3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Upgrading computer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 12:24 PM
  #1  
JUSTgotMINE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: raleigh, nc
Upgrading computer

What is a good upgrade for a stock automatic trans computer. I don't have any mods yet, but making my list and doing research. Thanks!
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 12:35 PM
  #2  
OptusX4's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
Well, first off, you could get a myriad of information via searching. There are two main computer options: Programmable Standalones, or "piggy-back" chips. I notice you said you have no mods, so really this upgrade should be for a later date, when you do. The main reason we need chips for these cars is to provide adequate fuel for the mods we're running. If you were to add a cat-back, downpipe, midpipe, and intake to your car, you would start overboosting to 11-12psi due to the reduced restriction. This will also cause a horrendous FD-death-inducing lean condition, thus we get a computer upgrade to add fuel.


Standalone vs Piggy back is an often-asked question, and the answer mainly relies on what you want out of the car. If you've done your handful of mods and are going to be happy, then a piggy back would be great. But, if you plan to keep adding things, then the piggy back would have to be retuned over and over. On the other hand, if you wanted to go single turbo you would never ever use a piggy-back, because of all of the tuning involved.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 12:46 PM
  #3  
JUSTgotMINE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: raleigh, nc
I'm sorry, I forgot to say that I did have a cat-back on it now. I plan on putting a downpipe and intake on it. I read that I will be ok using the stock computer with that. I'm not going to do much more than that...but I'll do the AST and vacuum lines.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 12:52 PM
  #4  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Arrow

https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...threadid=92092
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 03:43 PM
  #5  
JUSTgotMINE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: raleigh, nc
I know this is probably a dumb question, but how hard is it to switch out a stock for stock ecu?
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 03:47 PM
  #6  
rx-7ml's Avatar
Rotarian
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: United Kingdom
JUSTgotMINE, take plug off old ECU, plug into new ECU. Unless the FD is different from all the other ECU's I've changed!

Last edited by rx-7ml; Aug 22, 2002 at 04:00 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 03:55 PM
  #7  
GoRacer's Avatar
Speed Mach Go Go Go
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 2
From: My 350Z Roadster kicks my RX7's butt
Exclamation Auto

Please note that he said: ECU for an "Auto"!

I know the piggybacks won't work but do not know about the stand alones (like Apexi PFC).
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 04:26 PM
  #8  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
Did you guys read maxpesce's reply in that link? You need to piggyback the stock ECU to retain the Auto full functions.

The PFC alone will get rid of functions like the HOLD and other stuff....
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 04:41 PM
  #9  
the_glass_man's Avatar
Will u do me a kindness?
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,031
Likes: 4
From: Parlor City, NY
good idea
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 05:01 PM
  #11  
Rotarius's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Bay Florida
Im trying to build my Rx7 to be relatively faster but to be reliable at the same time. One off your first steps should be is to set a goal of what you want and then go for that goal one step at a time. I came to the conclusion not to get a ECU. I just dont want to end up having the car spend more time in the garage than in the road. Other people might disagree with me but I want this car to last me as far as i can. Im not too much of a speed freak. Mid 13`s is my goal and fast enough for me.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 05:06 PM
  #12  
the_glass_man's Avatar
Will u do me a kindness?
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,031
Likes: 4
From: Parlor City, NY
Isn't the new AEM supposed to work with an Auto???
I think I remember hearing things like you can even choose the shift points or something crazy like that.
I also thought the Auto ECU was something different from the regular ECU.
I have the answer to all your problems just do a tranny swap.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 07:02 PM
  #13  
GoRacer's Avatar
Speed Mach Go Go Go
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 2
From: My 350Z Roadster kicks my RX7's butt
Originally posted by Mahjik
Did you guys read maxpesce's reply in that link? You need to piggyback the stock ECU to retain the Auto full functions.

The PFC alone will get rid of functions like the HOLD and other stuff....
Nope, didn't read it. I've asked Pettit before and they said it wouldn't work. I don't know about the other brands. My friend has an auto so i'm interested in the answer as well.

I don't beleive Pettit is a piggyback, so my last reply was worded wrong. If i'm not mistaken, a piggyback is adding a daughterboard...is that correct?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
May 9, 2016 07:06 PM
sinistersam
New Member RX-7 Technical
5
Sep 13, 2015 07:17 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44 AM.