3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

What our cars could have looked like with better cooling from the factory.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 09:46 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Keep to the right.
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 793
Likes: 1
From: Mascoutah, IL
What our cars could have looked like with better cooling from the factory.

I am one of those people who thinks that pretty much every non-Mazdaspeed bodykit out there ruins the work of genius that is the 3rd gen RX-7. However, if some aftermarket company saw fit to make a front bumper like the one I'm showing below, I would be all over it. I doubt it would ever sell in large numbers becuase the average guy on the street would think it's stock....No show-off factor. But that's point. I want a stock-looking front bumper with better cooling. This is what I came up with:



Would any of you go for something like this?

...And stock for comparison:



I'm sorry if this post belongs in the appearance mods section. I'm just proposing what could have been so I wasn't sure where to put it.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 09:50 PM
  #2  
Rxmfn7's Avatar
Do a barrel roll!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,529
Likes: 2
From: Lower Burrell, PA
They did basically that with the 99 front end..
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 09:55 PM
  #3  
kuroi FD's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: orlando/st. petersburg
If you upgrade your cooling system you shouldnt have cooling issues, im in florida and never see over 87 on the hottest days.

Also Mazda made the front end like it is not only because its sleek and cool looking but has a very low coefficient of drag which makes the car mad fast yo. Yours looks great but it raises the coefficient of drag and thats one reason I will probably never go 99 spec although I love it.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 10:03 PM
  #4  
Rxmfn7's Avatar
Do a barrel roll!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,529
Likes: 2
From: Lower Burrell, PA
Originally Posted by kuroi FD
If you upgrade your cooling system you shouldnt have cooling issues, im in florida and never see over 87 on the hottest days.

Also Mazda made the front end like it is not only because its sleek and cool looking but has a very low coefficient of drag which makes the car mad fast yo. Yours looks great but it raises the coefficient of drag and thats one reason I will probably never go 99 spec although I love it.
While this is true, no matter how good your cooling system is, more airflow to the heat exchangers is never a bad thing. Also, the R1 package raised the C/D about .2 IIRC, and the 99 spec spoiler even a bit more between the spoiler and the chin splitter, not that anyone would ever notice that different of drag, but you can notice the increased high speed stability from the gain in downforce.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 10:23 PM
  #5  
patfat's Avatar
Track junkie
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 1
From: Providence, RI
Look for a used PFS front bumper
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 03:47 AM
  #6  
s-thetikz's Avatar
4 rotor 964 lol
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
From: SoCA/ MA
Originally Posted by kuroi FD
If you upgrade your cooling system you shouldnt have cooling issues, im in florida and never see over 87 on the hottest days.

Also Mazda made the front end like it is not only because its sleek and cool looking but has a very low coefficient of drag which makes the car mad fast yo. Yours looks great but it raises the coefficient of drag and thats one reason I will probably never go 99 spec although I love it.
coefiicient of drag ? you must be doing a good 200 mph to appreciate a phrase like that.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 07:57 AM
  #7  
airborne's Avatar
King of the Duct Tape
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 0
From: PA
it looks like a stock front with the n-tech "shark mouth" mod or whatever.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 08:14 AM
  #8  
ptrhahn's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,282
Likes: 703
From: Arlington, VA
Get a 99 spec. It looks the best, and was likelythe only one ever wind-tunnel tested. You might gain a little drag, but you'll also gain downforce and cooling capacity... and looks IMO
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 08:45 AM
  #9  
crassfc3s's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: san antonio , tx
please most of you arent going nearly fast enough to have c/d factor in, 99 spec pwns all
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 10:04 AM
  #10  
tcb100's Avatar
DinoDude
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
From: Harpers Ferry, West Virginia
Like Patfat said above, look at the PFS front facia.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 10:06 AM
  #11  
dubulup's Avatar
development
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 7
From: Lafayette, LA
and remove the fog lamps
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 11:52 AM
  #12  
kuroi FD's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: orlando/st. petersburg
Originally Posted by s-thetikz
coefiicient of drag ? you must be doing a good 200 mph to appreciate a phrase like that.

One day hopefully , c/d doenst only effect top speed fellows, it effects fuel economy, and more importantly handling at higher speed which IS important on the track.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 02:00 PM
  #13  
Addict's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 134
Likes: 1
From: Aurora IL
I actually like the '93 front end a LOT more than the '99. I like this large increase in oil cooler ducts and some increase in the main intake area. And my current front end has a little bit of droop and wave in it that I wouldn't mind replacing with something that looked stock...

Comparison to "shark mod", I think this one is much subtler. The shark mod distorts the center of the main duct down much more, doesn't it, 'cause it isn't lengthening the sides of the main duct, just pushing down the middle?

Comparison to PFS , didn't that one have a much more verticle seperation between the oil cooler ducts and the middle? Though I remember liking the PFS front end, I admit.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 02:27 PM
  #14  
'87 turbo II's Avatar
Sleeper but still slow
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
seems like too mcu hmoney for soemthing that looks exactly stock with the 99-spec as an option. I mean I love the stock lines don't get me wrong but you already have that bumper if you own an FD just slightly smaller.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thecody59
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
14
Jan 23, 2016 11:52 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:04 PM.