3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Proof that K&N sucks at filtering air

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-14-13, 07:27 PM
  #26  
Cheap Bastard

iTrader: (2)
 
adam c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Posts: 8,370
Received 50 Likes on 42 Posts
Do you think that somehow the dust from the cars in front of you doesn't enter the stock intake? I think that the air in front of the car is the same as the air under the car.
Old 07-14-13, 09:24 PM
  #27  
Rx7 Wagon

iTrader: (16)
 
Narfle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: California
Posts: 6,988
Received 875 Likes on 548 Posts
I think my M2 definitely picks up more crud. But its not unmanageable.
Old 07-15-13, 12:30 PM
  #28  
BadAss DoItYourselfer

iTrader: (9)
 
jetlude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Paradise
Posts: 869
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
K&N ask that you oil filter before use. What the real reason for this? Does it help with the filtration, protect the metal gauze from corrosion preserve the element or what?
Old 07-15-13, 02:21 PM
  #29  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (5)
 
Tem120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
To quote that " .Does it flow better? At very high airflow volumes, probably. BUT, our engines CAN'T flow that much air unless super-modified, so what is the point? " .. remember boosted engines are dependant on that flow for power . on an NA engine maybe this statement is true . to a point. I just took my engine apart .. and it was not dirty .. I've taken my intercooler piping out countless times and its been quite clean .

I have an apexi intake .
Old 07-15-13, 02:28 PM
  #30  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (66)
 
Bryan Jacobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: where the wild things roam
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jetlude
K&N ask that you oil filter before use. What the real reason for this? Does it help with the filtration, protect the metal gauze from corrosion preserve the element or what?
It is to help filtration afaik. They compare it to using a dry cloth or a wet cloth to pick up dirt. The wet cloth picks up more.
Old 07-15-13, 07:07 PM
  #31  
Recovering Miataholic

 
wstrohm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fountain Valley, CA
Posts: 1,531
Received 38 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by wstrohm
... It's worse than that...
That bulletin came out in 1995. There was very little development in the aftermarket place for the FD at the time. However, their "claim" was the hot air, not dirty air was killing the airpumps.
Mazda knew the cone filters were bad news. Whether or not it was the high underhood temperature causing airpump failure, it should be obvious that hotter air = lower power and shorter turbocharger and engine life. The OEM air filter collects outside air, not under-hood air. (Unfiltered dust is bad too, of course.) IMHO the OEM FD air intake system is very well designed.
Old 07-15-13, 08:53 PM
  #32  
Cheap Bastard

iTrader: (2)
 
adam c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Posts: 8,370
Received 50 Likes on 42 Posts
I dont really understand the point of this thread. If you want a higher flowing filter, more particulate matter will get thru. Thats a fact.

I have never heard of an FD engine failure (or damage) due to using a K&N filter.
Old 07-15-13, 09:27 PM
  #33  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by adam c
i have never heard of an fd engine failure (or damage) due to using a k&n filter.
+1
Old 07-16-13, 12:11 AM
  #34  
needs more track time...

iTrader: (13)
 
primerGrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Menlo Park, CA
Posts: 325
Received 30 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by adam c
I dont really understand the point of this thread. If you want a higher flowing filter, more particulate matter will get thru. Thats a fact.
The point of the thread is that the K&Ns let in more dirt. Some users of K&N other than you might care, and have an interest in minimizing this.

And to your second point, flow rate depends on both the porosity of the filter and the area of the filter. A large area filter with low porosity can flow as much as a smaller area filter with high porosity. So it is possible with different filter designs to have high flow without extra particulate.

I have never heard of an FD engine failure (or damage) due to using a K&N filter.
Since the damage is diffuse, and over a long period of time, it would be difficult to assign to a specific cause without controlled testing. In other words, your statement would be true if K&Ns cause damage, and also if they don't cause damage. So no conclusion can be drawn from the fact that you haven't read any threads stating "My K&N destroyed my engine".

