Rotary Works Billet TB Question
#26
you should start to remove parts in that system then to find the one that is the trouble. i would start with the easiest part, and move the throttle by hand, if it sticks, then keep working on it. if it does not stick, then i would put the cable back and disconnect it from the pedal end, and then see if it works there.
#27
Racecar - Formula 2000
In the last photo, the sharp angle change coming off the end of the metal tube is not good and I wouldn't be surprised if that is the bind point. I make it a rule that I never have a situation like that because even if it doesn't bind, it will wear the sheath lining and fatigue the inside cable.
#28
In the last photo, the sharp angle change coming off the end of the metal tube is not good and I wouldn't be surprised if that is the bind point. I make it a rule that I never have a situation like that because even if it doesn't bind, it will wear the sheath lining and fatigue the inside cable.
#29
Rotary Freak
Prior to discs, on bicycles with v-brakes, the manufacturers used a steel tube for tight 90 degree turns at the end of the bowden. Dunno if anyone does a 180, something like that would be the only way to improve matters with that cable run.
Never paid any great attention, I've seen those rotary works TBs on yahoo recently, do they do a version specifically for RHD perhaps? Short of that, remaking the throttle wheel or adapting another one with some sort of cable stop above the plenum for a straight pull, would be the best way.
Never paid any great attention, I've seen those rotary works TBs on yahoo recently, do they do a version specifically for RHD perhaps? Short of that, remaking the throttle wheel or adapting another one with some sort of cable stop above the plenum for a straight pull, would be the best way.
The following users liked this post:
DaveW (01-01-24)
#30
So I had the guy come from the shop that helped me finish up the car, he thinks it’s the vacuum on the engine during decel causing the butterfly to stick shut. He suggested drilling a small hole in the butterfly to help alleviate this. Any thoughts on that?
#33
Rotorhead for life
iTrader: (4)
Turned out my TB just needed a very thorough cleaning - a combination of some carbon build up on the secondary plate shaft (I had over 100K miles on it by then) and the stronger vacuum during decel prevented the springs for the secondary plates from fully closing them upon return to idle
#34
Racecar - Formula 2000
That's weird. The only mechanical logic to that is the BF's being pulled away from the TB inlet by vacuum and causing them to contact the TB wall a tiny bit inboard (or something else binding) that wouldn't be obvious w/o the vacuum. Maybe you can replicate that force by pressing on the BF's from the inlet side. I can't think of anything related to tuning that might cause that (not that I've had anything but the OE ECU)...
^He may be on to something... Different situation & TB, but way back in the early '90s I had similar issue with my '84 GSL-SE with the OEM TB. What was going on was after a quick decel (high vacuum) coast down to idle, sometimes the secondary plates would stay cracked open slightly & flutter, resulting in a high idle speed that would fluctuate. Stomping the throttle in neutral (to cause another rapid change in vacuum) would usually return the engine to a normal idle.
Turned out my TB just needed a very thorough cleaning - a combination of some carbon build up on the secondary plate shaft (I had over 100K miles on it by then) and the stronger vacuum during decel prevented the springs for the secondary plates from fully closing them upon return to idle
Turned out my TB just needed a very thorough cleaning - a combination of some carbon build up on the secondary plate shaft (I had over 100K miles on it by then) and the stronger vacuum during decel prevented the springs for the secondary plates from fully closing them upon return to idle
#35
^He may be on to something... Different situation & TB, but way back in the early '90s I had similar issue with my '84 GSL-SE with the OEM TB. What was going on was after a quick decel (high vacuum) coast down to idle, sometimes the secondary plates would stay cracked open slightly & flutter, resulting in a high idle speed that would fluctuate. Stomping the throttle in neutral (to cause another rapid change in vacuum) would usually return the engine to a normal idle.
