3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Water temp sender in thermostat housing - BAD IDEA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 24, 2005 | 03:20 PM
  #76  
Csefiroth0's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Originally Posted by adam c
Home depot carries the brass "T", but I was not able to find the 3/8" hose barb fitting to go into the coolant hoses. I found that at another hardware store. Home depot didn't have many fittings to choose from.
dammit.. i thought the hose barb fittings were 1/4!! i guess i have to go back to ACE!
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2005 | 03:55 PM
  #77  
adam c's Avatar
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,368
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Originally Posted by SPOautos
The turbo coolant line ...............
I don't think anyone suggested the turbo coolant line for the sender. We were talking about the throttle body coolant line
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2005 | 03:56 PM
  #78  
adam c's Avatar
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,368
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Originally Posted by Csefiroth0
dammit.. i thought the hose barb fittings were 1/4!! i guess i have to go back to ACE!
I had to go back too!!
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2005 | 08:13 PM
  #79  
KevinK2's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 6
From: Delaware
Originally Posted by SPOautos
.......... Since the turbo coolant lines are routed from the hottest point to the coolest point they will always have good flow no matter what the thermostat or bypass is doing..........I still think the first part of the turbo line in that rubber hose would be an ideal place and is a better place than the tb line.
What drives the flow when running is pressure drop between the 2 points, and the pressure drop is very low at idle, t-stat wide open. Highest flow will be when t-stat is near closed and revs are high, with high drop across the restrictive bypass path. If turbo line was started at the wp discharge, that would not be the "hottest" source, but would result in highest flow as it is the highest pressure point.

But your right in that flow should always be into the turbo, from a hotter point than the TB input, be it slow at idle. The gage will read very high temps after shutdown, likely higher than at other possible sensor locations, due to thermally induced reverse flow from the turbo. Hope someone tries it ... could be scarey for some :o
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2007 | 07:36 PM
  #80  
rozado's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Dale...it worked like a charm. Thanks for the write up and bump for others looking.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 06:03 PM
  #81  
RX7 Rotary Rocket's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, QC, Canada
I know this thread is old but I had a question, if I have made TB coolant line removal mod, what other coolant line I can use and tap my "T" ?

Thank you !
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 06:42 PM
  #82  
1QWIK7's Avatar
White chicks > *
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,146
Likes: 1
From: Secaucus, New Jersey
If you did the TB mod, you wouldnt need to "T" into the line, you can just use a straight coupling.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 06:45 PM
  #83  
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
needs more track time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,772
Likes: 798
From: Bay Area CA
Originally Posted by 1QWIK7
If you did the TB mod, you wouldnt need to "T" into the line, you can just use a straight coupling.

I'm personally not sure but according to maxcooper a temp sensor needs to be in the flow of the fluid. Makes sense to me after thinking about it.

http://maxcooper.com/rx7/how-to/spa_gauges/index.html
"Note that temp senders must be in the oil flow, rather than at a dead end to read correctly, unlike pressure senders. "
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 06:47 PM
  #84  
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
needs more track time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,772
Likes: 798
From: Bay Area CA
Originally Posted by maxcooper
You can also get rid of the sensor for the stock gauge near the oil pressure sensor and use that spot for your aftermarket gauge sensor. The stock water temp sensor in that location is used only for the gauge, so the only side effect is that the stock gauge stops working.

-Max

If you are using a Power FC and replace the stock sensor with an aftermarket one, I would assume that the PFC no longer gets a coolant temp reading. Is that correct?
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 07:05 PM
  #85  
1QWIK7's Avatar
White chicks > *
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,146
Likes: 1
From: Secaucus, New Jersey
Originally Posted by gracer7-rx7
I'm personally not sure but according to maxcooper a temp sensor needs to be in the flow of the fluid. Makes sense to me after thinking about it.

http://maxcooper.com/rx7/how-to/spa_gauges/index.html
"Note that temp senders must be in the oil flow, rather than at a dead end to read correctly, unlike pressure senders. "

True.

Well then he can "T" off where the 2 coolant hoses used to meet at the TB. Thats what i did for my TB mod. I didnt cap off either hose, i simply joined them together.

Im assuming he can "T" off there for the gauge no?
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2009 | 07:53 PM
  #86  
Sgtblue's Avatar
Urban Combat Vet
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,160
Likes: 983
From: Mid-west
You can just loop a section of hose from the T-stat housing to the rear iron, by-passing the TB. Then just insert the 'T' fitting, which I covered with an old section of hose.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2009 | 01:39 AM
  #87  
jonnyrx7's Avatar
ROTARY PUNX
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
I didnt tap anything at all. I just purchased a buddy club WATER SENDER ADAPTOR that attches between my coolant hose & where it attaches to the rest of the coolant housing/stock sensor I'll take pics tomorrow morning. Greddy also sells one. I didnt have to drill anything...just 2 clamps & a cut radiator house. Literally 5 minutes & my Water Temp gauge works perfect. looks like this...
then in the center on the other side there is a 1/8 hole drilled for the water sender adaptor
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2009 | 08:06 AM
  #88  
Sgtblue's Avatar
Urban Combat Vet
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,160
Likes: 983
From: Mid-west
Originally Posted by jonnyrx7
I didnt tap anything at all. I just purchased a buddy club WATER SENDER ADAPTOR that attches between my coolant hose & where it attaches to the rest of the coolant housing/stock sensor...
That is easier, but doesn't tell you anything until your t-stat opens up. Check the OP's very first post for the downsides. One reason he was motivated to try the TB line in the first place.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2009 | 02:24 PM
  #89  
jonnyrx7's Avatar
ROTARY PUNX
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by Sgtblue
That is easier, but doesn't tell you anything until your t-stat opens up. Check the OP's very first post for the downsides. One reason he was motivated to try the TB line in the first place.
I see. Well that was my easy solution hahaha
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2009 | 02:33 PM
  #90  
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
needs more track time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,772
Likes: 798
From: Bay Area CA
^That is also what adam_c had referred to at the beginning of the thread before switching to the throttle body coolant hose as Dale and others recommended.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 12:57 PM
  #91  
Newbie
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
From: MI
I may have skimmed over it, but did anyone give any pros/cons to putting the sensor here?