There have been many anecdotal statements from users on this forum that intakes using K&Ns are found to be "dusty" or "gritty". And several times, in different threads, I've read the suggestion to put a dab of grease on the inside of the intake, and test it after a couple of weeks. If you ran this experiment, and the grease was gritty, would you think your engine was going to last as long as it would otherwise?
Old 07-16-13, 01:24 AM
  #35  
10-8-10-8

 
SA3R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
OEM airbox with OEM paper filter and a modified cold air intake hole in the plastic garnish snorkel panel above the airbox (with the intercooler duct blocked off to be its own intake) is how I run mine.
Basically copies how the 99-2002 cars left the factory. Eliminates hot intercooler air feeding into the airbox, and both the airbox and intercooler get their own source of cold air separately from the front of the car, using all stock plastics, looks 100% stock.
Old 07-16-13, 07:59 AM
  #36  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by primerGrey
I've read the suggestion to put a dab of grease on the inside of the intake, and test it after a couple of weeks. If you ran this experiment, and the grease was gritty, would you think your engine was going to last as long as it would otherwise?
These engine fail far sooner for various other reasons than what some extra dust particles are ever going to do.. Unless you turn your car into a Baja contender, it's not an issue. It's just a marketing ploy for different companies to get you to spend money on their products. If it were really proven to kill motors, (rotary or not), there wouldn't be a single aftermarket air filter available as no one would be buying them.
Old 07-16-13, 08:49 AM
  #37  
Goodfalla Engine Complete

iTrader: (28)
 
Monkman33's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kennewick, Washington
Posts: 3,233
Received 32 Likes on 25 Posts
I agree with Mahjik. The carbon and suit from a rich mixture will be far more coarse and damaging than super fine sand.
Old 07-16-13, 09:33 AM
  #38  
needs more track time...

iTrader: (13)
 
primerGrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Menlo Park, CA
Posts: 325
Received 30 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Mahjik
...If it were really proven to kill motors....
Who in the marketplace is going to take the time to "prove" that extra dirt from a specific aftermarket filter, mounted in a specific aftermarket CAI or other non-stock location, kills motors?
Old 07-16-13, 01:03 PM
  #39  
Cheap Bastard

iTrader: (2)
 
adam c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Posts: 8,370
Received 50 Likes on 42 Posts
No one is going to take the time to do that because it never happens.

Our motors die from two main causes: Worn out coolant seals, and broken apex seals. Tiny particulate matter ............. doesn't matter.
Old 07-16-13, 01:16 PM
  #40  
Goodfalla Engine Complete

iTrader: (28)
 
Monkman33's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kennewick, Washington
Posts: 3,233
Received 32 Likes on 25 Posts
And the fact that our engines create and build up far larger and far coarser particulate matter all the time.
Old 07-16-13, 01:30 PM
  #41  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (5)
 
tom94RX-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
So I can dismiss the thought of dust possibly causing all or some of the wear on my rotor housings when I was stupidly using a k&n air filter with no filter oil?
Old 07-16-13, 02:04 PM
  #42  
Goodfalla Engine Complete

iTrader: (28)
 
Monkman33's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kennewick, Washington
Posts: 3,233
Received 32 Likes on 25 Posts
That is a bit different. It probably contributed to any accelerated wear. But I bet you ended up with a failure elsewhere besides lan apex seal or housing getting sanded down too much.
Old 07-16-13, 02:09 PM
  #43  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (5)
 
tom94RX-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Ya there was a engine failure from detonation but we were discussing whether all the wear/grooves in the rotor housings and loss of compression was from a water injector issue I had and not enough premix, or from ALS seals, and I've been wondering if it might also be from the air filter.
Old 07-17-13, 02:37 PM
  #44  
needs more track time...

iTrader: (13)
 
primerGrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Menlo Park, CA
Posts: 325
Received 30 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by adam c
No one is going to take the time to do that because it never happens.

