.

If that butterfly is sticking, it would keep the boost from leaving the secondary turbo.

Just something easy to check.

Vince
Old 08-20-21, 12:28 PM
  #38  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
SwappedNA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NA
Posts: 690
Received 84 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by Project88Turbo
Ok. You've really got unlucky with this!

One thing to check, I forgot I had to do on my own car, is the valve/ butterfly in the crossover pipe. The flap in there has gotten misaligned at some point and was hanging up. A little adjusting later and it was opening smoothly again.

If that butterfly is sticking, it would keep the boost from leaving the secondary turbo.

Just something easy to check.

Vince
Are you referencing the CCV? That one was tested and confirmed good.
Old 08-20-21, 12:33 PM
  #39  
Racecar - Formula 2000

 
DaveW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bath, OH
Posts: 3,853
Received 280 Likes on 200 Posts
Originally Posted by SwappedNA
That did cross my mind, but if the cat was/is clogged, wouldn't it choke under heavy load all the time, not just with the secondary turbo?

Edit: My car is also a JDM FD, so I do not have a precat.
Remember that exhaust flow goes up not only with boost pressure, but also with RPM. So it is possible that a clogged cat could cause loss of boost above 4500 even if there are no obvious issues below transition. And it would get worse the higher the RPM.

Also possible is that an intake restriction could cause a similar issue due to too much flow restriction to handle the higher RPM flow needs.

Last edited by DaveW; 08-20-21 at 12:43 PM.
Old 08-20-21, 12:37 PM
  #40  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
SwappedNA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NA
Posts: 690
Received 84 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveW
Remember that exhaust flow goes up not only with boost pressure, but also with RPM. So it is possible that a clogged cat could cause loss of boost above 4500 even if there are no issues below transition. And it would get worse the higher the RPM.

I did think that a clogged cat could be a possibility. However, I had one in my RX-8 and it literally would choke the engine and make it fall on its face. With my FD, it will slowly build boost but never reach 10PSI after the secondary transition, even in 1st or 2nd. So maybe it's a possibility that its providing enough of a restriction to slow spool?
Old 08-20-21, 12:41 PM
  #41  
Racecar - Formula 2000

 
DaveW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bath, OH
Posts: 3,853
Received 280 Likes on 200 Posts
Originally Posted by SwappedNA
I did think that a clogged cat could be a possibility. However, I had one in my RX-8 and it literally would choke the engine and make it fall on its face. With my FD, it will slowly build boost but never reach 10PSI after the secondary transition, even in 1st or 2nd. So maybe it's a possibility that its providing enough of a restriction to slow spool?
How much it restricts flow would of course depend on how complete the blockage is. So it might not be completely blocked and give these symptoms - similar on intake restriction.
Old 08-20-21, 12:46 PM
  #42  
RX-7 Bad Ass

iTrader: (55)
 
DaleClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 15,399
Received 2,439 Likes on 1,509 Posts
So at this point what is your boost pattern?

Have you tested the turbo control actuator itself to make sure it's holding and doesn't have a torn diaphragm?

May also need to do a one-by-one check of vacuum lines to make sure they are hooked up right.

Dale
Old 08-20-21, 12:48 PM
  #43  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (29)
 
championadrien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Sounds pre-control/wastegate actuator system related. My initial guess is whatever (solenoid/PFC duty cycle/etc.) is supposed to restrict flow/pressure to the wastegate actuator in order to allow the actuator to remain closed and build boost, is not in fact restricting flow/pressure to said WG acuatator. You can CAREFULLY test this by disconnecting all hoses to wastegate actuator, and flooring it until you see 10psi post transition. (Obviously release once you see 10PSI since no wastegate actuator will mean no boost control and you will boost off your map)

This ensures your wastegate actuator is holding the wastegate closed properly. If the latter works, I'd start working up the control system chain, with the next stage being the wastegate actuator solenoid (stuck open? being told to open when not supposed to?)
Old 08-20-21, 01:11 PM
  #44  
RX-7 Bad Ass

iTrader: (55)
 
DaleClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 15,399
Received 2,439 Likes on 1,509 Posts
It's also possible you just aren't running at 100%. What is the state of your plugs and wires?

