Uneven ride height
12-31-01, 10:27 PM
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Turtle Creek, Pa, USA (Sub of Pittsburgh)
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Uneven ride height
I was just reading the thread about Koni's on FD's and I remember reading last summer about how FD's are known to sit low on the driver's front side.
When I installed the Koni sport shocks and Eibach springs (from Pettit)
I did notice that when sitting level the gap between the fender and the top of the tire was greater on the passenger side then the drivers side. It was a clear difference! I even called Koni but they said that my install was correct.
I have since put on 17" and moved all the lower perch mounting locations to the middle position and had an alignment. I still notice a difference but not as much.
Can anyone confirm if this height difference is a fact of the car's geometry or special cases of suspension wear.
Just wondering...
When I installed the Koni sport shocks and Eibach springs (from Pettit)
I did notice that when sitting level the gap between the fender and the top of the tire was greater on the passenger side then the drivers side. It was a clear difference! I even called Koni but they said that my install was correct.
I have since put on 17" and moved all the lower perch mounting locations to the middle position and had an alignment. I still notice a difference but not as much.
Can anyone confirm if this height difference is a fact of the car's geometry or special cases of suspension wear.
Just wondering...
01-02-02, 01:14 PM
#2
Full Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Drums, Pa.
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have the same problem.
Installed H&R lowering springs on my 93.
My rears are even, left to right, but my
left front is 1/2 " lower than the RF.
I switched all the mounting rubbers
from left to right (except springs) and
it's the same. It has to be a variation
in the springs.
Jack
Installed H&R lowering springs on my 93.
My rears are even, left to right, but my
left front is 1/2 " lower than the RF.
I switched all the mounting rubbers
from left to right (except springs) and
it's the same. It has to be a variation
in the springs.
Jack
01-02-02, 01:24 PM
#3
Lives on the Forum
jagjack
Originally posted by jagjack
I have the same problem.
Installed H&R lowering springs on my 93.
My rears are even, left to right, but my
left front is 1/2 " lower than the RF.
I switched all the mounting rubbers
from left to right (except springs) and
it's the same. It has to be a variation
in the springs.
Jack
I have the same problem.
Installed H&R lowering springs on my 93.
My rears are even, left to right, but my
left front is 1/2 " lower than the RF.
I switched all the mounting rubbers
from left to right (except springs) and
it's the same. It has to be a variation
in the springs.
Jack
01-02-02, 02:10 PM
#4
Full Member
I've got the Koni's on their full drop, and mine is and was the same way before the struts... about 1/4" to 1/2" lower on driver side... I was told it's not a big deal, that many cars vary about that much. That, or we're all getting fat!
01-02-02, 05:15 PM
#5
reliable performance
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've noticed the difference too on my totally stock, low mileage '95. It's not a problem as the car feels perfectly balanced, and the difference isn't noticeable visually, only when you measure it.
Here's a theory, and it's only a shot in the dark, but do you think the difference has anything to do with the car being designed in Japan? Could the designers have set it up to ride a little higher on our passenger side because in Japan that side carries the driver and the extra weight of the steering column and some other things? Like I say, it's only a theory.
Here's a theory, and it's only a shot in the dark, but do you think the difference has anything to do with the car being designed in Japan? Could the designers have set it up to ride a little higher on our passenger side because in Japan that side carries the driver and the extra weight of the steering column and some other things? Like I say, it's only a theory.
01-02-02, 05:28 PM
#6
Lives on the Forum
And a very PLAUSIBLE THEORY INDEED
Originally posted by JConn2299
I've noticed the difference too on my totally stock, low mileage '95. It's not a problem as the car feels perfectly balanced, and the difference isn't noticeable visually, only when you measure it.
Here's a theory, and it's only a shot in the dark, but do you think the difference has anything to do with the car being designed in Japan? Could the designers have set it up to ride a little higher on our passenger side because in Japan that side carries the driver and the extra weight of the steering column and some other things? Like I say, it's only a theory.
I've noticed the difference too on my totally stock, low mileage '95. It's not a problem as the car feels perfectly balanced, and the difference isn't noticeable visually, only when you measure it.
Here's a theory, and it's only a shot in the dark, but do you think the difference has anything to do with the car being designed in Japan? Could the designers have set it up to ride a little higher on our passenger side because in Japan that side carries the driver and the extra weight of the steering column and some other things? Like I say, it's only a theory.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AMOC
SE RX-7 Forum
1
09-10-15 09:42 AM