Additionally I remember seeing a post not long ago that installed the sensor in the plug on the TOP of the filler neck, are there any pros/cons to that location as well?


Personally I would prefer to install the sensor into the already tapped hole on the top of the filler neck, right next to the cap. I already have a fitting that adapts the sensor to the correct size for that hole, and it fits fine, I just want to make sure it's going to work correctly before I get everything else I'm doing wrapped up and go to use it.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 05:54 PM
  #92  
scotty305's Avatar
~17 MPG
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,478
Likes: 334
From: Bend, OR
JHew84, the photo in your post shows the thermostat housing. When the thermostat is closed, there will be very little coolant flow through this area and the temperature will be much colder than the coolant that is being recirculated inside the engine. This is exactly the place that DaleClark (and others) suggested NOT to put a temperature sensor in the first few posts of this thread.

The filler neck is also on the wrong side of the thermostat and will not see much coolant flow when the thermostat is closed. In the worst case scenario, the thermostat could stick closed and the coolant inside the engine could be boiling but a temperature sensor installed in either of those locations would not know the difference.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 10:26 AM
  #93  
Newbie
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
From: MI
Ah, thank you, I actually tore apart my old motor last night and realized the same thing. I was under the impression that the two plugs went to different areas and one might be behind the thermostat, but it's not. I also thought they were discussing something different because they kept talking about "tapping" the thermostat housing and both of those places were already tapped, semantics :P.

Guess I'll be hitting up the hardware store tomorrow to get that T setup and install it on the TB line, I agree with dale completely about it being pointless to only see the temp when the thermostat opens.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 09:38 AM
  #94  
RX7 Rotary Rocket's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, QC, Canada
Originally Posted by Sgtblue
You can just loop a section of hose from the T-stat housing to the rear iron, by-passing the TB. Then just insert the 'T' fitting, which I covered with an old section of hose.
Perfect I'll try that, thanks !
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 12:08 PM
  #95  
TwinCharged RX7's Avatar
Built Not Bought
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 964
From: Stamford, CT
^ - regarding the pic above, I understand that the hose goes to the nipple on top of the rear of the engine. But which nipple does it connect to at the front?

My engine came with a single turbo, so the nipple at the rear of the engine (top of pic) is just plugged, but at the front of the engine (bottom of pic) I have two nipples about 3 inches apart, facing the rear of the car, and they are linked by a short piece of hose. My question is which one are you using, and is it safe to just block one off?

It looks like I have 3 options, what would you do?

1. cut the short hose between the two front nipples and splice in a t for the sensor.

2. join the two front nipples with a Y connector, and then run a hose from the connector to the rear of the engine.

3. block one of the front nipples off, and run a line from the rear to the front like in the pic above (if this is the best option, which front nipple is best, upper or lower).

Also, what am I missing that required the front nipples to be looped together? Im sure it was part of the single turbo conversion.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 07:09 PM
  #96  
Sgtblue's Avatar
Urban Combat Vet
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,160
Likes: 983
From: Mid-west
The nipple that the hose is connected to is just barely out of frame in my earlier picture. It's high on the back of the waterpump housing. Your just by-passing the TB and going straight to the nipple on the rear iron. (See circled areas in diagram)
They may have looped the TB outlet to one of the turbo coolant line nipples for the twins.

Reply
Old Jul 4, 2009 | 05:16 PM
  #97  
t2terror's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Springfield MO
Originally Posted by JHew84
I may have skimmed over it, but did anyone give any pros/cons to putting the sensor here?


Additionally I remember seeing a post not long ago that installed the sensor in the plug on the TOP of the filler neck, are there any pros/cons to that location as well?


Personally I would prefer to install the sensor into the already tapped hole on the top of the filler neck, right next to the cap. I already have a fitting that adapts the sensor to the correct size for that hole, and it fits fine, I just want to make sure it's going to work correctly before I get everything else I'm doing wrapped up and go to use it.

I was looking at this area as well to mount a thermo sensor. Has it been ultimately determined that this location is a good / bad spot to place a sensor? To me it seems simple enough to get a 3/8 to 1/8 brass reducer and mount the sensor.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2010 | 12:15 PM
  #98  
dagoof's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 143
Likes: 6
From: Idaho
Originally Posted by KevinK2

I was lazy and just added a parallel resistor to the oem sensor, so stock gage jumps at 220F.
Can you explain
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2010 | 05:24 PM
  #99  
grimple1's Avatar
Turd Ferguson
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 2
From: Sherman Oaks, California
^^ you should PM him, he posted that over 5 years ago
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2010 | 12:15 PM
  #100  
scotty305's Avatar
~17 MPG
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,478
Likes: 334
From: Bend, OR
I don't think KevinK2 visits these forums anymore, his account hasn't been logged in for a long time. Search for 'temp gauge linearization,' it may be in the 3rd Gen FAQ /useful links thread: https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/faq-3rd-gen-other-useful-links-68640/
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sherff
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
9
Feb 24, 2019 12:09 PM
befarrer
Microtech
3
Aug 22, 2015 05:52 PM
LMBTG
New Member RX-7 Technical
7
Aug 15, 2015 01:43 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:48 PM.