Turned out my TB just needed a very thorough cleaning - a combination of some carbon build up on the secondary plate shaft (I had over 100K miles on it by then) and the stronger vacuum during decel prevented the springs for the secondary plates from fully closing them upon return to idle
Turned out my TB just needed a very thorough cleaning - a combination of some carbon build up on the secondary plate shaft (I had over 100K miles on it by then) and the stronger vacuum during decel prevented the springs for the secondary plates from fully closing them upon return to idle
#36
Racecar - Formula 2000
I'm confused by what you said here. It can't be sticking closed at 2K RPM. Do you mean it doesn't want to open further once you get to 2K RPM, or what? When it's at 2k if you let off, does it close? Or just not want to open further?
#37
~17 MPG
iTrader: (2)
If engine vacuum is actually pulling the throttle blade closed, the vacuum will usually be stronger when decelerating at 5000 RPM or 4000 RPM than when the engine is decelerating at 3000 RPM or 2000 RPM. Higher engine speed will pull stronger vacuum on a closed throttle, since it's trying to pump more air per minute.
The following users liked this post:
DaveW (01-12-24)
#38
#39
Racecar - Formula 2000
Yup - sure looks like vacuum is causing the issue. My guess is the butterflies must be hanging up on something when there is significant vacuum.
#40
Rotary Freak
Back in the old days, some did drill the throttle blade (and add progression holes) when idle and emulsion circuits couldn't accommodate - that would be a hail mary on mixtures not vacuum.
Does your ecu log MAP? Looking at that cable run again, I'd wager you're under half a minimum bend radius on a bowden cable. I'd still fix that before acting.
I suppose you can silver solder the hole closed, so the mod is not irreversible. If you do proceed, I wouldn't start at your hardware store, 1/16th bit size either! Jet or wire gauge drills are probably what you're looking at. For best results, I'd be avoiding a wonky hand drill in situ - I'd probably resort to turning the pin vice by hand before that, although by rights, for the small sizes, you should be doing 10s of thousands of rpm to avoid breaking them endlessly.
Does your ecu log MAP? Looking at that cable run again, I'd wager you're under half a minimum bend radius on a bowden cable. I'd still fix that before acting.
I suppose you can silver solder the hole closed, so the mod is not irreversible. If you do proceed, I wouldn't start at your hardware store, 1/16th bit size either! Jet or wire gauge drills are probably what you're looking at. For best results, I'd be avoiding a wonky hand drill in situ - I'd probably resort to turning the pin vice by hand before that, although by rights, for the small sizes, you should be doing 10s of thousands of rpm to avoid breaking them endlessly.
#41
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,816
Received 2,586 Likes
on
1,837 Posts
on my P port i drilled the plates on my Weber, for just the reason Billyboy describes, the throttle plate needs to be in a certain place physically for the idle and transfer ports to work, but the engine wanted more air.
i started with the tiny drill bit set for like a dremel, similar to what your dentist uses. its been a long time, the old days, but i think i ended up at like 0.015" or something. you can solder it closed, or you can on a Weber, the plate is brass. i went up to like 0.030 or something and had to come back down, because the carb still needs some vacuum to actually carburate
or maybe you could just put a bigger spring in the TB, or use the Mazda throttle body which won't have this problem
i started with the tiny drill bit set for like a dremel, similar to what your dentist uses. its been a long time, the old days, but i think i ended up at like 0.015" or something. you can solder it closed, or you can on a Weber, the plate is brass. i went up to like 0.030 or something and had to come back down, because the carb still needs some vacuum to actually carburate
or maybe you could just put a bigger spring in the TB, or use the Mazda throttle body which won't have this problem
#42
Racecar - Formula 2000
So:
If sticking open is the case, then j9fd3s' stronger spring suggestion may be the solution.
If it's sticking closed like I think ecurbd02 meant, then either some bleed holes or a longer radius (larger diameter pulley) to the throttle cable at closed throttle may enable opening. You may need a variable radius pulley like I see on some exercise machines to give more mechanical advantage coming off closed throttle. If the cable force is too high, then your circuitous large-angle-change cable routing could make the cable act like a capstan and cause it to bind.
