3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

What our cars could have looked like with better cooling from the factory.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-15-06, 09:46 PM
  #1  
Keep to the right.

Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Mascoutah, IL
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What our cars could have looked like with better cooling from the factory.

I am one of those people who thinks that pretty much every non-Mazdaspeed bodykit out there ruins the work of genius that is the 3rd gen RX-7. However, if some aftermarket company saw fit to make a front bumper like the one I'm showing below, I would be all over it. I doubt it would ever sell in large numbers becuase the average guy on the street would think it's stock....No show-off factor. But that's point. I want a stock-looking front bumper with better cooling. This is what I came up with:



Would any of you go for something like this?

...And stock for comparison:



I'm sorry if this post belongs in the appearance mods section. I'm just proposing what could have been so I wasn't sure where to put it.
Old 06-15-06, 09:50 PM
  #2  
Do a barrel roll!

iTrader: (4)
 
Rxmfn7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lower Burrell, PA
Posts: 7,529
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
They did basically that with the 99 front end..
Old 06-15-06, 09:55 PM
  #3  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
kuroi FD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: orlando/st. petersburg
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you upgrade your cooling system you shouldnt have cooling issues, im in florida and never see over 87 on the hottest days.

Also Mazda made the front end like it is not only because its sleek and cool looking but has a very low coefficient of drag which makes the car mad fast yo. Yours looks great but it raises the coefficient of drag and thats one reason I will probably never go 99 spec although I love it.
Old 06-15-06, 10:03 PM
  #4  
Do a barrel roll!

iTrader: (4)
 
Rxmfn7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lower Burrell, PA
Posts: 7,529
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by kuroi FD
If you upgrade your cooling system you shouldnt have cooling issues, im in florida and never see over 87 on the hottest days.

Also Mazda made the front end like it is not only because its sleek and cool looking but has a very low coefficient of drag which makes the car mad fast yo. Yours looks great but it raises the coefficient of drag and thats one reason I will probably never go 99 spec although I love it.
While this is true, no matter how good your cooling system is, more airflow to the heat exchangers is never a bad thing. Also, the R1 package raised the C/D about .2 IIRC, and the 99 spec spoiler even a bit more between the spoiler and the chin splitter, not that anyone would ever notice that different of drag, but you can notice the increased high speed stability from the gain in downforce.
Old 06-15-06, 10:23 PM
  #5  
Track junkie

 
patfat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 1,258
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Look for a used PFS front bumper
Old 06-16-06, 03:47 AM
  #6  
4 rotor 964 lol

iTrader: (1)
 
s-thetikz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SoCA/ MA
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kuroi FD
If you upgrade your cooling system you shouldnt have cooling issues, im in florida and never see over 87 on the hottest days.

Also Mazda made the front end like it is not only because its sleek and cool looking but has a very low coefficient of drag which makes the car mad fast yo. Yours looks great but it raises the coefficient of drag and thats one reason I will probably never go 99 spec although I love it.
coefiicient of drag ? you must be doing a good 200 mph to appreciate a phrase like that.
Old 06-16-06, 07:57 AM
  #7  
King of the Duct Tape

 
airborne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it looks like a stock front with the n-tech "shark mouth" mod or whatever.
Old 06-16-06, 08:14 AM
  #8  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,027
Received 500 Likes on 274 Posts
Get a 99 spec. It looks the best, and was likelythe only one ever wind-tunnel tested. You might gain a little drag, but you'll also gain downforce and cooling capacity... and looks IMO
Old 06-16-06, 08:45 AM
  #9  
Full Member

 
crassfc3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: san antonio , tx
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
please most of you arent going nearly fast enough to have c/d factor in, 99 spec pwns all
Old 06-16-06, 10:04 AM
  #10  
DinoDude

 
tcb100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Harpers Ferry, West Virginia
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Like Patfat said above, look at the PFS front facia.
Old 06-16-06, 10:06 AM
  #11  
development

 
dubulup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
and remove the fog lamps
Old 06-16-06, 11:52 AM
  #12  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
kuroi FD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: orlando/st. petersburg
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by s-thetikz
coefiicient of drag ? you must be doing a good 200 mph to appreciate a phrase like that.

One day hopefully , c/d doenst only effect top speed fellows, it effects fuel economy, and more importantly handling at higher speed which IS important on the track.
Old 06-16-06, 02:00 PM
  #13  
Full Member

 
Addict's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Aurora IL
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I actually like the '93 front end a LOT more than the '99. I like this large increase in oil cooler ducts and some increase in the main intake area. And my current front end has a little bit of droop and wave in it that I wouldn't mind replacing with something that looked stock...

Comparison to "shark mod", I think this one is much subtler. The shark mod distorts the center of the main duct down much more, doesn't it, 'cause it isn't lengthening the sides of the main duct, just pushing down the middle?

Comparison to PFS , didn't that one have a much more verticle seperation between the oil cooler ducts and the middle? Though I remember liking the PFS front end, I admit.
Old 06-16-06, 02:27 PM
  #14  
Sleeper but still slow

iTrader: (1)
 
'87 turbo II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
seems like too mcu hmoney for soemthing that looks exactly stock with the 99-spec as an option. I mean I love the stock lines don't get me wrong but you already have that bumper if you own an FD just slightly smaller.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thecody59
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
14
01-23-16 11:52 AM



Quick Reply: What our cars could have looked like with better cooling from the factory.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47 PM.