Our motors die from two main causes: Worn out coolant seals, and broken apex seals. Tiny particulate matter ............. doesn't matter.
So, summarizing:

a) We all seem to agree that K&Ns let in more particulate.
b) So far at least, there is no viable option for aftermarket intakes that improves upon K&N and still fits into the same form factor.
c) Some are not concerned about extra particulate, and believe it is self-evident that extra particulate doesn't produce extra wear (quite a surprise to me, but hey, I'm an engineer, not an insurance salesman. The wonderful thing about this forum is that all opinions are equal.)
d) Some are concerned, and are seeking steps to get extra filtering. I've posted what I plan to do - buying the prefilters K&N sells for this purpose.
Old 07-17-13, 03:33 PM
  #45  
Urban Combat Vet

iTrader: (16)
 
Sgtblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 12,012
Received 863 Likes on 612 Posts
Originally Posted by primerGrey
So, summarizing:

a) We all seem to agree that K&Ns let in more particulate.
b) So far at least, there is no viable option for aftermarket intakes that improves upon K&N and still fits into the same form factor.
c) Some are not concerned about extra particulate, and believe it is self-evident that extra particulate doesn't produce extra wear (quite a surprise to me, but hey, I'm an engineer, not an insurance salesman. The wonderful thing about this forum is that all opinions are equal.)
d) Some are concerned, and are seeking steps to get extra filtering. I've posted what I plan to do - buying the prefilters K&N sells for this purpose.
a) I agree K & N may let in more particulate.
b) There is no viable option (for me) on my particular car and it's current intake system.
c) Some are overly concerned about the suspected amount of extra particulate involved. And I believe it's self-evident that the engines fail and are rebuilt due to many factors. None of which have been directly attributed...or even likely attributed to the suspected differential amount of particulate allowed in by K & N's as opposed to any other filter.
d) I'll certainly consider a pre-filter, but not until I pull out my K & N again for routine cleaning and re-charging.
e) I'm not an engineer...hey, I've never even tried to drive a train. And as a goverment worker I'm even lower than insurance salemen. But I think my opinion is definitely equal with your's, and best for my car.
Old 07-17-13, 04:06 PM
  #46  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (83)
 
Supernaut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles CA
Posts: 5,859
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Filtration Testing for Amsoil, K&N, Napa, Jackson Racing, Baldwin, and Mazda air filters on a Miata
Old 07-17-13, 06:15 PM
  #47  
Cheap Bastard

iTrader: (2)
 
adam c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Posts: 8,370
Received 50 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by primerGrey
.............. I've posted what I plan to do - buying the prefilters K&N sells for this purpose.
Just a simple question: Do you have any idea how much flow restriction the K&N pre-filters will add?
Old 07-17-13, 06:31 PM
  #48  
needs more track time...

iTrader: (13)
 
primerGrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Menlo Park, CA
Posts: 325
Received 30 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by adam c
Just a simple question: Do you have any idea how much flow restriction the K&N pre-filters will add?
From the K&N site: "Red colored pre-cleaners are made from large, open cell foam that is oiled. They will stop 90% of the dirt, yet only add a 2% restriction to the airflow of the filter. "


It may not help stop finer particulate any better than the main K&N. So adding the pre-filter may only extend the time between cleanings as opposed to improving filtration. But, best I can think of for these cylinder style filters.
Old 07-19-13, 03:16 PM
  #49  
Full Member

iTrader: (2)
 
rtrylvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A recent experience of mine may shed some light on why the K&N replacement filters suck at filtering. I couldn't for the life of me get my air box to seal right. Had I not been looking for a problem, I wouldn't have found one. I did notice that there was a slight gap on the eyelet side of the box. I tried greasing it and all kinds of things to get it because it was so close. I never was able to get it right so I sent the filter back to K&N for a refund. It makes me wonder how many other people have that same gap and don't even know it.
Old 07-20-13, 01:49 AM
  #50  
Urban Combat Vet

iTrader: (16)
 
Sgtblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 12,012
Received 863 Likes on 612 Posts
My stock filter fit like a glove in the stock air box.


Quick Reply: Proof that K&N sucks at filtering air



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22 AM.