3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

RX-7 Wheels???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 02:52 PM
  #1  
THI's Avatar
THI
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
RX-7 Wheels???

I'm fixing to buy these wheels(pictured below) so I'm just wondering if anyone has any infos on them. They have the same exact dimensions as FDs' stock wheels. The seller stated that they are magnesium wheels made by Magtek, which also supplied wheels for motorcyles,specifically the NSR250. They are pretty light at only 15lbs a piece. He also said they came off a JDM FC3S but someone pointed out that FC3S wouldn't have those offsets. Can anyone shed some light on these wheels...
Thanks!



Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 04:05 PM
  #2  
DaleClark's Avatar
RX-7 Bad Ass
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,622
Likes: 2,723
From: Pensacola, FL
That's dead on with the stock FD's wheels - 16x8 50 offset. Weight is negligibly different.

They're neat, but I dunno if I would spend a lot of money on wheels that are functionally the same as stock.

Dale
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 04:54 PM
  #3  
THI's Avatar
THI
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
They can be mine for around $300!!! A whole set at that price is a pretty good deal to me...

Last edited by THI; Apr 25, 2006 at 05:12 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 05:16 PM
  #4  
Newbie
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
From: MI
ya, but they are no better than the stock wheels, hell 93 FD rims are even ligther than that at around 13 lbs, and IIRC 94+ wheels only weigh like 14.5-15 lbs anyway, he's saying why bother buying them when there really is no real advantage to them over stock?
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 05:33 PM
  #5  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally Posted by JHew84
ya, but they are no better than the stock wheels, hell 93 FD rims are even ligther than that at around 13 lbs, and IIRC 94+ wheels only weigh like 14.5-15 lbs anyway, he's saying why bother buying them when there really is no real advantage to them over stock?
Stock wheels are not that light. The early wheels were about 14, later wheels 16 lbs. I do agree that these are not a performance benefit over the stock wheels but may be an aesthetic upgrade for some tastes.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 05:47 PM
  #6  
Newbie
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
From: MI
thats right, 93's were like 13.7-.8, later wheels were like 15.8 or something... still not a huge rotational mass advantage though, but i agree if he likes the asthetics of them that could be a worthwhile venture, personally i love the stock FD rims...
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 07:21 PM
  #7  
FDNewbie's Avatar
Sponsor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
If you're gonna upgrade, at least go w/ nicer rims. Those rims don't look very nice IMO...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
The1Sun
New Member RX-7 Technical
9
Mar 18, 2018 11:08 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 PM.