RX-7 good daily driver?
#26
Back in the 7 life again
LOL, a FD is like a brat teenage daughter, eveytime you save up some money to put into...oh, say, a house, it needs a new accessory or something that just drains the money back out. And, its not like you can give up your daughter, she is family after all, just like the FD
#27
~17 MPG
iTrader: (2)
When I bought my RX-7 I had a daily-driver Toyota Corolla, which broke on my a few months ago (go figure, I spent so much time maintaining the RX-7 that I neglected the Toyota).
So I've been driving my 3rd Gen daily for a few months, commuting about 300-400 miles / week with no problems so far. It's a great touring car, high-speed commutes are a blast. City-speed driving is not fun, sportscars don't have quite the same manners as family sedans when it comes to low-speeds, stop and go, and crappy roads..
Just be sure to maintain it like a Ducati, not like a Honda. It should treat you well. BTW mine's bone stock.
-scott-
So I've been driving my 3rd Gen daily for a few months, commuting about 300-400 miles / week with no problems so far. It's a great touring car, high-speed commutes are a blast. City-speed driving is not fun, sportscars don't have quite the same manners as family sedans when it comes to low-speeds, stop and go, and crappy roads..
Just be sure to maintain it like a Ducati, not like a Honda. It should treat you well. BTW mine's bone stock.
-scott-
#28
Power Trippin'
iTrader: (4)
Originally posted by scotty305
Just be sure to maintain it like a Ducati, not like a Honda. It should treat you well. BTW mine's bone stock.
Just be sure to maintain it like a Ducati, not like a Honda. It should treat you well. BTW mine's bone stock.
#29
~17 MPG
iTrader: (2)
Like I said, I don't consider the RX-7 to be an unreliable car, it simply needs more attention than most other cars. Look at sportbikes, they require a much more diligent maintenance schedule than automobiles. I sold my ninja a year or two ago, but don't the modern ones still need the chain lubed every 500-1000 miles or so? Ducati was the first one to pop into my head, with their desmodromic valve system and all. Adjust the valves every 10-15k, right?
Bottom line: If you're not performing some sort of maintenance on your baby (whether it be a sportbike or an RX-7) once a month, you're neglecting it IMHO.
-s-
Bottom line: If you're not performing some sort of maintenance on your baby (whether it be a sportbike or an RX-7) once a month, you're neglecting it IMHO.
-s-
#30
Call me gramps!
With the mods listed below, I put ~10k miles over the period of one college year. It never gave me problems (with the exception of an old coolant level sensor and a flying piece of tire debris which hit the radiator harder than I could kick it). The only problems it ever had were problems that weren't really the car's fault, but they were just due to cheap plastics (which can be prevented).
#31
Forever Modified
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by FDNewbie
Reliable as a Honda? You are totally smoking some crap.
Mazda simply doesn't take the time or cost necessary to engineer parts as reliable or sturdy as Toyota and Honda, and that's simply a fact. If anything, they've gotten better w/ time, and so the FD definitely isn't a prime example of their worksmanship.
Reliable as a Honda? You are totally smoking some crap.
Mazda simply doesn't take the time or cost necessary to engineer parts as reliable or sturdy as Toyota and Honda, and that's simply a fact. If anything, they've gotten better w/ time, and so the FD definitely isn't a prime example of their worksmanship.
VS the Rotary
Only one company ever produced vehicles for sale with rotary engines, Mazda. Amount of time and people invested in them, significantly less. Mazda did invest the time and money to engineer these cars, but how much can you do only being one. Mazda took a big leap to go in a different direction, when not many people would.
The rotary is reliable, minus the turbos. Infact I have heard of many first gens hit up to 200,000 miles with ease. But when boosted, and when more power from the little engine is asked for, things tend to break easier too. Why do you think mazda went turboless in the Rx8's?, because of this. So with the information above, and the fact that it is not uncommon for turboless rotaries to reach such high mileage, would assume that yes the engine has not been explored enough and hasn't had the time it's needed on the disection table to make it as reliable as I believe it could be. And perhaps it could be the most reliable thing we have ever seen.
