3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Non-sequential write-up

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 12:46 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Non-sequential write-up

A while back I came across a post by FD3BOOST and he had a great "how to" write-up of the "poor man's" non-sequential on his website. Link doesn't seem to work anymore. Anyone save the pics and write-up?
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 01:04 AM
  #2  
Snook's Avatar
Tony Stewart Killer.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,156
Likes: 4
From: London
nooooo whyy!!

dont do it bro
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 01:12 AM
  #3  
jpandes's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,236
Likes: 1
From: San Francisco, CA
Check out this thread:

http://www.nopistons.com/forums/inde...howtopic=35289

There's a simple write up and someone posted some good pics too.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 03:31 AM
  #4  
RX7SpiritR's Avatar
The Spirit of FLUFF!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
From: East Highland, CA
Originally posted by SurgeMonster
nooooo whyy!!

dont do it bro
whats wrong with him?
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 05:00 AM
  #5  
clayne's Avatar
PV = nRT
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,250
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand (was California)
Converting to non-seq and removing emissions controls is a damn no-brainer:





That has got to be atleast 40 lb's worth of CRAP. No bullshit, I'll weigh it when I have a chance.



Excuse the inverted catch can and BOV rag mount, it's not normally that way.

Last edited by clayne; Feb 16, 2004 at 05:02 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 05:15 AM
  #6  
clayne's Avatar
PV = nRT
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,250
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand (was California)
Seriously. Sequential is for a time long past.

There's no such thing as a free lunch and while you may get more immediate turbo spooling with sequential configuration you WILL pay for it in the mid-range during transition. You cannot spool up the second turbo without directing exhaust away from the primary and towards the secondary turbine side. If you could it would be FREE energy.

Might as well move the inevitable power dip to the beginning of the curve rather than the middle of it. More predictable, more simple, and for the people using a typically sized single turbo, the same or LESS lag than sequential.

I'm just counting the months until a GT-series goes in here.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 05:45 AM
  #7  
dubulup's Avatar
development
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 7
From: Lafayette, LA
Man - what are your intake temps? you might want to look into some sort of heat sheild(s)...I see two hot spots under your hood.

1. up front near radiator, right where the front turbo filter is...
2. Leftside of the UIM, where the cast iron exhaust manifold is (OH and two turbochargers), also where your rear turbo filter is located...

(relocated AIT sensor to stock IC...nice)
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 06:00 AM
  #8  
clayne's Avatar
PV = nRT
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,250
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand (was California)
dubulup,

Honestly about the same as before. 20-40C depending on conditions.

Shields would help, but it's really not that significant when the car is moving. I was well aware of the heat possibilities when I set them up that way. The front has a vent to open air via an opening near the foam ducting.

I went with this setup to allow more air to flow under the hood and also to minimize inlet lengths.

I'd have the primary filter right on the compressor housing if the elbow didn't have the required OMP nipple.

Last edited by clayne; Feb 16, 2004 at 06:05 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 06:14 AM
  #9  
jspecracer7's Avatar
1JZ powered
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,423
Likes: 0
From: Where there's only two seasons, hot and wet! I love Okinawa
I think Jason(artguy) is the only TRUE pre-NONSequential user I know of(went non-seq then back to seq). Everybody else I know went from seq to Non and stayed.

I liked it. It was fun while it lasted.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 09:27 AM
  #10  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
I'm not debating on whether or not I want to go non-sequential (I already know I am), I'm just looking for this guy's excellent "how to" page. I have crazy boost spike from my mods. I have already ported the wastegate, and I'm not willing to get rid of my MP and put on a high flow cat in order to solve the prob. Supposedly, going non-sequential will fix the boost prob. Lag, no lag, I don't really care either way...I just wanna be able to control the boost! However, I need to pass emissions every other year, so I want this to be reversible (in other words, "poor man's" non-sequential). So, anyone have FD3BOOST's write-up???
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 09:32 AM
  #11  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Thanks for the link jpandes.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 09:41 AM
  #12  
BoostCrzy's Avatar
Doritos on a toothpick
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 5
From: west palm beach, FL
<-----non-seq. and loving it....
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 10:07 AM
  #13  
blueskaterboy's Avatar
Olympic Muff Diver
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA
nonseq is much easier and you dont have as much to worry about...

im using 14psi on my nonseq twins... once they are shot i will go to 3540 or 40r... if only there was twins that could give me 450-500hp.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 11:30 AM
  #14  
TwinTurbo93's Avatar
0-rotor-0-turbo-0-fd
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Here is a very helpfull link
Before I did mine, I read it like a million times , it has lots of info you need.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 05:15 PM
  #15  
911GT2's Avatar
The Power of 1.3
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,837
Likes: 0
From: Shrewsbury, Massachusetts
I should respond, I am the self appointed ambassador to non-seq. Do it and don't look back!
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 08:38 PM
  #16  
mazdaspeed00's Avatar
For Sale
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,133
Likes: 0
From: Irvine
non-seq rocks the lag isnt as bad as people make it out to be.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 09:51 PM
  #17  
Fd3BOOST's Avatar
Recovering Milkaholic
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,206
Likes: 0
From: Budds Creek, Maryland
Sorry man, If I had known that people were waiting to use that how to I would have made a back up file of it before I got rid of the website..
Anyway. Until someone wants to be a guinea pig and let me do the mod for them and get the pix again this will have to do...


The poor mans non sequential.

Step 1.
Remove the turbo control actuator (TCA) and plug the lines with some bolts and zip ties.
Step 2.
Wire the TCA flapper door open (towards the front of the car)
Step3.
"T" the blow off and charge relief valve lvacum lines together, plug the remaining vacum line that runs from the charge relief valve to the lower intake manifold
Step4.
Remove the two vacum lines to the charge control valve and plug the remaining vacum lines.
(one from the y pipe to the charge control valve & one from the LIM to the charge control valve)
Step5.
Remove the black plastic pressure tank & plug the remaining vacum lines to the precontrol solinoid.
You should have a total of seven vacum lines plugged
Two off the LIM, one off the "Y" pipe, two off the hardpipe and two from the TCA (turbo control actuator)


-Dave
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2004 | 12:23 AM
  #18  
spooledUP7's Avatar
There and back again
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Camarillo, Ca
I to have a couple of boxes that look like that.

Originally posted by clayne
Converting to non-seq and removing emissions controls is a damn no-brainer:





That has got to be atleast 40 lb's worth of CRAP. No bullshit, I'll weigh it when I have a chance.
Excuse the inverted catch can and BOV rag mount, it's not normally that way.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Snook
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
17
Feb 27, 2021 02:54 PM
HalifaxFD
Canadian Forum
126
May 9, 2016 07:06 PM
zooq
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
15
Apr 15, 2002 12:20 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:45 AM.