O.K with this A/F or not ??????
Trending Topics
#9
Lives on the Forum
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
You can't just give a single number and have it mean anything.
It would be much better to post a graph or at the very least, a set of values at different rpm points. Also, how was this A/F ratio measured, and with what?
It would be much better to post a graph or at the very least, a set of values at different rpm points. Also, how was this A/F ratio measured, and with what?
#12
Tenseiga
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
rynberg is right
that's fine for idle but not at 6000rpm under boost
i assume it was wb due to dyno but that is also important.
i also say 11.4 is a good number to shoot for under full load.
that's fine for idle but not at 6000rpm under boost
i assume it was wb due to dyno but that is also important.
i also say 11.4 is a good number to shoot for under full load.
Last edited by Sesshoumaru; 01-22-04 at 10:25 PM.
#15
Isn't stoich something like 14.7? How come that isn't the # to shoot for. Of course, the reason is because things in practice differ soemwhat than things on paper but I was wondering as to why exactly.
#16
Lives on the Forum
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by Choser
Isn't stoich something like 14.7? How come that isn't the # to shoot for. Of course, the reason is because things in practice differ soemwhat than things on paper but I was wondering as to why exactly.
Isn't stoich something like 14.7? How come that isn't the # to shoot for. Of course, the reason is because things in practice differ soemwhat than things on paper but I was wondering as to why exactly.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
t-von
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
9
09-10-15 01:56 PM