3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

to TOKICO or Not

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-08, 09:08 AM
  #51  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 317 Likes on 190 Posts
You guys are forgetting something. The shocks may only be $500, but add $250-$300 in springs, plus if your upper mounts are bad I think they are something around $100 each from Mazda. The rubber dry rots and compresses and the dust boots and bump stops tear over time. If you put a new shock and lowering spring on old rubber, the fit will be sloppy and the car may sit too low. They you have all sorts of problems such as bottoming out and rubbing through the fender liners or worse, the body harness that runs above the front wheels. I've seen cars sit over and inch lower just because the stock rubber was compressed/damaged. If your upper mounts are still in decent shape, then the setup is still reasonably priced. Otherwise you might as well run a coilover.
Old 11-03-08, 09:29 AM
  #52  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 317 Likes on 190 Posts
Originally Posted by katit
Who can tell me which setup will make FD handle close to BMW? Ride quality and cornering?
You will never get BMW ride quality in a Mazda. While the RX-7 suspension systems are very good for their time and even good by modern standards, BMW is far ahead. A lot of it has to do with the chassis design, suspension geometry, material choices, isolation from noise/vibration, etc. The RX-7 was designed to compete with cars much more expensive but cost half the price, so compromises had to be made. The car was just made too light by using sheet metal and plastic that was too thin vs using more exotic materials to keep the cost down. This transmits into a lot of noise/vibration/harshness in the suspension. There isn't enough sound deadening in the chassis either. The fact that the subframes are bolted directly to the body vs being isolated does wonders for handling, but nothing for ride quality. That being said, you can make it handle similar to a BMW, but you will never get the same solid feel or ride quality. If you re-did the entire suspension with a quality coilover, new bushings or upgraded ones, added some braces to the chassis like the Tanabe, Mazdaspeed or other, dynamatted the entire interior including the soda-can-thin doors and roof, and did something about the cheep creaky interior plastics, you may come somewhat close. To give an example of how solid a BMW chassis is and how well isolated it is, I was working on an early 2000s 325 xi recently. I had all the interior door panels off replacing window regulators and the car still felt more solid and had less noise entering the cabin that an RX-7. Just remember that everyone's tolerance and perception for this kind of stuff is different. So what may feel solid and well handling to one person may feel like a piece of garbage to another.
Old 11-03-08, 10:34 AM
  #53  
fadedvr=pink

iTrader: (2)
 
pinkrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sacramento,CA
Posts: 1,402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Why not try ground control since they come with new upper mounts, and you can ask for custom spring rates. if you get your shocks from them (koni) you can have it the whole setup matched and assembled before it comes to your door. Tell them you want to go all out on ride smoothness or you want a ride similar to an E46. Im sure they will work with you

Last edited by pinkrx7; 11-03-08 at 10:36 AM.
Old 11-03-08, 11:16 AM
  #54  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Rotary Experiment Seven
You guys are forgetting something. The shocks may only be $500, but add $250-$300 in springs, plus if your upper mounts are bad I think they are something around $100 each from Mazda. The rubber dry rots and compresses and the dust boots and bump stops tear over time. If you put a new shock and lowering spring on old rubber, the fit will be sloppy and the car may sit too low. They you have all sorts of problems such as bottoming out and rubbing through the fender liners or worse, the body harness that runs above the front wheels. I've seen cars sit over and inch lower just because the stock rubber was compressed/damaged. If your upper mounts are still in decent shape, then the setup is still reasonably priced. Otherwise you might as well run a coilover.
I'm not forgetting, what I'm saying is that the cheaper coilovers have crap dampers. IMO, it's better to get a good set of dampers and springs than a cheap coilover set.
Old 11-03-08, 03:16 PM
  #55  
needs more track time

iTrader: (16)
 
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bay Area CA
Posts: 9,186
Received 508 Likes on 350 Posts
Originally Posted by Supernaut
I have toks with gc coilovers. I drive around in brooklyn and manhattan alot I can tell you, Im not to pleased. Every time I drive over a bump it feels like someone is punching my *** cheeks. NOT COOL. Im sure it has alot to do with the poor road conditions where I drive and it will be alot better some where else but it still sucks. I will be looking for new shocks in the future. On nice roads though, the car handles like a dream.

I felt the same way with the cheap Tein coilovers on Queens, LI, NYC, NJ streets. NYC streets just suck and any performance oriented suspension will make it worse. I was happiest in terms of ride quality with stock springs on stock shocks or Konis when I lived there.




