Sequential system, Mazda genius or turbo wank?
#26
~17 MPG
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by Improved FD
you obviously have never been in an FD with a medium sized single turbo, what "dangerous transition" are you talking about??
In tight 2nd gear corners, the tail end will step out quickly when the secondary turbo kicks in. It happens pretty frequently on most autocross courses: even with the drop to 8psi, you still gain a lot of power in a split-second, without changing throttle position.
-s-
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All I have to say is Amen to Mazda. I am on the stock sequential system and I have no complains aslong as its working properly. I think the system truely optimizes the power in a streetable fashion. With the right driver behind the wheel I dont see many car's bossing a 7 around the pavement. In nearly stock form and simple air flow mod's exhuast, dp & intake the system is able to run high 12's. Too me thats a decent sports car.
PS. Doubt me ill bring the time slips
PS. Doubt me ill bring the time slips
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Brooklyn New York
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hmm Sequential for me all the way. So no one has the Stage 3's in Sequential form? Everyone has them to run together? Looks like i'll be the first than. All i want is 400 to the wheels and it should be able to get me that. We'll just have to wait till it gets a bit warmer to see.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Brooklyn New York
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by granclay
Help Me With A Cheap Non Sequential Setup!!!
Thx
Help Me With A Cheap Non Sequential Setup!!!
Thx
#35
Mr. Links
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by Goukid2
All i want is 400 to the wheels and it should be able to get me that.
#36
Soft & Wooly
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lakewood, CO (formerly Seattle)
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm surprised even 380rwhp is practical... the stock FD turbos are just too small to flow enough air for any more than that. You probably had to use '99+ J-spec turbos to get even that much.
What they SHOULD have done is a non turbo 20B... lighter, better MPG, super reliable, more torque, just as much HP, and probably about the same price, since no turbos. Only downside is not quite as easy to mod but I doubt this would have a meaningful impact on their sales since anyone that can afford a $40K 2-seater new either can afford a turbo kit or just doesn't want to do mods.
What they SHOULD have done is a non turbo 20B... lighter, better MPG, super reliable, more torque, just as much HP, and probably about the same price, since no turbos. Only downside is not quite as easy to mod but I doubt this would have a meaningful impact on their sales since anyone that can afford a $40K 2-seater new either can afford a turbo kit or just doesn't want to do mods.
#37
[QUOTE= What they SHOULD have done is a non turbo 20B... lighter, better MPG, super reliable, more torque, just as much HP, and probably about the same price, since no turbos. Only downside is not quite as easy to mod but I doubt this would have a meaningful impact on their sales since anyone that can afford a $40K 2-seater new either can afford a turbo kit or just doesn't want to do mods.[/QUOTE] I'm with him
Cheers
Cheers
#38
Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Originally Posted by fluffysheap
I'm surprised even 380rwhp is practical... the stock FD turbos are just too small to flow enough air for any more than that. You probably had to use '99+ J-spec turbos to get even that much.
Dave
#39
73 13B 4 port
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: atlanta
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My car puts down 350 rwhp on stock seq. system when I had boost issues where primary turbo wont come on till 4500 rpm, and my water temp sender broke, so it was running super rich. I then put a regulator per dgeesaman described above and fixed the temp sender, and it should be around 360+ rwhp. So yes, a working seq. system is where it is at IMO.
#40
Please somebody help!!!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Woodridge, IL
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Improved FD
it's a hopelessly complex and poorly engineered system
take a look at a Mark IV Supra sometime
take a look at a Mark IV Supra sometime
Last edited by NissanConvert; 02-12-07 at 06:15 PM.
#41
Lives on the Forum
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by Goukid2
So no one has the Stage 3's in Sequential form? Everyone has them to run together? Looks like i'll be the first than.
Originally Posted by Improved FD
it's a hopelessly complex and poorly engineered system
take a look at a Mark IV Supra sometime
take a look at a Mark IV Supra sometime
As far as the "dangerous transition" goes, quite frankly this should almost never rear its head in street driving. If it does, frankly, the driver needs lessons. It can happen on an auto-x course with a certain layout. It should never happen on the track. Ever. Again, the "dangerous transition" while cornering is massively blown out of proportion.
#43
Lives on the Forum
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by NissanConvert
But has anyone gotten sequential BNR's over the 400hp mark? If not; that's the dragon i intend to chase.