Capstan ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capstan_equation ):
The force gain increases exponentially with the coefficient of friction and the total angle of contact (around the cylinder or in this case, along the cable).
Last edited by DaveW; 01-13-24 at 06:39 PM. Reason: added last sentence
#43
Racecar - Formula 2000
Capstan effect in throttle cable
...Capstan ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capstan_equation ):
The force gain increases exponentially with the coefficient of friction and the total angle of contact (around the cylinder or in this case, along the cable).
The force gain increases exponentially with the coefficient of friction and the total angle of contact (around the cylinder or in this case, along the cable).
Last edited by DaveW; 01-15-24 at 09:39 AM.
#44
So if there is even a small amount of force added to the cable tension, like what may be present in the butterfly pivot due to the vacuum pulling on it, or the sharp bend near the pulley, that multiplies exponentially through every curve of the cable and is, IMO, likely to be the issue making it stick closed.
#45
Racecar - Formula 2000
Well, what I mentioned and explained is only a possible cause, not 100% certain it's actually that. Good luck with it.
#46
Racecar - Formula 2000
totally understand the cable issue you guys are bringing up. My only thing that makes me think it’s not, is when it’s not sticking there’s no variance in amount of force required through the stroke of the pedal and that it’s rpm dependent. Please correct me if I’m wrong, it’s just the way my brain is working when I think of it lol once it gets above 20 deg where I’m at, I’m gonna drill a small hole in the butterfly. I was gonna check the duty of the iac at idle to make sure I have a little room to bring the idle down though
The capstan reference only applies when there is some extra force to be overcome near and/or at the throttle plates, and that is only present when there is vacuum, i.e., car running. And that, IIRC, is when you said the issue occurs.
#47
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,816
Received 2,586 Likes
on
1,837 Posts
this is a good idea, the IAC adds air, and can change the cell of the map the engine is in, which can change fuel, which if its not right can do odd things to the RPM, its part of the bouncy PFC idle issues
BTW our solutions have basically been if the throttle is physically sticking, like the blade gets stuck somewhere, but it could easily be a map issue
BTW our solutions have basically been if the throttle is physically sticking, like the blade gets stuck somewhere, but it could easily be a map issue
#48
"When it's not sticking" - does that mean w/o vacuum on the intake, i.e., car not running?
The capstan reference only applies when there is some extra force to be overcome near and/or at the throttle plates, and that is only present when there is vacuum, i.e., car running. And that, IIRC, is when you said the issue occurs.
The capstan reference only applies when there is some extra force to be overcome near and/or at the throttle plates, and that is only present when there is vacuum, i.e., car running. And that, IIRC, is when you said the issue occurs.
#49
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,816
Received 2,586 Likes
on
1,837 Posts
yes when the car is not running. Ok I didnt realize the capstan reference was in reference to when there is an additional force to overcome. That does make sense though. If it is the throttle cable binding, do you have an idea where I could get a longer cable aside from custom? The USDM cable is longer than the JDM which is why I went with it. The jdm cable won’t reach.
you might also try to route yours more like that one
The following users liked this post:
DaveW (01-16-24)
#50
Racecar - Formula 2000
yes when the car is not running. Ok I didnt realize the capstan reference was in reference to when there is an additional force to overcome. That does make sense though. If it is the throttle cable binding, do you have an idea where I could get a longer cable aside from custom? The USDM cable is longer than the JDM which is why I went with it. The jdm cable won’t reach.
They are well known for supplying push-pull cables for aircraft. I use their cables for the throttle and for swaybar controls on my racecar.
They are VERY good and easy to work with AND THEY ANSWER THEIR PHONE. They can make almost anything you want, quickly and at a reasonable cost.
Last edited by DaveW; 01-16-24 at 01:04 PM.