Last edited by lopedl; 07-06-04 at 12:16 PM.
#32
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
Originally posted by lopedl
Only one company ever produced vehicles for sale with rotary engines, Mazda.
Only one company ever produced vehicles for sale with rotary engines, Mazda.
http://www.monito.com/wankel/nsu.html
#38
Rotary Freak
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Slovenia, Europe
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by ulost2my7
regardless if an fd is reliable or not, depending on whats done, gonna be done etc etc, its a weekend car.
regardless if an fd is reliable or not, depending on whats done, gonna be done etc etc, its a weekend car.
And its a money pit
#39
Lives on the Forum
Originally posted by Section8
The engines in the FDs usually go due to ignorant modifcation. You can't simply throw an intake and exhaust and DP on the car because the stock ECU doesn't know how to handle the added air, and then you run lean and detonate. Unfortunately, those are the first things people do when they start modding the car for power.
The engines in the FDs usually go due to ignorant modifcation. You can't simply throw an intake and exhaust and DP on the car because the stock ECU doesn't know how to handle the added air, and then you run lean and detonate. Unfortunately, those are the first things people do when they start modding the car for power.
Last edited by SleepR1; 07-06-04 at 05:01 PM.
#40
Originally posted by lopedl
The simple fact is most vehicles say 99.9% of them use a piston driven engine, so the piston for years and through many major manufactures has been developed with precision and is far more reliable than the turbo rotary because of the amount of time and number of people dealing with them.
VS the Rotary
Only one company ever produced vehicles for sale with rotary engines, Mazda. Amount of time and people invested in them, significantly less. Mazda did invest the time and money to engineer these cars, but how much can you do only being one. Mazda took a big leap to go in a different direction, when not many people would.
The rotary is reliable, minus the turbos. Infact I have heard of many first gens hit up to 200,000 miles with ease. But when boosted, and when more power from the little engine is asked for, things tend to break easier too. Why do you think mazda went turboless in the Rx8's?, because of this. So with the information above, and the fact that it is not uncommon for turboless rotaries to reach such high mileage, would assume that yes the engine has not been explored enough and hasn't had the time it's needed on the disection table to make it as reliable as I believe it could be. And perhaps it could be the most reliable thing we have ever seen.
The simple fact is most vehicles say 99.9% of them use a piston driven engine, so the piston for years and through many major manufactures has been developed with precision and is far more reliable than the turbo rotary because of the amount of time and number of people dealing with them.
VS the Rotary
Only one company ever produced vehicles for sale with rotary engines, Mazda. Amount of time and people invested in them, significantly less. Mazda did invest the time and money to engineer these cars, but how much can you do only being one. Mazda took a big leap to go in a different direction, when not many people would.
The rotary is reliable, minus the turbos. Infact I have heard of many first gens hit up to 200,000 miles with ease. But when boosted, and when more power from the little engine is asked for, things tend to break easier too. Why do you think mazda went turboless in the Rx8's?, because of this. So with the information above, and the fact that it is not uncommon for turboless rotaries to reach such high mileage, would assume that yes the engine has not been explored enough and hasn't had the time it's needed on the disection table to make it as reliable as I believe it could be. And perhaps it could be the most reliable thing we have ever seen.
BUT, my point still stands, IMO. And I guess I'm talking more specifically about the FD, because, like you said, NA rotaries pretty much last forever.
The FD was made to meet and beat the best of the best sports cars of it's time, yet still be dirt cheap. Everything has it's cost, and we all know that. And because of that...because the FD was to be an affordable sports car, Mazda HAD to skimp somewhere. Performance definitely wasn't an option...so reliability was. These things are quite obvious I believe...just look at the parts section, and see the most often bought parts, because they consistantly break and go bad.
