3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

PFC Boost controller V AVC-R

Old Jul 13, 2005 | 02:21 PM
  #1  
fd3typer2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: UK
PFC Boost controller V AVC-R

Hi,

My car is undergoing some serious upgrading and I want to get an electronic boost controller to make the dyno sessions easier. I currently am using 2 MBCs.
I really like the look, spec and adjustability of the AVC-R but don't have anywhere to mount it. Instead I have considered the PFCs add on boost controller kit.

Does anyone know the differences setting wise between the 2, and if I can dial out spike effectively with the PFC add on?


I will be running sequentials with highish boost.

Thanks
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2005 | 02:58 PM
  #2  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
The boost controller kit is the exact same solenoid used with the AVC-R....

Any boost controller can eliminate spiking....including manual ones.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2005 | 03:09 PM
  #3  
fd3typer2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: UK
Yup, the MBCs I was using were doing a great job.

Solenoids are the same, but are the options which are set through the commander the same too? Some feedback from people using the PFC/PFC boost controller setup would be appreciated.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2005 | 04:40 PM
  #4  
neit_jnf's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 261
From: Around
i thought the PFC controlled boost on our cars using the stock system? is the add-on boost control kit necessary?
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2005 | 05:14 PM
  #5  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally Posted by neit_jnf
i thought the PFC controlled boost on our cars using the stock system? is the add-on boost control kit necessary?
No, it is not necessary, the PFC can use the stock solenoids to control the boost. However, using a nice quality NEW solenoid rather than 10+ year old OEM solenoids often has better results.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2005 | 05:30 PM
  #6  
nopistons94's Avatar
white FD lover
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 0
From: central jerzy
Originally Posted by rynberg
No, it is not necessary, the PFC can use the stock solenoids to control the boost. However, using a nice quality NEW solenoid rather than 10+ year old OEM solenoids often has better results.

or you can just update the stock solenoids and have the best of both worlds.. for someone that is looking to keep it more OEM of course
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2005 | 08:05 PM
  #7  
books's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 46
From: St. Louis
Here are 3 datalogs graphed from the same car before and after going single.
The first one is the sequential twins running 15 psi on the secondary; the PFC is controlling boost.
The second graph is a single turbo using the PFC with the Apexi Boost Control Kit solenoid.
The last graph is a single turbo using a Profec B Spec II to control boost.

Last edited by books; Oct 24, 2007 at 03:51 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2005 | 09:03 PM
  #8  
Trevor's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ. USA
Power FC boost control with the stock solenoids seems to work pretty well. I think its just a little conservative...creeping up on the boost a little more than an agressive EBC in order to avoid spikes. That being said I don't think its a real problem and I don't plan on using anything else to control boost.

The only thing that I have to caution about is that the commander can only get wastegate "closed time" down to 20%. If you have a catless free flowing exhaust this may net you too much boost. For me on a cold night I've creeped to 11.1 psi at 20% when I was shooting for mid-high 10's. The FC Datalogit is able to drop the "closed time" all the way down to 0% to get you true wastegate/minimum boost but it costs extra. I'm running 16% with the datalogit which is getting me 10.4 psi in cool (77F) weather when both turbos are on line.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2005 | 10:26 PM
  #9  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally Posted by books
Here are 3 datalogs graphed from the same car before and after going single.
The first one is the sequential twins running 15 psi on the secondary; the PFC is controlling boost.
The second graph is a single turbo using the PFC with the Apexi Boost Control Kit solenoid.
The last graph is a single turbo using a Profec B Spec II to control boost.
VERY interesting......the Profec spools 150-200 rpm slower than the Apexi (as setup, anyway), but is MUCH more stable. Gee, I guess the cheapy Profec doesn't do such a bad job, huh?
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2005 | 11:12 PM
  #10  
quicksilver_rx7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,336
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
I'm controlling boost with the PFC via *NEW* stock solenoids with no problem
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2005 | 03:30 AM
  #11  
fd3typer2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: UK
Thanks for your input guys. Looks like it's a waste of money then! I will have a little more money for other things.

The PFC on its own does a very good job at 15psi with sequentials. Just what I was looking for.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cristoDathird
Introduce yourself
28
May 30, 2019 08:47 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:35 PM.