3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Want cooler engine bay without changing hood

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-06, 05:21 PM
  #26  
White chicks > *

iTrader: (33)
 
1QWIK7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Secaucus, New Jersey
Posts: 13,147
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I rather get a vented hood. IMO
Old 04-17-06, 05:22 PM
  #27  
development

 
dubulup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by FDNewbie
I'd love to see what temp changes (if any) would be recorded via this mod, and if there would be any noticeable difference if combined w/ a vented hood. Paging Scrub!

~Ramy
If I find some time this week to complete this mod, I should have some before and after datalogs. Same conditions to my best ability.
Old 04-17-06, 05:26 PM
  #28  
Sponsor
RX7Club Vendor
iTrader: (10)
 
FDNewbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by dubulup
If I find some time this week to complete this mod, I should have some before and after datalogs. Same conditions to my best ability.
That would rock And do you have a stock or vented hood?
Old 04-17-06, 05:27 PM
  #29  
development

 
dubulup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by FDNewbie
That would rock And do you have a stock or vented hood?
stock
Old 04-17-06, 05:35 PM
  #30  
Original Gangster/Rotary!


iTrader: (213)
 
GoodfellaFD3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Posts: 30,529
Received 539 Likes on 326 Posts
Originally Posted by 7racer
Rich,

don't you think you could achieve the same affect by getting a vented hood?
Hi Bob,

Right before I had my car painted back in 2004 I put a lot of thought into whether i wanted a vented hood, what front bumper i wanted, should i change the rear wing, etc.

I came to the conclusion that I really like the stock look (with 99 spec front bumper). I wanted something classy and flowing, basically an FD where I can pull into a Ferrari meet and not feel out of place. The scoot hood, whale tail wing, etc look definitely isnt for me. Plus, having to deal with rainwater inside the engine bay seems like a pain in the *** .

Rich
Old 04-17-06, 05:43 PM
  #31  
Senior Member

 
axr6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Auburn, CA
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FDNewbie
I don't doubt you sir...but just for the sake of thoroughness, was everything else left exactly as is? Seeing that air resistance increases exponentially at higher speeds, I think it's very plausible to have a considerable gain by modifying the car in such a way that it decreases the amount of drag (I'm guessing that's what this is doing...by allowing air to flow through).

I'd love to see what temp changes (if any) would be recorded via this mod, and if there would be any noticeable difference if combined w/ a vented hood. Paging Scrub!

~Ramy

The test, every single time I made a modification, was performed on a 2.1 mile flat section of the freeway with 4 runs each time and averaging the results. 2 runs in each direction to account for any wind differences.

If you wonder, at the time, that section of freeway was fairly abandoned at daybreak, when I did those runs. The only variables were the air temperatures but, I used to record them as well, and since most of my tests were done during one CA winter, those temps were probably easily within 10 F degree.

As I look at today's far higher degree of knowledge and modifications, the results of my testing seem to very nicely correlate with posted dyno results. At that time those few of us who were doing these things were kind of stumbing in the dark, taking chances with our mods... still made some incredible changes...
Old 04-17-06, 05:50 PM
  #32  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

 
7racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 3,736
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
Hi Bob,

Right before I had my car painted back in 2004 I put a lot of thought into whether i wanted a vented hood, what front bumper i wanted, should i change the rear wing, etc.

I came to the conclusion that I really like the stock look (with 99 spec front bumper). I wanted something classy and flowing, basically an FD where I can pull into a Ferrari meet and not feel out of place. The scoot hood, whale tail wing, etc look definitely isnt for me. Plus, having to deal with rainwater inside the engine bay seems like a pain in the *** .

Rich

Your right...I'm not a fan either of gaudy hoods and still love the stock/99 spec look.

I was thinking for of the FEED hood since it doesn't change the look much.
Old 04-17-06, 05:50 PM
  #33  
Senior Member

 
axr6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Auburn, CA
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dubulup
thanks for the pictures...this is something I'm interested in trying. I do AutoX in the rain, but like to keep a some what clean bay...Battery is in the cabin and I run an open intake, so blocking objects are no issue. Looks like I'll need some some of shield for my intake if things look like they can get too wet.



not if you like the stock hood

You probably will not notice much differences at AutoX speeds which are usually way below 100 mph. On my timing sheet the difference in acceleration times really showed up over 140 MPH where the exponentially increasing air drag and resistance must be overcome by either exponentially increasing horsepower or reducing drag.
Old 04-17-06, 06:54 PM
  #34  
None

 
Kevin T. Wyum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That's a good idea for a number of reasons. So dirt, mud and debris wasn't an issue with the screen in place? I'd think water might be a threat to the fuse blocks etc. coming from underneath.
Old 04-17-06, 08:03 PM
  #35  
Senior Member

 
axr6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Auburn, CA
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kevin T. Wyum
That's a good idea for a number of reasons. So dirt, mud and debris wasn't an issue with the screen in place? I'd think water might be a threat to the fuse blocks etc. coming from underneath.