I believe that's simply a fact we gotta deal with. If the FD was a $50K base price car to begin w/, I think the story would be a little different. Notice tho, I'm not just talking about the rotary engine. I'm talking about crappy door handles (the passenger one), weak exterior door handles (that break on everyone), plastic clips that I don't believe they actually thought would hold ANYTHING in place lol because they break like no other, etc etc. I'm sure you can count the countless small parts that fall apart and break over time - a relatively short time.
My 86 accord was in much better shape bodywise than most FDs I see today, and it had 208K miles on it. So I hope you see my point. Yes, it's not like a Ford Explorer, which literally falls apart after the 3 year mark lol...but it's no Honda or Toyota either.
I'm not trying to rag on Mazda. No way. I freakin LOVE Mazda for making what I believe is the best car ever...the FD. BUT, lets not kid ourselves and think that the FD is a toyota w/ a rotary engine...reliable and top notch craftsmanship & durability, cuz it's not.
Last edited by FDNewbie; 07-07-04 at 12:16 AM.
#42
Originally posted by cruiser
Agree with FDNewbie.
Agree with FDNewbie.
The interior freakin falls apart on you! lol But hey...I still love her...like crazy, and wouldn't have it any other way.
#43
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by FDNewbie
Thanks. There's a reason why ppl laughed at the post in the "you know you own an RX7 if" thread that said "everytime you clean your car you find random bolts and nuts, the origins of which are unknown..."
The interior freakin falls apart on you! lol But hey...I still love her...like crazy, and wouldn't have it any other way.
Thanks. There's a reason why ppl laughed at the post in the "you know you own an RX7 if" thread that said "everytime you clean your car you find random bolts and nuts, the origins of which are unknown..."
The interior freakin falls apart on you! lol But hey...I still love her...like crazy, and wouldn't have it any other way.
#44
Back in the 7 life again
well, to the point, the RX-7 was NEVER intended to be a daily driver. Its a sports car pure and true....and of course, everything that goes along with that little tag. The best thing we can do as owners is spring for a step up in quality when something breaks (if available)....like going to a MAF (hint hint hint)
#45
i have my FD as a daily driver. i love it. its fun and i look forward to EVERY day that i get to drive it anywhere... work, grocery store, mall, theatre, etc. i got mine in January with 32k miles on it. its about to turn over to 40k now (lots of long trips were necessary this spring unfortunately... 600miles round trip multiple times). i've not had any issues with it other than routine maintenance. new tires, plugs, plug wires, and fluids when i bought her. just stayed ontop of the regular maintenance. oil every 2.5k, plugs are gonna be ever 10k, etc. i dunno... maybe i've been one of the lucky ones. my car has been babied its whole life. perhaps it will start to break alot more when it gets older oh well, i love it!
#46
Rotary Freak
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Slovenia, Europe
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sometimes I just wish I could use it as a daily driver. But I drive to much, my gas/maintenance expenses would be just too much. That's why I only enjoy it on weekends and at track events.
#47
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Clovis, NM
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quick question. How long do FD motors usually last before needing rebuild or replacement? 50k? 100k mi?
Also, I'm assuming turbos need to be replaced at the same time, or soon after? I hear alot about the turbos needing a cool down period and warm up before driving. Will a turbo timer solve this , if you want to call it one, problem? I'm not worried about the warm up part, I always warm up my car before driving, no matter what it is. But sitting in a car for 5 min to allow the turbo to cool, that seems a bit of an annoyance. Just so you all know, which I'm sure you can tell, I'm a newb to the forum, and rotaries for that matter. I'm like many other people I'm sure, I'm getting interested in FDs but have heard many problems of em. I usually only put 10k on my car (an 88 mustang GT) in a year. I usually drive only 10 miles or less a day. Yeah, I know, I don't have to commute very far. I'm goin in the air force soon and wanted an FD, but again, reliability is an issue in a car and so is maintenance cost. Anyways, any feedback or comments on FDs will be appreciated.