I agree with pretty much everything Mahjik said on this. It mirrors my experiences with 6 different suspension setups on my 2 FDs over the years.
Old 11-03-08, 07:01 PM
  #56  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 317 Likes on 190 Posts
Well I wouldn't get the cheapest set, but you can get something decent in the $1500 price range.
Old 11-03-08, 07:10 PM
  #57  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
katit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Even if I get Flex I still need sway bars, right?
Old 11-03-08, 07:14 PM
  #58  
R.I.P. Icemark

iTrader: (2)
 
staticguitar313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: gilbert, arizona
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have Tokico Illuminas with Tein springs on my car, i have no complaints AT ALL
Old 11-03-08, 07:35 PM
  #59  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by katit
Even if I get Flex I still need sway bars, right?
Need? No. You can try the upgraded suspension without and see how it feels. I would wager that an upgraded shock/spring combo (whether coilovers or not) on an FD is still going to have less roll than a BMW 540 with upgraded sway bars.
Old 11-04-08, 11:07 AM
  #60  
needs more track time

iTrader: (16)
 
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bay Area CA
Posts: 9,186
Received 508 Likes on 350 Posts
Originally Posted by 2007 ZX-10
I thought the Widefoot mounts were no longer made (?)

Yes they are. Made on demand as Mahjik stated. Email David Breslau for a set

David Breslau <widefoot@comcast.net>
Old 11-04-08, 11:22 AM
  #61  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
katit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Mahjik
Need? No. You can try the upgraded suspension without and see how it feels. I would wager that an upgraded shock/spring combo (whether coilovers or not) on an FD is still going to have less roll than a BMW 540 with upgraded sway bars.
Tokico HTS comes as a "SET" on shox.com. They give springs practically free ($630 for set), however shox.com people don't know what ratios are those and they don't have them in stock yet.

I guess I need to call Tokico and see what they say. It may be that their ratios similar to the ones you suggested and worth a try. Too bad nobody sells them on eBay so I could use Microsoft cashback
Old 11-04-08, 12:41 PM
  #62  
Senior Member

iTrader: (8)
 
Zoolander's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 431
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Bottom line: there are NEVER enough opinions on suspension components. I, too, have been researching this subject and have read most of the threads and still cannot make a decision. At least this new thread on this much discussed topic finally cleared up my confusion on coilovers. I bought new rubber upper mounts ($60 each) in preparation for my coilover install, but I guess I don't need those if I DO end up getting a coilover system, as it's built-in (unless I break apart the system to add the rubber - no point in that). But coilovers are metal to metal, which Howard Coleman does not recommend. But they are still very popular and has the best adjustability for ride height......

Shocks/Springs/Upper mounts almost = cost of lower end coil-overs, but it sounds like lower end coilovers aren't worth it. I want to adjust my ride height with some performance thrown in. Is Ground Control my answer? Good thing I can return the rubber mounts.
Old 11-04-08, 04:01 PM
  #63  
needs more track time

iTrader: (16)
 
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bay Area CA
Posts: 9,186
Received 508 Likes on 350 Posts
The GC coil overs have a polyurethane pad at the top to help dampen some of the noise, vibration and harshness one would feel from metal to metal spring against mounting surface. That pad is much smaller than the OEM upper shock mount but it definitely helps.

Other coil overs have this also. Which ones exactly, I don't know. I know the bottom of the line Tein's re-use the OEM upper shock mounts which helps on the NVH side quite a bit.


Zoolander - I've written replies on a few threads on my opinions regarding the various suspension setups I've had on threads in the suspension section. You are welcome to search for them using my user name. My impressions were focused mainly from the street perspective so its not to be compared to howard coleman's excellent thread and advice on his track/street oriented thread in the Suspension section (which is an excellent and informative thread that is well worth a read).



The problem with trying to search forums for information on suspension setups and ride quality in particular is that a lot of the info is very subjective - a matter of opinion. Making it more complicated is that you don't know the frame of reference of the person writing the review. A 20 year old's impression of good ride quality is a lot different than a 40 or 60 year old's impression.

Furthermore, the specific roads you drive on in your area will affect your impression of a given suspension package also. If you drive on the comparatively smooth,well kept roads of Cali compared to frost heave, broken up roads of NYC for example, your opinion on a good riding suspension will differ greatly.
Old 11-04-08, 05:21 PM
  #64  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
gio64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 655
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gracer7-rx7
The problem with trying to search forums for information on suspension setups and ride quality in particular is that a lot of the info is very subjective - a matter of opinion. Making it more complicated is that you don't know the frame of reference of the person writing the review. A 20 year old's impression of good ride quality is a lot different than a 40 or 60 year old's impression.