No, I never personally experienced any problem with dirt or water. Regading mud, that could be ugly but, you know how ugly it is when you run off a racetrack into the mud and pack it into every possible opening in your chassis and engine compartment. In such case the screen would be the smallest of your mud problem source. I remember spending long hours scraping, hosing and cleaning mud from my racecars following those off road incursions. So, I suggest stay away from mud any time, any car.

As to water problems. It may be a good idea to either move the fuse block or wrap it. Having said that, I did not worry about it as shorts in electrical circuits tend to happen when high voltage arcs across contaminated water. Clear water has very high resistance to electrical current flows. (for instance, in the Bay Area, utilities use Hetch Hetchy tap water to wash their dirty insulators on energized lines up to 500,000 Volts). The low voltage levels (12 volts) represent very little dangers for arc to develop. There is simply very little PUSH behind the electrons to start moving across any resistance. It is the level of voltage that initiates an electrical arc, followed by the appropriate amount of current (that does the damage), according to Ohm's law.
Old 04-17-06, 08:47 PM
  #36  
Will u do me a kindness?

iTrader: (2)
 
the_glass_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Parlor City, NY
Posts: 5,031
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Kevin T. Wyum
That's a good idea for a number of reasons. So dirt, mud and debris wasn't an issue with the screen in place? I'd think water might be a threat to the fuse blocks etc. coming from underneath.
And which reasons are those?

So did you ditch the whole fender lining and use the mesh or just cut out part of the lining?
Old 04-17-06, 09:09 PM
  #37  
Senior Member

 
axr6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Auburn, CA
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by the_glass_man
And which reasons are those?

So did you ditch the whole fender lining and use the mesh or just cut out part of the lining?
Just cut out the lining inside of the openings and slipped and riveted the wire screen between the steel fender and the rest of the plastic lining.
Old 04-17-06, 10:10 PM
  #38  
Boost Addict

iTrader: (3)
 
nashman69g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Metairie, LA near new orleans
Posts: 1,898
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
doesn't this affect air flow for the wheel well?
Old 04-18-06, 01:50 AM
  #39  
Senior Member

 
axr6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Auburn, CA
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nashman69g
doesn't this affect air flow for the wheel well?
I am not sure what your asking here as far as wheel well aiflow being effected? Certainly you will be expelling a certain amount of extra air through the wheel wells but, what is it that worries you about it?

Let's put it this way; I have not found any handling or braking problems as the result.

When I raced the car I had the large brake disks with Wildwood calipers and still ducted cold air to my calipers so, never had any brake problems, if that is what you suggest. I certainly would not expect any problems for cars that are not raced.

Hope I answered your question.
Old 04-18-06, 02:00 AM
  #40  
I AM A THIEF!!! I AM A THIEF!!!

 
-efini-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ontario Socal
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why is the engine bay low pressure...it has air being forced into it by the front air damn and that air is much hotter than the surrounding ambeint air...in what way would this be low pressure? i dont understand...it doesnt make sense...what teh ****?
Old 04-18-06, 02:01 AM
  #41  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
f150rx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Rancho Cucamonga
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is what the forum is about alot of info that can be shared and discussed ,correct me if im wrong, on a hot day i crack one window open about an inch you can tell air inside the cabin gets vacuumed out(especially for smokers). I open another window and air doesn't get sucked out anymore, instead it circulates around the cabin and cause a turbulance, I understand what you guys are saying but would you rather drive on a hot day with only one window open or feel the temp. actually go down with another window open. If you drive a truck with a window in the back glass, you crack the drivers window only does it get really windy? how bout opening the back glass... then you feel circulation of air ,OK if air doesnt get sucked out from top of the hood and actually reversed than it's very believeable and i now learned it from you guys but it does circulate (vent) under the hood. Now for the radiator actually not flowing correctly because air is trapped due to removing the weatherstrip then what affect does the opening of under the engine bay do when the wetherstrip is on. Theres also been a thread about the solenoid black box from the 96 and up FD's not being able to work on US spec 93-95 FD's, alot of people tried and failed and said it's either not worth it or wouldn't work, I agree that it's alot of work but what is this after tinkering with our cars already. Well I happen to get one of these black boxes anyway and it's currently working on my car right now with the correct boost pattern all you need is a wiring and vaccum diagram and carefully chase each one. I never forced anybody to perform this mod to begin with it's just ideas that might or might not work , everything begins with an idea it's up to you to follow. I will perform a test on coolant temps. with and without the weatherstrip numerously and try to get consistent results. If it really raises coolant temp. than of course I will drop this idea my self, but i do know one thing for sure it will help it when the car is not moving.
Old 04-18-06, 09:14 AM
  #42  
Mi Casa Yu Casa