Could also be the coil pack harness.

Do you know for 100% that the spark plug wires are hooked up right?

Have you tried swapping the electrical connectors for the WG control and pre-control that are bolted to the front of the UIM? That's super easy to do and see if it makes any difference.

Just read back through the thread, trying to remember what you've done and tried so far .

The TCA you replaced, this is the actuator that's bolted to the exhaust manifold, correct? New one held pressure when you put a finger over the port?

Dale
Old 08-20-21, 06:00 PM
  #45  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
SwappedNA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NA
Posts: 690
Received 84 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by DaleClark
It's also possible you just aren't running at 100%. What is the state of your plugs and wires?

Could also be the coil pack harness.

Do you know for 100% that the spark plug wires are hooked up right?

Have you tried swapping the electrical connectors for the WG control and pre-control that are bolted to the front of the UIM? That's super easy to do and see if it makes any difference.

Just read back through the thread, trying to remember what you've done and tried so far .

The TCA you replaced, this is the actuator that's bolted to the exhaust manifold, correct? New one held pressure when you put a finger over the port?

Dale
I believe the plug wires are hooked up correctly. I took a before and after picture during the plug change, and the car runs perfect otherwise, though I will double back and check the wire routing.

I'll try swapping the WG and precontrol and see if that makes any difference. All of the solenoids are new, so it's possible they might have been switched, but it was behaving the same way before and after the solenoids were changed out, so maybe they were incorrect to begin with and incorrect when replaced in terms of those two being connected to the harness, though I think my mechanic would have noticed that, as hes familiar with FD's (typically I do my own work but for reasons I won't get into here I don't have that luxury at the moment.)

As for the TCA, yes indeed. Sourced it from tomsn16, verified working. I even changed the retainer clip for the rod for a brand new one. I do have his notes on the latest diag he performed that I'll post here in a second, that might shed some light on things.

Many thanks to everyone who has contributed their input and feedback on this post up to this point, it is very much appreciated!

Edit: my technician's notes -




Last edited by SwappedNA; 08-20-21 at 07:01 PM.
Old 08-21-21, 07:45 PM
  #46  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
SwappedNA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NA
Posts: 690
Received 84 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by SwappedNA
I believe the plug wires are hooked up correctly. I took a before and after picture during the plug change, and the car runs perfect otherwise, though I will double back and check the wire routing.

I'll try swapping the WG and precontrol and see if that makes any difference. All of the solenoids are new, so it's possible they might have been switched, but it was behaving the same way before and after the solenoids were changed out, so maybe they were incorrect to begin with and incorrect when replaced in terms of those two being connected to the harness, though I think my mechanic would have noticed that, as hes familiar with FD's (typically I do my own work but for reasons I won't get into here I don't have that luxury at the moment.)

As for the TCA, yes indeed. Sourced it from tomsn16, verified working. I even changed the retainer clip for the rod for a brand new one. I do have his notes on the latest diag he performed that I'll post here in a second, that might shed some light on things.

Many thanks to everyone who has contributed their input and feedback on this post up to this point, it is very much appreciated!

Edit: my technician's notes -


So I looked at the wastegate and precontrol, they are both connected correctly, white plug on the right. At this point I'm at a loss, I'm speculating it may be a clogged cat, but its weird how systematic it is, Exactly at 4500 is when the issue starts. I'd think if the cat was clogged, there would be some variance in that.
Old 08-23-21, 08:36 AM
  #47  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (29)
 
championadrien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by SwappedNA
So I looked at the wastegate and precontrol, they are both connected correctly, white plug on the right. At this point I'm at a loss, I'm speculating it may be a clogged cat, but its weird how systematic it is, Exactly at 4500 is when the issue starts. I'd think if the cat was clogged, there would be some variance in that.
Have you tried removing all vacuum hoses from the WG actuator (essentially keeping the WG closed) and trying to hit 10PSI post transition/4500RPMs? This would isolate ALL control issues and would point to a clogged cat/bad actuator spring.

