3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Unhooked double throttle car seems faster =)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 10:18 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Unhooked double throttle car seems faster =)

Unhooked my double throttle the other day and man do i ever get boost faster now. car feels really smooth and just drives so much better.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 10:22 AM
  #2  
NTIMD8's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
From: Ontario
When you say "unhooked" did you just unhook the vacuum lines from the solenoid and plug the nipple on the intake?
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 10:44 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Originally Posted by NTIMD8
When you say "unhooked" did you just unhook the vacuum lines from the solenoid and plug the nipple on the intake?
Yeap unhooked the vacuum line and plugged the solenoid nipple. The vacccum is still attached on the other side.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 11:16 AM
  #4  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 12,313
Likes: 27
From: Hershey PA
Did you have a boost gauge to show what your before/after boost was?

FYI, the double throttle is designed to reduce boost when the engine is cold.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 02:54 AM
  #5  
BobfisH's Avatar
RX7 lover
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 3
From: UK
Originally Posted by dgeesaman
Did you have a boost gauge to show what your before/after boost was?

FYI, the double throttle is designed to reduce boost when the engine is cold.
no its not, its designed to reduce airflow (sorry to nitpick)
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 06:06 AM
  #6  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 12,313
Likes: 27
From: Hershey PA
And the reduced airflow reduces boost and engine load. It's the same thing, isn't it?

Dave
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 10:14 AM
  #7  
TRISPEEDFD3S's Avatar
FEED me
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,787
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by dgeesaman
And the reduced airflow reduces boost and engine load. It's the same thing, isn't it?

Dave
You guys are freaking funny...
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 12:51 PM
  #8  
matty's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,014
Likes: 40
From: CT
i have heard this is a good mod. anyone know more about it?
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 01:03 PM
  #9  
FD3S2005's Avatar
SideWayZ The Only Way
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,945
Likes: 32
From: Davie, Florida
so is it a bad thing or good thing to do?
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 01:09 PM
  #10  
Pistonkilla1's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
What's good about this is that you can now remove all associated plumbing for the vacuum controlled secondary throttle. This removes one hose from the throttle body area. Must leave the solenoid attached so that the ECU does not give an error code unless you want to replace it with a resistor. The second benefit is less air flow turbulence after the first double throttle which does not open up 100%. The first (mechanical) is at an angle to the second (vacuum)one. This should give a wee bit more hp, but how much has not been qualified. At least it makes the system simpler and frees up space.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 01:12 PM
  #11  
T2 Tsunami's Avatar
Stud Service
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
From: Lancaster PA
any links or write-ups for this?. Is this safe to do for a non-sequential PFC equipped FD?
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 01:24 PM
  #12  
FD3S2005's Avatar
SideWayZ The Only Way
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,945
Likes: 32
From: Davie, Florida
is it safe for a sequential with a pfc?
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 01:39 PM
  #13  
Pistonkilla1's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Its function is primarily to protect against the idiot factor. The valves stay shut until the car is warmed up. This doesn't allow too much air into the cold motor. When I say idiot factor I am talking about people that would start the car up cold and immediately floor it. So, its safe with whatever setup you may have.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 02:04 PM
  #14  
SLOASFK's Avatar
Top's always down
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,841
Likes: 2
From: Spain
It's not ECU controlled, it's controlled by a solenoid on the rack.

It's never "safe" to do, but it's also never harmful to do. It's something Mazda put in there to help prevent idiot owners from popping their motors. This may be news to you, but the owners are the number 1 enemy of this car.

here's the link on how to delete it.

http://www.rx7.org/Robinette/double_throttle.htm

Also, if you just want to disable it, all you have to do is pull the hose off the actuator and zip tie it shut.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 02:06 PM
  #15  
T2 Tsunami's Avatar
Stud Service
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
From: Lancaster PA
So, are you saying that there are no benefits to doing this mod?
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 02:10 PM
  #16  
SLOASFK's Avatar
Top's always down
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,841
Likes: 2
From: Spain
Originally Posted by T2 Tsunami
So, are you saying that there are no benefits to doing this mod?
the only benefits would be if the actuator or solenoid got stuck closed(which I've never heard of happening) or if you're building your car up and you really want that extra 2-3hp you get from the flow increase of not having the butterflies in there. Or if you're doing a DIY rebuild and you want to make it that much easier to take off the UIM next time. Other than that, you're just putting your motor at risk.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 03:25 PM
  #17  
DigDug's Avatar
Registered User
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 0
From: Sterling, VA
The DT solenoid is ECU controlled, and the PFC doesn't activate it. If you have a PFC, you know what it's like to have it disabled, but not removed.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 05:23 PM
  #18  
BobfisH's Avatar
RX7 lover
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 3
From: UK
Originally Posted by dgeesaman
And the reduced airflow reduces boost and engine load. It's the same thing, isn't it?

Dave
no, reduced airflow at the same boost. The DTC works by closing 2 of the three intake butterflies. flow @ 10psi through 3x area is greater than flow @10psi through 1xarea.

So in short, you still run 10psi, but because there is less of a gap to force the air through, the flow is less. Same principle as to why removing the cat causes the car to lean out - you run the same boost but the car leans out because resistance is reduced and thus flow is increased.




p.s your car might run much better because of a leaky DTC solenoid partially closing the valve all the time.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 05:27 PM
  #19  
SLOASFK's Avatar
Top's always down
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,841
Likes: 2
From: Spain
With the DT closed, my friends FD sees a max of 7PSI. With DT open, he sees 11.5.

I'm with Dave on this one.

And Bob, your theory on the midpipe is long outdated. It's been shown that running a midpipe at stock boost does not cause the car to lean out. It's because the wastegate gets overwhelmed and causes overboosting that causes the lean conditions associated with installing a midpipe, not the incresed flow itself.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 05:35 PM
  #20  
adam c's Avatar
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,368
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Having the DT closed reduces boost (measured after the throttle body), and airflow. Removing the DT is not a "mod". It simply allows more flow to a cold engine. The loss of weight is virtually zero. The amount of space saved is virtually zero. So why would anyone do this?? The only reason must be so that they can boost higher on a cold engine.

The DT is there for a good reason. Leave it alone!!!
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 05:41 PM
  #21  
SLOASFK's Avatar
Top's always down
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,841
Likes: 2
From: Spain
Originally Posted by adam c
Having the DT closed reduces boost (measured after the throttle body), and airflow. Removing the DT is not a "mod". It simply allows more flow to a cold engine. The loss of weight is virtually zero. The amount of space saved is virtually zero. So why would anyone do this?? The only reason must be so that they can boost higher on a cold engine.

The DT is there for a good reason. Leave it alone!!!
Well, if DigDug is correct, then those of us running PowerFCs don't have it anyway.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 05:47 PM
  #22  
HKNY's Avatar
Thou Shall Search
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
From: NY
If its working fine it's best left alone.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 06:19 PM
  #23  
adam c's Avatar
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,368
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Originally Posted by SLOASFK
Well, if DigDug is correct, then those of us running PowerFCs don't have it anyway.
Having a power FC has nothing to do with having a DT. The power FC may control it (I don't know), but it certainly doesn't eliminate it.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 06:25 PM
  #24  
tiger18's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
From: UK
I removed mine purely for the extra 1 horsepower,, i swear i can feel it LOL,,, No really i removed mine because it cleans up the upper intake its 1 less solenoid on the rack and if you get giddy like me and completely cut out the double throttle divider ect maybe just maybe it really does make the car a little faster. (I want my car to be simple) :-)
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 06:28 PM
  #25  
adam c's Avatar
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,368
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
An FD will never be simple.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:15 PM.