Also, I'm assuming turbos need to be replaced at the same time, or soon after? I hear alot about the turbos needing a cool down period and warm up before driving. Will a turbo timer solve this , if you want to call it one, problem? I'm not worried about the warm up part, I always warm up my car before driving, no matter what it is. But sitting in a car for 5 min to allow the turbo to cool, that seems a bit of an annoyance. Just so you all know, which I'm sure you can tell, I'm a newb to the forum, and rotaries for that matter. I'm like many other people I'm sure, I'm getting interested in FDs but have heard many problems of em. I usually only put 10k on my car (an 88 mustang GT) in a year. I usually drive only 10 miles or less a day. Yeah, I know, I don't have to commute very far. I'm goin in the air force soon and wanted an FD, but again, reliability is an issue in a car and so is maintenance cost. Anyways, any feedback or comments on FDs will be appreciated.
#48
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Bedford, MA, USA
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
redsuns_fd, mines got 103k miles on it and is still running strong. Original engine and turbos. In terms of warmup and cool down here's what I've found to work. I drive out of my driveway the second after I start the car in the morning, but I keep the car out of boost until the water temp (as read from an aftermarket gauge/sensor) is around 170-180C, which takes about 2-3 minutes or so in the summer (unless you've got a bad thermostat), a couple more in the spring/fall. I don't think that the turbo temps have anything to do with it, it's the engine operating temp. Turbos should spin freely regardless of their temp, but most rotaries balk some if you get on the gas hard prior to the engine warming up, turbo or NA. In terms of cooling the turbos down. Yes you can use a turbo timer, but my rule of thumb is to drive out of boost (aka in vacuum) for at least 5 blocks on the way home. During this time I also keep the fans on using the manual fan mod I've got (keeps the water temps at a steady 180C even if I'd been driving hard prior to this). I've got my turbo timer set to keep the car running for only 30 seconds after pulling out the key. I keep the fans on for a good 5 minutes or so after stopping the car. This routine seems to keep the car happy.
#49
Lives on the Forum
In my experience, 102543 miles stock with hard use; 18000 miles with heavy mods and hard use. Ask someone else, and they'll give you a different answer. The FD is a deep dark hole that you throw money into.
Originally posted by redsuns_fd
Quick question. How long do FD motors usually last before needing rebuild or replacement? 50k? 100k mi?
Quick question. How long do FD motors usually last before needing rebuild or replacement? 50k? 100k mi?
#50
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Clovis, NM
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alright, thanx for the input guys. Now onto question # 2.
FD vs MR2. Given this is a forum dedicated to all that is rotary, I'm sure most will go with the 7, but has anyone heard good word on the 91-95 MR2 turbos? I'm kinda at a crossroad and I am trying to figure out which path is for me. I freakin love FDs, but MR2s have caught my eye as well. I know the FD has "reliability issues" so I've heard, but with reliabilty, I've heard the MR2 will take the trophy. I want a 2 seater thats unique and fun (both MR2 and FD fit in this category). I know both are very capable and have potential. And I consider myself somewhat mechanically inclined. I'm not a tech though, nothing like that at all, but I take very good care of my car. Any feedback will be appreciated.
FD vs MR2. Given this is a forum dedicated to all that is rotary, I'm sure most will go with the 7, but has anyone heard good word on the 91-95 MR2 turbos? I'm kinda at a crossroad and I am trying to figure out which path is for me. I freakin love FDs, but MR2s have caught my eye as well. I know the FD has "reliability issues" so I've heard, but with reliabilty, I've heard the MR2 will take the trophy. I want a 2 seater thats unique and fun (both MR2 and FD fit in this category). I know both are very capable and have potential. And I consider myself somewhat mechanically inclined. I'm not a tech though, nothing like that at all, but I take very good care of my car. Any feedback will be appreciated.