Like you mentioned, with how systematic it is -- my guess is something in the control system is preventing the WG from staying shut once the system switches to both turbos vs just primary. If you have a PFC -- datalogging could help.

Last edited by championadrien; 08-23-21 at 08:39 AM.
Old 08-23-21, 11:22 AM
  #48  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
SwappedNA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NA
Posts: 690
Received 84 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by championadrien
Have you tried removing all vacuum hoses from the WG actuator (essentially keeping the WG closed) and trying to hit 10PSI post transition/4500RPMs? This would isolate ALL control issues and would point to a clogged cat/bad actuator spring.

Like you mentioned, with how systematic it is -- my guess is something in the control system is preventing the WG from staying shut once the system switches to both turbos vs just primary. If you have a PFC -- datalogging could help.
I'll look into that, I'm worried about overboosting, though. But I imagine once I go over 4500, I control the throttle to maintain and keep it at 10PSI and prevent overboost? Sounds simple enough, I just don't want to be missing something because we all know the end result if this is done wrong, lol.

Edit: are those lines in question the two facing the front of the car?
Old 08-23-21, 01:31 PM
  #49  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (29)
 
championadrien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by SwappedNA
I'll look into that, I'm worried about overboosting, though. But I imagine once I go over 4500, I control the throttle to maintain and keep it at 10PSI and prevent overboost? Sounds simple enough, I just don't want to be missing something because we all know the end result if this is done wrong, lol.

Edit: are those lines in question the two facing the front of the car?
Yes, if you're paying attention you'll be able to take your foot off the gas before 11-12 PSI. I've hit 14 PSI on BNR Stage III's with the stock PFC without fuel mods so take that for what it's worth. You don't necessarily need to floor it, you'll probably hit 10 PSI at 70% throttle but if you're flooring it and not even getting past 7 PSI even with the WG vacuum lines disconnected, then I'd start investigating the mechanical side of things (WG actuator, actuator pre-load, flapper door, clogged cat, misfires).

The lines depend on how your solenoids are setup but see picture for lines in stock configuration. Essentially you don't want ANY air going to the actuator for this test. In the stock configuration this means you need to remove the line from the primary compressor housing to the actuator.




You theoretically could get away with just disconnecting the line to the solenoid (1), but a thorough test would have you disconnect both lines at the actuator (2 & 3).

Hope this helps -- I've spent years diagnosing various sequential issues.

Last edited by championadrien; 08-23-21 at 02:06 PM. Reason: highlighted wrong actuator - fixed picture
Old 08-28-21, 01:30 AM
  #50  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
SwappedNA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NA
Posts: 690
Received 84 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by championadrien
Yes, if you're paying attention you'll be able to take your foot off the gas before 11-12 PSI. I've hit 14 PSI on BNR Stage III's with the stock PFC without fuel mods so take that for what it's worth. You don't necessarily need to floor it, you'll probably hit 10 PSI at 70% throttle but if you're flooring it and not even getting past 7 PSI even with the WG vacuum lines disconnected, then I'd start investigating the mechanical side of things (WG actuator, actuator pre-load, flapper door, clogged cat, misfires).

The lines depend on how your solenoids are setup but see picture for lines in stock configuration. Essentially you don't want ANY air going to the actuator for this test. In the stock configuration this means you need to remove the line from the primary compressor housing to the actuator.




You theoretically could get away with just disconnecting the line to the solenoid (1), but a thorough test would have you disconnect both lines at the actuator (2 & 3).

Hope this helps -- I've spent years diagnosing various sequential issues.

So by both, you mean the lines at the wastegate and turbo precontrol?


Quick Reply: Where did all my boost go? - sequential troubleshooting



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04 AM.