3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

non seq stock twins at 16psi?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-28-08, 03:49 PM
  #101  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
2007 ZX-10R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm all for research, but spending hours testing a $75 sensor that isn't even designed for the task at hand is poor use of my valuable time
2007 ZX-10R is offline  
Old 03-28-08, 03:58 PM
  #102  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by 2007 ZX-10R
I'm all for research, but spending hours testing a $75 sensor that isn't even designed for the task at hand is poor use of my valuable time
That was never the discussion. The discussion was whether or not the stock map sensor ould read 17 PSI, and the answer was then, and still is now, yes.

As I said before:

Originally Posted by Mahjik
IMO, there is no win/loss with that. I never said it was "recommended", I said was "possible" and it is.
Mahjik is offline  
Old 03-28-08, 04:10 PM
  #103  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
2007 ZX-10R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mahjik
That was never the discussion. The discussion was whether or not the stock map sensor ould read 17 PSI, and the answer was then, and still is now, yes.
for some, yes, for others, no...as demonstrated by maxcooper

and it also depends on the atmospheric pressure where the measurement is made and how accurate the $50 gauge is you are using to do the measurement

so again it's not a cut and dried answer
2007 ZX-10R is offline  
Old 03-28-08, 04:16 PM
  #104  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by 2007 ZX-10R
so again it's not a cut and dried answer
It's not a cut and dry NO either.
Mahjik is offline  
Old 03-28-08, 04:27 PM
  #105  
Senior Member

 
SPICcnmGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maxcooper's read out is from the PFC, which as I've stated now 3 times doesn't read out the actual psi from the turbos.

If you only used the PFC to tell you boost and everything then yes it appears it is 16psi, but if you take an actual boost gauge or Mity vac. and test what the pressure REALLY is, then it is 17-17.5psi.
SPICcnmGT is offline  
Old 03-28-08, 04:46 PM
  #106  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
2007 ZX-10R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the bottom line is the stock sensor was likely designed with a "buffer" or "window" of surplus pressure quantification to keep morons from blowing their engines by misusing it and being a bit off in their expected max boost

however, to make a blanket statement that "x" is the absolute hairy edge and you can always go to "x" and be safe is foolish

again, the big picture is why risk it for a $75 sensor, why not use the sensor actually designed for the job (what a concept)? that's the real issue here, not essay length novels about the stock boost sensor that no one will bother to read
2007 ZX-10R is offline  
Old 03-28-08, 04:47 PM
  #107  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
2007 ZX-10R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SPICcnmGT
If you only used the PFC to tell you boost and everything then yes it appears it is 16psi, but if you take an actual boost gauge or Mity vac. and test what the pressure REALLY is, then it is 17-17.5psi.
according to your test with your gauge, which is statistically irrelevant
2007 ZX-10R is offline  
Old 03-28-08, 05:00 PM
  #108  
Senior Member

 
SPICcnmGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2007 ZX-10R
according to your test with your gauge, which is statistically irrelevant
But it IS more relevent than the test you have done on it.

Here I'll help you out, not that you are going to read it and LEARN something but hey can't say I didn't try. If you don't believe what Chuck says about tuning and the PFC you don't need to believe anything anyone says:
https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...ght=MAP+SENSOR

This is just an interesting thread to read that has to do with this:
https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...ght=MAP+SENSOR
SPICcnmGT is offline  
Old 03-28-08, 07:39 PM
  #109  
Old School

 
Matt Hey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Baldwin City, KS
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Matt Hey
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Hey
Did you calibrate your 3 bar sensor?
Originally Posted by 2007 ZX-10R
yes
How did you calibrate your 3 bar sensor?

Originally Posted by 2007 ZX-10R
nice essays on the linked thread, not sure who's going to actually read it, though
Nobody seems to care about calibrating their MAP sensor correctly? If you don't get the correct absolute pressure from the given PIM voltage then that's ok huh? You can still tune it with the wrong pressure readings. You could use the default PIM scale and offset for your 3 bar MAP sensor and tune it so that it works. The boost readings, boost settings, and P-Rows would be way off but it should work for a little while. If you use a boost controller and never use boost data then you might get away with it. The default PowerFC maps work fine with the wrong PIM scale. It's certainly not a necessity but I believe one should either correctly calibrate or understand the problems caused by reading incorrect absolute pressures.

If you didn't understand any of the above then please understand that you can't trust your PowerFC boost readings or settings. Please use a boost controller to reduce your chances of a blow motor.