Furthermore, the specific roads you drive on in your area will affect your impression of a given suspension package also. If you drive on the comparatively smooth,well kept roads of Cali compared to frost heave, broken up roads of NYC for example, your opinion on a good riding suspension will differ greatly.
I agree with this.
I am older and -as much as I like sporty rides- I probably would lean a bit more over to a slightly more "controlled" ride, especially considering, like I said, that my car is nowhere near to seeing the track.

On a slightly different note, I am a bit curious about this: would a set of coilovers be lighter in weight than a set of shocks and spings and/or lighter in weight than a stock setup? And if so, of how much?
Sorry, I am just a curious guy.
Old 11-04-08, 07:27 PM
  #65  
needs more track time

iTrader: (16)
 
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bay Area CA
Posts: 9,186
Received 508 Likes on 350 Posts
^no, not in my experience.
Old 11-04-08, 07:42 PM
  #66  
fadedvr=pink

iTrader: (2)
 
pinkrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sacramento,CA
Posts: 1,402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by gracer7-rx7
The GC coil overs have a polyurethane pad at the top to help dampen some of the noise, vibration and harshness one would feel from metal to metal spring against mounting surface. That pad is much smaller than the OEM upper shock mount but it definitely helps.

Other coil overs have this also. Which ones exactly, I don't know. I know the bottom of the line Tein's re-use the OEM upper shock mounts which helps on the NVH side quite a bit.


Zoolander - I've written replies on a few threads on my opinions regarding the various suspension setups I've had on threads in the suspension section. You are welcome to search for them using my user name. My impressions were focused mainly from the street perspective so its not to be compared to howard coleman's excellent thread and advice on his track/street oriented thread in the Suspension section (which is an excellent and informative thread that is well worth a read).



The problem with trying to search forums for information on suspension setups and ride quality in particular is that a lot of the info is very subjective - a matter of opinion. Making it more complicated is that you don't know the frame of reference of the person writing the review. A 20 year old's impression of good ride quality is a lot different than a 40 or 60 year old's impression.

Furthermore, the specific roads you drive on in your area will affect your impression of a given suspension package also. If you drive on the comparatively smooth,well kept roads of Cali compared to frost heave, broken up roads of NYC for example, your opinion on a good riding suspension will differ greatly.

Not sure how right you are on that the GC pads. I have a set out in my room right now and the pad seems to be rubber.
Old 11-04-08, 07:56 PM
  #67  
fadedvr=pink

iTrader: (2)
 
pinkrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sacramento,CA
Posts: 1,402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Zoolander
Bottom line: there are NEVER enough opinions on suspension components. I, too, have been researching this subject and have read most of the threads and still cannot make a decision. At least this new thread on this much discussed topic finally cleared up my confusion on coilovers. I bought new rubber upper mounts ($60 each) in preparation for my coilover install, but I guess I don't need those if I DO end up getting a coilover system, as it's built-in (unless I break apart the system to add the rubber - no point in that). But coilovers are metal to metal, which Howard Coleman does not recommend. But they are still very popular and has the best adjustability for ride height......

Shocks/Springs/Upper mounts almost = cost of lower end coil-overs, but it sounds like lower end coilovers aren't worth it. I want to adjust my ride height with some performance thrown in. Is Ground Control my answer? Good thing I can return the rubber mounts.
In my experience riding in tokico illumina and koni shocks w/ GC the koni GC mix felt the smoothest, tokico was slightly more harsh on rebound..
Old 02-13-09, 10:27 PM
  #68  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
RX7Crazy_84's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: vancouver BC
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BC

Originally Posted by Zoolander
Bottom line: there are NEVER enough opinions on suspension components. I, too, have been researching this subject and have read most of the threads and still cannot make a decision. At least this new thread on this much discussed topic finally cleared up my confusion on coilovers. I bought new rubber upper mounts ($60 each) in preparation for my coilover install, but I guess I don't need those if I DO end up getting a coilover system, as it's built-in (unless I break apart the system to add the rubber - no point in that). But coilovers are metal to metal, which Howard Coleman does not recommend. But they are still very popular and has the best adjustability for ride height......

Shocks/Springs/Upper mounts almost = cost of lower end coil-overs, but it sounds like lower end coilovers aren't worth it. I want to adjust my ride height with some performance thrown in. Is Ground Control my answer? Good thing I can return the rubber mounts.

sorry for bringing this up from dead but where did you get the upper rubber mount from?
I need to get them as well




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 PM.