 
chopstix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Japan Tokyo
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tried to find a diagram showing the high pressure that builds at the bottom of the windscreen. Could only find this one, representing lift.
Attached Thumbnails Want cooler engine bay without changing hood-lift-model.jpg  
Old 04-18-06, 12:27 PM
  #43  
Senior Member

 
axr6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Auburn, CA
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by -efini-
why is the engine bay low pressure...it has air being forced into it by the front air damn and that air is much hotter than the surrounding ambeint air...in what way would this be low pressure? i dont understand...it doesnt make sense...what teh ****?
I do not think that the engine bay is LOW pressure at all. What our testing seem to consistently indicate is that at high driving speeds the pressure build-up in front of the windshield exceeds the underhood pressures, thus is the reverse air flow into the engine compartment from the base of the windshield.

I did the same test as othes in this thread where I taped little piece of yarns onto the hood opening below the windshield. It was not on my FD but on a 83 Mustang and I was looking for not air exit but, cowl induction. Still, the test was consistent with the findings of others. At low city speeds the yarns were being blown OUT from the engine compartment but, when a certain speed was exceeded (forgot the exact number but, probably around normal freeway speeds) the yard were solidly being pushed back under the hood opening beacuse of the pressure built up at the base of the windshield

So, don't think of this as low pressure under the hood. Rather, high pressure against higher pressure.
Old 04-18-06, 12:33 PM
  #44  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
f150rx7:

You are wrong. It has been repeatedly proven. Brian Davies (Wargasm) even tested this with underhood thermosensors and discovered that, if anything, temps went up a degree or two with the weatherstripping removed. Unfortunately, his website is down at the moment.
The following users liked this post:
Nakd n Fearless (04-24-19)
Old 04-18-06, 12:37 PM
  #45  
King of the Duct Tape

 
airborne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I also have cut out the fender liners. I installed a wire mesh and a layer of charcoal screen. Also, I cut out aluminum pieces that I can slip in if I'm going out in the rain.

I did it to try and help out my hot air intake but I didn't notice a significant temp difference. But its been like that for a few years and things under the hood haven't gotten extra dirty.
Old 04-18-06, 12:56 PM
  #46  
development

 
dubulup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by axr6
You probably will not notice much differences at AutoX speeds which are usually way below 100 mph. On my timing sheet the difference in acceleration times really showed up over 140 MPH where the exponentially increasing air drag and resistance must be overcome by either exponentially increasing horsepower or reducing drag.
I'm more interested in dumping engine bay heat, so if air is exiting the bay, heat must be going with it, no? I route fresh air up under my intake, and if it has a low resistance exit path, the more air will flow...acceleration would be an added bonus

further
I pulled the liners last night, and it looks like one could improve air flow through the oil coolers as well with a screen section behind each cooler. I know the 300ZX TT guys do something similar with their IC's (same location as FD oil coolers)

homemade louvers on a 300Z board
http://twinturbo.net/net/viewmsg.asp...&msg_id=868066
Old 04-18-06, 01:03 PM
  #47  
King of the Duct Tape

 
airborne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are you referring to the fender liners dubulup? If so thats kind of funny. I thought that the fender liners combined with the vent behind each wheel were meant to *help* flow through the oil coolers.
Old 04-18-06, 01:09 PM
  #48  
development

 
dubulup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
^LOL, I think you are right.

nm, found it




my problem with this is the windshield washer reservoir is right behind it. If there were an opening in the liner, wouldn't that be a less resistive path and generate more flow.

I, for one don't like to hack Mazda's engineering with the car...but hell, at this point there's no turning back, haha! You know, the liner is two pieces and they are stapeled together

Last edited by dubulup; 04-18-06 at 01:18 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Nakd n Fearless (04-24-19)
Old 04-18-06, 01:21 PM
  #49  
development

 
dubulup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
look at the brake duct in that picture as well
Old 04-18-06, 01:48 PM
  #50  
King of the Duct Tape

 
airborne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I noticed that's an R1 diagram. I have a touring and didn't see any ducting at all while I was cutting out the fender well. I guess the poor 1 oil cooler cars have to soldier on with no airflow.


Quick Reply: Want cooler engine bay without changing hood



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:01 PM.