I really don't have a problem with you using a 3 bar MAP sensor. It's a good idea if your going to go single. If you were a little more open minded you might learn something here.
Matt Hey is offline  
Old 03-28-08, 08:00 PM
  #110  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
2007 ZX-10R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SPICcnmGT
But it IS more relevent than the test you have done on it.

Here I'll help you out, not that you are going to read it and LEARN something but hey can't say I didn't try. If you don't believe what Chuck says about tuning and the PFC you don't need to believe anything anyone says:
https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...ght=MAP+SENSOR
basically what I get from that is the stock sensor is flaky, something I've known for years, which is why I pitched it
2007 ZX-10R is offline  
Old 03-28-08, 08:06 PM
  #111  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
2007 ZX-10R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Matt Hey
How did you calibrate your 3 bar sensor?
atmospheric pressure in beautiful North Carolina

Nobody seems to care about calibrating their MAP sensor correctly? If you don't get the correct absolute pressure from the given PIM voltage then that's ok huh? You can still tune it with the wrong pressure readings. You could use the default PIM scale and offset for your 3 bar MAP sensor and tune it so that it works. The boost readings, boost settings, and P-Rows would be way off but it should work for a little while. If you use a boost controller and never use boost data then you might get away with it. The default PowerFC maps work fine with the wrong PIM scale. It's certainly not a necessity but I believe one should either correctly calibrate or understand the problems caused by reading incorrect absolute pressures.
it works fine and has for two years, you'd have to ask Brian Cain how the various PFC settings were adjusted

If you didn't understand any of the above then please understand that you can't trust your PowerFC boost readings or settings. Please use a boost controller to reduce your chances of a blow motor.
I still use the Commander to monitor max boost because I know for a fact the Autometer pos gauge I have is off, which is a major reason I blew my previous motor

I really don't have a problem with you using a 3 bar MAP sensor. It's a good idea if your going to go single. If you were a little more open minded you might learn something here.
I'm sure I could spend countless hours on the PFC subforum and learn alot of stuff, but it's not all that important to me, that's why I paid a tuner, I'd rather be driving
2007 ZX-10R is offline  
Old 03-28-08, 08:21 PM
  #112  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Wade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Matt Hey
There is nothing cheap about it. Most RX-7 owners that boost 14-16 psi don't need to upgrade their pressure sensor. I bet more RX-7 owners boost this much with the stock sensor than with upgraded sensor.
...
IMHO, between the PowerFC settings that need to be made and the wiring job to connect the new 3 bar sensor, it's riskier and less reliable for someone running low boost to move up to the 3 bar sensor.
I agree with the above 100%. If someone wants to run up to around 17psi (or even slightly more) and their tune is reasonable, the stock MAP sensor is sufficient.

Wade
Wade is offline  
Old 03-28-08, 08:29 PM
  #113  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
2007 ZX-10R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ask Brian Cain or Steve Kan's opinion, they tune these cars for a living, everyone else is just spouting random opinions based on very limited experience, usually their own cars and that's it

over 1 bar gauge, you need the GM sensor, no one except those two guys are going to change my mind
2007 ZX-10R is offline  
Old 03-28-08, 08:45 PM
  #114  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
 
rollingsband1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: warfield
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i just think the 3 bar map sensor is a cheap piece of mind for any build i will now do if im going to up the boost past 14psi.. weither its right or wrong i dont care whats 100 dollars when you spend thousands on motors and performance parts..


If you own a FD you should now know not to go cheap or you will pop a motor.. do everything you can to save your motor.. thats my motto at least!
rollingsband1 is offline  
Old 03-28-08, 08:47 PM
  #115  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
2007 ZX-10R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
amen brother
2007 ZX-10R is offline  
Old 03-28-08, 08:53 PM
  #116  
silver ghost

iTrader: (11)
 
G's 3rd Gen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Home of the Rolex 24
Posts: 3,061
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by 2007 ZX-10R
ever tried it without (the 100 octane)? straight midpipe?
yes straight mid.. no. why chance it. By the way. Damn this thread blew up..Your set-up up is only as good as its tune, fuel..and the beat goes on.

Last edited by G's 3rd Gen; 03-28-08 at 09:02 PM.
G's 3rd Gen is offline  
Old 03-28-08, 08:58 PM
  #117  
fadedvr=pink

iTrader: (2)
 
pinkrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sacramento,CA
Posts: 1,402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by rollingsband1
i just think the 3 bar map sensor is a cheap piece of mind for any build i will now do if im going to up the boost past 14psi.. weither its right or wrong i dont care whats 100 dollars when you spend thousands on motors and performance parts..


If you own a FD you should now know not to go cheap or you will pop a motor.. do everything you can to save your motor.. thats my motto at least!
dont be a tool. theres a line between buying good parts that make a difference, and buying anything availible that *could help. esp. if your only running 14 lbs.

the fact that all you anti-stock map sensor people ignore is: no matter what, if your car ain't tuned for past 17 lbs you're screwed either way, don't matter if you had a 25k gold plated 10 bar sensor - your ***** gonna blow same as a stock sensor.
pinkrx7 is offline  
Old 03-28-08, 09:00 PM
  #118  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by rollingsband1
If you own a FD you should now know not to go cheap or you will pop a motor..
I've been on this forum for quite a while. I even spent about a year or so just watching and reading before I ever registered. I've seen people spend a ton of money on their car and pop their engine within a few thousand miles.

It's not how much money you spend, it's spending what you do spend wisely.
Mahjik is offline  
Old 03-28-08, 09:08 PM
  #119  
Old School

 
Matt Hey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Baldwin City, KS
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2007 ZX-10R
I still use the Commander to monitor max boost because I know for a fact the Autometer pos gauge I have is off, which is a major reason I blew my previous motor
Your Autometer gauge is very likely more accurate than your Commander boost reading. Most professional RX-7 tuners do not know how to calibrate the MAP sensor so the boost reading will usually be off except at one pressure. Don't trust the Commander Boost reading to be correct! You can use it as a reference to see if something has changed but don't interpret anything from the value.
Matt Hey is offline  
Old 03-29-08, 01:29 AM
  #120  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
2007 ZX-10R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pinkrx7
the fact that all you anti-stock map sensor people ignore is: no matter what, if your car ain't tuned for past 17 lbs you're screwed either way
no kidding sherlock! of course the car must be tuned for the boost you're running
2007 ZX-10R is offline  
Old 03-29-08, 01:30 AM
  #121  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
2007 ZX-10R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Matt Hey
Your Autometer gauge is very likely more accurate than your Commander boost reading.
I know it's off, trust me

and what is so difficult about calibrating the MAP sensor?
2007 ZX-10R is offline  
Old 03-29-08, 02:13 AM
  #122  
fadedvr=pink

iTrader: (2)
 
pinkrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sacramento,CA
Posts: 1,402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 2007 ZX-10R
no kidding sherlock! of course the car must be tuned for the boost you're running
just get the feeling people think if a hose 'pops' off and they boost 20 that the 3 bar will cushion their ***.
pinkrx7 is offline  
Old 03-29-08, 10:47 AM
  #123  
Senior Member

 
SPICcnmGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mahjik
I've been on this forum for quite a while. I even spent about a year or so just watching and reading before I ever registered. I've seen people spend a ton of money on their car and pop their engine within a few thousand miles.
+1, first doing research before you do anything is very important. Arguing without the proper research and experience is pointless and is one reason everyone is afraid of touching these cars so much.

Originally Posted by Mahjik
It's not how much money you spend, it's spending what you do spend wisely.
+2, Why spend extra money on something you don't need. I could buy the best everything and still blow my engine at 10psi. Tuning is where it is at, not the equipment, that is unless you pass the performace capabilites of the equipment, which in this case is 17-17.5psi. Running 16-17psi the stock map sensor if fine, anything about that I could see getting a 3bar but for 16-17psi it isn't worth the money, whether $1 or $1000.
SPICcnmGT is offline  
Old 03-29-08, 10:53 AM
  #124  
Senior Member

 
SPICcnmGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2007 ZX-10R
I know it's off, trust me

and what is so difficult about calibrating the MAP sensor?
How do you know it is off?? Did you test with a gauge you know is correct?? or against more than one other gauge?? Thats as good of an argument as saying the stock map sensor only reads 14.7psi without testing it.

Here is how to calibrate a map sensor:
https://www.rx7club.com/showpost.php...83&postcount=3
SPICcnmGT is offline  
Old 03-29-08, 11:09 AM
  #125  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
2007 ZX-10R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SPICcnmGT
Here is how to calibrate a map sensor:
https://www.rx7club.com/showpost.php...83&postcount=3
thta's great, but how many people actually do this? and how many people use a $10 pressure gauge from Grainger or McMaster Carr as their "standard"
2007 ZX-10R is offline  


Quick Reply: non seq stock twins at 16psi?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 PM.